Spotlight

FRANCE 24 English

FRANCE 24's prime time interview of the day goes beyond the headlines: join us as news-making guests from around the globe go in depth on the stories that matter. Every day at 6:15pm Paris time.

  1. 30 MARS

    UK ex-ambassador Westmacott: Whether PM likes it or not, British govt 'a bit involved' in Iran

    For Spotlight, François Picard is pleased to welcome Sir Peter Westmacott, distinguished ambassadorial fellow with the Atlantic Council's Europe Center and former British ambassador to France, Turkey and the United States. As a senior British diplomat with decades of experience across key transatlantic and Middle Eastern postings, he approaches the current crisis with both concern and analytical caution.  Watch moreBoots on the ground? Trump eyes Iran's oil hub of Kharg Island For Sir Westmacott, what we are witnessing in the Middle East is not a clearly articulated strategic intervention, but rather a fluid and, at times, incoherent policy trajectory driven by shifting justifications and severely limited consultation with allies. From his perspective, the central challenge lies in the absence of a discernible core objective behind the United States' actions. The traditional frameworks of diplomacy – alliance coordination, legal justification and strategic clarity – appear to have been bypassed. This has left partners such as the United Kingdom and France in a position of reactive engagement, balancing their security dependencies with growing unease. Ultimately, Sir Westmacott sees this conflict not as a decisive campaign, but as an evolving and costly entanglement: one that risks escalating instability while delivering uncertain strategic gains. The imperative now, as he views it, is to identify a viable diplomatic "off-ramp" before the consequences deepen further for regional and global stability.

    15 min
  2. 27 MARS

    As Maduro appears in New York court, Venezuela's state apparatus 'remains in place'

    François Picard is pleased to welcome Christopher Sabatini, Senior Research Fellow for Latin America, the US and the Americas program at Chatham House. According to Sabatini, the removal of a head of state like Venezuela's Nicolas Maduro through external force may appear, at first glance, as a decisive rupture. Yet what unfolds beneath the surface reveals continuity rather than transformation. The structures of power, the networks of coercion and the embedded systems of corruption do not dissolve with the extraction of a single leader. Instead, they persist, adapt and often reconfigure themselves within the same, and possibly even more hardened, institutional shell. What is presented as regime change is, upon closer inspection, a targeted decapitation: a symbolic and operational act that leaves the governing apparatus largely intact. Without a negotiated transition or the reconstruction of political legitimacy through democratic means, the underlying regime not only survives but recalibrates. Personnel may shift, alliances may subtly realign, but the logic of power remains unchanged. This pattern extends beyond Venezuela. External pressure, when applied without a viable pathway for political transition, risks deepening humanitarian crises while failing to produce structural reform, Sabatini explains. In such contexts, regimes prioritise survival, even at the cost of their own people, while international strategies drift between coercion and uncertainty. What emerges is not transformation, but the endurance of a deep-rooted system, under altered conditions.

    8 min
  3. 25 MARS

    Georgia's links to Iran: Ex-defense minister Khidasheli denounces Al-Mustafa University activities

    François Picard is pleased to welcome Tina Khidasheli, jurist and former defence minister of Georgia. According to Khidasheli, Georgia is suspended between its declared European future and an increasingly authoritarian present. While formally holding candidate status for EU membership, the political reality has shifted toward systemic control, legal ambiguity, and the suppression of dissent. Legal instruments, particularly the foreign agents law, are designed not merely to regulate but to deter, creating an environment where ordinary professional or civic activity risks criminalisation. The result, Khidasheli says, is a chilling effect that extends across civil society, media, and even routine international engagement. At the strategic level, decision-making is no longer anchored in national interest as traditionally conceived, but instead calibrated against external power expectations, most notably those of Moscow. This reorientation reflects not ideological conviction, explains Khidasheli, but political survival. Governance is driven less by values than by the imperative of maintaining power, preserving wealth and avoiding accountability. Simultaneously, security concerns are selectively addressed. While visible signs of radicalisation and foreign ideological influence emerge, institutional attention is redirected toward those who raise alarms rather than the phenomena themselves. This inversion of priorities underscores a broader pattern: the state's mechanisms are increasingly employed to stifle dissent rather than safeguard society. The cumulative effect is a fragmentation of social cohesion.

    14 min

À propos

FRANCE 24's prime time interview of the day goes beyond the headlines: join us as news-making guests from around the globe go in depth on the stories that matter. Every day at 6:15pm Paris time.