The It Depends Podcast with Matt and Tenille

First Person Consulting

Each episode Matt and Tenille grapple with questions that have no clear answers. For those working in evaluation, systems change, design or complexity this is a great place for you to learn to sit with uncertainty. A podcast where the answer to each question starts with ”it depends...”

Episodes

  1. 29 SEPT

    #7 Press Pause: Rethinking Systems and Evaluation with Emily Gates

    In this episode of The It Depends Podcast, Matt and Tenille sit down with Associate Professor Emily Gates from Boston College. Emily is an evaluator, educator, and systems thinker whose work bridges theory and practice, with a focus on how evaluation can better reflect the realities of large-scale systems change. Their conversation ranges from the limits of outcomes-focused evaluation to the importance of boundaries, perspectives, and stewardship in systems practice. Together, they explore what it means to evaluate systemic change, the role of commissioners and funders, and why evaluators may need to act less like neutral judges and more like facilitators of critical deliberation. Emily invites us to pause, self-critique, and think differently about how evaluation can contribute to meaningful, lasting change. Whether you’re an evaluator, commissioner, or just curious about how change happens in complex systems, this conversation will spark reflection, raise challenging questions, and—of course—leave you with the reminder that sometimes the only answer is: it depends.   Thanks for listening to the Podcast! You can find out more about First Person Consullting on our website, and follow us on LinkedIn.   These are links to the resources mentioned in the episode: Emily's new book co-written with Pablo Vidueira - Evaluative Inquiry for Systemic Change Thomas Schwandt's Evaluation Foundations: Cultivating a Life of Mind for Practice The Omidyar Group's Systems Practice Workbook And while we didn't mention it in the episode, Emily shared afterwards that she routinely goes back to Nora Bateson's book: Small Arcs of Larger Circles: Framing Through Other Patterns (here's an excerpt) for inspiration and new layers of insight.

    58 min
  2. 10 SEPT

    #5 Beyond Cost-Benefit: Defining Value for Investment with Julian King

    In this episode of It Depends, we sit down with internationally recognized evaluator Julian King to explore what it really means to assess value. Moving beyond traditional cost-benefit analysis and social return on investment, Julian introduces his award-winning Value for Investment (VfI) approach - an interdisciplinary framework that combines economic rigor with stakeholder perspectives.   Together, they unpack how VfI helps evaluators and commissioners define value propositions, integrate mixed methods, and make evaluative reasoning more transparent. They also touch on rubrics, participatory evaluation, and Julian’s idea of “Cubist evaluation,” which emphasizes multiple perspectives and collective sense-making in practice.   Julian covered a lot in this episode, and there's plenty of it freely accessible online! Check out the below resources: Julian's home page with free resources and training opportunities: https://www.julianking.co.nz/ Julian's 'Evaluation and Value for Investment' Substack A Guide to Evaluation of Value for Money in UK Public Service written by Julian King and Alex Hurrell A specific Substack post by Julian on 'Mixed Reasoning and Cubist Evaluation' Jane Davidson's book which changed Julian's approach: Evaluation Methodology Basics: The Nuts and Bolts of Sound Evaluation Thanks for listening. You can find out more about us on our website, or follow us on LinkedIn.

    37 min
  3. 26 AUG

    #4 Context Matters! Designing and Scaling in Systems with John Gargani

    Scaling impact sounds simple—just do more of what worked. In reality, it’s messy: contexts shift, resources are finite, politics and procurement warp timelines, and “success” looks different to different people. That’s why designing and evaluating for scale is one of the hardest gigs in our field. In this episode of The It Depends Podcast, Matt sits down with evaluation pioneer John Gargani to explore the intersections of design, evaluation, and scaling impact. With over three decades of experience, John shares how a “misspent youth” led him into evaluation, why design and evaluation are inseparable, and how evaluators can play a crucial role in shaping better programs from the outset. Together, Matt and John unpack the nuances of design thinking, the discipline required for innovation, and the challenges of moving beyond linear “growth models” of scale toward more dynamic, context-driven approaches. Along the way, they dive into real-world examples—from global health crises to water infrastructure—and consider what it takes to responsibly scale innovations without losing sight of ethics, trade-offs, and long-term sustainability. We mention some resources in this episode - including John's book - which is free! Here are some quick links to get you started: Scaling Impact: Innovaton for the Public Good by Rob McLean and John Gargani GIZ Scaling Digital Innovations Workbook Thanks for listening. You can find out more about FPC on our website, or follow us on LinkedIn.

    57 min
  4. 20 JULY

    #1 Constraints, Commissioning, and Causation with Eleanor Williams

    In this debut episode of It Depends Podcast, co-hosts Matt Healey and Tenille Moselen dive into the murky middle of evaluation practice—where complexity thrives, answers are rarely black and white, and good questions matter more than quick fixes. They’re joined by Eleanor Williams, Managing Director of the Australian Centre for Evaluation, for a wide-ranging and thoughtful conversation on evidence, ethics, and embedding evaluation in the heart of public policy. Together, they explore: What makes evidence fit for purpose—especially in fast-paced policy environments The importance of meaningful relationships between evaluators and commissioners The role and realities of quasi-experimental design in the public sector Thinking around everyday ethical dilemmas evaluators face. This episode is a must-listen for anyone navigating the tension between rigour, relevance, and real-world constraints. It’s honest, nuanced, and full of insight. Some of the resources mentioned in the episode are linked below: The Australian Centre for Evaluation homepage, and specifically the Commonwealth Evaluation Toolkit Relational Commissioning blog post by Eleanor Williams and Skye Trudgett The UK Government’s Magenta Book – see including Annex A on different methods for use in evaluations The webpage with more on the Australian Public Sector Evaluation Network (APSEN). You can find out more about First Person Consulting and what we do on our website: www.fpconsulting.com.au.

    37 min

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
2 Ratings

About

Each episode Matt and Tenille grapple with questions that have no clear answers. For those working in evaluation, systems change, design or complexity this is a great place for you to learn to sit with uncertainty. A podcast where the answer to each question starts with ”it depends...”

You Might Also Like