Science with Benefits

Rod Lamberts

In each episode of Science with Benefits, a different STEMM sector insider shares insights, perspectives and personal stories from their career and life experience.  In conversation with OG science communicator Dr Rod Lamberts*, guests aren't always "the usual  suspects" in STEMM, but they all share one thing: a unique perspective on the sector you haven't heard before. Whether you're en experienced insider or at the beginning of your STEMM career, there's always something interesting on Science with Benefits.  *Rod has been a science communication academic and practitioner for nearly 30 years. Check out his much more NSFW podcast "A Little Bit of Science" wherever you get your podcasts. And stay tuned for a new one coming in late 2026!

Folgen

  1. vor 6 Tagen

    Ben Newell - Director of the UNSW Institute for Climate Risk & Response

    Keywords climate risk, interdisciplinary research, climate science, behavioral science, policy impact, communication, economic analysis, environmental policy, decision-making, climate response climate change, trust in science, communication, uncertainty, public perception, research advice, interdisciplinary, personal balance   Summary In this conversation, Ben Newell discusses his role as the director of the New South Wales Institute for Climate Risk and Response, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in addressing climate risk. He highlights the challenges of integrating diverse fields such as psychology, law, and business to create effective climate policies. The discussion also covers the significance of clear communication in climate science, the need for economic analysis in understanding climate impacts, and the importance of engaging with policymakers to drive meaningful change. Newell reflects on the evaluation of success in climate research and the ongoing efforts to influence climate risk disclosure practices. In this conversation, Ben Newell discusses the importance of transformative change in climate action, the complexities of trust in climate science, and the challenges of communicating uncertainty. He emphasizes the need for public trust in science, particularly in controversial areas, and shares insights on navigating interdisciplinary research. Additionally, he highlights the significance of maintaining a work-life balance as a researcher.   Takeaways The Institute focuses on climate risk and response. Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial for addressing climate issues. Different disciplines have varying perspectives on risk. Effective communication is key to conveying climate science. Economic analysis can bridge gaps in climate understanding. Engaging with policymakers is essential for impact. Success is measured by academic output and public engagement. Building a trusted voice in climate discourse is important. Behavioral insights can enhance policy effectiveness. Continuous learning is necessary for improving climate risk practices. Transformative change is essential for climate action. Trust in climate science is influenced by political leanings. Communicating uncertainty is crucial in climate discussions. Public trust in science varies across different fields. The COVID experience highlighted trust breakdowns in science. Interdisciplinary research requires balancing expertise and collaboration. Maintaining a work-life balance is important for researchers. Understanding different perspectives enhances research effectiveness. The worst case scenario in climate predictions is evolving. Scientists are still trusted sources of information by the public. Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Climate Risk and Response 03:08 Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Climate Science 05:57 Challenges of Interdisciplinary Research 09:04 Communicating Climate Science Effectively 12:03 Bridging Economics and Climate Science 14:57 Policy Engagement and Impact 18:01 Evaluating Success in Climate Research 26:21 Transformative Change in Climate Action 27:24 Trust and Climate Science 28:46 Communicating Uncertainty in Climate Events 32:47 Public Trust in Science 37:04 Advice for Aspiring Researchers 40:15 Balancing Work and Personal Life

  2. 22. Juli

    Sarah Keenihan - Legendary science communicator, writer and editor

    Keywords science communication, freelancing, environmental crisis, academia, qualitative research, writing, editing, academic publishing, communication strategies, public engagement trust in science, imposter syndrome, science communication, advice for writers, navigating disagreement Summary In this conversation, Sarah Keenihan discusses her journey back to academia as a postgraduate student in science communication, triggered by an environmental crisis in South Australia. She reflects on her previous experience in science, the challenges of freelancing, and the importance of effective science communication. The discussion also touches on the balance between meeting client expectations and maintaining ethical standards in writing and communication. In this conversation, Sarah K and Rod Lamberts explore the complexities of trust in science, the challenges of imposter syndrome, and the importance of mentorship for aspiring science writers. They discuss the nuances of engaging with differing opinions and the need for transparency in scientific communication. Sarah shares her personal experiences with imposter syndrome and offers advice for those starting their careers in science writing, emphasizing the value of seeking guidance and finding balance in life beyond work. Takeaways Sarah is returning to university to pursue a PhD in science communication. Her interest in science communication was sparked by an environmental crisis. She has a PhD in a traditional science field, which she refers to as 'legit'. Freelancing in science writing involves juggling multiple clients and deadlines. Networking is essential for success in freelancing. Effective science communication requires understanding the audience's needs. Academics often forget how much they know and need to simplify their messages. The importance of structuring stories to hook readers early is crucial. Trust is built through transparency and accuracy in communication. Ethical considerations can lead to turning down work that doesn't align with personal values. We need to engage with people we disagree with. Trust in science varies among different groups. People want to see real individuals involved in science. Imposter syndrome is a common experience for many. Using fear can be a motivator for success. It's important to find a mentor for guidance. Physical activities can provide mental relief. Knowing when to take a break is crucial. Being human in your work fosters connection. Asking for advice can lead to valuable insights.   Chapters 00:00 Revisiting Academic Roots 02:58 Navigating Environmental Crises 06:00 The Freelance Journey 08:58 The Role of Science Communication 12:00 Balancing Pragmatism and Ethics 17:21 Navigating Disagreement and Trust in Science 18:25 The Challenge of Trust in Science 24:29 Imposter Syndrome: A Common Struggle 28:38 Advice for Aspiring Science Writers 30:57 Finding Balance Beyond Science

  3. 15. Juli

    Ryan Winn - CEO, Science & Technology Australia

    Summary In this conversation, Ryan Winn discusses his role in connecting the science sector with public servants and politicians, emphasizing the importance of communication and collaboration. He shares insights on the challenges of advocacy, the need for science literacy, and the significance of building trusted relationships in policymaking. The discussion highlights the value of celebrating small wins in science communication and the ongoing efforts to bridge the gap between science and society. In this conversation, Ryan discusses the complexities of political decision-making, the challenges and excitement of Senate estimates, and the importance of restoring trust in science. He emphasizes the need for effective communication in the science sector and shares insights on leadership, imposter syndrome, and the value of open conversations in fostering a collaborative environment in STEM. Takeaways Ryan Winn believes he has the best job in science, connecting people. Celebrating and connecting the science sector is vital for progress. Everyone in the science and policy realm is trying to do the right thing. Building relationships is key to effective science communication. Researchers need to be involved in policy-making processes. Science communication roles require translating complex ideas. Success in science communication is often about visibility in media. The importance of diverse representation in science is crucial. Advocacy can feel like shouting into the wind at times. Small wins in science communication can lead to significant changes. Senate estimates can be a tedious but necessary part of political engagement. Restoring trust in science is crucial and requires nuanced communication. The science sector has not kept pace with societal changes in communication. Effective communication must cater to the audience's needs and preferences. Leadership in science advocacy requires authenticity and relationship-building skills. Celebrating hidden voices in the sector can enrich the conversation. Understanding the complexity of the world requires diverse perspectives and knowledge. Chapters 00:00 Connecting Science and Society 03:01 The Role of Science in Policy 05:57 Navigating Complex Relationships 09:00 Measuring Success in Science Communication 11:50 The Challenges of Advocacy 15:06 Celebrating Small Wins in Science 17:25 Awakening to Complexity in Political Decision-Making 18:18 The Drudgery and Excitement of Senate Estimates 20:35 Restoring Trust in Science 25:54 Becoming a Leader in Science Advocacy 27:54 Navigating Imposter Syndrome 29:41 The Importance of Open Conversations in Science

  4. 15. Juli

    Dan Angus - Director of Queensland University Technology’s Digital Media Research Centre

    Keywords Computational Social Science, Data Donation, Ethics, Self-Reporting, Digital Media, Research Methods, Advertising, Social Science, Algorithms, Data Privacy advertising, data donors, participant bias, subjective experience, research challenges, academic success, aspiring researchers, work-life balance Summary In this conversation, Rod Lamberts and Dan Angus delve into the emerging field of computational social science, discussing its significance, methodologies, and ethical considerations. They explore the concept of data donation, the challenges of self-reporting in research, and the role of computational methods in enhancing social science research. The discussion also touches on the insights gained from digital platforms and the complexities of researching contested spaces such as pornography and advertising. In this conversation, Dan discusses the nuances of advertising, the importance of understanding participant bias in research, and the subjective experiences that shape data collection. He emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaboration in academia and shares insights on measuring success in research. Dan also offers advice for aspiring researchers and reflects on the balance between professional and personal life, highlighting the importance of curiosity and community engagement. Takeaways Computational social science is a new interdisciplinary field. Data donation allows for more accurate data collection. Ethics and consent are crucial in data donation processes. Self-reporting can lead to inaccuracies in research. Computational methods can enhance traditional social science research. Digital platforms provide valuable data insights. Research in contested spaces faces unique challenges. Positive impacts of digital content are often overlooked. Advertising research can benefit from data donation methods. The importance of transparency in data collection is paramount. Political advertising garners more attention than other forms. There is a bias in who participates in research studies. Subjective experiences of participants are valuable in research. Resistance in research can lead to refinement of ideas. Success in research is indicated by raising more questions. Building relationships is key to impactful research. Patience is essential in navigating a career path. Curiosity drives meaningful contributions to various fields. Balancing work and personal life is crucial for well-being. Creating conditions for others to succeed is a priority. Chapters 00:00 Introduction and Context 02:10 Exploring Computational Social Science 04:36 Data Donation and Ethics 09:43 Challenges of Self-Reporting 12:21 The Role of Computational Methods 14:08 Data Insights from Digital Platforms 17:53 Research in Contested Spaces 18:49 The Focus of Attention in Advertising 20:04 Understanding Data Donors and Participant Bias 22:25 The Importance of Subjective Experience in Research 23:50 Navigating Challenges in Research and Academia 29:05 Indicators of Success in Research 31:41 Advice for Aspiring Researchers 35:18 Balancing Work and Personal Life

  5. 15. Juli

    Kylie Walker - STEMM sector peak body CEO extraordinaire

    Keywords STEM, diversity, leadership, policy, research funding, innovation, education, technology, engineering, Australia geopolitical shifts, research opportunities, philanthropy, investment, R&D, imposter syndrome, trust in science, indigenous knowledge systems, future perspectives, Australia   Summary In this conversation, Kylie Walker, CEO of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, discusses her role in promoting STEM across diverse sectors, the importance of inclusivity in education, and the challenges faced in policy and research funding. She emphasizes the need for a shift in how research is valued and funded in Australia, advocating for a culture that encourages risk-taking and innovation. The discussion also highlights the Elevate program aimed at supporting diverse individuals entering STEM fields and the potential for Australia to seize global opportunities in research and technology. In this conversation, Kylie discusses the impact of geopolitical shifts on research funding, particularly in Australia, and the opportunities that arise from these changes. She emphasizes the importance of philanthropy and investment in R&D, while also addressing the challenges of navigating imposter syndrome in professional settings. The discussion touches on the need to restore trust in science and the potential of integrating Indigenous knowledge systems into future research methodologies.   Takeaways Kylie Walker is the CEO of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering. STEM workforce is diverse and extends beyond traditional research roles. The Elevate program supports individuals from various backgrounds to enter STEM fields. Passion and drive are key criteria for the Elevate program. Mature age students often have a clearer purpose in their studies. Kylie measures her success by the satisfaction of her members and the impact on systemic issues. There is a need for a cultural shift in how research funding is perceived in Australia. The current funding system often favours established researchers over innovative ideas. Australia has the potential to lead in global research and technology. Kylie sees exciting opportunities for Australia in the evolving global landscape. Geopolitical shifts are creating uncertainty in research funding. Australia's stability presents an opportunity for global research. Philanthropy in Australia lacks established pathways for investment. Navigating imposter syndrome is a common challenge for professionals. Owning one's space is crucial in leadership roles. Imposter syndrome can serve as a motivating fuel. Trust in science is often a reflection of communication issues. Indigenous knowledge systems offer valuable perspectives for research. Weaving different knowledge systems can enhance understanding. The future of knowledge transmission is still in its infancy.   Chapters 00:00 Introduction and Background of Kylie Walker 02:58 The Role of STEM in Diverse Sectors 05:59 Elevate Program and Diversity in STEM 08:58 Measuring Success in Leadership Roles 11:50 Challenges in Policy and Research Funding 14:59 The Need for Risk-Taking in Research 18:05 Opportunities for Australia in Global Context 18:28 Geopolitical Shifts and Research Opportunities 21:22 Philanthropy and Investment in R&D 23:50 Navigating Imposter Syndrome 28:49 Restoring Trust in Science 33:23 Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Future Perspectives

  • 5 Folgen

Info

In each episode of Science with Benefits, a different STEMM sector insider shares insights, perspectives and personal stories from their career and life experience.  In conversation with OG science communicator Dr Rod Lamberts*, guests aren't always "the usual  suspects" in STEMM, but they all share one thing: a unique perspective on the sector you haven't heard before. Whether you're en experienced insider or at the beginning of your STEMM career, there's always something interesting on Science with Benefits.  *Rod has been a science communication academic and practitioner for nearly 30 years. Check out his much more NSFW podcast "A Little Bit of Science" wherever you get your podcasts. And stay tuned for a new one coming in late 2026!

Informationen

  • Erstellt von
    Rod Lamberts
  • Jahre aktiv
    2026
  • Folgen
    5
  • Bewertung
    Unbedenklich
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Science with Benefits
  • Sendungswebsite
    Science with Benefits