Frontier AI Labs with Wil Waldon

Hi 👋 I'm Wil Waldon. I build products with Claude and I teach others how to do the same. I've been writing code for 15+ years. Fullstack product engineering, MVPs for early-stage founders, a couple of exits. These days most of my workflow runs through Claude. Claude Code, the API, system prompts, MCP servers. I use all of it daily. This channel is where I break down how I actually use Claude to build and ship work. Not hype. Not demos that fall apart outside a screen recording. PROMPTS --- https://www.skool.com/ai-and-automation-3750/about

  1. 6h ago

    Best AI for Work 2026: Claude vs ChatGPT, Tested

    Both models are good enough that the right question is which one does the specific thing you need better. This episode breaks down where each one wins for actual work. The short version. Claude wins on writing quality, instruction-following, long-document analysis, and agentic work. ChatGPT wins on image generation, voice, custom GPTs, and ecosystem breadth. Where Claude pulls ahead. For anything client-facing, Claude produces prose that needs less editing, with fewer clichés, better structure, and more controllable tone, which is the single most-cited reason people prefer it for memos, reports, and articles. It also holds detailed constraints better, so when you give it specific headings, a voice, and things to avoid, it sticks to them more faithfully. On the coding and analysis side, Claude leads the reasoning benchmarks (91.3% on GPQA Diamond) and holds a slim edge on SWE-bench Verified, and its context window is the most-cited reason developers switch, with the API tier going up to 1M tokens for long codebases, contracts, and book-length documents. Where ChatGPT pulls ahead. Image generation is not close. ChatGPT generates images natively and Claude cannot generate them at all, so if visuals are in your workflow, that decides it. ChatGPT also browses the web in real time, while Claude does not do that natively, and it integrates directly with Word, Excel, Teams, and Outlook through Microsoft Copilot, which matters if your business already runs on Microsoft 365. For high-volume API work, the flagship cost gap is large: a small internal RAG tool running 10M input and 2M output tokens a month runs roughly $300 on Claude Opus versus $55 on GPT, and it scales from there. Pricing. If you're choosing between Claude Pro and ChatGPT Plus, pick on capability, not price, because they both cost about $20 a month. The one real gap is ChatGPT's cheaper $8 Go tier and its more generous free tier. The move most professionals actually make. The common 2026 setup is ChatGPT for ideation, images, and quick questions, and Claude for the serious writing, editing, long-document analysis, and agentic file work. At about $20 each, running both is roughly $40 a month, which is trivial against the time it saves if AI is core to your job. Bottom line for a service business or agency. If your work is mostly writing, client documents, and code, Claude is the stronger daily driver. If you're producing marketing visuals, doing web research, or living in Microsoft 365, ChatGPT earns its seat. Most people find a clear preference within a week of running both on real work. Topics: Claude vs ChatGPT 2026, best AI for work, AI for small business, AI writing tool, AI for consultants and agencies, Claude Code, ChatGPT vs Claude pricing, long context AI, AI coding model, business AI workflow. Best AI for work 2026, Claude vs ChatGPT for business, AI tool for agencies and freelancers, AI writing and coding assistant, running Claude and ChatGPT together.

    34 min
  2. Jun 21

    Building a Million Dollar AI App - Day 1: AI Coaching with OpenAI Vision

    Day 1 of building a million dollar AI app. I'm 20 years into software development and I use AI agents and tools like Lovable to ship faster than I ever could by hand. In this video I walk through the AI coaching feature I just implemented in Stable Manager Pro, an app that helps riding instructors give better feedback to students.The feature uses OpenAI Vision to analyze a photo of a rider on a horse and return real coaching feedback: overall balance score, posture analysis, hip engagement, upper body angle, and specific coaching cues. The output reads like what a real instructor would say after watching a student ride. Two years ago you couldn't build this. Today it's one API call.What's covered:How OpenAI Vision analyzes a rider's posture from a single photoThe coaching output: balance, posture, stirrup position, hip engagement, upper body angleWhy this works for equestrian coaching specificallyHow I'm using OpenAI and Claude together to ideate featuresWhat's coming in v1.1: video upload, FFmpeg frame extraction, multi-frame analysisThe app is stablemanagerpro.com. We're in soft launch and onboarding stable owners, students, and instructors now. Web app first, with iOS and Android coming.This is Day 1 of an ongoing series where I show how I build apps using AI tools instead of hand-coding everything. Subscribe to follow the build. New videos drop as features ship.Stable Manager Pro: https://stablemanagerpro.com#AI #BuildInPublic #OpenAI #Lovable #AIagents #SaaS #AIapp #VibeCoding #equestrian #softwaredevelopment #Claude #AIcoaching

    4 min
4.6
out of 5
32 Ratings

About

Hi 👋 I'm Wil Waldon. I build products with Claude and I teach others how to do the same. I've been writing code for 15+ years. Fullstack product engineering, MVPs for early-stage founders, a couple of exits. These days most of my workflow runs through Claude. Claude Code, the API, system prompts, MCP servers. I use all of it daily. This channel is where I break down how I actually use Claude to build and ship work. Not hype. Not demos that fall apart outside a screen recording. PROMPTS --- https://www.skool.com/ai-and-automation-3750/about

More From Stage Zero

You Might Also Like