The Internet, Reviewed.

Kirsten Drysdale

Critical Reviews of Online Content, with occasional Adventures in Fact Checking I'm reviewing the internet, one content creator/influencer/YouTube channel/podcast at a time - to help you know who's worth following, and when to smash that mute button. I'm trying to make this a largely positive project - to platform good people, and encourage civil and constructive debate. I also occasionally do videos for my "TINY LIES" series, which are investigative adventures in fact-checking in this crazy post-truth era we're in. Find more at my YouTube channel, TheInternetReviewed.

Episodes

  1. 7 May

    How A $50K Donation Disappeared

    Earlier this year, the Australian Financial Review reported on a $49,500 personal political donation from cryptocurrency exchange company Swyftx to Labor MP Andrew Charlton, made during last year's federal election campaign.Charlton's office "declined to comment" on the story, while the Swyftx CEO responded to it directly in a LinkedIn post, where he defended making the donation and explained it was part of a lobbying "long game" and "education process". (Worth noting here that after the election, Charlton was appointed assistant minister for the digital economy, and went on to be a key driver of the new legislation that regulates cryptocurrency.)That donation was originally disclosed on the Australian Electoral Commission's transparency register (which is how the AFR was able to report on it), but when I went to find it there, it had disappeared. It turns out that donation disclosure has since been "amended" to reflect the fact that the money actually went to NSW Labor. (Even though Swyftx clearly thought they'd given it to Charlton.)It also turns out, these sorts of donations - and subsequent "amendments" - happen *quite a lot*.Donors don't realise the money they are "giving" to individual major party candidates is actually going to the party itself. We usually don't get to see it, because it's all 'tided up' before donation disclosures are made public. (Independent candidates, on the other hand, have many donations disclosed next to their names, because they don't have a party machine behind them.)This one, for whatever reason, slipped through. And as an added bonus, we got to hear directly from the donor about their motivations.

    10 min
  2. 5 Mar

    Finally! A Fresh Voice on Feminism, Gender & Parenting: Elena Bridgers

    Elena Bridgers is a science writer with an academic background in human biology, and "a special fascination in motherhood and evolutionary mismatch". She shares information about what motherhood was like (to the best of our knowledge) in hunter-gatherer societies - that is, for 95% of human history (and ongoing, for remaining hunter-gatherer societies today).The "evolutionary mismatch" lens she looks through highlights discrepancies between the physical and social environment we evolved to mother in, and the contemporary post-industrial world where things are very different. (Much better in some ways, not so good in others.)The sheer scale and speed of her success in just a couple of years shows how strongly her message is resonating with women who can't understand why mothering can be so damn hard, in this comfortable modern world. I don't think her content is only interesting to mothers, though. I think it's for anyone who is interested in humans, in why birthrates are falling all over the world, in why political polarisation between genders is increasing, or in how to make family life better in the modern world.She posts shorter form text and video content to platforms like Instagram and TikTok, but I prefer her Substack "Motherhood Until Yesterday" (and podcast by the same name), as it allows much more room for nuance, details, and links to sources... all the good stuff! (And I really enjoy her writing style, which is a nice bonus on top of the content.)I love that she clearly cares about getting at the truth of things - even when those truths are, as she puts it, "inconvenient" for "ambitious progressives". Some have described her content as "rage bait", but I strongly disagree. I think it can be controversial and difficult to hear, but that is because she is opening up difficult conversations that are important to have. She has shown pretty impressive accountability when making mistakes and being called out for them by her audience. This is a rare trait online (anywhere, really!) and I think should be applauded.

    21 min

About

Critical Reviews of Online Content, with occasional Adventures in Fact Checking I'm reviewing the internet, one content creator/influencer/YouTube channel/podcast at a time - to help you know who's worth following, and when to smash that mute button. I'm trying to make this a largely positive project - to platform good people, and encourage civil and constructive debate. I also occasionally do videos for my "TINY LIES" series, which are investigative adventures in fact-checking in this crazy post-truth era we're in. Find more at my YouTube channel, TheInternetReviewed.

You Might Also Like