The Carlat Psychiatry Podcast

The Carlat Psychiatry Podcast

Clear, engaging, and practical updates on clinical psychiatry. Hosted by Chris Aiken, MD, and Kellie Newsome, PMHNP. Earn CME for listening at www.thecarlatreport.com/podcastcme

  1. 2d ago

    Treating Couples: Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy — Balancing Acceptance and Change Andrew Christensen, PhD

    Dr. Andrew Christensen, distinguished research professor of psychology at UCLA and co-developer of Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT), explains how IBCT balances acceptance and change in treating relationship distress. He walks clinicians through the assessment and feedback process and the DEEP formulation, describes the three core interventions—empathic joining, unified detachment, and practical problem-solving—and discusses treatment length, termination, and training resources. Published On: October 19, 2026 Duration: 44 mins 19 seconds Learning ObjectivesAfter completing this educational activity, participants should be able to: · Describe the core principles of Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy and explain how acceptance-focused and change-focused interventions are integrated in treating relationship distress. · Distinguish rule-governed change from contingency-shaped change and explain how in-session emotional experiences can facilitate more constructive couple interactions. · Identify the components of the IBCT DEEP formulation—differences, emotional sensitivities, external circumstances, and patterns of interaction—and describe their role in assessment and treatment planning. · Describe how empathic joining, unified detachment, and practical discussions are used to help couples address emotionally significant conflicts more constructively. Topics Covered in This Interview·      The distinctive challenges and advantages of conjoint couple therapy ·      How IBCT developed from traditional behavioral couple therapy ·      Integrating acceptance and change in relationship treatment ·      Why behavioral assignments and communication skills may not produce enduring change ·      How partners’ differences can be sources of both attraction and conflict ·      Rule-governed behavior versus contingency-shaped change ·      Facilitating spontaneous change through emotionally meaningful in-session interactions ·      How therapists decide when to emphasize acceptance or direct change ·      The IBCT assessment sequence: conjoint interview, individual sessions, and feedback ·      Assessing intimate partner violence, commitment, and competing relationships ·      The DEEP formulation: differences, emotional sensitivities, external circumstances, and patterns of interaction ·      Identifying recurring conflict cycles and developing a shared, less blame-focused understanding ·      Collaboratively setting the agenda for active treatment sessions ·      Empathic joining and the development of compassionate conversations ·      Unified detachment and examining patterns of conflict together ·      Practical discussions and preparing for challenging situations ·      Experiential learning versus direct instruction in couple therapy ·      Treatment duration, outcomes, termination, and follow-up sessions ·      IBCT training opportunities and the OurRelationship online program

  2. Oct 5

    Treating BPD Series, Episode 4: Mentalization-Based Treatment—From Reacting to Reflecting with Carla Sharp, PhD

    Dr. Carla Sharp is a leading expert in Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT), developmental psychopathology, and the treatment of personality disorders. She is the John and Rebecca Moores Professor of Clinical Psychology at the University of Houston, where she serves as Associate Dean for Faculty and Research and directs the Developmental Psychopathology Lab and the Adolescent Diagnosis, Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment Center. A prolific scholar with more than 380 peer-reviewed publications and eight books, she has made substantial contributions to the development and dissemination of mentalization-based approaches and is a certified supervisor and licensed trainer in MBT for both adults and adolescents. In this episode, Dr. Sharp offers a comprehensive introduction to MBT as a treatment for BPD — from what mentalizing is and how it develops through early “serve-and-return” interactions, to how disruptions in this capacity contribute to the difficulties characteristic of BPD. She takes clinicians inside an MBT session, explaining experience-near exploration, empathic validation, affect elaboration, and the mentalizing loop. She also unpacks the three pre-mentalizing modes — psychic equivalence, teleological mode, and pretend mode — and discusses the therapist’s use of self, the importance of maintaining a curious “not-knowing” stance, and how clinicians can recognize when a patient’s capacity to mentalize is strengthening. Learning Objectives After completing this educational activity, participants should be able to: Define mentalizing and explain how disruptions in its development and functioning contribute to borderline personality disorder.Describe how MBT uses experience-near exploration, empathic validation, and the mentalizing loop to strengthen a patient’s capacity to reflect on the mental states of self and others.Identify the three pre-mentalizing modes — psychic equivalence, teleological mode, and pretend mode — and recognize when mentalizing has broken down in a clinical interaction.Apply the MBT mentalizing stance, including curiosity, uncertainty, and therapist use of self, to support reflective functioning in patients with borderline personality disorder. Topics Covered in This Interview What mentalizing is and its role in psychological functioningHow mentalizing develops throgh early “serve-and-return” interactionsMentalizing difficulties in borderline personality disorderStrengthening mentalizing as the core treatment target of MBTWhat an MBT session looks like in practiceExperience-near exploration and the mentalizing loopEmpathic validation and managing emotional arousalAffect elaboration and working with underlying emotional experienceMentalizing relationships with others and with oneselfHow patients and therapists determine the focus of an MBT sessionThe three pre-mentalizing modes: psychic equivalence, teleological mode, and pretend modeRecognizing when mentalizing has gone offlineThe therapist’s use of self in MBTThe mentalizing stance: curiosity, uncertainty, and “not knowing”Recognizing progress and the generalization of mentalizing outside therapy

  3. Aug 31

    CBT-I: The First-Line Treatment for Chronic Insomnia with Dr. Donn Posner (Part 2 of 2)

    Dr. Donn Posner is a leading expert in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I), founder and president of Sleepwell Consultants, and an adjunct clinical associate professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Stanford University School of Medicine. He is co-author of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia: A Session-by-Session Guide, and he has trained and consulted with clinicians nationally and internationally across nearly four decades of clinical practice.  In this second of two episodes, the conversation turns from what CBT-I is to how clinicians actually learn and deliver it. Dr. Posner reviews the available training pathways and what proficiency really requires, and explains why sleep hygiene — the advice most patients have already heard many times over — does not treat chronic insomnia, even though it has a place later in the work. He identifies the high-yield principles any clinician can apply immediately, including a fixed morning wake time, early light exposure, and getting out of bed when not sleeping. He then examines sleep effort as a perpetuating factor and CBT-I as fundamentally a therapy of acceptance, describing how he prepares patients for a treatment that will make them feel worse before it makes them better, and how cognitive work addresses the fear and resistance that follow. He closes with what clinicians should expect from a course of treatment — typical length and spacing, responder and remitter outcomes, and the durability of gains — along with how he handles sleep medication and why guidelines place CBT-I ahead of hypnotics. Learning Objectives After completing this educational activity, participants should be able to: Explain why sleep hygiene is ineffective as a monotherapy for chronic insomnia, and describe the more limited role it plays within a full course of CBT-I.Identify high-yield behavioral sleep medicine principles — including a fixed morning wake time, early light exposure, and getting out of bed when not sleeping — that clinicians can apply before completing formal CBT-I training.Describe sleep effort as a perpetuating factor, and summarize how the cognitive and acceptance-based components of CBT-I address the dysfunctional beliefs and resistance that arise during treatment.Summarize the expected course and outcomes of CBT-I (including typical session number and spacing, responder and remitter outcomes, and durability of gains) and explain why guidelines position CBT-I ahead of hypnotic medication. Topics Covered in This Interview Pathways to training in CBT-I and behavioral sleep medicineBoard certification in behavioral sleep medicineWhy sleep hygiene alone does not treat chronic insomnia: the dental hygiene analogyWhere sleep hygiene does belong within CBT-IAvailable CBT-I training programs and online optionsHow clinicians become proficient: consultation, community, and case experienceHigh-yield behavioral sleep principles any clinician can applySleep regularity, fixed wake times, and morning light exposureWhy getting out of bed is the hardest intervention for patients to acceptSleep effort as a perpetuating factorWhat good sleepers do — and do not do — to fall asleepCBT-I as a therapy of acceptancePreparing patients for the work: “I'm going to make you worse before I make you better”The cognitive component: uncovering and debunking dysfunctional beliefsCommon patterns of resistance, and exposure as the remedyTypical treatment length, session spacing, and pacingResponders versus remitters, and what the outcome data showDurability of gains and the role of sleep self-efficacyManaging and tapering sleep medication alongside CBT-IWhy guidelines position CBT-I ahead of hypnotic medication

4.7
out of 5
534 Ratings

About

Clear, engaging, and practical updates on clinical psychiatry. Hosted by Chris Aiken, MD, and Kellie Newsome, PMHNP. Earn CME for listening at www.thecarlatreport.com/podcastcme

You Might Also Like