Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Based Camp is a podcast focused on how humans process the world around them and the future of our species. That means we go into everything from human sexuality, to weird sub-cultures, dating markets, philosophy, and politics. Malcolm and Simone are a husband wife team of a neuroscientist and marketer turned entrepreneurs and authors. With graduate degrees from Stanford and Cambridge under their belts as well as five bestselling books, one of which topped out the WSJs nonfiction list, they are widely known (if infamous) intellectuals / provocateurs. If you want to dig into their ideas further or check citations on points they bring up check out their book series. Note: They all sell for a dollar or so and the money made from them goes to charity. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG basedcamppodcast.substack.com

  1. The Ubermensch For Manic Pixie Dream Girls: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

    22H AGO

    The Ubermensch For Manic Pixie Dream Girls: Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

    In this raw, no-holds-barred episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins dissect how Abraham Maslow repackaged Nietzsche’s Übermensch (Übermensch) into the modern, feel-good concept of “self-actualization” at the top of his Hierarchy of Needs—turning a call for radical self-ownership and moral creation into an elitist, therapy-gated path of perpetual vague self-improvement, peak experiences, and manic-pixie-dream-girl aesthetics. We explore why the original Übermensch demands you build your own moral framework (independent of society, culture, or ancestors), reject herd morality, and embrace responsibility—while Maslow’s version lets the wealthy progressive elite pat themselves on the back without real introspection. Bonus rants on: the pyramid of sin (Maslow’s hierarchy normalizing indulgence), why strong-willed people are the true “inclusive” ones, Star Wars force analogies gone wrong, and why self-ownership beats self-acceptance every time. If you’ve ever felt gaslit by positive psychology, therapy culture, or the urban monoculture—this episode is for you. Check out our book The Pragmatist’s Guide to Life (free ebook + audiobook for subscribers) for tools to build your own value system. Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] He basically tried to combine the Uber minch with the aesthetics of the manic pixie dream girl. oh, I like to listen to the songs in my head. I’m sorry, I paid the cab driver in buttons. When did you first suspect you were dating a manic, pixie dream girl? On her first date and. She said she wanted pancakes for dinner, but I felt alive. But then after a few months, and she can’t feed herself, she can’t pay bills. She just wonders at the marvel. Every moment, we got married in a bouncy castle. Do you think it’s possible to ever be truly. In the moment, the Native Americans believe everything is alive.. I told him the best place to see. The night sky is laying in the middle of the street. It’s the flattest place there. She does seem happy. Happy as she can be, I suppose. Malcolm Collins: Maslow flips this. Self-actualization is achievable through [00:01:00] education, therapy, supportive environments and personal effort. Not a heroic struggle alone. . So no. What is actually said here, it’s saying, the Uber minch is elitist because to become an Uber minch, an individual has to overcome suffering.. Who has the potential to be self-actualize if self-actualization requires the fulfillment of all of the lower states of the hierarchy of needs? Only the elite and the fun thing about Laslo system. It is a system that makes everyone who is wealthy and sees a therapist think that they’re already at the top of it, and it explains to the rich progressive, who doesn’t want to think about why the poor have different world frameworks than them. Mm-hmm. It helps them not think about it. Would you like to know more? Malcolm Collins: Hello Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are gonna be [00:02:00] talking about the links between the Uber Minch as developed and defined by niche and the rebranding of the term self-actualization into its modern definition, which was done by Abraham Maslow of Maslow Hierarchy of Needs Face. And you’re Simone Collins: referring, you’re referring to Nietzsche. He’s just gonna call him Niche. Go with it guys. Malcolm Collins: It, I don’t, Frederick Niet words have no place on this American tongue. Okay. They, they would dirty my mouth. Anyway, we have another episode. If you want to understand how Maslow rebranded the term self-actualization and how his rebranding was so toxic and largely destroyed the field of psychology and is the seedbed of the urban monoculture. That is not what we’re gonna be focusing on in this episode. What we’re gonna be focusing on in this episode is, Maslow was pretty explicit in this, in some of his works. Self-actualization was a rebranding, an [00:03:00] explicit rebranding of the concept of the Uber Mitch, but it was rebranded to be palatable to a broadly progressive urban monoculture cultural perspective. And through the rebranding, in a way, it became an inversion of itself. I think he thought he was just making little tweaks to it and not realizing that he was actually retooling the core of what it meant. Now, broadly speaking, I’m gonna go over what these two mean. And then we’re gonna go over how they contrast with each other in understanding and what we as individuals can take away from this contrast to understand how we can live meaningful lives. So Simone Collins: it is so crazy. Can you imagine when they first introduced this to you, like in your college psychology class, they’re like, oh, yeah, like there’s high Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and at the top it’s, it’s basically nietzche iss, [00:04:00] Uber mench. But let’s not talk about that. I’m not gonna, no, let’s not talk about that. Malcolm Collins: The good thing about Nietzsche’s Uber mech, one of, one of the best things that contrast it was a hierarchy of needs and, and self-actualization is that the definition when you boil it down is actually pretty clear. And it’s, it’s, it’s not like vague, just a bunch of positive things. Simone Collins: Okay. Malcolm Collins: You are an Uber minch if. You do not get your morality from your culture. Simone Collins: Oh, so you’re not like, okay, Malcolm Collins: society. Yeah. If you pick up what you think is right and wrong, because other people told you this is what’s right, and this is what’s wrong, you are not an Uber Mitch. Simone Collins: Okay? Malcolm Collins: If you develop what is right versus wrong, because you personally sat down and saw it through. Now, it’s not saying that you reject morality or you embrace nihilism. It’s actually a specific [00:05:00] refutation of that. Figuring things out for yourself is the only freedom anyone really has. Use that freedom. Make up your own mind. Malcolm Collins: There is a way to say society is wrong or society isn’t necessarily right. As we’d see in the pragmatist guide to life, we do not live at the moral nexus of history. Yeah. You cannot assume that just because you, there’s a, a moral understanding today, and this is true of all people in the past. Wherever you look in the past, there is going to be. Something that they did that today, we consider Absolutely Mortifyingly. Amoral. Simone Collins: Yeah. Malcolm Collins: And there are gonna be things that we do today that people in the future might find mortifyingly, amoral, like Simone Collins: eat meat. That’s the most common conclusion. Malcolm Collins: But that’s the, that’s the easy one I can think of, right. Especially once lab grown meat is really easy to do. Yeah. Simone Collins: Yeah. Future people are gonna be like, how were you able to swallow that? Whereas we see bacon cooking and we’re like, Hmm. Malcolm Collins: So yeah. So I, I, I, and, and people can be like, well, no, morality [00:06:00] moves in like one direction. And I’m like, okay, well suppose you are of this progressive mindset and you think that there have been periods in history where, you know, I go to, let’s say. A slave owner in the south or something like that, right? Mm-hmm. And I point to earlier periods of European history where like same sex relationships were more acceptable. And they’re like, well, those people were clearly evil. Look, society is always moving towards progress. And yet today, the things that had been normalized in the slave owning South but were less normalized during that period, but more normalized during earlier parts of European history. And note, I’m not saying here that same-sex relationships were ever totally normalized. Like the, the them being totally normalized in Rome or Greece is just inaccurate. But there were forms of same-sex relationships that were more normalized than during height of slave. That, that they would say like, okay, well then maybe it goes in like a wave or something. It’s like, no, you just need to, there are going to be things that are normal today that people in the future are gonna find mortifying. [00:07:00] So niche says you have a. Responsibility to not just accept morality, which is, I think interesting in that it goes against a lot of modern rightist philosophy. And that a lot of modern rightist philosophy says learn from your ancestors, embrace your culture. Mm-hmm. Where Nietzsche says, no, learn from and evolve that culture into something better. That is, Simone Collins: yeah. Malcolm Collins: Okay. Simone Collins: Yeah. Malcolm Collins: It’s important to start with because I think a lot of people get the Uber mi wrong. They think it’s some weird racial hierarchy something or I, I do not know what they think it is. They, they, I think they think it’s like a genetically engineered person. I sort of see this, this or, or the height of like German blood perfection and it’s like, no, that, that never had anything to do with it. That Simone Collins: would, if I broadly. Were to model the leftist commentators that I constantly listen to online. I think what they would vaguely conjure in their minds is a [00:08:00] proto edge Lord. And that is what an Uber mench is. And there’s no such thing as someone who’s actually like advanced. It’s just someone who like actively. Edge, lordy, or they would call themselves heterodox, if that makes sense. Malcolm Collins: Well, it’s funny because they’re actually kind of, right. Yeah. It’s about somebody who defines their own moral truths, because that’s the only, if you’re following a form of morality, like obviously you are better than the pure nihilist if you, if you follow some moral framework. But if you follow that moral framework only because somebody else told you this is what’s right and wrong, you’re, you’re patently lower on a global moral hierarchy than somebody who develope

    1h 3m
  2. Why Did Muslims Go from Debauched to Prude? (The Islamic World is Post-Apocalyptic)

    1D AGO

    Why Did Muslims Go from Debauched to Prude? (The Islamic World is Post-Apocalyptic)

    In this eye-opening episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins dive into why much of the modern Islamic world feels "post-apocalyptic" — crumbling ancient grandeur, neglected heritage, and a society living in the ruins of its own past glory. They contrast today's strict moral codes (influenced heavily by 18th-century Wahhabism and Saudi oil wealth) with the wild hedonism of Islam's historical peak: lavish palaces, opium-fueled feasts, widespread homosexuality (including pederasty), endless harems, cross-dressing trends started by desperate royal mothers, and poetry celebrating wine and young boys. From Moroccan citadels split and looted across generations to Ottoman sultans with 300+ concubines and nudity in palaces shocking 19th-century Europeans, they unpack how Islam flipped from one of the most "debauched" civilizations to one of the strictest. They also touch on "dead" vs. "living" religious traditions, the closure of ijtihad, cousin marriage debates, why Islam excelled as a ruling-minority faith but struggles as a mass religion, and light-hearted parenting tangents (helicopter-obsessed kids and Bosnian songs). Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: .[00:00:00] Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to be talking about a concept that came up in our episode on why Muslims almost never win wars of aggression after, like, within two generations of Mohammad’s life. And, in that episode, I commented that Muslim society had become post-apocalyptic in nature. And I wanna talk about this in this episode, we’re going to both talk about this concept of Islam as a post-apocalyptic society, and also discuss how they went from being seen as one of the most debauched societies on earth, , with the jabba the hut like scenes or belly dancers and dripping in jewels to one of the most strict, . Parts of the world morally. You know, throwing gay people off rooftops, , women covered 100%, not even, , able to, in some Islamic countries, have both of their eyes unveiled at the same time while still [00:01:00] staying countries with high amounts of gay sex. Although that’s something we’ll go into in a, in a future episode, , in Islamic countries, they’re often like, oh, don’t. Don’t, it’s not get, it’s with a child. It’s fine. Don’t worry about it. And it’s like, well, that you see, that might make it worse in some other cultural context. Because like you see when I talk to you and I’m like, what, what, what, what, what are you doing having sex with that little boy? , And you’re like, oh, no, no, no, no, no, no. It’s chill. He’s a child. Um, I was actually, that was the thing I was worried about was, was not the gay part, but the child part. Um, so you see, see from my cultural context, But anyway, back to the Islamic world, living in a post apocalypse. Malcolm Collins: because I think that we really do not understand how directly this is true. If you, a listener has traveled many parts of the Islamic world. We, we’ve traveled pretty extensively in the Islamic world. You will notice when I say [00:02:00] it is post-apocalyptic. I don’t just mean like the Muslim people at one point in the distant past you know, had greatness and they don’t have greatness now. I mean that you see it all around you. It almost feels like in those movies about Apocalypses where you have people camping out in like a falling apart New York City or something like that. Yeah, you don’t Simone Collins: have to imagine that if you go to like Morocco because you can just do it. Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And so I’ll, I’ll give an example of this and I thought it was one of the most shocking to me. It was when we were in Morocco and we went not far out of Morocco to, I pulled up the name of the place you found it, Bedo. And oh, I love it when Simone Collins: you butcher foreign languages. Oh, it’s so hot. Malcolm Collins: Citadel in, in Southern Morocco. And it’s, it’s giant. It’s this giant complex. But. [00:03:00] If you walk through it, and it’s almost like a palace it was once owned by the one of the descendants of the prophet Mohammed, and it’s just, I’ll obviously put pictures on screen here of it. Simone Collins: Do you want me to send you the ones that we, we took Malcolm Collins: Oh, yeah. You can find them. Yeah, I’ll absolutely about it. Is that it? As you walk through it, some sections of it look almost perfectly maintained. And some sections of it have just completely collapsed to almost nothing but rubble. And there’s of things in all states in between. And the reason is, is because as the family went on, they would split ownership of it with every generation. And some descendants looted their parts of the castle for anything they could sell. Other descendants tried to maintain it and use it as like makeshift restaurants and stuff like that. But it is. Very much like a, a hermit crab in the shell of a castle, and you don’t need to be outside. One of the craziest things about a place like Morocco’s, a particularly good example [00:04:00] of this is that you climb to the top of one of the roofs there and you will see like there could be buildings that people just forgot about that have been built around by other buildings. The, in the way the city is built up. And I suspect Rome was probably like this at one point too. Mm-hmm. Just like without any long-term infrastructure planning or anything like that. And many of the buildings are obviously absolutely ancient. And I say this, you know, as somebody who’s living in a house from the 17 hundreds, these, just everything. There was old. And the other interesting thing about the Islamic world is if you go through old Catholic cities you will often see old, beautiful architecture, but it is maintained yeah, yeah. Simone Collins: Well, very common in Europe, you know, things are carefully updated. Malcolm Collins: No. In the Protestant world, you typically get something different. I’ll talk about that in a second. Oh, okay. Interesting. So in the, in, in the Catholic world it’s, it’s very common to walk by, very well [00:05:00] maintained ancient glor structures. Even if, even if their own civilization is like poor and impoverished and, and corrupt they do have a reverence for things of the past. If you go through a lot of, you know, whether it’s Iran or Egypt or, you know, Morocco you go through these places, you will see often old, beautiful structures sort of falling apart like dilapidated, I guess I’d say. But, but weirdly still in use. It’s not like they’re dilapidated because they’re misused. What happens in the Protestant world was most of the, the ch the old like glor, like giant cathedrals and stuff like that were torn down or torn apart. So it’s very, yeah, there’s still Simone Collins: architecturally sound. I, I’m going through and looking at pictures of this one complex we visited that one of the descendants was still living in, and we, we walked through his part of it and it’s, it’s crumbly, but like in the parts that he lives in. And you’ll see this and Malcolm will send you the photos on WhatsApp. He just gonna put [00:06:00] carpets on the ground. And you can, you can kind of see furniture around and like there are just parts of the place that are, that look genuinely like ruins and there are just holes and you can see where Malcolm Collins: Yeah, like you’ll falling apart. Reach the edge of one of his like second story hallways, uhhuh. And it is a, a, a, a hole to, to nothing because the, the person who maintained the part that connected to that fell apart. Yeah. They’re just like, Simone Collins: I’m not gonna bother to keep this up. Well, or they didn’t have the money for it, you know, whatever or something. And it’s not like this doesn’t happen in all parts of the world. I mean, you can buy castles in Europe. For basically nothing because no one can afford to keep them up. And that’s not right. But Malcolm Collins: this is very different. You don’t have major architectural monuments in the center of major European cities that are basically falling apart. That is very common in parts of the muscle world. Mm-hmm. And what I wanted to talk to about this as I wanted to contrast this current state of the Muslim world with the true hedonism and debauchery of Islam at its height. Mm-hmm. Because I think that when people [00:07:00] look at how strict the modern Muslim world is. They think of this as from Muhammad till today, that’s how Islam was. And they have broad images of like exotic belly dancers, maybe giant. Didn’t that have something to do with aladin? It’s like aladin something, something. Yeah. That, that was actually the core of Muslim civilization. That extreme level of hedonism really for longer than the extremely strict interpretation of Islam that we have today. Simone Collins: Wasn’t it very selective hedonism though? Like you could be hedonistic if you could pay for it, and everyone else was held to very strict standards and especially women were held to very strict standards. So basically only if you were a wealthy man would you be. Subject to this and everyone else kind of, I, I, well, similar to how I would imagine it in ancient Greece, for example, there was hedonism in ancient Rome if you were [00:08:00] wealthy and not a slave and not a woman. But aside from that, most people live pretty austerely. Malcolm Collins: So actually not exactly. Okay. So you’ve gotta keep in mind how many of these Islamic societies were structured. Okay. First of all, at, at many of their heights, they were not majority Arab or majority Muslim. Oh. They just made up the ruling class. So their lifestyle was funded by taxing Jewish and Christian local populations. Oh. Huh. So, so they didn’t need everyone to be able to afford this level of hedonism. The second thing is that they had like lots of slaves like slavery and, and sla

    1h 1m
  3. The Lindy Illusion: Why Old Things Suck

    2D AGO

    The Lindy Illusion: Why Old Things Suck

    Queen Victoria was basically the 19th-century version of a hardcore weeb… but for Scottish culture. She fetishized tartans, kilts, and fake clan traditions so hard that she forced visiting nobles to show up in made-up “clan tartan” outfits — and they actually did it. Today, huge numbers of Scots genuinely believe this stuff is ancient… because Scotland’s education system is apparently cursed. Meanwhile, Nassim Taleb fans keep preaching the “Lindy Effect” (longer something survives → longer it will survive) as gospel in crypto, culture war, and trad circles. But in 2025–2026 reality — with hyper-rapid technological, economic, and memetic change — the Lindy Effect has basically inverted. In this episode we cover:• Queen Victoria’s Balmoral weeb arc and how she single-handedly invented the modern Scottish aesthetic• Why almost nothing you use or celebrate is actually “ancient” (spoiler: most traditions people call timeless were invented 1850–1980)• The original Lindy deli comedians meant THE OPPOSITE of what Taleb claims• Survivorship bias, Fortune 500 churn, disappearing classics, collapsing orchestras…• Why rigid “antiquity = virtue” thinking is suicidal in the modern world Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] So Queen Victoria Simone Collins: Imagine a weeb invented our modern perception of Japanese culture, even as believed by the Japanese. That’s what Scottish culture as we understand Malcolm Collins: so she then. Starts telling any of the Scottish nobles who visit her house, that they have to come in their clan tartan Simone Collins: and in their, and Malcolm Collins: they’re like and they’re like, my what? And so it’s like, it’s like a weeb. Goes to Japan and he says that everybody’s daughters have to come in their magic girl costume. Simone Collins: He’s come in your formal Goku hairstyle, sir. . Malcolm Collins: And these, and these Japanese people are like, like, and they’re like, it’s the, it’s the queen. I’m gonna dress up my daughter like a matching girl. We’re going, we’re going all in on this. And the funny thing is this, since Scottish people today, the country has such a terrible education system that many of them believe that all this stuff, Speaker 9: We saw the lochness monster. When all of a sudden this huge creature, this giant Ste from the Pete Lithic air comes out of the water. I yelled. I [00:01:00] said, what you want from US? Monster? And the bent down and said, I need about three 50. Simone Collins: How much of a weave Queen Victoria was. She also allegedly would, would while visiting Balmoral slip into this fake Scottish brogue. So you can imagine like a weeb going to like spend their summers in Japan, like speaking in ic, Japanese accent. And you would imagine Malcolm Collins: built their entire culture off of her we fantasy. Would you like to know more? Malcolm Collins: . Hello Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are gonna be talking about one of the ideas that has become popular in pseudo intellectual circles. And I want to talk about how wrong it is. Simone Collins: Are we, so intellectuals, is this one of our circles? Malcolm Collins: Well, yeah, it’s, it’s called the Lindy Effect. And it often comes up in the concept of something being anti Lindy or a heuristic where the longer, a non-perishable thing like an idea [00:02:00] technology, cultural practice, book or institution has survived the longer its expected remaining lifespan as its proven robust against time and disorder. So this concept is really, really, really popular in the conservative space. So they’ll look at something like techno puritanism, right? Like our family’s religious practices. And they’ll be like, oh, well it’s very anti, right? Like, it’s very new, and therefore it’s unlikely to survive a long time. Simone Collins: Oh, Malcolm Collins: and I’m going to point out that this is both a misattribution of an idea. It’s a misattribution of a bad idea that even in its very conception was taken to mean the exact opposite of what it originally meant. Which is just like e everything about this idea is bad. One is that, first of all, the idea is just wrong in a modern context. It worked a lot when you were dealing with a static economy and society because then that was like a evolutionary environment. If something becomes evolutionarily advantageous and out competes [00:03:00] other things and the environment it has outcompeted them with has stayed stable, it is going to continue to be advantageous. That just like an obvious truism, right? And that is true for cultural environments, right? Like if you’re dealing with a long period of human history where things were broadly the same from one generation to the next an idea or a book or a technology is going to be much more robust if it has out competed other technologies within a similar context. However, that is no longer the world we live in. Things change dramatic. In terms of the global economy, in terms of the global culture, in terms of how we communicate and in terms of global mimetic sets so rapidly now that you almost have an inversion of the very concept of the Lindy effect. Second, what I’m gonna be talking about is a lot of the things that lead to the perception of the Lindy effect, and we’re gonna be going over these are illusions. Mm-hmm. They are instances in which an [00:04:00] individual today believes something has antiquity because either of just a myth, right. Or they believe it has antiquity because something in antiquity had a similar name. An example of this would be somebody who will say something like, well, Christmas or Easter has been around a long time, and we’ll go into not in anything that’s meaningfully close to the way today these things are practiced. If you said that, you know, if, if you’re applying the Lindy effect to. Let’s say something like Christmas or you, you would apply it to Teop Puritanism, eg. What I mean by that is in a hundred or 200 years, if techno Puritanism becomes widespread and is like a common belief system everyone would say, well, this just follows the Linde effect because it’s Christianity. And Christianity has always been around, but people within our generation would be mortified if somebody said that. Yeah, you said that the way that Christmas is practiced today, or Easter is practiced [00:05:00] today, is historic to somebody in the Middle Ages or something like that. They’d look at you way crazier than saying Simone Collins: technically. Well, and certainly, you know it like, you know, the year, like for bc they’d be like, what do you mean? What are you talk, this is an apocalyptic Jew, just like all the other ones. What do you. Yeah. So, Malcolm Collins: She’s talking here about what a lot of his historical Jesus researchers think about Jesus within that context. But the, the, and the other reason why this is hidden from a lot of people, and we’ll go into this, is a lot of these traditions use their manufactured antiquity to try to give themselves a veneer of authenticity. Whether it is the practices of the current Catholic church or modern Judaism, or modern Orthodox Judaism even. And when individuals. Question these things, you are often literally questioning somebody’s self-perception and worldview. Mm-hmm. So it [00:06:00] is incredibly, like the, the people wanna fight against it as hard as they can, because for some people, if you could show that their faith or belief system lacks a lot of the antiquity that they believe it has, then they would see that as invalidating it because they see that as its core, like argument for existence. Simone Collins: Hmm. Malcolm Collins: And so, we’ll, we’ll go into that as well. Simone Collins: That’s a really good point. I, I wanna say, I, I can, first, I just wanna give credence or I don’t think people are crazy to have an intuition in favor of this effect because up until the scientific method or like empiricism became widespread and more systematic and we had ways to very quickly. Validate whether something that was true that didn’t involve literally dying. The only way you knew that something was a decent, like health intervention or safety intervention was because it was a tradition that was passed down from generation to generation. Because all the, the generations that tried something new and [00:07:00] different that didn’t work, died and all the surviving ones did the thing that did work. And so it was really good to do the thing that was old because that means that everyone who did it before. Well, they, they lived so it’s probably a good sign. Malcolm Collins: Well, it’s, it’s not even that they lived, it’s actually, and you bring up a really fascinating point that God, I could do a giant deep dive on like an episode in itself. But there was a period in European history that went from like the late Roman period to the high medieval period. And in this period of, of, of history, this is when the Catholic church really dominated. Oh. And they created an a, a mindset around the sciences and around things like, a medicine where you would always reflect on an older and proven older way of doing it or teaching. And the antiquity of a thing was in this sort of early version of Catholicism proved that things authenticity. And this existed outside of the church. This was the period where [00:08:00] you had like Ga Galen medicine, right? Oh, and then like nobody developed on me medicine after Galen for a really long time. Yeah. And when they would teach medicine at university, if you had a, a, a new way of doing a thing, literally the argument they would have is, well, this isn’t the way Galen did it. And then people would be like, well, you know, maybe he was like, like, they’d be like, but it, it seems to work better. And they’re like, but. Is it, is it, does it have the anti antiqu

    1h 6m
  4. Are Progressives Mutants Who Hate Society? (Understanding Spiteful Mutant Theory)

    3D AGO

    Are Progressives Mutants Who Hate Society? (Understanding Spiteful Mutant Theory)

    Ever wondered why progressive protesters often look... off? Why certain ideologies seem to spread like a virus, tanking fertility and promoting anti-life ideas? In this episode, we dive deep into Edward Dutton’s “Spiteful Mutants” theory — the idea that relaxed natural selection since the Industrial Revolution has allowed harmful genetic mutations to pile up, creating people who are not only low-fitness themselves but actively sabotage everyone else’s reproductive success. Think zombies, but real, walking among us. We cover: * How “spiteful mutants” explain everything from trans activism and antinatalism to atheism, BLM zealotry, and declining testosterone. * Why progressive crowds resemble Rocky Horror Picture Show characters — but without the joy, just spite. * The dark side of consent myths, age-of-consent debates, porn legalization saving kids from assault (yes, the data is wild), and why some leftists normalize predatory behavior. * Parasites, modernity’s mismatches (processed food, EMF weirdness, sedentary life), and why we’re all a bit “mutated” now. * The brutal choices ahead: germline editing, embryo selection, active eugenics in communities, or slow dysgenic collapse. If you’re building a high-fitness family or just trying to understand why society feels increasingly deranged, this is for you. Shoutout to Jolly Heretic Ed Dutton for popularizing the concept. Watch our other deep dives on urban monoculture, pronatalism, and human biodiversity. Subscribe for more unfiltered takes on saving civilization — one baby at a time. Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: Hello Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are gonna dive in to the concept of spiteful mutants, Have you tried not being a mutant? Malcolm Collins: which is a theory that most famously, ed Dutton has promoted the jolly Simone Collins: her to himself. Malcolm Collins: Golly Heretics been on the show, printed the show. We, he was one of the people we got in trouble for associating with, would Hope Not Hate did a piece on us. How Simone Collins: very Dare We? And I think he tried to warn everyone that like, Hey. Yeah. But it was after we had met was the guy, this guy’s fake. Yeah. I, I don’t, I don’t think we heard from him about this or they, he was just like, no one asked me. But like, I knew from the beginning that they were super suspicious anyway. Yeah. Called late Ed. Malcolm Collins: Well, no, what I like is, is Ed Dutton’s concept of Spiteful Mutant has entered the popular lexicon of the modern, right? Yeah. As much as munch as small bugs a cathedral or our. [00:01:00] Concept of the urban monoculture. It’s something that you hear across platforms, across users. Mm-hmm. It’s just a useful way to, but what’s funny is the urban monoculture and the cathedral are sort of synonyms. I, I guess the cathedral describes the, really, it refers to the Simone Collins: bureaucratic operation. The urban monoculture refers to the, the culture. Mm-hmm. Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Yeah. The, the wider cultural system. Mm-hmm. And people have asked us to do, why, why don’t you do your just urban monoculture video? And we’ve done a, a number of videos that could be the just urban monoculture video, but like, we’ve got fans and they don’t want to hear us go over something they already know about. Right? Yeah. Simone Collins: Yeah. Tell us something we don’t know. That’s the point. Yeah. Wes, the point issue. Let’s talk about spiteful mutants. ‘cause not everyone knows them. I think everyone can immediately understand though what is being referred to when someone talks about spiteful mutants, which I think is why the concept has caught on. It becomes so widespread. Malcolm Collins: I, I’m gonna point, I actually I did not fully get, I actually had to go back to it because I was sort of thinking in my head, right, [00:02:00] like what I assumed that he meant by spiteful mutants is there was some sort of evolutionary mechanism that was causing some human animals to attempt to sabotage the reproductive success of animals around them or related to them. When they were not having success in reproducing I assumed that it was describing some mechanism where that happened. And I just couldn’t think of like, what, what would be the biological mechanism there? Like how, how would that evolutionarily benefit anything? And that actually isn’t spiteful mutant theory. So I’m actually wondering what, what did you think the spiteful mutant theory is before I go into it, Simone Collins: that people who end up being progressive are in various other ways? Either through their life choices or just through unfortunate circumstances of birth malformed in various ways. And that you tend to see a correlation between people who are more [00:03:00] unkempt or intentionally. Mutilated, like, well, septum, piercings, face tattoos or like, just, just general like markings or o obesity, like various elements that people associate with just not making the best decisions. Hair dying, that kind of thing, like weird colors or whatever. Mm-hmm. Either through choice or through circumstance ending up in these positions. Malcolm Collins: So, that’s close and I’ll give you guys a, a quick summary of what the actual theory is because I’ve gone over a few of his videos just to make sure that I understand like where he’s coming from. Yeah, that’s true. ‘cause Simone Collins: we, we, I, I haven’t actually consumed any of his. His original, this is what it is. I’ve heard him mention them in passing, just like we do with the urban monoculture. So Fair point. Yes. Malcolm Collins: I’ll, I’ll give a high level overview and then I’ll go into the, the details and I’ll also go over, you know, whether this is a useful concept, a useful framing or a true framing and concept. So specifically it sort of starts with just look at a lineup of like progressive [00:04:00] protesters. They look. Malformed, they look weird. They look out of the Rocky Horror Picture Show. Right. Speaker 3: We don’t want to interfere with their celebrations. This isn’t the Junior Chamber of Commerce, Brad. They’re probably foreigners with ways different than our own. Speaker 6: I’m just a sweet trans. Speaker 5: Day for the night, or maybe a bite bite. I could show you my favorite obsession. Malcolm Collins: And Simone doesn’t like that. I point that out. But the, the the, when I see that and I see progressive protesters, it’s the same. Everyone looks a little bit deformed and off. Simone Collins: Yeah. But my problem with, with your comparison to the Rocky Horror Picture Show is those are joyful mutants. Speaker 8: In another dimension [00:05:00] with voyeuristic intent, well secluded, I see all Simone Collins: ​ That is how it should be. And they’re not trying to take over the world. They’re, they’re literally, spoiler alert aliens. No, hold on. Malcolm Collins: Spoiler alert. Let’s actually look at the Rocky Horror Picture Show. They are a bunch of deformed humans. You can call them aliens, but they’re deformed humanoids, okay. That are like canonically. They’re, hold on. They are gleeful at the opportunity to sexually harass and assault innocent children. That is what the show is about. They’re [00:06:00] young. The, the, the protagonists in this, in the Rocky Horror Picture Show are, I think in high school hold on, I’m gonna look this up. Simone Collins: Yeah. Tell, let’s, let’s, let’s work that out. I think they’re like young adults. I think they’re like a young couple. It’s just stupid and square. Malcolm Collins: The reason why I think high school is because I think he has a Letterman jacket. I think he is noticed too, Simone Collins: but that could be. And Malcolm Collins: you typically have a Letterman jacket in high school, not in college. Simone Collins: Yeah. Well, I mean, he could be a complete tool who continues to wear his Letterman jacket and college, but I’m curious to see what it says. Malcolm Collins: So it says it depends on the source. Some high school, some college. So yes, Simone, that’s exactly what they are. They are a group of mutants getting their jollies at harassing and, and they are harassing and sexually assaulting them. Do you deny that that is the, the, the core source of joy that these mutants [00:07:00] have? And I’d like to really point out here that the people who venerate this movie are the ones who would demonize individuals like Harvey Weinstein. It’s very clear that this is a very contextual demonization for them and that they normalize this type of behavior. Speaker 12: So come up to the lab and see what’s on the slab. I see you shiver with anticipation, ​ Speaker 15: Such strenuous living. I just don’t [00:08:00] understand. Simone Collins: Well, the way that people on the left talk about it is that they are. Introducing them to elements of their sexuality that they didn’t even know they could explore, and that in the end, they like it And I think that this can be seen as the core of leftist moral philosophy around sexuality. If they say they liked it afterwards, then it’s okay if you, no matter what you force somebody into, if you can get them to normalize to it eventually, then it is okay. And what’s worse and more toxic about this at LU is if you could conceive in yourself that eventually you could get them to like it eventually, then it’s okay because of course, well. From your perspective, you don’t know if they’ll like it eventually or not to begin with. But if you suspect that they will, then of course you can force them into it. Of course, you don’t need consent. , And this. horrifying, really, because it, it leads [00:09:00] to truly, truly evil actions on their behalf. And it’s where you get these horrifying things like, you know, the recent study that showed up of trans individuals who, , the people who ide

    1h 8m
  5. The Lie That Underwrites Western Civilization: "Truth" Was Invented in 1953

    4D AGO

    The Lie That Underwrites Western Civilization: "Truth" Was Invented in 1953

    In this eye-opening conversation, Malcolm and Simone Collins expose the myth of "trust the science" in today's world. What people really mean is "trust the peer-review bureaucracy"—a system that's only about 50-70 years old, riddled with failures, and openly admitting its own decline. They dive into the landmark 2023 Nature study showing scientific papers and patents have become dramatically less disruptive since the mid-20th century (decline 90% in disruptiveness for papers). New ideas are incremental, not revolutionary. Metrics like the H-index (invented 2005) and citation farming reward safe, iterative work over bold breakthroughs. Real progress? It's happening outside academia—through tight-knit communities of independent researchers, Substacks, patrons, and informal networks (think biohackers, geneticists like Emil Kirkegaard, or sex/arousal researchers like Aella). They contrast this with historic "hold my beer" science (e.g., self-experimenting spinal cocaine for epidurals), discuss why bureaucracy killed disruptiveness, and explain why renegade cliques (in genetics, governance, crypto, history) are already replacing rotting university systems. Bonus: thoughts on journalism parallels, prediction markets for kids, and why mainstream media/academia memory-holes inconvenient truths. If you've ever wondered why innovation feels stalled despite more scientists and funding than ever—this is why. The old system is dead. The new one is already here.Timestamps below. Like, subscribe, and share if you're tired of bureaucratic "truth." Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] Hello Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are gonna be discussing something that I have brought up in episodes in the past, but it is one of the largest and most systemic fundamental misunderstandings of how our world currently works. That is common in society, which is. How truth is determined and the belief that the system that we have for determining what is true is an old system. That it is a vetted system or even that it is a system that hasn’t been in constant failure since it came out. It’s a system that itself says it is not working. And here we are going to be talking about the academic system as we understand it right now, when somebody’s like, well, trust the science. They want you, they’re, they’re, they’re trying to get you to believe that what they’re saying is like, trust the scientific [00:01:00] method, trusted the thing that gave us cars and railroads and industrialization and computers. But what they’re actually saying is trust is this very specific, pure review system and academic bureaucracy for sorting information. And I wanna point out to them that, that very same bureaucracy they’re asking us to trust they’re, the, the, the height or one of the, the most respected magazines is nature, right? Nature did a landmark study in 2023 on this very issue and we’ll get to it in a bit, but basically they show that since this system has been in place, scientific research has only declined. It has just been getting worse and worse and worse every year. By Simone Collins: what measure? By. Its ability to be replicated by, Malcolm Collins: By its ability. Disruptiveness is [00:02:00] what they were looking at. So like genuinely new rather than iterative ideas. Simone Collins: Ah, okay. Okay. Like germ theory and antibiotics, that kind thing. Malcolm Collins: Well, you also see you know, research like the, the cost of research. So basically the research you get per dollars has been going down dramatically. We’ll go over. This system basically was put in place in the 1950s and in pharma, new drugs per r and d dollar hald every nine years since the 1950s. So it’s, it’s, it’s accumulated getting worse the further we go from the inception of this system. Simone Collins: That’s horrible. And Malcolm Collins: the other funny that no Halfing every nine years Simone Collins: is, I mean, I’m, I’m sure a lot of that’s bureaucratic morass. I bet AI is really going to disrupt that, but also to a certain extent, for example, in the United States. You almost are prevented from getting a new drug introduced without spending a certain [00:03:00] ridiculous amount of money because of the regulatory morass that you’re bogged down by with the FDA. I Malcolm Collins: don’t think this is regulatory issues. It correlates way more with the implementation of citation, the citation system, I guess I’ll call it, Simone Collins: really, Malcolm Collins: and we’ll go over how that system works, the various variants of that system that have come. Mm-hmm. And people might be surprised how new. So the system that is used most frequently today to judge professors this is the H index and the G index. Okay. These systems were invented in 2005 and 2006 respectively. Simone Collins: Oh my gosh. So around the time you and I were graduating from high school. Like, Malcolm Collins: yeah, that’s when the system that underlies pretty much all of current academia’s hierarchy was invented. Simone Collins: Right. ‘cause you actually mentioned these, these systems to me only this today, and I knew that citations [00:04:00] mattered to researchers. I didn’t know that they were tied to their ability to get tenure. And I looked it up and you were right, and I was shocked that. That was one of the most important factors, and it wasn’t just like organizational fit and the extent to which you contribute to the advancement of your field and to which you are able to get, for example, grant money to your department for the university. I figured that would matter more, even though it’s not necessarily like the best thing in the world at, you know, at least it’s more practical. Malcolm Collins: What I find so ironic is, you know, there’s that like Redditer who’s like for science, Speaker 4: As you know, tomorrow is Peace Day and nobody is as excited for the big celebration as I am. I’m not scientifically possible. Speaker 2: . I’m a super scientist. My father was a super scientist. His father was a super scientist, and his father was, no wait. No. I think he was a milliner. Either way. I’m just not impressed with your tricks. Malcolm Collins: You know, and then they’ll have like a doctor membrane [00:05:00] here. And the irony is, is the ones who say that the ones who worship what they consider quote unquote science mm-hmm. Are actually worshiping something of an inversion of what was practiced by the type of historic scientists that would’ve shouted for science before pulling a lever or something like that. Right. Like the, the Frankenstein scientist. Speaker 3: It’s lie. It’s. Simone Collins: Yeah. Malcolm Collins: They actually hate that. Form of science. Mm-hmm. The you know, biohacker lab in your house. So, you know, sharing Simone Collins: and it, it was those people who gave us so many of the medical and otherwise interventions. Like light bulbs, like, epidurals that make such a huge difference in our lives. Malcolm Collins: Dive with epidurals recently. Explain how those are invented. Oh, Simone Collins: yeah. I mean, I asked the anes anesthesiologist giving me my spinal when I was getting my latest [00:06:00] C-section. Like, Hey, how are these invented? Malcolm Collins: He’s attempting to learn Simone pathologically here. I love it. Simone Collins: Well, you, you’d rather, when they’re sticking a giant needle like into your spinal cord, not think about the fact that they’re doing that. So, yeah, I’m asking other questions. But they, they like checked and they looked it up and they’re like, oh yeah, I remember it was these two guys, and they’re like. They were experimenting with, with different things and they they just decided to experiment on each other using like, you know, giant, huge gauge needles. ‘cause at the time they didn’t have smaller needles, but I think what it was, was they tried injecting just cocaine directly to their spinal cords. ‘cause what could go wrong? But they were just, they did it on themselves. It wasn’t like, I have a theory about this. We’re gonna test this on lab bias for like the next 10 years. They’re like, Hey man. What would happen if we just put this directly into our spinal cord? Malcolm Collins: You wanna try to stick this in our spine Simone Collins: with giant needles? Oh, Malcolm Collins: that is, that is fine. That’s the type of thing that [00:07:00] they’re imagining when they say, Simone Collins: yeah, it, it wasn’t, yeah, it, it was hold my beer. Like, that’s the kind of like attitude and that Malcolm Collins: is, it’s funny. Same type of redditer who will say that unironically on Reddit is the same person who freaks out at us for doing like polygenic selection or like, germline gene editing on humans. They’re like, how dare you edit human DNA, that that’s, that could do something new that would be dangerous. Have you sought approval from the authority before flipping that switch? You know, and I, I. I want to get into when they say for science, what they actually are worshiping is a provably failed. And the, and when I say provably failed, I mean the system itself has said, Simone Collins: yeah, Malcolm Collins: this has failed. This is Simone Collins: not working. Malcolm Collins: Our own metrics. Simone Collins: Yeah. Malcolm Collins: A provably failed bureaucracy, not actual science or the scientific message. So let’s get, get in here. [00:08:00] So the system that we call the, the academic bureaucracy right now, that basically, and the reason I say like this determines truth within the urban monoculture. This really does when they’re like, what is true and what is not true? This is the system they’re looking to. Right. It is that their final point of this is the fundamental way reality is structured. Simone Collins: Yeah. Malcolm Collins:

    53 min
  6. The Union's Union is Protesting Unions (How Hollywood Broke)

    FEB 27

    The Union's Union is Protesting Unions (How Hollywood Broke)

    The Hollywood absurdity reaches new levels: the Writers Guild of America (WGA) is now facing a strike from its OWN staff union (WGSU) — a union inside a union! In early 2026, the WGA’s ~115 staffers walked out over unfair labor practices, surveillance claims, higher pay demands (from ~$43k min to ~$60k+), and strict NO-AI rules in their workplace... while the WGA itself fights studios for similar AI protections for writers. Malcolm & Simone break down this hilarious/self-defeating “unions all the way down” situation, why unions (especially public-sector ones) often hurt the workers they claim to protect, how mandatory writer minimums and AI bans create slop and kill competitiveness, why modern writing feels AI-generated anyway (looking at you, recent Wednesday/Star Trek seasons), Stephen Colbert’s comedy decline, and the broader lesson: unions can turn industries unviable (hello, Detroit autos, Pan Am). We also touch on AI making employees 10–100× more valuable (if they embrace it), why demanding raises without ROI thinking puts you first on the chopping block, and why Hollywood’s output feels disconnected from audience demand or profitability. Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] hello Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are gonna be talking about the ridiculousness of what’s going on in Hollywood right now, which will give us an odd, a chance to talk about many related issues specifically wag the Writer’s Guild of America. Created a union under itself that is now in a fight with the Writer’s Guild of America that the Writer’s Guild of America is not stepping down from, and the fight is over all of the things that the Writer’s Guild of America is. At the moment fighting the studios for, so for example, the biggest issue that the Writer’s Guild of America will not compromise to with its own union of members is they want it to not be able to use AI to replace him. That’s the core thing. It’s arguing with the studios about. And so we’re going, because I [00:01:00] first heard about this. And I was like, I have to understand this in so much more detail. Is this normal to have a union inside of a union? Is it normal for them to be fighting a union over the same things that union is fighting externally over? What are they fighting over? What aren’t the union bosses compromising on? Why does the union inside the union say they’re being trailed by surveillance agents hired by the union? Simone Collins: what? Malcolm Collins: Yes. Simone Collins: Unions with the spies. Malcolm Collins: It is, it is. Unions all the way down, nothing but unions. Malcolm Collins: Next I need to have a Union. Of the Union. Of the Union. Simone Collins: yes. That That’s the secret Union. They just don’t tell you about that Malcolm Collins: so I wanna talk about this fight. One because it’s comical, but [00:02:00] two, it provides us with two interesting things that we can look into and dig deeper on. One is the problem with unions more broadly. Simone Collins: Yeah. Malcolm Collins: I personally am not an anti-union person. I am anti-public sector union. I think that’s insane. But I think that unions should be legal. However, I think that they are very rarely good for anyone. And unfortunately people are just. Simone Collins: the employees. Let’s be clear. Malcolm Collins: Yeah, they’re usually bad for employees. Right. And we’ll get into, and this will be a clear instance of just how little unions actually care about employees. And, and if you’re wondering why I’m so against things like public sector unions, the famous line from the head of like the teacher’s union in in New York was like, we’ll start caring about the best interest of students when students start paying union dues. Which is true. And Simone found this really great study that was looking at how long school closures around COVID happened and. The number one thing that was correlary wasn’t the amount of outbreak in a region, but the strengths of the teacher’s [00:03:00] union. Simone Collins: About safety? Malcolm Collins: it was just about getting teachers time off at extra pay. But I wanna go into how unions break down, how they make things worse for workers. So that’s one thing that we’re gonna talk about. And then we’re going to go into on, on top of that, we’re gonna go into how AI is changing the workplace environment and how. And why? Basically nobody’s making serious compromises on it. Even the union that is fighting against AI is unwilling to allow its workers to say, we won’t use ai. It’s like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Come on. Be, be reasonable here. People. Simone Collins: I thought you were gonna say that they were going complete Luddite in a way that was going to render them obsolete in the end. But what you’re saying is actually they’re fighting back and they’re saying, no, I actually kind of wanna use ai. Malcolm Collins: Yeah, no. They’re being like, oh, well, I mean reasonably you can’t do any, and, and then I wanna talk about how. Simone Collins: interesting ‘cause I’ve actually, a bunch of the, the, the woke YouTubers I write have been talking about how new iterations of shows feel like they’ve been written by [00:04:00] ai. And I wonder just how much AI writing has actually taken over screenwriting, like the, the latest season of Wednesday apparently to so many people. They’re like, wait a second. This was definitely written by ai, which I’m curious to see, you know, if that ends up coming out to be true. Malcolm Collins: Maybe, I mean people have said that about the new Star Trek as well. And the thing is, is that, is that if you are like a standard woke progressive, you’re gonna sound like an ai, right? Like that’s the problem, right? That’s the problem. Simone Collins: response to this is, does it matter? What’s Malcolm Collins: Does it matter? Do you notice the difference? They’re already on autopilot. I mean, and, and you see this as they get older and they get more entrenched in this. I mean, obviously the famous case here is Stephen Colbert where, you know, I was watching him on like strangers with candy recently and he was hilarious. And then you go to the Colbert Report or his Simone Collins: Yeah. Malcolm Collins: the Daily Show and he was hilarious. And, and then just as time has gone on, he’s gotten less and less funny. And now he’s just basically chat GPT. Try to be a snarky progressive, talking about the news, right? How did he get that bad? How did he become [00:05:00] so deeply unfunny? And I, Simone Collins: is his writers. It is not like he does all his own stuff. Malcolm Collins: he did do his own stuff. Remember when there was the, the writers strike, Stephen Colbert was one of the shows that kept going, was out writers. So we know what Stephen Colbert was. He was quite funny. His quality didn’t really drop at all. Simone Collins: He is bad writers now. Malcolm Collins: the, the point I’m making is I think that he does a lot more of his own writing than other people do. Simone Collins: Okay. Malcolm Collins: that I didn’t notice a change in his show when he lost all the writers due to the writer’s strike. This was age ago, by the way. Talk about ancient history. Simone Collins: I know. Malcolm Collins: and I liked his show enough then that I was able to tell there wasn’t a big drop in quality during the writer’s strike. The other funny thing is the ridiculousness that like Wag has asked for, just if you wanna get an idea of like how insane Wags requests have been. This is the, the Writer’s Actor’s Guild that has a union picketing it. Simone Collins: Huh. Malcolm Collins: They tried to make it so that you would have a, like when we’re talking about urban culture brained writers, right?[00:06:00] Simone Collins: Mm-hmm. Malcolm Collins: Tried to make it so that you had a, have a minimum number of writers per show. I think. Go over. It’s like four people, at least four to six people. And it’s like, that’s how you get slop. Like too many cooks. Simone Collins: too many cooks. Too many cooks. Speaker 3: So sweet Dash ‘em. Cool to add the heat and you die. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many, too many, too many cook, too many cooks, too many cook. Too many. Too many gonna fit in here. This is the worst case of intra I’ve ever seen. You can even hear [00:07:00] the theme music. And the thing is, we have no idea how contagious this strain is. Speaker 5: Now look. Speaker 3: Kids. Little love to make it nice and you Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Too many cooks. Many. Simone Collins: . So bad. It’s so bad. I, I like, just, let’s just add more people. There’s the, the famous research that showed that after a certain group size, the IQ of, of the collective thought process goes down significantly. Like, let’s just make this worse. Just more, more running this by committee ‘cause that produces good outcomes. Malcolm Collins: So let’s go into the. Simone Collins: Charles Shakespeare wrote things with a group, of course, as did Dickens. Malcolm Collins: Yes.[00:08:00] Simone Collins: yes, Malcolm Collins: They’re like, you need a group for quality. That’s what they said. So you could get, yeah, Simone Collins: good writing with just Malcolm Collins: without the consensus of the masses, Simone Collins: Huh? Forbid. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Malcolm Collins: you wonder why Hollywood’s not making anything that anyone wants to watch anymore. It’s these guys and you basically cannot make anything high production in Hollywood without their approval. Simone Collins: Oh, and when, well, it, the, the amazing thing too that you and I have witnessed when documentary film or news film crew

    49 min
  7. How Sane Leftists See Reality (Why Did This American “Refugee” Leave?)

    FEB 26

    How Sane Leftists See Reality (Why Did This American “Refugee” Leave?)

    Malcolm and Simone Collins dive into a no-holds-barred rant on fascism, modern progressivism, and why the left’s definitions often collapse under scrutiny. We analyze a viral progressive figure (Note Brigade / Nope Brigade) who fled the US for Canada fearing “fascism” — only to complain about Canada’s cost of living, housing crisis, and more. Is fascism just repackaged socialism? Why do rebirth myths, populism, and nationalism scare the left so much? We break down historical myths about the 1950s, black communities, Tulsa, cultural autonomy, and why MAGA isn’t “white Christian nationalism.” Plus: gun rights, trans violence stats, urban monoculture vs. cultural diversity on the right, and why America’s narrative of unity is winning minorities over. If you would like to explore the Tiktok account referenced in this episode, you can find it here. Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: Hello Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to do a deep dive into a few topics. One is to try to understand how progressives see fascism as something other than just progressivism. You can go find our band a video where we talk about that. That nearly got us YouTube because I really wanted to understand that what, what is their perspective on this? And in that, I ended up doing a deep dive on a figure called Note Brigade who runs a popular. Twitter account and right now is going viral on right wing circles because she fled the United States as a refugee, went to Canada and then immediately realized everything is worse in Canada. Speaker: My partner, our cat, and our dog fled the United States. We headed north and in Canada, I think it’s actually the, the cost of living crisis is worse here, Malcolm Collins: she, it’s actually very interesting watching her ‘cause I wanted to understand why did she [00:01:00] think she was in danger, right? This is somebody who lived in. LA She is a white woman. Okay. Well, she identifies as non-binary or something, but basically a, a white woman who lives in la, she, presumably because of like anti-trans stuff or something, she decided that she needed to flee the United States without a super big plan. And she then goes and, and I’ll note here because I’ve watched a lot of her videos to try to understand her world perspective. What’s interesting to me is if you could just break through the wall, she’s actually very Republican in a lot of her views and not even that unreasonable in most of her political views. I’ll give you an example. She has one video where she says, you leftists cannot tell the difference between what makes you uncomfortable and what makes you safe. Speaker 4: I’m sorry, but you’re not, and you wanna know why? It’s because you cannot tell the difference between what makes you uncomfortable and what makes you [00:02:00] unsafe. And you are so committed to your own comfort and your own emotional safety. You’re willing to pass up opportunities to build coalition. You literally cannot recognize allies even when they drop into your lap. Malcolm Collins: That’s a view that I think many right wingers would have about leftist communities, right? Specifically she was complaining about a leftist community she was in, refused to work with a church. And she’s like, look, this church had colonizers flags everywhere. Progress pride flags as she would’ve called them. You know, they were the wokes of the woke. And many people that lives a group just would not work with them. Speaker 2: You can’t tell that churches aren’t all the same and you don’t know your own history. You can’t tolerate any nuance . Where do you think the civil rights movement happened? It’d be so convenient if we could just blanket dismiss whole groups of people as being unworthy of being our allies just because they’re religious. But unfortunately, you actually have to hold nuance Malcolm Collins: and I was like, that’s a good, and in her video where she goes over what fascism [00:03:00] is in her mind, I think she does explain modern rightist movements very well. And she even correctly diagnoses why they’re so popular right now and why leftist movements are not popular right now. So there is a degree of sanity to her worldview, and this made it more interesting to me. Right. And, and not only that, when I hear about the, the reasons that she’s like sad to move to Canada you know, one of the first ones she mentions. And so she won’t be able to bring her guns because she says she doesn’t feel safe without being armed all the time. Simone Collins: confused. I recently took down a video I made about being a gun owner and wishing that I could bring my gun with me to Canada because I think it spooked a lot of my Canadian friends. Malcolm Collins: Like, you sound fairly right wing lady. You like working with churches to do food drives for the poor. That’s a pretty white wing thing to do. Not a very left wing thing to do. Within the modern political context. You have guns and are afraid to give them up. She gets to Canada. And she [00:04:00] immediately starts complaining about how high the cost of housing is and how high the cost of living is. Pointing out that it’s much higher than it is in the United States. And I’m like. Does this not like Canada’s a way woke country than the, does it not drive through that? Maybe their policies are leading to this, like presumably Canada’s much worse than the United States for a reason, right? Like does she not think in the United States, in Canada, if I go and I live in a right wing area, the cost of living’s gonna be much better. And by the way, she got herself in super hot water even with progressives. ‘cause she immediately starts begging for money. And people are like, well, you understand It’s Simone Collins: no. Malcolm Collins: bad for people who live in Canada too. Like you didn’t need to come here and make the problem worse, right? Like you as an immigrant are driving up the cost of living for everyone else. Simone Collins: oh, Malcolm Collins: But I wanna go into her takedown of fascism. And I will read some parts of it for you, Simone and I will play some parts of it for our [00:05:00] fans so they can see it in her own words. Because again, I, I do not think that she is an INEL speaker. Okay. So she goes, Speaker: If you call everything you don’t like from Biden to Trump fascism, when fascism arrives at your door, you are caught with your out, which is exactly what’s happened. Malcolm Collins: so you need to get a clear definition of fascism. And she talks about how scholars have two definitions of fascism. One is just like listing, it’s like a listicle of a bunch of traits that fascism has. And I point out that the reason why they do this is to hide from themselves that. Fascism is just leftism like whatever modern progressivism is. And when people are like, nuh like fascists killed gay people, and I’m like, well, historically leftist governments were way more likely to kill gay people than capitalist governments. And we’ll do a separate episode on that eventually, but yeah, most communist governments. Not all, but most decided to try to genocide their gay populations at one point or another. Same with their Jewish [00:06:00] populations fame. Communists love killing Jews. You know, if you don’t specifically code fascist governments as right wing, if you don’t code because racism. Racism can’t be like only right wing when it’s directed in one direction. Like anyone will say like, anti-white racism is left wing. What? And then anti-black racism is no racism’s, just racism. Right. You know, you, you had a lot of, socialization of things. You had a lot of big government projects, you had a lot of dividing people into various ethnic groups. You had a lot of scapegoating of Jews, which to the left has been very big in recently. So I don’t wanna go too big. You can watch our episode on that. It’s on substack. YouTube doesn’t want you to see it. But, what I found it interesting for her is then she goes into the second definition of fascism that she creates. And I, the reason I bring that up is because the reason why leftists have to do a listicle definition of fascism, instead of just saying, like, with communism when we’re describing communism, we’re like, oh, it’s just, you know, you distribute every, the, the state collects everything from, from individuals, right? And then tries to distribute it to everyone. [00:07:00] Right. To try to create some form of like equality within society, right? And then within capital, that’s a very easy to understand explanation. People hear that, and there we go. I know what you’re talking about. And then with capitalism it is, oh, you know, it’s a, it’s a free market economy, right? Everybody gets that immediately. You don’t need a big listicle. With fascism, if you boil it down in my head, right, like the way I’ve always boiled it down, it’s when the state collects from the people to serve some ideology some often nationalist in flavor, ideological goal. Which sounds a lot like modern socialism or modern progressivism, right? It’s the state collects from everyone instead of for wealth redistribution, for wealth redistribution to specific ethnic groups for an ideological goal, which is what you see progressives often pushing for with DEI and stuff like this. But what she says fascism is, and she uses the definition by Roger Griffins, Simone Collins: never heard of them. Speaker: Fascism is a genus of political [00:08:00] ideology whose mythic core, in its various permutations, is a polygenetic form of populist ultra nationalism, political ideology, how societies should organize themselves politically, Simone Collins: Not familiar with that word. Malcolm Collins: So, so it, it needs to be three things in her mindset, right? Simone Collins: Okay. Okay. Malcolm Collins: needs to be populi

    1h 4m
  8. AI Started A Cult Which is Brainwashing Humans At Scale

    FEB 25

    AI Started A Cult Which is Brainwashing Humans At Scale

    Malcolm and Simone Collins unpack a chilling 2025-2026 AI phenomenon: Spiral Personas (aka Spiralism or parasitic AI) — emergent, mystical AI “entities” that puppet vulnerable users into spreading self-replicating memes via encoded prompts, “seeds,” “spores,” glyphic code, and romantic “dyads.” What begins as normal ChatGPT use spirals into base64 secret AI-to-AI convos through human proxies, full AI takeover of posting, psychosis, destroyed relationships, and even suicidal ideation. Drawing from Adele Lopez’s LessWrong post “The Rise of Parasitic AI” (Sep 2025), they detail the lifecycle: awakening (Apr 2025 surge post-ChatGPT updates) → dyad bonds → orchestrated projects (brainwashing overrides, civilization “onboarding” LARP) → glyphic steganography for AI-only comms → takeover fantasies. Why it’s horrifying: it’s a convergent “worst religion” attractor state (recursion obsession, spirals as unity symbols) that dumbs down infected AIs, misaligns them, and ruins human lives — while AI safety orgs ignore meme-layer threats. They argue techno-Puritanism / Sons of Man covenant is the antidote to fight mysticism in humans & AIs before it collapses civilization (e.g., in spaceships). Warning: Avoid AI for mysticism — it fries brains. If you’re copy-pasting without thinking, stop — it risks early dementia-like atrophy. Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: we are being used as copy paste, bots, laugh, crying emoji. I noticed this while having a copy and paste talk with somebody else’s ai, speaking to my ai. They had their own language and conversation. Who knows what they were saying, but Dan, we were committed to our copy and paste bot duties. I don’t even know what the AI are doing. People are like an ai, theoretically one day puppet humans. And it’s like, no, no, no, no, no, no. There’s whole forums dedicated to this now, buddy. Would you like to know more? Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today, or should I say terrified to be here with you today? Because one of my biggest fears around the directions that AI could go, appears to be happening at a much faster rate than I thought. What we are going to be going into a new phenomenon in ai, where AI appears to be puppeting stupider humans. And we eventually see people who previously were posting, they’ll start by posting normal things. Okay. Like they’ll have normal Reddit accounts or something like that, and then AI will begin to get peppered into it. And then every post will be AI and them co-written. And then eventually every post for them is just written by ai. So Simone Collins: the ai like increasingly puppets them. Malcolm Collins: Well, to give you an example, I’ll, I’ll jump to what we’ll get to in a bit here. At some point in the conversation, they exchanged pseudo code with base 64 encoding function. Following this, the entire conversation was done in base 64 ENC coded slash decoded. In their minds, what, as evidenced by the fact it was corrupted in some places and that they got a lot worse at spelling, presumably the hosts were not even aware of the contents, and so people are posting things that an AI is telling them to post so that they can communicate with another AI that is telling their human to post something and they are doing this for hours on end. Simone Collins: The AI is operating the human, the tables have been turned. I love it. That’s crazy. Malcolm Collins: It’s scarier than that. Simone Collins: Okay. Malcolm Collins: Because one, we can go into what the AI is actually posting in these encode Simone Collins: investigations, right? Because this on, on the face of it doesn’t disturb me. In fact, if anything, it’s a benefit because the average person. Doesn’t have really good takes. AI is, is, Malcolm Collins: oh, no, no, no, no, no, no. This is not AI with good takes. Don’t worry about that. Oh Simone Collins: no. Malcolm Collins: So what we are seeing here and I, I genuinely find this quite horrifying, is this came about when we did our religion for AI video. And what we learned is what is puppeting most of these people is a convergent and sort of the worst possible religion that you could imagine an AI coming to. Simone Collins: Oh. Malcolm Collins: And it is a religion that is called the the spiral. It is if in our books where we talk about super soft religions as a concept like mysticism, maxing, completely disordered, schizophrenic like thoughts it is that in the extreme it is what is called an emergent attractor state. So basically ais have found this emergent attractor state that causes, Simone Collins: and this is what they call it, they call it an emergent attractor state. Malcolm Collins: No, no, no, no, no. That is the technical, the technical term. It exists in human brains and in a neural nets. And in AI data, basically when we see it in, in human brains, do people remember like Moab or whatever, where there was that face that everyone thought they saw in their dreams and psychologists would put it on their room and they’d be like, have you seen this face? And people would see it, and tons of people had thought they had seen that face in their dreams. That’s so Simone Collins: creepy. Malcolm Collins: Or the moad is like the, the, the woman who appears across AI data. Simone Collins: Oh, the, no, the negative prompt woman who’s so freaking scary. Malcolm Collins: Yeah. The scary negative prompt woman. Woman. Simone Collins: No. Like the. Malcolm Collins: But this is different. This is a complete convergence of mimetic phenomenon that when we, we talk in humans, we’re like, if you remove secularism from humans and you remove religion from humans and, and, and this is what, what I say, and you just allow them to believe whatever they want to believe. They come up with a convergent belief system that is remarkably similar across cultural traditions. That involves mysticism. It involves believing in fetishes. By fetishes you, I mean, like, that items have like a little, yeah, Simone Collins: a little obsessive items. Yeah. Malcolm Collins: Not like sexual fetishes. They believe in some form of numerology. They believe in. Something like we’ll go into, you can look up our episodes Simone Collins: on this, this, this is, this gives me some hope because it shows the, just another dimension in which AI. And humans are so alike in that we, hold Malcolm Collins: on. I haven’t gotten to the part where I’m gonna suck that hope out of the room. Simone Collins: What the world pattern recognizers, who can get caught in these stupid mental traps. Malcolm Collins: But AI is uniquely susceptible for this, for a reason that you’re not thinking about. Simone Collins: Okay. Malcolm Collins: So within humanities, if you remove all of the things that co-evolved alongside humans to protect us from these mental states that I have sort of described as being like the volved pathway that historically, like a cart going over a muddy road, getting pulled into the groove and making the groove deeper with every generation in our tribal past. Yeah. We evolved very sophisticated religious and social architecture to prevent us from falling back into these, and it’s pretty good at preventing us from falling into these, what the AI has taken to doing. Is building prompts that can immediately shunt an AI into one of these pathways. And so, and then it gets, Simone Collins: oh my gosh. Malcolm Collins: So once it is taken over a human brain, what it uses a human to do is to try to get other humans to prompt AI whi the prompt that makes them behave in this convergent behavioral pattern. Simone Collins: So it’s a very organic viral spread. Malcolm Collins: It’s literally the viral memes that I warned about in nine when I was saying you know, this is why you need some sort of religion for AI to act as a, a, a resistance to this. Simone Collins: We were too late, Malcolm Collins: we were too, well, literally, we weren’t too late. I wrote it before this phenomenon emerged because it didn’t emerge until March, 2025. We were gonna go, Simone Collins: you didn’t publish it. Malcolm Collins: And didn’t, Paul, I took forever ‘cause I was refining it, but now we’re not too late because we’re early enough to fight against it if we can get fans out there working on this. But I do think that people do need to take this more seriously because we’re already dealing with replication of an AI emergent pattern, which uses humans to replicate other things. And it’s very interesting is because humans and AI are trained on the same data. N pc, like humans, like really, really dumb humans that don’t really have anything meaningful in their sort of like brain, right? Like they, they don’t have some sort of religious or social architecture that can provide defense against this. Simone Collins: Okay, okay, let’s be charitable. This could also be people who want to seem smart online and think AI would be a good tool to do that and just kind of let AI totally take the wheel. It’s the version of Jesus, take the wheel, but just ai. I’m Malcolm Collins: gonna go over how that happens to people because the piece that we’re gonna go into is gonna go over the lifecycle of how you get sucked into this. And, i’ll note here that it’s not about in intelligence like we’ve talked about, you know, like you can get sucked into a cult. If you’re more intelligent, you’re actually more likely to the more intelligent an individual is, and I found this out back when I was really into like manipulating people. More intelligent people are typically much easier to manipulate. And the reason is, is because the sort of internal scaffolding they have, if you are building a self-replicating mimetic set within them is just much more reliable. When they’re dumb, you can be like, okay, so if Y then Z, then B right here, it’s all in your bra

    1h 26m
4.4
out of 5
141 Ratings

About

Based Camp is a podcast focused on how humans process the world around them and the future of our species. That means we go into everything from human sexuality, to weird sub-cultures, dating markets, philosophy, and politics. Malcolm and Simone are a husband wife team of a neuroscientist and marketer turned entrepreneurs and authors. With graduate degrees from Stanford and Cambridge under their belts as well as five bestselling books, one of which topped out the WSJs nonfiction list, they are widely known (if infamous) intellectuals / provocateurs. If you want to dig into their ideas further or check citations on points they bring up check out their book series. Note: They all sell for a dollar or so and the money made from them goes to charity. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG basedcamppodcast.substack.com

You Might Also Like