The Sports Docs Podcast

SportsDocsPod
  • 4.9 (29)
  • Medicine
  • Biweekly

Sports medicine is a constantly evolving field, with hundreds of new articles published each month on the topic. This ever-growing wealth of information can make it challenging to stay updated on the newest approaches and techniques, and to know which data should actually change your practice. Join orthopedic surgeons, Dr. Catherine Logan and Dr. Ashley Bassett, as they chat about the most recent developments in sports medicine and dissect through all the noise. On each episode of The Sports Docs podcast, the hosts will tackle a specific injury – from ACL tears to shoulder instability – and review the top research from various high-impact journals that month, including The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Sports Health, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and more. The Sports Docs will also be joined by experts in the field of sports medicine – orthopedic surgeons, nonoperative sports medicine specialists, athletes, physical therapists, athletic trainers and others – to provide a fresh and well-rounded perspective based on their unique experiences. The Sports Docs – Dr. Logan & Dr. Bassett – are friends & former co-residents from the Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, who went onto esteemed sports medicine fellowships at The Steadman Clinic and The Rothman Institute, respectively. Dr. Logan practices in Denver, CO, and serves as Team Physician for Men's USA Lacrosse & as a Team Physician for U.S. Ski & Snowboard. Dr. Bassett is the director of the Women’s Sports Medicine Center at the Orthopedic Institute of New Jersey and practices across northern NJ, primarily in Morris and Sussex Counties. Together, they will bring monthly conversations on how to care for athletes of all ages and levels of play, with a healthy mix of cutting-edge science and real-world application. 

  1. 5d ago

    202: ATSD: Can Extension Recovery After ACL Reconstruction Impact Arthritis Risk?

    #AskTheSportsDocs: Can Extension Recovery After ACL Reconstruction Impact Arthritis Risk? **Does getting your knee straight after ACL reconstruction matter for more than just your immediate recovery? Could those missing few degrees of extension actually impact your cartilage health years down the road?** In this episode of *Ask The Sports Docs*, Dr. Ashley Bassett and Dr. Catherine Logan explore new research published in the September 2026 issue of the *American Journal of Sports Medicine* examining the relationship between early knee extension deficits after ACL reconstruction and changes in cartilage composition. We know that restoring full knee extension is essential for normal gait mechanics, quadriceps activation, and functional recovery. But this study suggests that early extension loss may also be associated with measurable changes in knee cartilage long before traditional imaging reveals osteoarthritis. The researchers followed 30 young patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, measuring knee extension at two months and evaluating cartilage health using quantitative T2 MRI mapping at six months. Patients with an extension deficit greater than 3 degrees demonstrated significantly greater increases in cartilage T2 relaxation times in specific regions of the medial femoral condyle, potentially signaling early cartilage matrix changes. **In this episode, we discuss:** - Why restoring full knee extension, including a patient's natural hyperextension, should be an early priority after ACL reconstruction. - The relationship between extension deficits, altered knee biomechanics, the screw-home mechanism, and joint loading. - How quantitative T2 MRI mapping can identify subtle cartilage compositional changes before structural degeneration becomes apparent. - The study's key findings, including greater increases in medial femoral cartilage T2 relaxation times among patients with early extension deficits. - Why persistent extension loss deserves early attention and how to distinguish rehabilitation-related limitations from mechanical problems such as cyclops lesions. - The potential implications for posttraumatic osteoarthritis prevention and long-term joint preservation. - Why these findings demonstrate an association, not causation, and what future research is needed to determine whether restoring extension can reduce arthritis risk. **Our biggest takeaway?** Full knee extension isn't just about getting back to walking normally or returning to sports. It may also be an important piece of protecting long-term joint health. Although this study does not establish that extension loss causes osteoarthritis, it reinforces the importance of early identification, careful measurement, and collaborative rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. **Article discussed:** *Association of Early Knee Extension Range of Motion Deficits With Cartilage T2 Relaxation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.* *American Journal of Sports Medicine*, September 2026. Have a sports medicine question you'd like us to tackle? Send it to thesportsdocspod@gmail.com or connect with us on Instagram @thesportsdocspod Subscribe to *The Sports Docs Podcast* on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or YouTube for more evidence-based conversations about sports medicine, injury prevention, surgical techniques, and return to sport.

  2. Nov 2

    201: Dr. Jorge Chahla and Dr. Robert Parisien: Hips Don’t Lie: How to Tackle Dysplasia (REBOOT-LIVE at AOSSM)

    Today’s episode is going to focus on addressing hip pathology in the setting of dysplasia — soft tissue management alone or with a periacetabular osteotomy. We are joined today by two outstanding guests!  Dr. Jorge Chahla is an Associate Professor of orthopedic surgery at Rush University Medical Center and serves as the Director of Biomechanical Research and Director of the International Fellowship Program at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush. He is a team physician for the Chicago White Sox, Chicago Bulls and The Joffrey Ballet. Dr. Robert Parisien is an Associate Professor of orthopedic surgery at Mount Sinai Orthopedics and is a team physician for US Ski and Snowboard and USA Fencing. He has published extensively on the topic of hip preservation and received numerous research awards over the years, so we are very excited to hear his take on this topic! So, without further ado, let’s get to the Exhibit Hall!

  3. Oct 26

    200: ATSD: Should Kneecap Arthritis Stop Me From Having a Meniscus Root Repair?

    Does advanced cartilage damage behind the kneecap mean a medial meniscus root repair is destined to fail? Or can patients still benefit from surgery despite existing patellofemoral arthritis? In this episode of Ask The Sports Docs, Dr. Ashley Bassett and Dr. Catherine Logan tackle an important question in knee preservation surgery: Should advanced patellofemoral chondrosis influence our decision to repair a medial meniscus posterior root tear? We're reviewing a new study published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine, titled “The Association of Advanced Patellofemoral Chondrosis With Outcomes After Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Repair.” Medial meniscus posterior root tears can dramatically alter knee biomechanics, increasing joint contact pressures and accelerating cartilage degeneration. While advanced medial compartment arthritis is a well-recognized consideration when selecting patients for root repair, the implications of cartilage damage in the patellofemoral compartment are less clear. The authors evaluated 115 patients undergoing medial meniscus root repair, comparing those with advanced patellofemoral chondrosis (Outerbridge grades 3–4) to those with minimal or mild cartilage changes (grades 0–2). The headline finding?  Patients with advanced patellofemoral chondrosis had a significantly higher rate of conversion to knee arthroplasty: 14.9% versus 2.1%. However, meniscal retear rates, revision surgery rates, and patient-reported outcomes among patients without subsequent surgical failure were not significantly different between groups. So, does kneecap arthritis mean we should abandon root repair? Not necessarily. In this episode, we discuss: Why medial meniscus posterior root tears can have biomechanical consequences similar to a total meniscectomy.How to recognize and diagnose root tears, including key MRI findings and the importance of weightbearing radiographs.Which patient characteristics influence our decision to recommend meniscus root repair versus nonoperative treatment or arthroplasty.Why advanced patellofemoral cartilage damage may be associated with a greater likelihood of future knee replacement.The difference between structural failure of a meniscus repair and failure to achieve long-term joint preservation.Why similar patient-reported outcomes don't necessarily tell the whole story when patients undergoing revision surgery or arthroplasty are excluded from the analysis.How patellofemoral cartilage status should influence preoperative counseling, surgical expectations, and shared decision-making.Our clinical takeaway: Advanced patellofemoral chondrosis should not automatically disqualify a patient from medial meniscus root repair. Patients with preserved tibiofemoral cartilage and appropriate alignment may still experience meaningful improvements in pain and function. However, existing cartilage damage behind the kneecap may signal a greater risk of future joint degeneration and arthroplasty. The goal of meniscus root repair is to restore function and preserve the joint, but successful repair does not guarantee protection against progressive arthritis. Tune in to hear how we're interpreting these findings and whether this new evidence will change our approach to patient selection and surgical counseling. Article Discussed: The Association of Advanced Patellofemoral Chondrosis With Outcomes After Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Repair. American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM), 2026. Connect with The Sports Docs! Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can also watch our episodes on YouTube! Follow us on Instagram: @thesportsdocspod Email: thesportsdocspod@gmail.com If you enjoy the show, please subscribe, leave a review, and share the episode with a colleague!

  4. Oct 19

    199: Overtime – Cuff Repair and the Biceps: To Kill or Not to Kill?

    Overtime – Cuff Repair and the Biceps: To Kill or Not to Kill?The Sports Docs Podcast | Overtime Are you a biceps killer? Or do you prefer to leave a normal-appearing biceps tendon alone during rotator cuff repair? In this episode of Overtime with The Sports Docs, Dr. Ashley Bassett and Dr. Catherine Logan tackle one of the longstanding debates in shoulder surgery: Should surgeons routinely release the long head of the biceps tendon during rotator cuff repair, even when the tendon appears completely normal? We review a prospective, multicenter randomized clinical trial published in the May 2025 issue of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS) titled “Preservation Versus Release of Normal Long Head of Biceps Tendon in Repair of Isolated Stage-1 Supraspinatus Tears.” Conducted across 13 centers in France, this study compared biceps preservation with biceps release (tenotomy or tenodesis) in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of isolated, minimally retracted supraspinatus tears. Key Findings Better functional outcomes with biceps release: At two years, patients undergoing biceps release demonstrated significantly higher Constant-Murley scores (86.8 vs. 82.9) and improved ASES scores compared with those undergoing preservation.Higher rates of clinically meaningful improvement: 97% of patients in the release group achieved the minimal clinically important difference in Constant score, compared with 88% in the preservation group.Fewer functional failures: Only 3% of patients undergoing biceps release had a Constant score below 70, compared with 15% in the preservation group.Fewer reoperations: Four patients in the preservation group required subsequent surgery to address symptomatic biceps pathology, compared with zero in the release group.Similar rotator cuff healing rates: Ultrasound demonstrated comparable cuff healing between groups, suggesting the functional differences were not attributable to improved tendon healing.The tradeoff? Popeye deformity: Biceps release was associated with a higher incidence of cosmetic deformity.Tenotomy versus tenodesis: Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant differences in functional outcomes between the two release techniques.What Does This Mean for Clinical Practice? Does this study justify routinely performing a biceps procedure during rotator cuff repair, even when the tendon looks healthy? Ashley and Catherine discuss the implications of these findings, including the possibility of occult biceps degeneration, the clinical significance of relatively modest differences in outcome scores, and whether prophylactic biceps treatment may reduce persistent symptoms and future surgery. They also explore why shared decision-making remains essential, particularly for younger athletes, manual laborers, and patients concerned about cosmetic deformity, cramping, or postoperative strength. Our Takeaway This study provides compelling evidence that releasing a normal-appearing long head of the biceps tendon during repair of an isolated stage-1 supraspinatus tear may improve functional outcomes and reduce subsequent biceps-related surgery. However, statistically significant differences do not always translate into substantial clinical improvements for every patient. Individual patient goals, activity demands, cosmetic concerns, and surgeon experience should continue to guide treatment decisions. The bottom line: A normal-looking biceps tendon may not always be a normal-functioning biceps tendon. This study adds important evidence to the ongoing debate over preservation versus release during rotator cuff repair. Article Discussed Preservation Versus Release of Normal Long Head of Biceps Tendon in Repair of Isolated Stage-1 Supraspinatus Tears. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS), May 2025. Stay Connected with The Sports Docs Podcast Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can also watch our episodes on YouTube! Follow us on Instagram: @thesportsdocspod Email: thesportsdocspod@gmail.com Website: www.thesportsdocspod.com If you enjoy the podcast, please subscribe, leave a review, and share the episode with a colleague!

  5. Oct 12

    198: Dr. Kenneth Hunt - Modern Management of Ankle Instability (Part II)

    In Part II of our conversation with Dr. Ken Hunt, orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon at the University of Colorado, we explore two important diagnoses that can complicate ankle injuries: syndesmotic injuries (high ankle sprains) and osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). This episode of The Sports Docs Podcast is brought to you by BraceLab. Whether you are recovering from an injury, managing everyday discomfort, or just trying to stay active and move confidently, BraceLab has you covered with high-quality, innovative support solutions.  We’ll tell you a bit more about how they are changing the game for ankle instability later in the show, but for now, you can learn more at BraceLab.com. For free samples, email samples@bracelab.com and mention The Sports Docs. We begin with the anatomy and biomechanics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, highlighting how high ankle sprains differ from traditional lateral ankle sprains in their mechanism, clinical presentation, and recovery. Dr. Hunt discusses the importance of distinguishing syndesmotic ligament injury from true mechanical instability, the role of physical examination and advanced imaging, and when surgical stabilization is indicated. We then review the evolution of syndesmotic fixation, including the transition from traditional screw fixation toward dynamic suture-button constructs such as TightRope. We discuss the evidence supporting suture-button fixation, including improved functional outcomes, lower rates of implant removal, and reduced malreduction rates in some comparative studies. Next, we shift our focus to osteochondral lesions of the talus, an important consideration in athletes with persistent deep ankle pain, swelling, or mechanical symptoms following an ankle sprain. Dr. Hunt shares his approach to diagnosis, including the complementary roles of MRI and CT, and explains how lesion stability, size, location, subchondral bone involvement, and prior treatment influence management. We explore the expanding surgical treatment options for talar cartilage injuries, from arthroscopic debridement and bone marrow stimulation to osteochondral grafting and emerging cartilage restoration techniques. Dr. Hunt also discusses how he approaches return-to-play decisions and the importance of evaluating more than symptom resolution alone. Topics covered include: High versus low ankle sprains: anatomy, mechanism, and recoveryDiagnosing syndesmotic instability with physical examination, radiographs, MRI, and weight-bearing imagingIndications for operative versus nonoperative management of syndesmotic injuriesSyndesmotic screw fixation versus dynamic suture-button stabilizationRecognizing osteochondral lesions after ankle sprainsMRI and CT findings that guide talar cartilage treatmentNonoperative management of stable osteochondral lesionsArthroscopic versus open approaches to talar cartilage restorationBone marrow stimulation, osteochondral grafting, and emerging cartilage repair techniquesReturn-to-play considerations following ankle injury and surgeryClinical takeaway: An ankle sprain is not a single diagnosis. Successful treatment depends on identifying the injured structures, determining whether mechanical instability or cartilage damage is present, and selecting a treatment strategy that addresses the athlete's pathology and functional demands. Join Drs. Ashley Bassett and Catherine Logan for the second half of this evidence-based discussion on modern ankle injury management. Listen to Part I for our discussion of acute lateral ankle sprains, chronic lateral ankle instability, and contemporary ligament treatment strategies. Find the research articles discussed in this episode and more from The Sports Docs Podcast at www.thesportsdocspod.com.

  6. Oct 9

    197: Dr. Kenneth Hunt - Modern Management of Ankle Instability (Part I)

    This video is about Ken HuntOn today’s episode of The Sports Docs Podcast, we’re joined by Dr. Kenneth Hunt, Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Chief of Foot and Ankle Surgery at the University of Colorado, Director of the UCHealth Foot and Ankle Center, and team physician for University of Colorado Athletics and the Denver Nuggets. This episode of The Sports Docs Podcast is brought to you by BraceLab. Whether you are recovering from an injury, managing everyday discomfort, or just trying to stay active and move confidently, BraceLab has you covered with high-quality, innovative support solutions.  We’ll tell you a bit more about how they are changing the game for ankle instability later in the show, but for now, you can learn more at BraceLab.com. For free samples, email samples@bracelab.com and mention The Sports Docs. In Part I, we take a comprehensive look at lateral ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. We discuss how to evaluate the athlete with an acute ankle injury, red flags that should prompt consideration of associated pathology, and when advanced imaging is warranted. Dr. Hunt walks us through his approach to early treatment, including the role of bracing, progressive weight bearing, and rehabilitation. We discuss what makes an effective ankle brace, when athletes should continue bracing after returning to sport, and why bracing should complement—not replace—proprioceptive and neuromuscular training. We also review the factors that may predict progression from a first-time ankle sprain to chronic ankle instability, including impaired jumping and landing ability and persistent deficits in dynamic balance. The conversation then shifts to management of chronic instability. Dr. Hunt explains when persistent instability becomes a surgical problem and how the Broström procedure has evolved from traditional anatomic repair to modern techniques incorporating arthroscopy, contemporary anchor technology, and, in selected patients, internal brace augmentation. We discuss: Evaluation of the acute lateral ankle sprainRed flags for associated ankle pathologyWhen to obtain MRI or other advanced imagingBracing during acute recovery and return to sportProprioception, balance, and neuromuscular rehabilitationRisk factors for chronic ankle instabilityReturn-to-play considerations and the PAASS frameworkIndications for surgery in chronic lateral ankle instabilityModern Broström repairInternal brace augmentation: who may benefit and whether every Broström needs itPart II: High Ankle Sprains & Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus In Part II, we will continue our conversation with Dr. Hunt and turn our attention to syndesmotic—or “high”—ankle sprains and osteochondral lesions of the talus. We examine the evolving management of syndesmotic injuries, including evidence comparing suture-button fixation with traditional syndesmotic screws. We discuss the potential advantages of dynamic fixation, including improved functional outcomes, fewer implant-related complications and hardware removals, and lower rates of malreduction. Finally, we tackle osteochondral lesions of the talus, reviewing diagnosis and treatment options ranging from nonoperative management to microfracture, cartilage and bone grafting, and newer cartilage-restoration strategies. Articles Discussed Recovery From a First-Time Lateral Ankle Sprain and the Predictors of Chronic Ankle Instability American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2016 Brace for Impact: A Retrospective Analysis of the Modified Broström-Gould Procedure With and Without Internal Brace Augmentation Cureus, 2023 Suture Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw for Syndesmosis Injuries: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2019 Evaluation and Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Cartilage, 2017 Modified Broström vs Suture Tape Augmentation: A Systematic Review Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2025 Internal Brace Augmentation Versus Modified Broström-Gould Procedure for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional and Radiographic Outcomes Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2026 Subscribe to The Sports Docs Podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, and YouTube. You can also find us on Instagram @thesportsdocspod or reach us at thesportsdocspod@gmail.com. www.cloganmd.com www.cosportsmedicine.com / https://orthopedicnj.com/physicians/ashley-bassett

  7. Sep 28

    196: Adding the LET: Does Graft Protection Come at a Cost?

    On today’s episode of The Sports Docs Podcast, we’re discussing the 2026 Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine article, “The Impact of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis on Knee Range of Motion After Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction,” by Hamad and colleagues from UCLA. The use of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) alongside ACL reconstruction continues to increase, particularly in young athletes at high risk for reinjury. While growing evidence suggests that LET can improve rotational stability and reduce ACL graft failure, questions remain about whether adding an extra-articular restraint may increase the risk of postoperative stiffness. In this retrospective cohort study, the authors evaluated 412 pediatric ACL reconstructions, including 167 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with LET. The primary outcome was restricted range of motion at three months, defined as a ≥5° extension deficit or ≥15° flexion deficit compared with the contralateral knee. We discuss several key findings: Restricted range of motion at three months occurred in 16.8% of ACLR + LET patients compared with 10.2% following isolated ACL reconstruction.After adjustment for patient and surgical factors, LET was associated with approximately twice the odds of restricted postoperative motion.Female sex was the strongest predictor identified, with more than four times the odds of restricted motion.Most motion deficits involved flexion rather than extension.Although most patients with early motion loss did not require another procedure, 4.2% of the LET group underwent manipulation under anesthesia and/or lysis of adhesions compared with 0.4% of the isolated ACL group.We also discuss why these findings should not discourage surgeons from performing LET in appropriately selected athletes.  Instead, the study highlights a potential trade-off between graft protection and early postoperative motion, reinforcing the importance of appropriate patient selection, careful LET positioning and tensioning, early restoration of knee motion, and close postoperative surveillance. Finally, we review the limitations of this retrospective study and discuss how evolving LET indications, graft selection, fixation techniques, rehabilitation adherence, and surgical technique may influence these findings. The takeaway: LET provides meaningful protection for the ACL graft in young, high-risk athletes—but surgeons and rehabilitation teams should remain vigilant about restoring motion and identifying patients who begin to fall behind early in recovery. Article Hamad et al. The Impact of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis on Knee Range of Motion After Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. Thanks for listening to The Sports Docs Podcast! Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, and YouTube to stay up to date on the latest developments in sports medicine. If you enjoy the podcast, please consider leaving us a review or comment. Email: thesportsdocspod@gmail.com Instagram: @thesportsdocspod

  8. Sep 21

    195: From the OR to the Octagon (Part 2): Cub Swanson’s Endoscopic Spine Journey with Guests Cub Swanson and Dr. Sohrab Gollogly

    In this special Athlete Highlight episode, we are back with Cub Swanson & Dr. Sohrab Gollogly - bringing together two sides of the surgical experience: the athlete who underwent surgery and the surgeon who performed it. Professional mixed martial artist and UFC Hall of Famer Cub Swanson joins his surgeon, orthopedic spine specialist Dr. Sohrab Gollogly, for a conversation about endoscopic spine surgery—from the athlete’s perspective and the surgeon’s point of view. In This Episode: Part Two In the next episode, we’ll continue the discussion and shift our focus to postoperative recovery and return to play following endoscopic spine surgery. What does recovery look like for a professional fighter? When can an athlete begin training again? And what does it take to get back to the highest level of competition? Meet Our Guests Cub Swanson Cub Swanson is a veteran professional mixed martial artist and one of the most respected featherweights of his generation. Swanson turned professional in 2004 and became a standout in the WEC before making his UFC debut in 2011. Known for his exciting and aggressive fighting style, he has faced many of the biggest names in MMA and has built a professional career spanning more than two decades. He was inducted into the UFC Hall of Fame’s Fight Wing in 2022. Outside the Octagon, Cub is a father of three and is passionate about mentoring the next generation of fighters and giving back to the sport that helped transform his life. Dr. Sohrab Gollogly Dr. Sohrab Gollogly is a fellowship-trained, board-certified orthopedic spine surgeon with more than 20 years of experience treating spinal disorders. Based in Monterey, California, Dr. Gollogly specializes in minimally invasive and endoscopic spine surgery, with particular interests in motion preservation and avoiding unnecessary fusion surgery. He completed his medical training at the University of Washington, orthopedic surgery residency at the University of Utah, and advanced fellowship training in adult spine surgery in Lyon, France, as well as pediatric spine surgery in San Diego. Dr. Gollogly is also a founding member of the EndoSpine Academy at Balgrist University Hospital in Zurich, where he is involved in surgeon education and the advancement of endoscopic spine techniques. Why This Conversation Matters Endoscopic spine surgery continues to evolve, and for athletes, the potential advantages of minimally invasive approaches extend beyond the operating room. For a professional fighter, the goals may include more than relieving pain or treating a structural problem. Motion, strength, function, recovery time, and the ability to return to a high-demand sport all matter. By hearing directly from both the athlete and surgeon, this episode explores what happens when those goals intersect—and what the decision-making process looks like when the stakes are a professional career. The Sports Docs Podcast Hosted by Dr. Ashley Bassett and Dr. Catherine Logan Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, and YouTube to stay up to date on the latest in sports medicine. If you enjoy the podcast, please consider leaving us a review or comment—it helps other sports medicine professionals and athletes find the show. Have feedback or a topic you'd like us to cover? Email: thesportsdocspod@gmail.com Instagram: @thesportsdocspod

See All (202)

4.9
out of 5
29 Ratings

About

Sports medicine is a constantly evolving field, with hundreds of new articles published each month on the topic. This ever-growing wealth of information can make it challenging to stay updated on the newest approaches and techniques, and to know which data should actually change your practice. Join orthopedic surgeons, Dr. Catherine Logan and Dr. Ashley Bassett, as they chat about the most recent developments in sports medicine and dissect through all the noise. On each episode of The Sports Docs podcast, the hosts will tackle a specific injury – from ACL tears to shoulder instability – and review the top research from various high-impact journals that month, including The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Sports Health, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and more. The Sports Docs will also be joined by experts in the field of sports medicine – orthopedic surgeons, nonoperative sports medicine specialists, athletes, physical therapists, athletic trainers and others – to provide a fresh and well-rounded perspective based on their unique experiences. The Sports Docs – Dr. Logan & Dr. Bassett – are friends & former co-residents from the Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, who went onto esteemed sports medicine fellowships at The Steadman Clinic and The Rothman Institute, respectively. Dr. Logan practices in Denver, CO, and serves as Team Physician for Men's USA Lacrosse & as a Team Physician for U.S. Ski & Snowboard. Dr. Bassett is the director of the Women’s Sports Medicine Center at the Orthopedic Institute of New Jersey and practices across northern NJ, primarily in Morris and Sussex Counties. Together, they will bring monthly conversations on how to care for athletes of all ages and levels of play, with a healthy mix of cutting-edge science and real-world application. 

Information

  • Creator
    SportsDocsPod
  • Years Active
    2021 - 2026
  • Episodes
    202
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2026 The Sports Docs Podcast
  • Show Website
    The Sports Docs Podcast

You Might Also Like