Cam Harvey: Through the Noise

Duke University's Fuqua School of Business

Fuqua economist Campbell Harvey gives his insights on pressing topics within the worlds of economics and finance.

  1. 2h ago

    France ≠ U.S.

    Cam Harvey and Robert Olinger examine why surprisingly weak nonfarm payroll growth didn’t trigger the market reaction many investors might expect—and why the headline jobs number may be missing the bigger economic story. Harvey argues that structural changes in the U.S. economy, including lower immigration and AI-driven productivity gains, could mean that modest employment growth is becoming the new normal. With unemployment remaining low, he explains why positive payroll growth can still be consistent with a healthy growth outlook. The discussion then turns to interest rates and the Federal Reserve. Harvey questions whether policymakers should be trying to slow economic growth at a time when the U.S. faces enormous fiscal obligations and an extraordinary wave of technology investment. At the center of the episode is the competition for capital. Massive AI infrastructure and data center investments are creating demand for financing, potentially pushing yields higher across government and corporate bond markets. As capital flows toward projects offering higher expected returns, other industries may face higher borrowing costs and reduced investment. Harvey argues that rising rates should therefore not automatically be interpreted as an inflation story. Instead, they may reflect expectations for stronger growth and unusually attractive investment opportunities created by technological innovation. In his view, this market-driven reallocation of capital could be essential to maximizing long-term U.S. economic growth.

  2. Sep 30

    Is there a crisis in the bond market?

    Is the U.S. bond market really entering a crisis with “no historical parallel”? In this episode of Cam Harvey’s Through the Noise, Cam Harvey and Robert Olinger examine the headlines surrounding rising Treasury yields and explain why a 10-year yield above 5% needs to be viewed in a much broader historical and economic context. Harvey argues that today’s interest rates are less extraordinary than the near-zero rates that followed the Global Financial Crisis and COVID-19. He examines what the yield curve is signaling about economic growth and uses 10-year Treasury and TIPS yields to show why inflation expectations alone do not explain the rise in long-term rates. The discussion also explores concerns about U.S. government debt and the risk of monetizing that debt through money creation. Harvey explains why market-based inflation expectations are important when evaluating those concerns and why he believes fiscal challenges are not the primary driver of higher Treasury yields. The conversation then turns to what Harvey sees as a key force behind rising rates: competition for capital. With corporations raising significant amounts of financing—particularly to support AI infrastructure and data center investment—investors need higher yields to supply that capital. Harvey connects this dynamic to expected real interest rates, economic growth, corporate bond spreads, and the shape of the yield curve. Finally, Harvey addresses claims that China is abandoning U.S. Treasuries, explaining how offshore custody centers such as Belgium, Luxembourg, and the UK can complicate interpretations of official Treasury holdings data. The central takeaway: a high interest rate cannot be judged as good or bad in isolation. Understanding bond yields requires examining inflation expectations, real rates, capital demand, economic growth, fiscal conditions, and the yield curve together.

  3. Sep 16

    Is It like 1999 or 1929?

    Yes, we are experiencing prolonged war, persistent inflation, 18% of our taxes go to pay only the interest on 40t in debt, long-rates are breaking 5%... but why all the pessimism? In my latest podcast, Through the Noise, with Robert Olinger, I dare to focus on the positives.  1. Unemployment is low and there is no sign it is set to jump. The AI jobpocalypse is increasingly unlikely. New opportunities continue to outpace displacement. 2.Inflation is annoyingly high at 3.4%. However, it is hardly a crisis. The breakeven 10-year inflation is 2.4% - somewhat above the Fed target. 3.Real wages have kept pace with inflation 4.A long rate of 5% is historically, no big deal. A normal yield curve will have a premium of a few percent over short rates. Indeed, it is the rate that we had 20 years ago. What was unusual was the very low long rates.  Crucially, the rate has increased but this is due to increases in the expected real rate - not inflation. Indeed, breakeven 10-year inflation has not increased over the past 12 months. Higher expected real rates may be an indication of higher growth opportunities.  5. Growth opportunities have increased. We have four technological revolutions happening simultaneously - that has never happened before - with AI opportunities leading the charge. GDP growth averaged a tepid 1.7% in the first two quarters. The Atlanta Fed is projecting 4.4% in the third quarter. The key issue is whether 10% is possible in the near future.   6. The stock market is near all-time highs. Yes, the stock market has been wrong many times before. However, this is not 1929. One obvious difference was the lack of technological innovations in 1929. Furthermore, it is not 1999. At that time, there was one technological innovation - the internet - with a much smaller potential to impact GDP.  To me, pessimism is overwhelmed by the case for optimism. This is not to say there is no risk. There is plenty of risk. Historically, every great innovation has downsides. With AI, the scale of the upside potential is vast - and the downside potentially existential. The best approach is to manage the risk, not seek to eliminate it.

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

Fuqua economist Campbell Harvey gives his insights on pressing topics within the worlds of economics and finance.

You Might Also Like