Digital Dopamine

Digital Dopamine

Tune in for a weekly dose of digital dopamine! Explore productivity apps, uncover tech trends, and dive into short coding tutorials tailored for new developers. Subscribe for insights that supercharge your tech journey! digitaldopaminellc.substack.com

Episodes

  1. 28 JAN

    The AT Protocol & Why You Should Drop Centralized Social Apps

    Intro (2 minutes) [Music Intro] What’s up, folks, and welcome to the second episode of the Digital Dopamine podcast! One of these days, I’m gonna get a sponsor lol and have a quick standard intro for everyone. In due time, in due time 😂. But people who follow me on IG have already seen what today’s episode is gonna be about, and that’s the AT Protocol, or Authenticated Transfer Protocol, atproto. All names are used in the space of decentralized digital identities. Alright, so we will be covering: * What the AT Protocol is at a basic-intermediate level so that developers and, more importantly, non-devs can understand what it is and how it works. * The key features of the AT Protocol and its benefits. * The Challenges and Limitations of the AT Protocol as of today. * Why apps built on the architecture (Bluesky, Flashes, and Pinksky) are superior to centralized social apps like IG, TikTok, and X, and what is capable within those apps. * Discussing a bit about Fanbase and UpScrolled. * Then, ending the show with a new project I’m starting up related to these apps and content distribution. After more research on the core tech and architecture of Bluesky, there are some concerns that I actually learned about and will give my honest frustration with it, but they pale in comparison to the issues I have with the likes of IG, TikTok, and X, and I personally see more benefits of using these apps over the others. So let’s get right into it. Main Story The At Protocol Overview *Skip to minute 30:00 if you want to skip the technical deep dive* So I’ll just start with a quick definition of the AT Protocol: “is a protocol and open standard for distributed social networking services.[3] It is under development by Bluesky Social PBC, a public benefit corporation created as an independent research group within [Twitter, Inc.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter,_Inc.) to investigate the possibility of decentralizing the service.[4] A distributed social network (not to be confused with a decentralized or federated social network) is a network wherein all participating social networking services can communicate with each other through a unified communication protocol, and all participants are equal. Okay, technical definitions are over. What is the purpose of switching, and why should you care? depending on what you’re looking for in your social apps and identity will determine if any of this is of interest to you. So far, monetization is the only frustrating challenge I see with these apps, and in a world where influencers are the biggest proponents for people who might want to switch. If they don’t have a way to make money on these new platforms, it’s gonna be hard to get people to transition. That being said, creators can take the extra step and use external revenue channels like Substack, Patreon, or Fanbase in order to generate income from the traffic they get through the platforms. But Bluesky IS planning to add revenue streams to the platform, like a tipping system as well as subscriptions in future feature releases, so hopefully that comes sooner than later. AT Protocol also doesn’t support private content yet. If you need a private account or encrypted DMs, this isn’t your platform yet. But it’s coming. For public discourse and community building, it’s great. Now this next section is about to get a bit technical and into the weeds so if any of this starts to confuse you or you don’t really care about the good and the bad of the protocol, I’ll try to have a timestamp of where you can skip to and we talk about the apps that stand to be a 1:1 alternative and what they offer. AT Protocol’s Key Features The “Speech vs. Reach” Framework So the core concept of apps built on ATP is “Speech vs. Reach”. This is the heart of what makes AT Protocol different, and it’s the fundamental architectural philosophy of its creation. AT Protocol deliberately separates two layers: “speech” and “reach” and explains both in detail. * Speech Layer = permissive, distributed authority. It’s the data repository level where everyone has a voice. Your posts, data, and identity are all stored in signed repositories that you control. * Reach Layer = moderation and algorithmic curation. This is where platforms decide what you see. It’s about limiting the visibility/reach of content based on preferences, algorithms, moderation policies, etc. You are basically able to curate what you see on your feed without a central algorithm showing you what it thinks you might like, or force-feeding you rage bait or thirst traps because it tracked how long you paused on the “Suggested Reels” section…Which, for some reason, always has something you’ve clearly stated “See Less” or “Not Interested” multiple times. You’re able to literally choose moderation services and custom feed algorithms built by community developers. For instance, I have a handful of coding feed algorithms I’ve subscribed to, and my feed rarely shows posts that I wasn’t interested in. IfIi start to see a trend in the wrong direction, I can search for a new algorithm to swap to OR use none if my followers and likes are vast enough for the standard algorithm to know what I actually like. And for context, there are over 50,000 custom feeds that exist on Bluesky. So there’s bound to be a feed that fits your preferences. Moderation Dive To dive a bit deeper, Bluesky uses a two-tier moderation system: baseline protections (violence, exploitation, fraud) that everyone follows, then user choice on top. What this means: Bluesky maintains community standards, but you decide which additional moderation filters you subscribe to. Community-run labelers create custom labels (”Spoilers,” “Political Content,” etc.), and you choose which ones affect what you see. This is fundamentally different from Instagram, X, and TikTok: * Instagram bans you with no explanation or appeal * X’s moderation is inconsistent and unilateral under Musk * TikTok’s algorithm removes content opaquely Bluesky gives you transparency—you know why you were flagged, can appeal, and can choose your own moderation standards. The key insight: Moderation is part of the “reach” layer (who sees what), not the “speech” layer (whether content exists). This means if you block someone on one AT Protocol app, that block carries across all apps. Your moderation rules work at the protocol level, not just one platform. You’re not at the mercy of one company’s moderation philosophy, and you set your own standards. DIDs (Decentralized Identifiers) Another awesome feature is DID, or Decentralized Identifiers. Instead of your identity being @username.instagram.com, which is tied to Meta’s servers, your identity on AT Protocol is a cryptographic DID that looks like a hash. Example: did:plc:7iza6de2dwap2sbkpav7c6c6 I’ll explain did:plc a bit later. This DID can have multiple human-readable handles (@alice.example.com, @alice.bsky.social), but the DID stays the same and is portable. And I think this is one of the most, if not THE most important features within this ecosystem. And that’s the fact that you can’t get banned or straight-up deleted from the devs/company that built the app. With Instagram, your account exists at the pleasure of Meta. And we have seen how they’ve been moving on IG recently. I’ve experienced it myself, and I’m a nobody on that platform lol. If they ban you, you lose everything—followers, posts, history, pretty much your whole digital identity. With AT Protocol, your DID (your actual identity) is cryptographically yours. Your posts are signed by you. If Bluesky shuts down, you move to another AT Protocol app and bring everything with you: all followers see your posts, your history is intact, and your identity persists. Now, how this works is: Your DID contains your public cryptographic keys, and your posts are signed with your private key. This means you can prove ownership of your account without asking permission from any company, and if it comes to it, you can migrate servers without the old server’s involvement. So imagine if a big name like IShowSpeed could leave Instagram, take 100% of his followers and posts him to Snapchat or TikTok (if they were on AT Protocol), and his username and followers would be transferred as well and they would still be able to verify it’s him AND he would still be able to have his own verified status come along too. That’s what the AT Protocol enables. So getting control and freedom of your digital identity would be a great thing for us as a society to do, in my opinion. But that leads us back to some of the major drawbacks and bottlenecks I discovered while researching this. The Challenges and Limitations So, currently, the most common DID method is did:plc “Public Ledger of Credential,” and Bluesky runs the single directory service that manages it. There’s no redundancy or independent backup, so if the directory goes down, critical network functions break. Which then raises the theoretical concern of you being banned at the protocol level by Bluesky if they really wanted to be petty 😩 cause that wouldn’t only ban you from Bluesky, it would ban your DID from all apps you’re using with DID. It also contradicts the whole decentralization narrative. But I’m not too concerned about this for a few reasons: * That would ruin the reputation of Bluesky and the Protocol they built,t which will encourage people to go back to the mainstream apps or switch to a different, more raw decentralized protocol, like Nostr. I won’t dive into Nostr, but I will leave links to the Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostr), the white-paper it released in 2020 (https://fiatjaf.com/nostr.html), and it’s Github README (https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr/) in the script. Also. Very cool protocol, but not as feature-rich to build on as AT Protocol. * They are already

    54 min
  2. Billionaires' Takeover Attempt in Greenland

    23 JAN

    Billionaires' Takeover Attempt in Greenland

    Intro (2 minutes) * *[Music Intro] Welcome everyone, to the first podcast of Digital Dopamine! Where I’ll be delivering a weekly dose of tech news, app demos, tips, and tricks, tailored to tech enthusiasts and developers of all levels. On today’s Episode we’re gonna focus on the Tech Billionaire’s wet dream…” Greenland”. As a lot of you probably know by now, there’s this feverish push to “buy” Greenland, which is pretty much another invasion, and they want to make it seem like it’s for national security. While that claim may be partially true. I’m gonna dive into the real culprits behind this push, and that’s all the tech billionaires, specifically the “PayPal” Mafia. Main Story Who’s the PayPal Mafia, you ask? Well i’ll get into that in a bit, but first, let’s go back to 2016, where a man named Ronald Lauder made the first move of this long game plan. I’ll keep this briefing quick, Lauder, in 2016, made a huge investment in , a luxury water bottling company founded by Svend Hardenberg and Jørgen Wæver Johansen, both of whom are well-connected in the political sphere. Now Ronald is the person who floated the idea during Trump’s first term to make Greenland part of the US (Source-1, Source-2), with some analysts describing his investments in Greenlandic businesses asa political strategy rather than purely commercial (Source). Ronald’s business partner, Jørgen, is married to Greenland’s current foreign minister, which is for sure a conflict of interest, but that’s never stopped the ultra-wealthy from doing business. But the same individuals negotiating foreign investment policy are also investment recipients. Now that’s just a bit of context for how this all started, and I recommend diving deeper into Ronald Lauder when you get some free time. But let’s hop ahead a few years to talk about some other Billionaires that didn’t wanna miss out on the exploitation. In 2019, when traction started to pick up on the “idea” of buying Greenland, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, and Michael Bloomberg all invested in a company called KoBold Metals through Breakthrough Energy, an organization founded by Bill Gates himself (Source). KoBold Metals is a company that explores and develops mineral resources essential for clean energy technologies, which consists of Ev Vehicle wind turbines, etc, and the minerals they are in search of include lithium, nickel, copper, and cobalt, which are critical for batteries and other renewable energy solutions. How they search for these rare earths is through AI-powered exploration of the island. And in 2022, guess who decided to join the party, Sam Altman, and since then, more and more investments have poured into KoBold Metals, valuing the company today at around 2.96 billion dollars. Speaking of muddied interests, Howard Nutlick….I mean, Lutnick… has been investing in a different Greenland Mining company called Critical Metals Corp……..for over 3 decades through Cantor Fitzgerald. He’s since divested in cantor but his stake was just handed over to his children……and I’m SUREEEE they will have a moral compass and not be a conflict of interest in the area moving forward. (Forbes) And then we have Ken Howery, a former venture capitalist and associate of Peter Thiel, who Trump appointed as US ambassador to Denmark…..like how is no major outlet reporting about this?!?!…. That’s rhetorical, of course. There are a couple more folks in the weeds of all of this, but for the sake of time, I’m gonna now get to the PayPal Mafia, and how they plan to create a “Freedom City”…which in reality will be an internet-native/technocratic nation, testing AI surveillance tech before bringing it back home here in the US. Let’s start at Praxis, which is a company founded by Dryden Brown and Charlie Callinan, with Howard Hughes Corporation founder David Weinreb, who is the current vice chairman. Praxis describes itself as an “internet-native nation” [1] and has stated plans to create a 10,000-person city in the Mediterranean. Brown is designing a theoretical “city-state” aiming to “restore Western Civilization,” and has had his sights on Greenland specifically. Who backs this concept???? PayPal Mafia members, including Peter Thiel and Ken Howery, Trump’s pick for Denmark ambassador So how do they play to test surveillance?? Praxis plans include “AI-augmented governance” and will feature “employer-friendly labor laws” described as “Elon-compatible.” The company’s manifesto describes creating all infrastructure—contracts, governance—on blockchain, creating a “tax-free enclave, governed by free-market principles and managed by a king-CEO leading citizen-shareholders.” (Source) The argument for why they are desperate for Greenland is that it’s a small, contained population (Greenland has under 57,000 people) where these billionaires with their shady political connections could experiment with governance, AI integration, and surveillance systems. All while being free from existing regulatory frameworks and the consequences that come with breaking them. These tech billionaires envision unregulated “freedom cities” in Greenland, free from democratic oversight, environmental laws, and labor protections. La Voce di New York Greenland’s cool climate is ideal for hosting massive AI data centers. Wikipedia—combining computational power with a controlled population creates something like a real-world laboratory. The PayPal Mafia’s collective vision is “a state stripped down to its bare bones, with only one objective: maximize shareholder value.”(Source: New Arab). These people include Elon Musk, Thiel’s minion JD Vance, Ken Howery, and other members across Trump’s executive branch, like David Sacks, who is Trump’s advisor on AI and cryptocurrencies. This group has unprecedented political access and, from their past actions, will surely stop at nothing until they get their greasy, greedy hands on Greenland. Peter Thiel and Elon Musk see Greenland not just as a source of rare earths, but as a laboratory for their libertarian economic and social experiments. ( The Irish Times ) The crazy part is, this is all being experimented with NOW in Próspera. “What’s Próspera?” you ask…..well, Próspera is a charter city on the island of Roatán in Honduras, operating as one of three Zones for Employment and Economic Development (ZEDEs) with autonomy from the national government. It’s backed by venture capitalists, including none other than Peter FUCKING Thiel, Marc Andreessen, and Balaji Srinivasan (buh-LAH-jee sree-nee-VAH-sun)…I literally had to add how to pronounce his name in the script lol. But the investment is through Pronomos Capital, and has recently attracted Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong as an additional investor. So this is pretty much a libertarian experimental zone designed to test free-market principles at scale. According to historian Quinn Slobodian, Próspera is part of a broader trend of projects aimed at implementing these theories in practice. The model features: * Minimal taxation: Tax rates are 1% on business revenue, 5% on wages, and 2.5% sales tax, with 5% personal income tax as of 2025. * Corporate governance: Honduras Próspera Inc. has veto power over the governing council’s nine-member body, with four members appointed by the company itself. * Crypto integration: Bitcoin is recognized as legal tender within the city. * Private arbitration and custom law: Businesses can select regulations from approved foreign jurisdictions or propose custom regulations subject to Próspera’s approval. (The Irish Times) And this is already negatively affecting the local populations of neighboring villages. The village of Crawfish Rock expressed fears about land expropriation, and funds earmarked for Honduras development haven’t reached nearby communities, while Próspera uses the island’s infrastructure (electricity, airports, garbage) with inequities. Honduras’ leftist President Xiomara Castro repealed the ZEDE law in 2022, citing sovereignty concerns, but Próspera didn’t stop operations…….they instead decided to sue Honduras for $10.7 billion—equivalent to one-third of the country’s GDP. (The Irish Times) This is the atrocity: create a private city with minimal regulation, extract wealth from the land and locals while ignoring their communities, and use international legal mechanisms to override national sovereignty if a government tries to stop it. Greenland would be where this model scales globally. Outro So really quick: we have mining companies searching for rare earth minerals (Bezos, Gates, Bloomberg via KoBold), water extraction (Lauder), and a libertarian city-state with AI governance (Thiel, Howery, Altman via Praxis), an ongoing experiment in Próspera testing these theories of libertarianism, minimal income and business revenue tax while at the same time, horrid wages for workers & being a haven for crypto fraud and laundering by the GOV—all connecting to the same island, all connected to PayPal alumni, all with Trump administration alignment. Editors Note All sources in the article are bolded with links. Feel free to correct any of my sources in the comments. Get full access to Digital Dopamine at digitaldopaminellc.substack.com/subscribe

    19 min

About

Tune in for a weekly dose of digital dopamine! Explore productivity apps, uncover tech trends, and dive into short coding tutorials tailored for new developers. Subscribe for insights that supercharge your tech journey! digitaldopaminellc.substack.com