Sigma Nutrition Radio

Danny Lennon
  • 4.9 (250)
  • NUTRITION
  • UPDATED WEEKLY

Discussions about the science of nutrition, dietetics and health. The podcast that educates through nuanced conversations, exploring evidence and cultivating critical thinking. Hosted by Danny Lennon.

  1. 6 DAYS AGO

    #604: How To Interpret Nutrition Research – David Allison, PhD

    How should we decide what counts as trustworthy evidence? Scientific rigor is not a single characteristic of a study, but a chain of decisions made from the moment a question is conceived to the point at which findings are communicated to the public. Errors can occur at every stage: the question may be ill-posed, the design may be incapable of answering it, the measurements may be weak, the analysis may be inappropriate, the interpretation may overreach, and the public-facing communication may become distorted. In this episode, Dr. David Allison, PhD discusses the deeper methodological issues that shape the field's conclusions. The discussion moves from the philosophy of scientific inquiry to the practical realities of study design, statistical analysis, interpretation, and dissemination. Timestamps: [03:30] Interview start [06:17] What is true scientific rigor? [10:06] Study design and analysis problems in nutrition [12:56] The DINS error [14:14] Conflation of heterogeneity in response vs. in outcomes [17:31] Misunderstanding of p-values and hypothesis testing [27:01] Incorrect labelling of "responders" and "non-responders" [34:49] Errors related to analysis of secondary outcomes [45:01] How can nutrition science improve as a field? [51:30] Key ideas segment (Premium-only) Links: Go to episode page (with list of episode resources) Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course

    52 min

  2. 28 APR

    #603: Should Dietary Fiber Be Considered Essential? – Andrew Reynolds, PhD

    Dietary fiber is widely recognized as an important component of a healthy diet, yet it is not typically classified as an essential nutrient. In this episode, Dr. Andrew Reynolds explores whether that distinction still holds, arguing that the traditional criteria used to define essentiality may be outdated when applied to modern nutrition science. The discussion moves beyond simply acknowledging the benefits of fiber and instead examines whether it meets the foundational requirements of an essential nutrient. This includes considering its physiological roles, the body's inability to synthesize it in sufficient quantities, and whether low intake leads to a meaningful and reversible dysfunction. Drawing on evidence from prospective cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, and mechanistic research, Reynolds outlines the strength of the evidence linking higher fiber intakes to reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, colorectal cancer, and premature mortality.  Reynolds presents a compelling case that fiber may play a fundamental role in maintaining normal physiological function and therefore warrants reconsideration within the framework of essential nutrients. Timestamps: [03:50] Interview starts [05:53] Understanding essentiality [09:26] Could there be a deficiency-state for fiber? [15:38] What are fiber guidelines based on? [23:52] Fiber and chronic disease risk: dose-response [28:59] Different types of fiber [37:21] Fermentation and SCFAs [42:55] Research priorities ahead [50:04] Low fiber health risks [58:02] Key Ideas segment (Premium-only) Related Resources: Go to episode page Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course Reynolds et al., 2026 – Dietary fibre as an essential nutrient: Reynolds et al., 2019 – Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses Episode 482: Carbohydrate Quality & Health – Andrew Reynolds, PhD

    59 min

  3. 21 APR

    #602: Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) – Megan Hellner, DrPH, RD & Katherine Hill, MD

    Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) is an eating disorder diagnosis characterized by a persistent restriction or avoidance of food intake that results in clinically significant consequences (medical, nutritional, and/or psychosocial), but without the weight- and shape-driven psychopathology typical of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In this episode, Megan Hellner and Katherine Hill outline how ARFID presents across the lifespan, why it is frequently missed in routine healthcare, and what an evidence-informed assessment and treatment pathway can look like in practice. A central theme is that ARFID is not synonymous with "picky eating" and not confined to any one body size. Patients may present at any point on the weight chart, including those who are weight-stable or in larger bodies, and the condition can begin in early childhood and persist into adulthood. The episode also highlights ARFID in athletes and physically active people, where restricted dietary variety and/or low intake can contribute to low energy availability and RED-S-like presentations, sometimes without an obvious intent to lose weight. Timestamps [03:48] Interview start [06:23] What is ARFID? DSM-5 definition vs "picky eating" [09:36] Clinical red flags: when restriction becomes a disorder [11:37] ARFID isn't always underweight: missed cases & diagnostic pitfalls [16:46] ARFID presentation profiles: low interest, sensory sensitivity, fear [18:59] Comorbidities & nutrition consequences [25:16] Evidence-based ARFID treatment [29:16] How to expand foods without pressure [32:28] Weight restoration, stabilization, and long-term maintenance [35:44] What research still needs [38:16] Differential diagnosis & referral Links/Resources Go to episode page (with links to papers and ARFID resources) Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course

    50 min

  4. 14 APR

    #601: Gallstones & Gallbladder Conditions: Impact of Diet – Angela Madden, PhD RD

    This episode examines what we actually know (and importantly, what we do not know) about diet in relation to gallstones and gallbladder conditions. Much of the public-facing guidance around gallstones focuses on "avoiding fatty foods", yet Dr. Angela Madden explains that this long-standing practice sits on surprisingly weak direct evidence, particularly when judged against the standards typically expected for clinical dietary recommendations. A central theme is the need to separate two distinct questions: dietary factors that influence the risk of developing gallstones (prevention), versus dietary strategies intended to reduce symptoms or complications once gallstones exist (management). While the prevention literature suggests plausible, consistent associations with overall diet quality and lifestyle factors, the specific question of prescribing a low-fat diet to manage symptomatic gallstones lacks robust randomized trial evidence. Dr Angela Madden is a clinical researcher in nutrition and dietetics at the University of Hertfordshire, where she established and led the nutrition and dietetics subject group and now focuses her research on improving nutritional assessment, dietary interventions, and patient-centred outcomes in clinical and public health settings. Timestamps [02:09] Discussion with Dr. Angela Madden begins [06:53] Understanding the gallbladder [08:08] Gallbladder disorders and their prevalence [13:42] Risk factors and pathophysiology [22:15] Dietary factors and gallstone formation [27:20] Exploring dietary fat and gallstones [34:09] Broader dietary considerations [45:44] Practical dietary recommendations Related Resources Go to episode page Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course Dr. Madden's univeristy page Cochrane Review: Madden et al., 2024 – Modified dietary fat intake for treatment of gallstone disease in people of any age Related episode: 513: Kidney Stones & Diet – Deepa Kariyawasam, RD

    53 min

  5. 7 APR ·  BONUS

    Coevolution With Foods? Multivitamins? Eating Too Early? – Ask Me Anything (SNP49)

    In this episode, Danny answers questions submitted by Premium subscribers. Questions Answered in This Episode: [00:05:13] Is eating too early (relative to chronotype) metabolically problematic? [00:16:55] Can plant-based diets reverse cardiovascular disease? [00:32:54] Are multivitamins useful insurance, or a waste with a good diet? [00:44:56] Does coevolution with foods determine human compatibility and benefit? [00:56:25] How should consumers choose supplement formulations and brands? [01:04:46] Folate vs folic acid: differences and best choice for women of childbearing age? [01:12:37] How reliable is omega-3 content in farmed salmon, especially imported frozen salmon? [01:19:18] How accurate are food labels for metabolizable energy and absorption, especially across processing levels? [01:23:58] Protein needs in breastfeeding and general rehabilitation (non-sport injury)? To listen to the full episode, subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium. Related Resources Go to episode page (with full resource list) Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Resources for this episode: Eckel et al., 2015 – Morning Circadian Misalignment during Short Sleep Duration Impacts Insulin Sensitivity Stothard et al., 2020 – Early Morning Food Intake as a Risk Factor for Metabolic Dysregulation Ep. #470: Melatonin, Meal Timing & Glucose Tolerance Ep. #579: Is Your Chronotype Hard-Wired or Modifiable? Article: A Plant Based Diet Reverses Heart Disease: True or False?

    22 min

  6. 31 MAR

    #600: Finite Knowledge, Infinite Ignorance

    "The more we learn about the world, and the deeper our learning, the more conscious, specific, and articulate will be our knowledge of what we do not know, our knowledge of our ignorance. For this, indeed, is the main source of our ignorance — the fact that our knowledge can be only finite, while our ignorance must necessarily be infinite." – Karl Popper To mark Sigma Nutrition's milestone 600th episode (and 12-year anniversary), Danny and Alan examine several areas in which their views have changed, softened, strengthened, or remained stable over the lifespan of the podcast. The discussion is therefore not only about nutrition itself, but also about the process of scientific reasoning: how positions are formed, what type of evidence can shift them, and why changing one's mind is often a sign of better thinking rather than inconsistency. The episode therefore serves as both a review of several specific nutrition controversies and a lesson in scientific epistemology. They discuss topics such as red meat, protein, dietary cholesterol, omega-3s, flavonoids, and sodium. Timestamps [11:04] Time-restricted eating [19:32] Protein intake, quality & dosing [35:04] Cocoa flavanols and cognition [51:38] Unprocessed red meat [01:05:23] Omega-3 supplementation [01:23:10] Dietary cholesterol [01:44:41] Sodium J-curve myth [01:53:41] Energy balance model Links Go to episode page (with study links & resources) Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course

    2 hr

  7. 24 MAR

    #599: Does Unprocessed Red Meat Increase Diabetes Risk? – Gil Carvalho, PhD MD & Mario Kratz, PhD

    This episode examines whether unprocessed red meat has a causal role in (1) type 2 diabetes risk and intermediate measures of glucose intolerance (insulin resistance, beta cell dysfunction, glycemic markers) and (2) cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. While there is commonly observed risk signal from observational cohorts, there exist short-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that show largely null effects on glucose homeostasis. This had led to differing opinions and interpretations of the evidence base. Some feel that in the context of an otherwise healthy diet, there isn't much to suggest concern about consuming unprocessed red meat. While others are of the view that there does exist a risk and that limiting or even avoiding consumption is prudent. The crucial concept of replacement effects is discussed. Increasing red meat intake always means decreasing something else or increasing total energy intake. Therefore, interpreting evidence requires specifying the comparator food(s), the background dietary pattern, the dose, the cut (lean vs fatty), and how the meat is prepared. To discuss their interpretations of this contentious evidence base, Dr. Mario Kratz and Dr. Gil Carvalho join the podcast to go through the studies most directly related to these questions. Timestamps [06:20] Red meat's impact is debated [10:54] Mechanisms linking meat to diabetes [15:31] Cohort evidence on diabetes risk [24:43] Differences between cohorts and threshold effects [33:13] RCT evidence and substitution trials [45:49] Why comparator foods matter [50:43] RCT examples and mixed results [01:00:30] Is there cardiovascular risk beyond saturated fat? [01:08:10] Epidemiology patterns and dose thresholds [01:11:36] Personal recommendations and risk tolerance [01:16:19] Key ideas Related Resources Go to episode page (study links, guest bios, additional resources) Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course Mario's YouTube channel: Nourished By Science Gil's YouTube channel: Nutrition Made Simple!

    1hr 19min

  8. 17 MAR

    #598: How Do Exercise & Diet Interact to Improve Glycaemic Control? – Jenna Gillen, PhD

    This episode examines how exercise and nutrition interact to influence glycaemic control, with particular focus on the postprandial period (i.e., the hours after eating) and on "time-efficient" exercise strategies such as low-volume interval training. Dr. Jenna Gillen outlines the physiological basis for why muscle contraction can acutely reduce post-meal glucose excursions, why repeated sessions can accumulate into longer-term improvements in insulin sensitivity, and why the nutrition context (pre- and post-exercise feeding, carbohydrate availability, and energy balance) can meaningfully alter observed outcomes. A key translational thread is that many clinically relevant improvements may come from small, feasible doses of activity; especially post-meal walking and brief "exercise snacks" used to interrupt sedentary time. However, the discussion considers who these interventions matter for most (and least). Postprandial glucose rises are normal in healthy individuals, whereas reducing exaggerated excursions is most relevant for those with insulin resistance, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Dr. Jenna Gillen is an Assistant Professor of Exercise Physiology in the Faculty of Kinesiology & Physical Education at the University of Toronto.  Timestamps [02:42] Dr. Gillen's research focus [04:11] Understanding glycemic control [10:07] Fasted vs. fed state exercise [11:10] Post-meal exercise benefits [20:10] Low volume interval training [26:27] Interval training and blood glucose [31:29] Energy balance and insulin sensitivity [36:32] Exercise and nutrition interactions [40:11] Practical exercise recommendations [43:56] Key ideas segment (Premium-only) Links Go to episode page (with links to papers) Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course See Sigma's recommended resources

    44 min
See All (625)

Hosts & Guests

4.9
out of 5
250 Ratings

About

Discussions about the science of nutrition, dietetics and health. The podcast that educates through nuanced conversations, exploring evidence and cultivating critical thinking. Hosted by Danny Lennon.

Information

  • Creator
    Danny Lennon
  • Years Active
    2014 - 2026
  • Episodes
    625
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © Sigma Nutrition
  • Show Website
    Sigma Nutrition Radio

You Might Also Like