Thematic Edge Podcast

Marvin Barth
  • 0.0 (0)
  • INVESTING
  • EVERY TWO WEEKS

Marvin Barth of discusses the thematic investing and the Themes driving markets with Mark Farrington of the Global Watchtower, with and without guests as the occasion demands. thematicmarkets.substack.com

  1. 6 DAYS AGO

    Episode 014: Iran blockade

    A detailed and at times sharply contested discussion on the strategic direction of the Iran conflict following the collapse of US-Iran peace talks and what it means for markets (recorded at noon London time on 13 April). In this episode, Mark and I analyse the shift from an historically intense air campaign to a US-led maritime interdiction strategy. While we both agree that the US is attempting a novel “sovereignty-denial” strategy for regime change, we differ on how much control the US will have over the intensity of the conflict from here. We discuss how the US is shifting responsibilities to allies, how they are responding, and how the US midterm elections affect the Trump Administration’s calculus. We then turn to the economic and market implications. While we find much to agree on in terms of relative effects, we differ over the implications for the dollar. Key themes: * The shift from a large scale bombing campaign to a maritime conflict focused on securing the Persian Gulf and maintaining open trade routes * The US attempt to reframe the conflict and transfer responsibility to allies through a coordinated international presence at sea * The ceasefire as a tactical pause rather than a negotiated settlement, enabling a transition in strategy rather than resolving the conflict * Two competing interpretations of US intent, one focused on managing escalation and internationalising the response, the other on denying Iran the ability to govern and ultimately forcing regime collapse * The concept of a “denial of sovereignty” strategy, where pressure is applied without invasion or nation building * The risk that Iran, as a weakened but still capable actor, may escalate through asymmetric attacks on regional infrastructure * The vulnerability of Gulf energy infrastructure and the limits of missile defence despite high interception success rates * The role of international law and the UN in shaping allied participation, particularly for Europe and Asian economies dependent on energy flows * A likely convergence of global behaviour around freedom of navigation operations, even among reluctant participants * Constraints on European military capacity compared to stronger operational readiness in parts of Asia and the Gulf * The emergence of a lower intensity but more distributed phase of conflict, with multiple actors shaping outcomes * Implications for markets, including the potential for short term resilience or relief rallies alongside persistent tail risks * Diverging views on the durability of this equilibrium and what it implies for the US dollar and global capital flows Timestamps 00:00 Introduction and framing 01:00 Breakdown of peace talks and announcement of US blockade 03:30 Nature of the ceasefire and why it was unlikely to hold 06:00 Transition from air campaign to maritime strategy 10:00 US objectives and the degradation of Iran’s conventional capability 14:30 Debate on control versus escalation risk 18:00 Iran as a weakened but still dangerous actor 22:00 Allied participation, constraints and incentives 25:00 Role of international law and UN positioning 27:00 Global convergence around maritime security 30:00 Transition to market implications 32:00 Competing interpretations of US strategy 36:00 Regime stability versus denial of governance 40:00 Escalation scenarios and downside risks 45:00 Market pricing and potential relief rally 50:00 Dollar implications and closing views Further Reading To explore the framework behind these views in more depth, see the following publications, which set out the strategic logic and potential endgames of the conflict. 📖 Dazed And Confused: Making sense of the ceasefire and what it might mean, Thematic Markets, 10 April 2026 📖 Perspective: Uncertainty suits neither quantitative modeling nor hyperbole, Seriously Marvin?!, 8 April 2026 📖 Strange Action At A Distance: Circumstance and savvy Machiavellianism compound Trumpian confusion, Seriously Marvin?!, 25 March 2026 📖 Alea Iacta Est: Don’t ignore irreversibility in the Iran war, Thematic Markets, 23 March 2026 → Foundational framework for the current phase This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thematicmarkets.substack.com/subscribe

    1hr 8min

  2. 1 APR

    Episode 013: Iran strikes credit with Zoso Davies

    This week Mark Farrington and I are joined by Zoso Davies, formerly Managing Director in European Investment Grade Credit Research at Barclays, where he spent over 15 years analysing major credit cycles including the European sovereign crisis, Brexit, and COVID. Now at a leading London based hedge fund and author of Macro Credit Thinking, Zoso brings a rare combination of top down macro perspective and deep credit market expertise. The discussion reframes how to think about credit risk as markets from stable but nervous about private credit to the realization that Iran-related disruptions likely will be more severe. That transition threatens to turn credit risk from narrative-driven volatility to broad-based concerns over defaults. In investment grade markets, realized losses so far are minimal, yet spreads remain elevated as investors demand conpensation for uncertainty, liquidity, and mark to market risk.. The Iran conflict thus is acting as an accelerant to earlier concerns. What had been a relatively contained concern around private credit now sits within a broader macro shock, as energy and petrochemical disruptions begin to feed into growth, revenues, and confidence. The risk is a transition towards tighter financial conditions that, once underway, can become self fulfilling (Being is believing) through institutional channels such as pension funds. Key themes * Credit typically is narrative driven: Market pricing reflects volatility and uncertainty far more than expected defaults * Investment-grade fundamentals are good: Default rates are minimal, but spreads compensate for liquidity and mark to market volatility * Private credit is heterogeneous and often misunderstood: The asset class spans a wide range of quality and structures, masking the narrower segment where risks actually sit * Iran risks changing that: The Iran conflict amplifies existing vulnerabilities but also risks undermining fundamentals * Energy and supply shocks matter for credit: Disruptions feed through to growth, earnings, and ultimately credit quality * Europe appears most exposed: Greater sensitivity to energy shocks and structural fragilities increase vulnerability * Institutional structures can amplify tightening: Pension fund behaviour and regulation may reinforce credit contraction once it begins Timestamps 00:00 Introduction00:25 Who is Zoso Davies01:38 Iran, private credit, and broader credit risks02:39 From chemistry PhD to credit analyst04:31 Breaking into finance in the 2008 crisis06:45 AI job fears versus the 2008 reality10:00 Careers, adaptability, and rolling with change12:02 How Zoso thinks about credit13:00 What investment grade credit actually is14:15 Why credit spreads are about more than defaults16:10 Credit as story and narrative shift17:22 When investment grade credit really breaks19:01 Why private credit gets all the attention21:24 What private credit actually includes22:43 How the private credit story got out of control26:18 BDCs, leverage, and where the real stress sits28:23 The real issue is confidence, not defaults32:00 Is this systemic before defaults rise35:24 You go bankrupt when no one will lend to you36:01 Why software was the original pressure point38:35 How tightening becomes self fulfilling42:34 Tightening credit conditions and rising defaults44:14 Iran, oil shocks, and macro spillovers46:00 Why Europe looks most exposed47:35 The market may be reading Trump wrong50:33 When credit damage starts to become real51:26 From software risk to cyclical sectors52:48 Final thoughts54:22 Where to find Zoso’s work This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thematicmarkets.substack.com/subscribe

    56 min

  3. 19 MAR

    Episode 012: Doomberg - Strategic implications of the Iran war

    A sharp and wide-ranging discussion on the strategic consequences of the Iran war. In this episode, Doomberg joins Marvin Barth and Mark Farrington to unpack why markets have remained surprisingly calm despite escalating violence in the Middle East, what may be coming next, and what the long-term, strategic consequences of this conflict are likely to be. The conversation digs deep into the structure of the global energy system. Key themes: * Market resilience despite conflict, supported by inventories, spare capacity, and supply leakage * Escalation risk and the limits of rerouting flows around the Strait of Hormuz * Oil pricing dynamics, where spikes are constrained by demand destruction * Structural shift in global energy power, with US self sufficiency and China’s external dependence * Divergence between US resilience and Europe’s structural vulnerability * Transition from efficiency to security across global supply chains * China’s strategy of controlling midstream and processing bottlenecks * Likely overcorrection and reinvestment in domestic capacity across the West * A coming infrastructure cycle in pipelines, shipping, and refining * Historical pattern of supply response and potential technological breakthroughs * Geopolitical realignment across key regions, including Asia, Europe, and North America Timestamps 00:00 Introduction and framing 02:00 Market resilience despite conflict 03:30 Escalation risk and Iran strike 05:00 Can supply bypass Hormuz? 06:30 The coming infrastructure response 08:30 Why oil spikes cannot persist 12:00 Long term logistics and distribution shifts 14:00 China versus US in the Middle East 18:00 US resilience and domestic supply 22:00 Europe’s structural vulnerability 32:00 The third dependency shock 34:00 Energy transition versus reality 36:00 From efficiency to resilience 41:00 China’s supply chain strategy 46:00 Who must adapt and how 47:00 Korea, Japan and regional positioning 52:00 Taiwan risk and strategic exposure 53:30 Market implications and closing This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thematicmarkets.substack.com/subscribe

    1 hr
  4. Episode 011: Iran implications with Erik @YWR

    4 MAR

    Episode 011: Iran implications with Erik @YWR

    How could the Iran conflict reshape global markets, China risk premiums and emerging market capital flows? Marvin Barth and Erik @YWR discuss geopolitics, uncertainty and the investment implications of a changing global order. In this episode, they explore whether a US-aligned Middle East could reduce geopolitical risk, why emerging markets may benefit from shifting capital flows, and whether China’s equity story changes if Taiwan risk declines. The conversation also examines Europe’s strategic positioning, the future of the dollar, and the broader macro consequences of global power realignment. Key themes • Iran conflict and market uncertainty • China risk premium and valuation debate • Complexity cascades and tail risks • Emerging markets and global capital flows • Europe’s strategic, technological and debt challenges • Dollar strength, stablecoins and global liquidity Timestamps 00:00 Intro and why AI was postponed 02:30 Iran conflict and market uncertainty 03:00 Bullish macro view and the “new empire” thesis 04:35 China markets and Taiwan risk premium 07:45 Complexity cascades and tail risk 10:50 Volatility, options and market pricing 12:40 Is containing China bullish for China? 18:30 The Godfather analogy for US strategy 25:20 China’s economic model versus market pricing 28:30 Emerging markets bull case explained 32:00 US versus China, global alignment choices 37:20 EM flows, currencies and investor FOMO 39:00 The end of the old world order 40:30 Europe’s strategic mistakes 43:30 AI regulation and Europe’s competitiveness 47:50 “Europe as the new EM” debate 49:30 Debt, growth and macro positioning 51:00 Dollar outlook and stablecoins 54:00 Europe risks from dollarisation 55:25 Final thoughts and next episode teaser This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thematicmarkets.substack.com/subscribe

    57 min

  5. 18 FEB

    Episode 010: Forest fire insurance

    Forest Fire Insurance explores how risk truly builds in financial systems and why volatility is not the enemy it is often portrayed to be. Marvin Barth and Mark Farrington are joined by David Dredge, CIO of Convex Strategies, to unpack the idea of self organised criticality in markets using the forest fire analogy. The discussion ranges from leverage, correlation and contagion to the failures of Sharpe ratio thinking and the dangers of suppressing volatility. The conversation moves through convexity, tail risk, demographic decline, central bank policy and the growing fragility of the global financial system. Dredge explains why insurance is cheapest when it feels least necessary and why the real risk lies in accumulated undergrowth rather than the spark that eventually ignites it. This episode is a deep dive into how systemic risk forms, how it is mispriced and why prudent investors should think less about forecasting outcomes and more about preparing for nonlinear shocks. Timestamps 00:00 Introduction to Thematic Edge and today’s guest 01:00 David Dredge, Convex Strategies and tail risk investing 03:20 Forecasting versus risk management 05:30 The forest fire analogy and self organised criticality 07:00 What is Sharpe World and why it fails 09:30 Rational Accounting Man versus prudent risk management 12:00 Incentives, leverage and systemic fragility 14:45 Good volatility versus bad volatility 16:00 Convexity, skew and why upside volatility matters 18:50 Why investors are not taking enough risk 21:30 Forest management, undergrowth and controlled burns 24:30 Geopolitical and financial systems colliding 27:40 Volatility pricing and the cost of insurance 29:30 Japan, debt dynamics and demographic decline 33:30 Population ageing as a structural risk driver 37:30 Global competition for capital and bond market stress 40:00 Arsonists, campers and fire marshals in the global system 43:00 Markets driving economies, not the reverse 45:00 Bond market stress and policy intervention 47:00 Kevin Warsh, central banks and balance sheet risk 49:30 Basel III, regulation and unintended leverage 52:00 Why systemic risk keeps being misdiagnosed This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thematicmarkets.substack.com/subscribe

    1hr 14min

  6. 4 FEB

    Episode 009: Trump 2.1 shock

    Unfortunately, the audio for this episode was terrible, so in addition to the time-stamped table of contents, a full, edited transcript is included below. In this episode, Marvin Barth and Mark Farrington reflect on a sequence of events that together signal a decisive shift in US strategy, from Venezuela to Greenland, and from emerging markets to monetary policy. They examine how recent US actions have reasserted strategic deterrence, clarified a new Western Hemisphere doctrine, and forced allies and adversaries alike to confront an uncomfortable reality. Whether welcomed or resented, American power still sets the terms. The discussion moves from geopolitics to markets, exploring what these shifts mean for asset allocation, the dollar, and global capital flows. Drawing on historical parallels with the 1990s, they unpack the case for a year of two halves, a steepening yield curve, bank outperformance, and a rotation away from debasement trades. They also assess the implications of a more orthodox Federal Reserve, balance sheet contraction, and deregulation, questioning widely held assumptions about gold, bonds, and portfolio construction. This is a wide ranging conversation about power, deterrence, and markets in transition, cutting through noise to focus on structure, incentives, and consequences. Table of contents 00:00 Why this year feels different02:00 Venezuela and the return of US deterrence06:00 Allies have fewer choices than they think08:00 Nigeria and the logic of alignment10:00 Capital leaving China, where it goes next11:30 Greenland, power, and nuclear deterrence15:00 NATO tension is not new19:00 Why Europe wants out of US assets21:00 The 1990s playbook markets forgot24:00 Dollar fear versus earnings reality27:00 What a harder Fed really means30:00 Yield curve, banks, and rotation36:00 Gold is a risk asset, not a hedge40:00 Why the 60–20–20 portfolio failed43:00 Bonds may matter again46:00 Hawk or organiser, redefining the Fed48:00 Power, markets, and the next phase Full, edited transcript MARVIN BARTH I’m Marvin Barth, and I’m here with my good friend and colleague, Mark Farrington, The Global Watchtower. We’re back to talk about some of the issues that we discussed in our last few episodes, where we got to interview some very interesting guests. We also changed our environment and are actually together at the Cross Keys Pub in Chelsea. Something I think we should do more often, do this in person. MARK FARRINGTON Absolutely. MARVIN BARTH What I wanted to start with is looking back at the Venezuela event and the David Kilcullen interview. Because that interview was unbelievable. Though it went way over time we could have talked to Dave for, I think, another hour or two if we had had the time. But for me, Venezuela set the tone for the year in the sense that last year, there was a lot of shock and awe from the Trump Administration, but there was never any clear definition. And I think other than tariffs, people didn’t get the sense of a real change in US strategy and position in the world. And then as we got towards the end of the year, we had the National Security Strategy, which we discussed back in December as widely misinterpreted. But it was abstract. Venezuela made the NSS tangible. First, it brought home very clearly the Trump corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, or the “Donroe Doctrine,” as people have been calling it. Second, it demonstrated an exceptionally important point Dave made about need for the US to reassert strategic deterrence. After the Afghanistan fiasco after the disaster of Ukraine US strategic deterrence was basically nil and while I’m not saying it’s back and I don’t think Dave was either, I do think it makes it very clear that any adversary around the world has to think twice before they try to counter the US or at least how they go about countering the US. I also think, and we’ll get into this more later, it also sends a very strong message to allies as well. Especially so given the contrast with how European allies handled the whole Greenland situation, Venezuela, as Dave said, wasn’t a flawless operation, but it was a very impressive show of capabilities, especially relative to the European show of sending a few soldiers to Greenland to, literally lay a towel on the ice. It clearly established to every ally that they cannot do this without the US. So, I think that’s going to be very important given how adversarial Trump administration has been in its rhetoric and actions with allies. Do you read that differently? Or what are your key reflections from the Kilcullen interview? MARK FARRINGTON I definitely agree with all those points, and I think that point that Dave made about re-establishing US deterrence was a very important insight. I didn’t immediately put that together, but, you know, he did, and that was helpful. And I also think, explains a lot of behavior of the Trump Administration around Greenland. There’s also an element of reinforcing nuclear deterrence too. The slight difference I might have to how you described it is that I broke the National Security Strategy into three compartments. I was interested in what it implied for the new corollary, the Western Hemisphere corollary, but also what it means for projection of power in the Pacific, the first island chain strategy, and also what it means for Europe and NATO and the Middle East, etc. So Venezuela definitely defined the Western Hemisphere doctrine clearly. And I think everyone got the message. It’s received the usual criticism you would expect anytime you use force. But otherwise, I feel like it has been surprisingly well accepted by the world and South America. I think it’s helped to tip elections in Latin America, as we’ve seen Costa Rica, for example, to the right as well. And I think it will be a successful strategy. Also, I would say Rubio deserves a lot of credit for that as well, not just Trump in this case. And that Latin America views it as a Trump / Rubio strategy, which is helpful. So yeah, I would concur on all the points. MARVIN BARTH So, I don’t disagree with any of that. When I say that it was a defining event, I agree that it was a demonstration only in the Western Hemisphere and only of one slice of the broader National Security Strategy, i.e. the Western Hemisphere Trump corollary. But it had a broader implication as the first clear manifestation of the NSS and the complete shift we’re seeing in the US relationship with the rest of the world. That’s what it brought home to me, because one of the problems with the Trump administration is they say so many different things and he’s so good at misdirecting that you often are left questioning what is real. This made the strategy real. MARK FARRINGTON It definitely means it’s real for everyone in the Caribbean. Exactly. Cuba is immediately standing to attention. MARVIN BARTH But it wasn’t just there. And by the way, you remember Dave said, watch Cuba next. Another really interesting point from the interview with Senator Dafinone of Nigeria, that you couldn’t join, that we should definitely delve into more here, is this tension between people being shocked and offended by how the Trump Administration treats them but realizing they have no choice because you’re either out in the wild by yourself or you have the protection of the United States. Senator Dafinone put that in very clear terms: the US Christmas Day bombings in Nigeria were not an imposition on Nigeria, we were equal participants; we wanted this. Yes, President Trump may be selling it at home in his own way that he needs to do for his politics. But for we Nigerians, this was about an ongoing counter-terrorism operation, and we were really happy to have a big, powerful friend come join us. At the same time, however, he did express very clearly they were very concerned about the Venezuela operation. So it wasn’t just in Latin America, it was around the world. People said, whoa! MARK FARRINGTON No, it was a strong statement, and it has various implications. And I think that one of the implications can be, that you’re concerned, you’re either aligned with the US or you’re not aligned. But one of the other implications can be that if we have an overlap in our goals, it can be the most useful partnership that you can have. In this case, Nigeria definitely wanted and collaborated with that operation. It supported the government’s goals as well. So, I think the US will be used like that. Not as a policeman, but as the deliverer of the painful, punitive message. And perhaps that’s what the Trump posture will be like. Not a normal policeman, but standing ready to act, to create decisive change in the use of military force. MARVIN BARTH By the way, the Dafinone interview brought home another topic we’ve discussed that we need to devote a whole podcast to, which is emerging markets where we both have strong backgrounds. I was fascinated by the opportunity that Senator Dafinone described in Nigeria under the reforms that President Tinubu is undertaking, and in the broader context of these geostrategic realignments, in the competition for these regions’ resources, populations and hearts and minds. That latter point was well illustrated in the news after our interview was that President Tinubu went to visit Turkey and establish relationships with the Turks and increasing trade ties there. Separately, China and Nigeria reaffirmed their strategic partnership. All these pieces are in the mix, and that competition is potentially a huge opportunity in emerging markets. MARK FARRINGTON Totally agree. And if you look at the equity flows that we’ve seen so far in the emerging markets, there’s clearly a big outflow from China and then redeployment in emerging markets ex-China. So, for all of the West, which have some restrictions now on being fully invested or invested at all, in China, they’ve made that strategic allocation and so th

    1hr 1min

  7. 21 JAN

    Episode 008: Nigeria in focus

    Nigeria is the largest economy and population in Africa, is abundant in natural resources, is an emergent cultural and technology center, and increasingly a regional manufacturing hub. Senator Ede Dafinone of Delta Central State (the main oil-producing region) explains the reforms of President Tinubu, the vast potential opportunities they may release, and how this lynchpin of Africa can navigate strategic competition between the US and China. 0:33 Why Nigeria merits your attention. 2:40 Who is Senator Ede Dafinone of Delta Central State? 6:19 The basis of Nigeria’s cooperation with US attacks on ISIS. 9:33 Nigerian perspectives on the shift to a new world order. 14:35 Nigerian views on President Trump. 17:14 President Tinubu’s willingness to challenge the system and reform. 21:00 What will define success and prospects for long-run success. 23:30 Senator Dafinone’s priorities for Delta State and Nigeria. 25:36 Opportunities in Nigeria created by reform. 31:52 Nigeria’s secret weapon: its educated diaspora. 33:52 Fine arts and fashion in Nigeria. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thematicmarkets.substack.com/subscribe

    36 min
  8. Making sense of Venezuela with David Kilcullen

    7 JAN

    Making sense of Venezuela with David Kilcullen

    The Thematic Edge opens 2026 with its first guest, David Kilcullen, retired Australian Army colonel, intellectual architect of both the “Surge” in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the world’s foremost authority on counterinsurgency. Colonel Kilcullen helps us make sense of what happened in Venezuela on 5 January and what to expect going forward. The discussion is structured around three questions that matter for markets. * First, what actually happened operationally, and what it reveals about escalation control, deterrence, and the limits of legacy air defence systems. * Second, what the episode signals about US grand strategy, the “Trump corollary of the Monroe Doctrine, the return of gunboat diplomacy, and the use of suzerainty style constraints to shape trade, currency choice, and commercial alignment. * Third, what long-term “success” means and what must be achieved to meet it, including political stabilisation of Venezuela, establishment of payments systems, control over resources, and how quickly the US needs to move before the window closes. Along the way, we challenge the prevailing narratives including claims of pre-negotiation with or foreknowledge of China and Russia, implications for the emergent global order, Taiwan, Ukraine, Europe, other regions’ security, who might be “next,” the scramble for resource control, what to watch for, and Venezuela’s potential as a test case for dollarization via stablecoins. With so much to talk about and such an insightful guest, this episode is longer than usual, but it will be required listening/viewing for anyone interested in assessing risks and making informed decisions in today’s rapidly shifting global order. Full transcript 1 00:00:06.560 --> 00:00:09.120 Marvin Barth: Good evening, and welcome to… 2 00:00:09.150 --> 00:00:25.030 Marvin Barth: the Thematic Edge. We are very excited, to start 2026 with our very first guest on the Thematic Edge. So, this time I’m not only joined by my longtime friend and colleague, Mark Farrington. 3 00:00:25.030 --> 00:00:29.289 Marvin Barth: Who’s going to join me in asking some of the questions of our guests. 4 00:00:29.290 --> 00:00:39.329 Marvin Barth: But I’m also joined by another very old friend of mine, David Kilcolon, and we are very fortunate to have him. 5 00:00:39.620 --> 00:00:54.339 Marvin Barth: for reasons we can discuss another time. My nickname for him is the International Man of Mystery, and most of that has to do with the fact that I can never get ahold of him, and he seems to be in some crazy place without cell phone connections. 6 00:00:54.700 --> 00:01:02.499 Marvin Barth: So we’re very lucky to have him, because he is exactly the right person to talk to 7 00:01:02.750 --> 00:01:13.620 Marvin Barth: about the events in Venezuela that occurred over the weekend. David is a retired colonel from the Australian 8 00:01:13.620 --> 00:01:24.070 Marvin Barth: Army. He, was a key advisor in both the Bush and Obama administrations. He has a consulting business, Cordillera Applications Group. 9 00:01:24.070 --> 00:01:29.290 Marvin Barth: That consults to many of the leading militaries, military alliances. 10 00:01:29.290 --> 00:01:40.729 Marvin Barth: and companies, around the world on security issues. He is universally acknowledged as the world’s foremost authority on counterinsurgencies. 11 00:01:41.280 --> 00:01:57.119 Marvin Barth: And he also happens to be a tremendously good, grants strategist, as illustrated by his last book, The Dragons and the Snakes. All his books are fantastic. I highly encourage you to go out and 12 00:01:57.420 --> 00:01:58.490 Marvin Barth: read them. 13 00:01:58.660 --> 00:02:02.519 Marvin Barth: David, welcome, and thank you for joining us. 14 00:02:02.990 --> 00:02:09.389 David Kilcullen: Thanks, Marvin. It’s an honor to be here, and my publisher thanks you for that very blatant plug of my books. 15 00:02:10.300 --> 00:02:21.289 Marvin Barth: well-deserved. I mean, if you want to understand any of the military or geostrategic developments of the last 20 years. 16 00:02:21.290 --> 00:02:34.590 Marvin Barth: you have to read David Gilkullen’s books. You know, Counterinsurgency is literally the field manual for counterinsurgency, not only for the U.S. military, but for most militaries around the world at this point. 17 00:02:34.600 --> 00:02:48.110 Marvin Barth: Out of the Mountains really described many of the things that we are now seeing take place, whether it was in Gaza or Ukraine. All of those things were basically forecast by David over a decade ago in that book. 18 00:02:48.110 --> 00:02:58.420 Marvin Barth: And in terms of the best possible framework for thinking about the geostrategic environment and the challenges that Western democracies face. 19 00:02:58.420 --> 00:03:09.939 Marvin Barth: Both militarily, economically, and strategically. You know, The Dragons and the Snake was second to no book out there, so, you know… 20 00:03:10.470 --> 00:03:16.739 Marvin Barth: I’ll give you another plug there. Now, before we… Before we go on, 21 00:03:16.740 --> 00:03:38.359 Marvin Barth: The, I do want, to remind everyone that nothing on this podcast should be considered, financial advice. You need to do your own research. We are providing information here, and especially on this topic, where we are literally in the fog of war, even though it’s an undeclared war. 22 00:03:38.840 --> 00:03:49.660 Marvin Barth: You should not rely on any of this information as being factual, because everything is up in the air right now, and we are doing our best to make sense of the information that is available. 23 00:03:49.930 --> 00:03:57.890 Marvin Barth: So with that, let’s start with, I actually wanted to structure this in sort of 3 segments that I think 24 00:03:58.120 --> 00:04:16.149 Marvin Barth: best fit your expertise, Dave. The first is just, like, diagnostic. What actually happened? You know, if you were a theater commander or something, and you were getting in this, this information, or you were, 25 00:04:16.149 --> 00:04:21.899 Marvin Barth: the head of the PLA trying to figure out what the heck the Americans just did. 26 00:04:21.959 --> 00:04:25.400 Marvin Barth: How would we assess what actually happened? 27 00:04:25.400 --> 00:04:35.189 Marvin Barth: Based on the information we have, today, the 5th of January. The second is really getting to that geostrategic point. 28 00:04:35.190 --> 00:05:00.130 Marvin Barth: you know, what are the grand strategy implications of this, not just for the U.S. and for the region, but globally, and then finally get back to where you are the, you know, clear, acknowledged expert, on counterinsurgency, which is really, and you’ve emphasized this over and over, really about creating a stable society, which is what it’s going to take to make this operation ultimately successful. So we want to get that. 29 00:05:00.320 --> 00:05:12.070 Marvin Barth: And in the end, I think we’ll get to, if we have some time, some, markets issues, which, feel free to, ask Mark and I questions around that. 30 00:05:12.580 --> 00:05:13.440 David Kilcullen: Absolutely. 31 00:05:13.900 --> 00:05:16.430 Marvin Barth: So let’s start with… I mean… 32 00:05:17.510 --> 00:05:28.149 Marvin Barth: One of the things that has been floated around a lot, is that this was somehow, pre-arranged, right? That this was a negotiated. 33 00:05:28.180 --> 00:05:41.639 Marvin Barth: settlement. And, you know, there are several signs, at least to my untrained eye, that suggest that. One, the strikes that were… that took place were actually quite limited, it seems. 34 00:05:42.190 --> 00:06:00.480 Marvin Barth: And there are a lot of, anti-aircraft weapons in, Venezuela. Their army may not be fabulously trained, but they’ve got lots of, equipment from, all their, foreign friends. And yet you were able to have a helicopter-led, 35 00:06:00.690 --> 00:06:18.329 Marvin Barth: exfil within a couple of hours without losing anybody. And then there’s also the sort of confidence that President Trump displayed in his press conference, suggesting that, you know, they’re basically going to run things under the new regime. 36 00:06:18.570 --> 00:06:28.579 Marvin Barth: Do you see this as a prearranged, or a negotiated settlement, or… and how did that work, or do you have other theories about what was going on? 37 00:06:29.220 --> 00:06:29.900 David Kilcullen: So… 38 00:06:35.220 --> 00:06:40.040 David Kilcullen: So I’ll put that caveat out there to start with. But I think it’s pretty clear… 39 00:06:40.040 --> 00:06:44.080 Marvin Barth: Dave, you froze for a second, so if you wouldn’t mind, what was that caveat again? 40 00:06:44.560 --> 00:06:57.519 David Kilcullen: Sorry, I was just saying that, the short answer to many of these questions is we don’t know, right? Or we don’t know yet. So, we should just bear that in mind as we’re… as we’re talking about it. 41 00:06:57.710 --> 00:07:00.220 David Kilcullen: The… I think the… 42 00:07:00.460 --> 00:07:18.170 David Kilcullen: it’s not a secret that there’s been ongoing negotiation between the US government and the Venezuelan government over almost a year now about a set of issues, but the one that’s become the sticking point was the stepping down 43 00:07:18.270 --> 00:07:23.879 David Kilcullen: of Maduro. As far as we know, about a week ago. 44 00:07:24.010 --> 00:07:30.470 David Kilcullen: that set of negotiations reached an impasse, where Maduro was essentially offered 45 00:07:30.660 --> 00:07:43.920 David Kilcullen: safe passage to exile, perhaps to the Middle East, or to Russia, where Bashar al-Assad is right now, of course. And this has seemed to have been a… 46 00:07:43.980 --> 00:07:56.840 David Kilcullen: preferred playbook from the Trump administration to offer a way out and a graceful exit with as much cash as you can carry, you know, to a comf

    1hr 27min
See All (14)

About

Marvin Barth of discusses the thematic investing and the Themes driving markets with Mark Farrington of the Global Watchtower, with and without guests as the occasion demands. thematicmarkets.substack.com

Information

  • Creator
    Marvin Barth
  • Years Active
    2025 - 2026
  • Episodes
    14
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © Thematic Markets, Ltd
  • Show Website
    Thematic Edge Podcast

You Might Also Like