#FactsMatter, the Citizens Research Council of Michigan podcast

Citizens Research Council of Michigan

Podcast by Citizens Research Council of Michigan

  1. Aug 26

    SNAP Changes Hit Michigan Families: What the Data Shows — and What the State Can Do Next

    Recent federal changes to SNAP eligibility have already led to an 8% decline in Michigan participation, leaving roughly 100,000 residents without access to food assistance. In this episode of the #FactsMatter podcast, Karley Abramson, Research Council Associate for Health Policy, outlines how the new federal One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) changed SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) eligibility, including the expansion of work requirements, the exclusion of refugees and asylum seekers, and the narrowing of geographic exemptions -- only counties experiencing extremely high unemployment now qualify. The episode also examines how these changes ripple through schools, health systems, and local economies, and what Michigan can do to mitigate the impact. From universal school meals to navigation support and stronger food bank partnerships, the loss of roughly 100,000 participants represents an estimated $300 million reduction in federal food dollars flowing into Michigan’s economy, with ripple effects for families, grocers, and healthcare systems. The conversation also highlights what Michigan can do to soften the blow, including universal school meals, navigation support, stronger food bank partnerships, and broader tools such as the earned income tax credit. Karley underscores that while some losses are unavoidable, Michigan can still act to ensure that every eligible resident receives benefits and that those who fall through the cracks have access to alternative supports.

  2. Aug 20

    Article IX is the poster child for how citizens have distrusted their elected officials…

    #FactsMatter podcast host Guy Gordon and Eric Lupher, president of the Citizens Research Council, take a deep dive into Article IX of the Michigan Constitution, which governs finance and taxation. They explore why Article IX has become a magnet for constitutional amendments over the past 60 years, noting that Michigan voters often turn to constitutional changes because of deep mistrust in the legislature’s ability to manage taxation and spending. The conversation examines several major issues that could resurface if Michigan voters approve a constitutional convention: Flat vs. graduated income tax: Michigan’s constitution mandates a flat rate, but exemptions and credits create de facto progressivity. Lupher explains that other states adjust their tax structures legislatively, whereas Michigan locks its structure into constitutional text. Sales tax limitations: Michigan’s 6% sales tax is constitutionally capped and heavily earmarked, leaving no room for local sales taxes—something many local governments may seek to revisit. State revenue limit: A Headlee-era cap tying state revenues to personal income has become “irrelevant,” Lupher notes, as personal income has stagnated and state revenues have fallen. “We are now $11, close to $12, billion dollars below that revenue limit…” Earmarking: The constitution’s extensive revenue earmarking restricts legislative flexibility, especially during recessions. Lupher recalls that earmarking was a major reason voters approved the 1961–63 constitutional rewrite. Borrowing restrictions: Michigan requires voter approval for certain types of state borrowing, an important safeguard, but one that can limit responsiveness during emergencies or major infrastructure needs. Local government finance constraints: Headlee, Proposal A, and taxable value limits have severely restricted local governments’ ability to raise revenue. Lupher suggests that local governments may be the most motivated constituency for a constitutional convention. Pensions: The constitution’s strong protections for public pensions were intended to ensure that governments kept their promises to workers. Although defined-benefit plans are less common today, these protections remain significant. Throughout the conversation, Lupher emphasizes that Article IX is cluttered with statutory-level detail, often copied directly from older laws. This makes the constitution inflexible and difficult to modernize. “If you're going to start in one place to clean this up… that's it.” The episode closes with a sober reminder: while Article IX may be the strongest argument for a constitutional convention, Michigan’s polarized political climate makes such an undertaking risky and contentious.

  3. Aug 19

    K–12 school enrollment has dropped nearly 25% since 2003. How MI is handling the financial fallout?

    Michigan’s new school budget quietly introduced one of the most consequential changes in years: a built-in mechanism to soften the financial blow to schools from a 25% decline in K–12 enrollment since 2003, with an additional 8% decline projected over the next five years. In this #FactsMatter episode, Guy Gordon and senior Research Director Craig Thiel unpack the drivers of Michigan’s 25% enrollment drop, explain why districts can’t simply “right-size” overnight, and explain how the new three-year averaging formula works. Because Michigan funds schools on a per‑pupil basis, declining enrollment means declining revenue. But districts can’t immediately cut costs—students who leave are spread across grades and buildings, and fixed costs like transportation and facilities don’t shrink proportionally. As Thiel explains, “It’s not that those 50 kids are all in the fifth grade and you can lose two fifth‑grade teachers.” Thiel explains that while the change will cost the state roughly $186 million next year, it represents less than 1% of total K–12 funding — yet it dramatically affects district stability. The catch? These dollars are one-time funds, creating a looming funding cliff unless lawmakers make the policy permanent. With Michigan projected to lose another 8% of students by 2031, this is not a temporary challenge but a structural one. Thiel argues that if declining-enrollment stabilization is to be part of the core funding formula, it needs a dedicated, ongoing funding source—not temporary dollars that disappear and destabilize district budgets.

  4. Aug 5

    How Michigan’s Education System Could Change if a Con-Con is Approved in November

    In this 10th episode of the #FactsMatter Podcast series exploring the issues Michiganders could face if a constitutional convention is approved on November’s ballot, host Guy Gordon and Research Council president Eric Lupher take listeners deep into Article VIII of the Michigan Constitution — the section devoted entirely to education. If voters approve a constitutional convention, Article VIII could face sweeping reconsideration. A Council Report on Article VIII was released last week as part of the Citizens Research Council’s Con-Con series. Guy and Eric unpack the big questions: should Michigan establish education as a fundamental right? What would stronger constitutional language on adequacy, funding floors, or student achievement mean for schools, courts, and taxpayers? How might delegates rethink governance in a system where responsibility is scattered across the legislature, an independent State Board of Education, the governor, and hundreds of local districts? The conversation also explores hot‑button issues likely to resurface, including private school vouchers and Michigan’s long‑standing prohibition on public funding for private education. Eric and Guy examine the political history behind the Blaine Amendment, why other states are moving toward vouchers, and how Michigan’s unique landscape could shape the debate. Higher education governance gets its own spotlight as they revisit the origins — and current dysfunction — of Michigan’s elected university boards at U‑M, MSU, and Wayne State. They contrast Michigan’s model with other states, weigh the risks of politicization, and consider whether a constitutional rewrite could bring stability to the state’s flagship institutions. Community colleges round out the discussion, with a look at fragmented local governance and the missed opportunities for statewide coordination that could better support students moving from K‑12 to two‑year and four‑year programs. This episode is essential listening for anyone trying to understand what’s at stake in a potential constitutional convention — and how decisions about Article VIII could shape Michigan’s educational future for decades to come.

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

Podcast by Citizens Research Council of Michigan

You Might Also Like