Rand Radio

Rand Paul Review
  • 3.6 (7)
  • POLITICS
  • UPDATED WEEKLY

Liberty or Death - Rand Paul 2028 www.randpaulreview.com

  1. Cyber War on Science: Cancer Journal Under Attack After Confirming Turbo Cancer from mRNA Shots

    5D AGO

    Cyber War on Science: Cancer Journal Under Attack After Confirming Turbo Cancer from mRNA Shots

    Turbo Cancers confirmed in 333 people in 27 countries — but the deep state is taking action using cyber attacks to block your access to the information This is outrageous. A prestigious peer-reviewed cancer journal has finally published the evidence that confirms mRNA shots cause turbo cancers. Then, BANG! The entire website is hit with vicious cyber attacks. Servers are taken down. Readers are blocked off from accessing the information. They can’t hide the truth anymore. On January 3, 2026, an Oncotarget study was published which documented the findings of 69 peer-reviewed articles. These studies documented 333 cases of turbo cancer in 27 different countries where tumors were rapidly growing and becoming extremely aggressive just weeks after receiving the mRNA shot(s). The boosters increased the aggression of the cancer dramatically. Lymphoma accounted for 38% of the cases, while breast, lung, colon, pancreas and other types of cancer were also appearing in rapid succession (far too quickly) in many patients. The Deep State reacted promptly. The editors of the study immediately contacted the FBI regarding the hacking of the website as well as the blocking of readers from accessing the information. They are pointing to the usual suspects tied to smear campaigns on PubPeer. There was no error. The hacking was a purposeful act to prevent the information from getting out. The scientific evidence within the study was shocking. The immune systems of the people being studied had been severely damaged. The body’s natural ability to detect and destroy tumor cells had been eliminated. The spike proteins from the mRNA shots were present in the cancerous tissues of the patients. The plasmid DNA in the mRNA shots contained SV40 promoters which allowed the plasmids to evade the body’s defenses due to the lipid nanoparticles used in the mRNA shots. The very things that regulators told us would NOT be a problem are exactly what are happening in the bodies of the people who received the mRNA shots. The real-world numbers confirm this cold hard fact. Huge studies in South Korea on millions of people. Huge studies in Italy on hundreds of thousands of people. Even huge studies by the U.S. military on over one million troops showing significant increases in lymphoma occurring shortly after the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for healthy young men and women began. If you are angry, fired up and ready to demand answers based on this type of raw, uncensored proof of the most egregious betrayal of medicine in modern history, then sign up today to become a paid subscriber so that you have access to every single explosive report, every single hidden connection, and every single piece of the puzzle that the Deep State keeps trying to erase – because what is coming next in this fight is going to be even worse. Our own government mandated that our citizens receive experimental vaccines under the threat of losing their jobs, being expelled from schools, and having their careers destroyed. This betrayal goes far beyond politics. Families are now watching their loved ones battle cancers that appear out of thin air. The same politicians and pharmaceutical companies that profited from these vaccines are now either refusing to comment on this issue or are working directly to suppress the evidence. The journal fought back. They successfully had the paper indexed properly on PubMed Central -- PMC12893478. It is still there. The attacks did not succeed in erasing history. But the desperation of the Deep State is clear. If the data presents a serious challenge to the entire narrative, they do not debate the science. They attack the messenger. They attack the medium through which the message is conveyed. And they attack the truth itself. This is no longer about public health. This is about power. Tyranny of big government wrapped in a white lab coat. Hypocrisy at the highest level of the elite class. A regulatory system that has been captured by the industries that it regulates, prioritizing profits over American lives. America deserves transparency. America deserves accountability. America deserves an end to mandatory medical experimentation on a free people. The signal from the turbo-cancer is deafening. The cover-up is beginning to fall apart. Americans are connecting the dots faster than ever. We cannot afford to look away. Demand all of the data. Reject the lies. Stand up against the next “emergency” that will result in the next round of this nightmare on our children and grandchildren. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.randpaulreview.com/subscribe

    2 min

  2. MAR 1

    Rand Paul SUPPORTS Our ICE Agents

    A new political divide is emerging among both constituents and elected representatives. The surprising twist? A growing number of politicians are siding with leftists and calling for the elimination of ICE. At the very least, Democrats want ICE off the streets of America’s largest cities. Rand Paul stands in opposition to those radicals. Instead of pivoting to the political flavor of the moment, Paul is standing firm in his support of ICE. ICE is America’s Last Stand If ICE weren’t patrolling the city streets, America wouldn’t be a unified country. ICE agents are the only barrier standing between law and order and complete chaos. Why doesn’t the left see it the same way? It’s a question Rand Paul is asking yet the Democrats haven’t provided a reasonable answer to. “I am not for chaos or force in the streets. I am for deporting violent criminals who are already in jail. Most Americans agree with that.” – Rand Paul Paul recently made news when discussing ICE with Katie Couric. Couric, a newscaster whose star has faded, minimized the importance of ICE arresting violent criminals. “If your daughter gets r*ped & he’s one of the 14%, I don’t think you’re gonna quibble about whether it’s 14 or 64.” – Paul The Kentucky senator’s retort came in response to Couric insisting less than 15% of illegal immigrants are violent offenders. Paul’s point? Even 1% of illegal invaders being violent is meaningful. Moreover, that 1% is justification enough for organized ICE efforts to remove all illegals from the United States. ICE is Restoring Its Rapport With the American People In the spirit of fairness, it’s worth mentioning Paul’s previous stance on ICE. The Kentucky senator insisted ICE had to restore its public trust following the clashes with protestors in Minnesota. ICE is doing exactly that. Paul is the first one to admit it. It’s a testament to the difference between Democrats and Republicans. Paul and other Republicans are consistent on the ICE effort while the Dems have reacted in character with their typical emotional pleas for open borders. How is the rapport between ICE and the American people being rebuilt? Through measured and peaceful illegal immigrant removal efforts. Paul is giving ICE credit for its internal reform effort. ICE protocols and policies were altered in mere days. Paul even went as fair as supporting the filming of ICE agents and other governmental officials in public. Why? Because doing so is a constitutional right. “We must avoid on all sides just resorting to inflammatory rhetoric. Declaring ‘nothing to see here,’ or rushing to label a U.S. citizen a ‘domestic terrorist’ before the evidence is established undermines trust and escalates already volatile situations.” – Paul The takeaway? Paul sees the immigration enforcement effort from different perspectives. He noted that he’s encouraged by the ongoing cooperation with government authorities in Minnesota and elsewhere. Paul’s point? There are two sides to every story. In some cases, there are more than two sides to a story. The American people clearly value liberty. The Trump administration feels the same way. Hence, ICE is examining its own actions including missteps in Minnesota and elsewhere. The outcome? A protection of our invaluable civil liberties while simultaneously removing illegal immigrants, many of whom have a criminal record. Paul Wants Americans to let ICE do Its Job It’s in everyone’s interest to pause and reflect for a moment. Reflect on the past years of the Biden administration when caravans of illegal immigrants invaded the United States. Those illegals crossed America’s southern border unimpeded. ICE is here to right that wrong, reversing years of a turnstile immigration policy. The moral of the story? Patriotic Americans should fall back, letting ICE do its job of securing our streets and neighborhoods. A little bit of patience goes a long way. Moreover, giving thanks to brave ICE agents for doing a job no one else is willing to do helps lift spirits. If you know any leftists or others who’ve turned on ice, steer them toward Rand Paul. Have them learn from Paul’s analysis of ICE, observing how he segued from somewhat of an ICE critic to an ICE supporter for good reason. It is in this spirit of fairness that we will take a collective step forward. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.randpaulreview.com/subscribe

    4 min
  3. Rand Paul condemns foreign aid

    FEB 24

    Rand Paul condemns foreign aid

    Foreign aid should never be a blank check. When countries execute people for “blasphemy” or for converting religions, they forfeit the right to receive U.S. taxpayer dollars. That’s why I’ve introduced legislation to make our aid contingent on religious freedom. Rand Paul Review is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.randpaulreview.com/subscribe

    1 min

  4. FEB 17

    COVID mRNA Jab Allegedly Kills a Seven Year Old Child

    Big pharma is well on its way to committing GENOCIDE. Through toxic, experimental vaccines, innocent American lives have been snuffed out at LIGHTNING speed. We can’t afford to ignore this. We can’t look the other way and allow companies like Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson to get away with this. They MUST face the music. They MUST be held accountable for treating human lives like disposable guinea pigs. Here’s what we’re up against… Big pharma NEVER answered for its duplicity or release of bioweapon “vaccines” during the height of COVID. Mind you, the virus itself was more than 98% survivable. Yet, that didn’t stop the pharmaceutical industry from releasing jabs that ended the lives of everyday Americans…and even CHILDREN. Seven Year Old Girl Loses Her Life to Big Pharma’s Greed Cassidy Baracka, 7, died within HOURS of being jabbed with a mRNA COVID shot. This was done in the name of “protecting” her. Yet, her first adverse reaction occurred when she began throwing up for eight consecutive hours. After that, one would think Cassidy wouldn’t have been subjected to any more of mRNA’s poison. SADLY, the adults in this seven year old’s life FAILED to save her. Instead, she was once again subjected to ANOTHER mRNA vaccine. That one proved to be deadly. In the hours after the vomiting and second injection, Cassidy tragically passed away. A seven year old girl… Her life ended prematurely, forever stolen…all because big pharma wanted to line its greedy pockets. They Used Her Death to Keep the Lies Alive By all accounts, Cassidy Baracka’s death should have been acknowledged as an adverse reaction to COVID vaccines…especially mRNA technology. That didn’t happen though. Instead, so called medical experts listed the seven year old’s passing as a “COVID death.” Let THAT sink in for a minute! This child NEVER had serious problems until AFTER being jabbed. After the first vaccine, she started vomiting profusely…which should have been a MAJOR red flag to adults tasked with her protection. Then, after the second vaccine, Cassidy passed away. That’s not a “COVID death.” That’s death at the hands of an undercover bioweapon. Yet, the medical establishment wants you to believe that a 98% survivable virus ended Cassidy’s life. Big Pharma’s Bloodlust Knows NO Bounds After a mRNA vaccine killed this seven year old girl, the powers that be tried to sweep it under the rug. Their efforts involved a MULTILEVEL plot to keep every single patriot in the dark. For starters, mainstream media pundits refused to report on what really happened. The tragedy of Cassidy’s death should have made national news. It should have been used as a cautionary tale of just how dangerous mRNA technology and rushed vaccines truly are. Instead…the truth was HIDDEN. Alongside mainstream media outlets, the medical establishment put false information on Cassidy’s death certificate. ANYONE who looks at it will read that COVID ended her life. They WON’T know that two mRNA vaccines led to the child’s profuse vomiting (a sign of her body REJECTING this shot), followed by her untimely passing. Don’t Let Cassidy’s Death Be in Vain Every single American needs to know the truth about what happened to Cassidy Baracka! Don’t forget… “COVID deaths” were used as excuses to ramp up vaccine mandates and generate more mRNA jabs. Look at it this way… If big pharma was willing to falsely classify Cassidy’s murder as a “COVID death,” how many other murders have been deceptively tied to this virus? Here’s the bottom line… mRNA technology needs to be banned. Pharmaceutical companies need to be prohibited from storing and creating more bioweapons. The FIRST step towards making this happen? Spreading the word about how Cassidy truly died, instead of letting big pharma execute more children. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.randpaulreview.com/subscribe

    2 min

  5. JAN 27

    They Deleted Texts, Blocked the Inquiry TWICE – Now EU MEPs Sue to Uncover the Pfizer Scandal

    The EU rushed the purchase of more than €35 billion Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccines in 2020–2021, the largest in history. If you think that’s a lot of money, you’re mistaken. With strong-willed Europeans going to bat for their people, there’s going to be hell to pay. German Member of Parliament, Christine Anderson, recently stood before the world in Brussels and shook the European Parliament. Ursula von der Leyen contributed €35 billion to Pfizer mRNA contracts and she wants to know why. She also tried to hide her contribution. Von der Leyen personally negotiated with Bourla, bypassing standard, lawful procedures. Did she know all along what she was really doing with that big of a chunk of change? Ursula Gertrud von der Leyen is a German politician, physician, and the first woman to serve as President of the European Commission since July 2019. She was re-elected to a second term in 2024, overseeing the EU’s executive branch, which enforces laws, manages budgets, and drives policies on trade, climate, and health for 450 million citizens across 27 member states. Her background is in medicine and economics. She’s seemingly blending the World Health Organization (WHO) and World Economic Forum (WEF) models of using people for financial gain while slowly killing them. It’s been lucrative for them thus far. For direct profits from the “pandemic” alone, not including additional windfalls that would be made due to cancer drugs, Alzheimer’s drugs, drugs for heart disease, etc. Companies like Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, and others all had global sales peaks in 2021–2022 before boosters started to decline because word got out that their shots were killing people: A rough, if not modest, estimate is that they made between $180 and $200 billion. A likely more accurate estimate is that they made at least $430 to $540 billion generated from COVID-19 vaccines and pandemic-related fallout, like delayed cancer screenings and boosting chronic disease treatments after pushing boosters on all of us. To give you an idea of just how much money that is, it’s equivalent to a mid-sized country’s annual GDP – like the entire economy in Sweden, Belgium, or Thailand. Year Key Revenue Breakdown (USD Billion) Total 2020 Development phase – about $1B with early trials/distribution ~$1B 2021 Pfizer/BioNTech: $37B (Comirnaty); Moderna: $18B; AstraZeneca: $2B; Others (J&J/Sinovac): $3B ~$60B 2022 Pfizer/BioNTech: $57B (incl. Paxlovid antiviral); Moderna: $19B; AstraZeneca: $3B; Others: $4B ~$83B 2023 Pfizer/BioNTech: $20B; Moderna: $7B; AstraZeneca: $1B; Others: $2B ~$30B 2024 Pfizer/BioNTech: $6B; Moderna: $1B; Others: $1B ~$8B Anderson accused von der Leyen of deleting text messages with Pfizer’s CEO, Albert Bourla. She’s gathered enough signatures to force an investigation twice, and nothing has come of it. Anderson should have been able to see why von der Leyen was lining Pfizer’s pockets for a bioweapon after 180 MEPs asked for the same information along with her, but the Parliament’s Conference of Presidents met in secret sessions and blocked her and the other MEPs Anderson says with passion while addressing her peers from Brussels: “. . .As you know, in the election campaign for EU Parliament, I ran on the promise that I would deliver an inquiry committee into the unspeakable events around mRNA procurement contracts and how Ursula von der Leyen acted in it. So, I tried to deliver on it. That is to say, we managed to get the required signatures for having such an inquiry committee twice. And both times it was just simply buried in some unelected body behind closed doors so that you, the citizens, would not find out who is actually for transparency, who’s actually for accountability of the Commission.” Anderson isn’t giving up, though. She, along with Marijke Ehlers from the Netherlands, and Charlie Weimers from Sweden are filing a complaint with the European Court so that there can be an open vote on whether or note there is an inquiry into this obvious usury of the people. They Have a Good Chance Of Exposing the Truth With Public Support On October 31, 2025, Anderson, Dutch MEP Marijke Ehlers (Patriots for Europe, Geert Wilders’ PVV), Swedish MEP Charlie Weimers (ECR), and others from ESN, Patriots, and ECR groups filed at the EU’s General Court. They do have a chance of pushing through an inquiry since the blocking of it was a violation of EU law and procedural rights. MEPs can force a vote if they have enough signatures, and they had plenty. Parliament had until November 20, 2025 to request an expedited ruling, or the case could drag on for years. This is how they might get caught in a parliamentary circle jerk while the key players have time to destroy evidence. Anderson says she’s met co-plaintiffs and lawyers to plan her next steps. She’s also vowing to stay the course. Von der Leyen’s Commission could also be in jeopardy amid her second term and fuel the populist anger against “Big Pharma’s” ridiculous influence on world health. She’s as corrupt as the Biden’s and Fauci. She’s got to go down with that ship. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.randpaulreview.com/subscribe

    2 min

  6. JAN 20

    Covid Vaccine Killed Two Teenagers Within Days Due To Myocarditis

    Dr. Peter McCullough reviews autopsies for a living. What he found after looking more closely into two teenage boys’ autopsies is beyond alarming. Each healthy teenage boy took two Covid shots, and in just days after receiving them, they died in their own homes. It’s time we look at what’s really in Covid mRNA Vaccines, and stop pretending that they were ever meant to stop the spread of Covid. These are biological weapons, and if you keep reading, you’ll understand exactly why. A thorough autopsy revealed that they had myocarditis in their hearts. Why? mRNA spike proteins go straight to the human heart tissue when introduced via vaccine. Dr. McCullough is trying to educate the world, but the medical establishment, even beyond Big Pharma, seems willfully ignorant and refuses to accept the stark truth. Spike Proteins in mRNA Vaccines: The Dark Truth Spike proteins cause a rush of inflammatory cells in the body. Inflammatory cells and the support cells around the heart were targeted in these boys by the spike proteins and likely attacked their hearts so fast that there was no way to call 911 or receive CPR. There was a triggering of cardiac death due to myocarditis, which was caused by the vaccines. This is likely why we are seeing a slew of young, healthy athletes keel over when playing sports, after having taken Covid shots. There are even papers proving that injecting mRNA Covid vaccine into mice causes myocarditis, followed by death. A study released by the CDC also admitted that myocarditis events increased by 13,200% when people were vaccinated with mRNA Covid shots. And this study was conducted over just a year. How a vaccine that can trigger heart failure in healthy, young, vital people is still on the market is unfathomable. Can you imagine the FDA approving something that increase your death risk by 100 let alone 13,200 percent? Dr. Vinay Prasad, the director of the FDA appointed under Trump also admits that mRNA causes spike proteins to go crazy and to induce myocarditis. mRNA vaccines need to be stopped, and fast. They should never be used, should be pulled from every shelf, and the company who made this poison need to be tried in a court of law, and spend years in jail for mass murdering the population. They Knew! What’s more, this isn’t some revelation. The companies that made these vaccines knew that spike proteins were deadly. They patented spike proteins! They were specifically engineered to attach to human cells. They used this “tech” in lab-created Covid so it would be more contagious. Spike proteins are amyloidogenic. Amyloid tissues are clumps of misfolded proteins (spiek proteins) that then deposit themselves where they don’t belong in the body, causing serious damage. They are sneaky in that they often mimic other diseases, complicating the recognition of the root cause and therefore and delaying a proper diagnosis. Amyloidosis is a pathologic extracellular tissue deposition of fibrils. Amyloid fibrils cause cardiac, renal, and systemic dysfunction. This is also why we’re seeing turbo cancer go crazy. Covid engineered spike protein is linked to heart damage, brain hemorrhage, eroded blood vessels, blood clots, autoimmunity, and accelerated cancer. Spike proteins destroy collagen in the body. They go straight to the endothelium and attack. Dr. McCullough says he’s never seen such a toxic protein in his life. And he’s not the only one. Japan’s most senior oncologist, Professor Fukushima, continues to slam the mRNA genetic vaccines and spike proteins specifically for these reasons. The moment they put this crap in nanoparticles, it can enter the blood throughout the whole body. A Japanese MP found spike proteins in a malignant lymphoma. Once these cells are created, they keep creating themselves, forever. They integrate into your stem cells. These are the “master cells’ that develop into all the other cells in your body. If they are corrupted, you can imagine what happens to the rest of your genome. Do you understand, now, that this is a true bioweapon? They forced you to take a gene therapy to produce buckets of spike proteins to kill you. This is why mRNA nanoparticle technology is so frightening. It’s a microparticle approach to mass genocide. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.randpaulreview.com/subscribe

    3 min

  7. JAN 10

    Allowing Biosimilars Will Change the Game

    Americans spend more on healthcare than any other nation. We also have one of the worst returns on healthcare investment in the world. Why is that? Rand Paul knows why: there’s too much bureaucracy and regulation stifling competition. Our flawed approach to healthcare leads to higher drug prices, extended illness, and shorter lives. Paul Wants to Fast-track Biosimilars Paul, an accomplished doctor, insists today’s science shows biosimilars are the equivalent of highly effective drugs. The difference between biosimilars and brand name medications? Biosimilars, sometimes referred to as “generics”, are more economical for patients. Moreover, biosimilars don’t require arguably pointless clinical studies. The Kentucky Senator authored a bill designed to persuade the Food and Drug Administration to adhere to evidence proving the merit of biosimilars. The FDA took Paul’s advice, implementing reform to reduce costs without sacrificing medication quality. Affordable Drugs Without the Red Tape Thanks to Paul’s legislation, the path is paved to fast-track biosimilars. What’s the plan? Paul’s bill streamlines the bogged down process for biosimilar approval. The idea is to eliminate repetitive requirements for clinical studies that waste time, effort, and money. The bill, dubbed Expedited Access to Biosimilars Act, hikes competition, boosts access to treatments that save lives, and decreases medication prices. “For years, biopharmaceutical researchers have argued that new and advanced methods of determining biosimilar clinical equivalence in early development have eliminated the need for late-stage human studies. When a biosimilar proves it is safe, effective, and similar to the brand name product in the early stages of its analytical and safety assessment, there’s no scientific justification to delay access.” – Paul The legislation removes the across-the-board immunogenicity requirement along with Clinical Efficacy standards and pharmacodynamics requirements unless there is sufficient scientific reason. However, Paul’s legislation does not remove the requirement for pharmacokinetic studies. Why is that? Pharmacokinetic studies are imperative as they serve as a means of demonstrating medications’ clinical safety. If the FDA pushes for even more study requirements, the agency will have to prove there is justification for those additional standards. The purpose? To guarantee all regulatory decisions pertaining to medication are made based on science as opposed to arbitrary government bureaucracy. Affordability is the new Beltway Buzzword of the Beltway In the end, Paul’s biosimilars bill centers on healthcare affordability. Removing government constraints in favor of a free market hastens competitor entrance. It won’t be long until biosimilars are available at prices that are more affordable than brand name medications. In other words, government will finally catalyze private sector innovation instead of impeding it. The best part? Paul’s push for modernization and medication affordability expedites the FDA biosimilar process for approval without jeopardizing consumer safety. The right wing’s open mindedness toward biosimilars is the perfect example of how Republicans are the real progressives of America’s political scene. The Democrats, who claim to be progressive, stifle free market innovation and competition, bogging down drug approval processes with unnecessary bureaucracy. It’s quite ironic that Paul, a Republican, is the one who pounded the table for a more progressive approach. Republicans like Paul are progressive where it matters: business, healthcare, and government efficiency. Biosimilars Will Save Us Billions Early estimates indicate biosimilar drugs will cut costly medication prices to surprisingly affordable levels. If those estimates are accurate, savings will amount to $38.4 billion every half-decade. The money will be redirected toward paying the national debt, invested in America’s infrastructure, or possibly distributed to taxpayers. “Americans pay too much for prescription treatments because of outdated FDA requirements. This bill would give pharmacists more options, subject to state law, to substitute unaffordable therapeutics with lower-cost alternatives. I offered similar reforms in the past because health care reform starts with giving patients more affordable choices. It’s time we stop letting red tape stand between patients and lower prices.”- Paul Paul’s idea is an obvious solution that Democrats negligently overlooked in favor of Big Government. For that, they’ll likely pay at the polls. Fast forward a couple years into the future and biosimilars will likely be ubiquitous. More importantly, Americans will pay significantly less for medications that greatly improve wellbeing and also save lives. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.randpaulreview.com/subscribe

    1 min

  8. 12/14/2025

    Ex-CIA Director John Brennan Is The Real Villain

    LIMITED TIME DEAL: 60% OFF FOR CHRISTMAS It would make a good slug for a screenplay: A CIA director works with a sitting president to undermine his opponent and help steal an election. When the opposition returns four years later and wins the presidency, heads must roll. Welcome to the show. This screenplay could have been written by Sen. Rand Paul, who saw Brennan as a villain years earlier. Paul was the only Senator who strongly opposed Brennan’s confirmation as Obama’s CIA Director in 2013. “When I filibustered his nomination for nearly 13 hrs,” Paul posted on X, “I never imagined the degree of his deceit. I am proud to have been the only U.S. senator to have voted no.” Paul used the filibuster when you had to pay a price: he talked for 13 hrs in the Senate. That’s how bad he wanted to stop Brennan, who voted for Gus Hall for president in 1976. Hall was a member of the Communist Party. The question becomes: How on earth did Brennan get confirmed as CIA director? Who would vote for a Communist sympathizer to head one of the world’s most powerful spy agencies? After all, once a Communist, always a Communist. Sen. Paul Vindicated Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Jim Jordan doesn’t like Communists or other ne’er-do-wells who seek to subvert the Constitution. In late October, Jordan referred John Brennan to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. Brennan is accused of knowingly making false statements during an interview before the Committee in 2023. According to a press release from the Committee, “While testifying, Brennan made numerous willfully and intentionally false statements of material fact that were contradicted by the record established by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) and the CIA.” Denying that the CIA relied on the discredited Steele dossier in drafting the post-2016 election Intelligence Community Assessment is a bold-faced lie. Brennan’s claim that the CIA was not “involved at all” with the Steele dossier should land him behind bars. The fact that Brennan said the CIA opposed including the Steele dossier in the Intelligence Community Assessment should tack on some more years to his sentence. According to the press release, newly declassified documents show that: * A CIA officer drafted the annex containing a summary of the dossier; * Brennan made the ultimate decision, along with then-FBI Director James Comey, to include information from the dossier in the ICA; and * Brennan overruled senior CIA officers who objected to the inclusion of the dossier material. Open and shut. Brennan lied to Congress. Federal criminal law holds that a person who makes any false material declaration “shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.” How many times did Brennan lie to Congress? That’s up to the court system to find out. It could add up to quite a bit of jail time for Comrade Brennan. How could Brennan be so stupid? Sen. Paul knew over a decade ago that anyone who would vote for a Communist for President of the United States had to be stupid. Paul has a knack for seeing what, in retrospect, appears obvious. If it was so obvious, why didn’t more people see it then? Rand Paul should run for president. We could use a common-sense seer behind the desk in the Oval Office when Trump’s term is over. Group Think Stupid Brennan isn’t the only one in hot water over an attempted coup via the Russian Collusion Hoax. Along with Brennan, “ex-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page were among more than two dozen people subpoenaed” as part of a DOJ investigation into the infamous 2016 Russian Collusion Hoax. Thirty federal grand jury subpoenas related to the “Russiagate” investigation were issued, according to the New York Post. According to The Post’s star reporter, Miranda Devine, it is a “WORST NIGHTMARE” scenario for the perpetrators of the conspiracy to take down Trump. How could the conspirators go so wrong? According to Divine, it was because they never considered the fact that Trump could become president again. They thought he’d be broke, in jail, or so demonized that he’d be forever politically ruined. Put another way, they’d never thought he’d rise from the ashes like an avenging Phoenix. And that’s just what he did. Imagine if Rand Paul had succeeded in blocking Brennan’s nomination over a decade ago. The Russian Collusion Hoax may never have made it out of the gates. Without CIA approval, the coup conspiracy might have been dead in the water. A man with that kind of foresight would make an excellent president. He’s a staunch Constitutionalist who works to protect individuals from an increasingly weaponized government. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.randpaulreview.com/subscribe

    2 min
See All (72)

Ratings & Reviews

3.6
out of 5
7 Ratings

About

Liberty or Death - Rand Paul 2028 www.randpaulreview.com

Information

  • Creator
    Rand Paul Review
  • Years Active
    2025 - 2026
  • Episodes
    72
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © Rand Paul Review
  • Show Website
    Rand Radio

You Might Also Like