Autonomy Insiders

Daniel Abreu Marques

Autonomy Insiders is the weekly podcast for people who need a clear view of autonomous driving, not recycled takes. Each episode features interviews with leaders across the autonomy ecosystem: robotaxi operators, OEMs, platform players, regulators, and investors. We go deep on Europe and China, markets that are often under-covered, and we always connect back to the US so you can compare playbooks. We talk about what changes outcomes: deployment constraints, unit economics, partnership strategy, safety cases, regulation, and the real work of scaling fleets and operations. You will hear what leaders are optimizing for, where they are stuck, and what they think is coming next. If you follow autonomous vehicles, this is built for you.

  1. 2d ago

    From Rental Cars to Robotaxis: Hertz’s Bet on Fleet Operations | Doria Holbrook, CEO Oro Mobility

    Every robotaxi still has to be charged, cleaned, repaired and financed. Hertz built a separate company to do that work, and it starts with human drivers. Doria Holbrook is CEO of Oro Mobility, the fleet platform Hertz launched this year to own, operate and orchestrate vehicles for ride-hail and autonomous platforms. Before Hertz, she worked at Cruise and helped build Amazon's last-mile delivery network. Oro runs a 45,000-vehicle rideshare fleet across 33 US markets and works with Lucid, Nuro and Uber on its first autonomous fleet in the Bay Area. First, the origin. Daniel Abreu Marques asks why Hertz spun Oro out instead of keeping it in-house, what makes innovation inside a hundred-year-old company hard, and where the name comes from. Then the model. Doria explains why Oro treats its driver-led fleet as the precursor to driverless operations, what an AV company actually buys from Oro, how pit stops differ from depots, and where Oro draws the line on remote assistance. Then the operations: what the Atlanta pilot taught the team, which KPIs partners measure, and why years of maintaining a large EV fleet transfer to autonomous vehicles. Then the money: what the $80 million strategic investment will fund, how Oro sets itself apart from other fleet operators, and why the missing residual-value market makes autonomous vehicles hard to finance. It ends with Europe, Hertz's franchise network, and what success looks like for Oro over the next five years. CHAPTERS 0:00 - From Hertz to Oro Mobility 5:48 - Why driver-led comes before driverless 8:03 - What an AV company buys from Oro 12:55 - Lessons from the Atlanta pilot 15:53 - The first autonomous fleet and the EV playbook 20:09 - The $80M raise and the competition 23:55 - Residual value: the robotaxi financing problem 25:54 - Europe and the next five years LINKS The AV Market Strategist (newsletter) - https://avmarketstrategist.substack.com  Listen on Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/7KilrHXFnMqafvtLMQDWXw  Listen on Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/autonomy-insiders/id1883492805 Doria on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/doriaholbrook/ Oro Mobility - https://www.oromobility.com/ #Robotaxi #FleetOperations #AutonomousDriving #Hertz #AutonomyInsiders

  2. Oct 21

    Auve Tech’s Driverless Shuttle Playbook for Airports and Beyond | Taavi Rõivas

    Robotaxis get the billions. But driverless shuttles on airports and private campuses may scale first, because the owner of the ground can say yes before the law changes. Taavi Rõivas was Prime Minister of Estonia. Today he chairs Auve Tech, a Tallinn company that designs its own eight-seat shuttle, MiCa, and its own self-driving software. Its shuttles run in small Japanese towns, in West Palm Beach and Abu Dhabi, and on the airside of Tallinn Airport with nobody on board. First, the bet. Daniel Abreu Marques asks why Auve Tech chose low-speed shuttles when most of the money chased robotaxis, why Navya and EasyMile struggled, and why a company this size builds the vehicle and the software instead of picking one. Taavi explains the redundancy behind MiCa and how a new route goes from 3D map to driverless. Then the economics. A driverless shuttle costs more than a minivan, so the saving has to come from the driver. Taavi explains how many vehicles one remote operator must monitor before the numbers flip, why that ratio differs between Switzerland and Dubai, and why the driver shortage at airports matters as much as cost. Then the deployments: what the regulator needed to see before the safety operator could leave the vehicle at Tallinn Airport, why the customer there also sends tools and aircraft parts on their own, and what daily rides with elderly passengers in Japan show about acceptance. It ends with the Middle East, Chinese robobuses arriving in Europe, whether "made in Europe" really sells, and the one rule a former head of government would change to scale driverless shuttles. CHAPTERS 0:00 - From Prime Minister to driverless shuttles 4:06 - Why shuttles, not robotaxis 9:39 - Inside MiCa: full stack, redundancy, new routes 16:25 - The economics: when driverless beats a driver 26:50 - On the ground: Tallinn Airport, Japan, Florida 35:57 - Regulators, the Middle East and the next two years 39:57 - Chinese robobuses and the one rule to change GUEST Taavi Rõivas, Chairman of Auve Tech and former Prime Minister of Estonia. Auve Tech designs and builds the MiCa autonomous shuttle and its self-driving software in Tallinn. LINKS Taavi on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/taaviroivas/ The AV Market Strategist (newsletter) - https://avmarketstrategist.substack.com Listen on Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/7KilrHXFnMqafvtLMQDWXw Listen on Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/autonomy-insiders/id1883492805 Subscribe on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@AutonomyInsiders #DriverlessShuttle #AutonomousDriving #Robotaxi #Estonia #AutonomyInsiders

  3. Oct 14

    Europe’s Own Path to Autonomous Mobility | Lukas Neckermann

    Is Europe hopelessly behind in autonomous driving, or should it skip the race altogether? Lukas Neckermann thinks both camps are wrong. If the driving software comes from California, China or Israel, what actually stays in Europe? Who earns the money, who employs the people, and who owns the fleets? Lukas coined the term “mobility revolution” more than ten years ago, built on three zeros: zero emissions, zero accidents, zero ownership. He started his career at BMW and Allianz, has written four books on mobility and cities, co-founded PAVE Europe and the Urban Places Lab, and runs Neckermann Strategic Advisory in London. In this episode: Why Europe’s path is an extension of public transport, not a substitute for itWhy one type approval framework beats a patchwork of US city permitsWhy most robotaxi revenue sits in fleet management, not softwareWhy banks and lessors are still on the sidelinesWhat has to be true by October 2027 for Europe to winChapters 00:00 Intro 02:11 Why both camps are wrong: Europe’s own path 07:44 Regulation as a head start, and why pilots die 12:22 Oslo and the public transport playbook 14:45 Where the money really stays: orchestration and insurance 19:37 The vertical integration myth and the hidden labor behind robotaxis 25:14 Who will own the fleets: banks, lessors and residual values 28:34 Serving the suburbs: regulation, ride pooling and mobility deserts 34:13 Europe in 2027 and 2030, and where to meet Lukas Links My newsletter: The AV Market Strategist Lukas on LinkedIn Urban Places Lab on LinkedIn PAVE Europe

  4. Oct 7

    Inside Germany's Autonomous Driving Law: The Hurdle Nobody Has Cleared

    Germany wrote the world's first legal framework for driverless commercial service in 2021. Five years later, no operator holds a regular Level 4 approval. Why? Till Stegemann is a lawyer at Rödl in Berlin. He advises cities, transport operators and companies on autonomous mobility. He is a co-author of the German Federal Ministry of Transport's handbook "Autonomous Driving in Public Transport", a practical guide for cities and transit operators on bringing driverless vehicles into public transport. In this episode, Till walks through the German process step by step. Which permit, from which authority, in which order, and what has to be in the file. We cover the vehicle approval from the KBA, why the functional safety concept is where applications stall, what the technical supervisor may and may not do, and how EU and UN rules change the picture. We close with Till's verdict on why Germany has the law but not the market, and what cities and operators should do first. Chapters 00:00 Intro: Germany's legal head start 01:37 The architecture: StVG, AFGBV and the SAE levels 09:01 Permit 1: Vehicle approval from the KBA 18:20 Permit 2: Operating area approval and the Berlin real-world test 24:12 The technical supervisor and the vehicle holder 29:22 Passenger transport permit and liability 32:30 EU type approval and the new UN regulation 37:48 Why Germany is not the first market 40:44 Advice for cities and operators Links My Newsletter with weekly AV Industry Analysis: https://avmarketstrategist.substack.com/ Handbook "Autonomous Driving in Public Transport" (German Federal Ministry of Transport): https://www.bmv.de/SharedDocs/DE/Anlage/K/autonomes-fahren-oeffentlicher-verkehr.pdf?__blob=publicationFile Till Stegemann on LinkedIn: here

  5. Oct 1

    Grab's Autonomous Vehicle Playbook for Singapore and Southeast Asia | Dominic Ong, GM Autonomous

    Southeast Asia should be the last place AV's arrive. Dense, improvised traffic, monsoon rain and some of the cheapest driver labor in any middle-income region. Yet in April 2026, Punggol in northeast Singapore became the first residential neighborhood in Southeast Asia with a public autonomous passenger service. In this episode of Autonomy Insiders, Daniel Abreu Marques talks with Dominic Ong, General Manager Autonomous at Grab, who runs that program with WeRide and Singapore's Land Transport Authority (LTA). We cover: → Why Grab's case for autonomous vehicles is about reliability, not driver cost → How Grab's hybrid model dispatches robotaxis and human drivers on one network → How Grab, WeRide and LTA split the work in Singapore → Why vehicle uptime now matters more than miles per critical intervention → What breaks an AV stack in Southeast Asia: vehicle costs in Singapore, monsoon rain, motorcycles and right-hand drive → Delivery robots, and why Grab takes equity in AV partners like WeRide, Momenta and Vay → How Grab views Waymo's planned entry into Singapore Chapters 00:00 Why Southeast Asia is the hardest robotaxi market 00:55 Grab and the GM Autonomous mandate 04:57 What autonomy actually solves for Grab 08:45 The hybrid model: robotaxis and human drivers on one network 14:02 Punggol: how Grab, WeRide and LTA split the work 19:02 From fixed-route shuttle to robotaxi ride-hailing 21:56 The metrics Grab actually watches 25:43 What breaks an AV stack in Southeast Asia 30:31 Autonomous delivery and robotics 33:48 Equity stakes, AV partners and Vay 42:01 Waymo enters Singapore 44:05 Who owns the fleet at scale About the guest Dominic Ong is General Manager Autonomous at Grab. He has worked on autonomous vehicles for more than a decade, first at Singapore's Economic Development Board and for the past ten years at Grab. Newsletter: The AV Market Strategist Connect with Daniel on LinkedIn #robotaxi #Grab #autonomousvehicles

  6. Sep 23

    The UK's Autonomous Vehicle Permit Process Explained

    London's first robotaxi service runs on the Uber app with a safety driver still behind the wheel. Here is every step a company must clear before the UK lets it take the driver out. Tym Syrytczyk co-founded the Institute for Driverless Transport (IFDT), an independent UK research body, and writes Self-Driving Insights. His recent piece on getting permission to run a robotaxi service in London is the plain-English explainer. This episode walks through it in order. The law comes first. Two Acts separate supervised rides from driverless ones. The 2018 Act set out insurance and liability, and the Automated Vehicles Act 2024 builds the permanent framework, due to be complete by 2027. The Department for Transport formally grants the permit. The DVSA runs most of the process, the VCA assesses the vehicle and its software, and Transport for London holds local consent. Next is the route a company actually takes. Waymo, Wayve and Apollo Go test in London without any trial permit, guided only by a non-statutory code of practice. Wayve and Uber carry passengers today on three ordinary private hire licences, so legally the service is no different from a standard Uber ride. Taking the driver out needs an automated passenger services (APS) permit and a safety case. Then it gets political. TfL has six weeks to respond to a proposed service, and if it stays silent, that counts as consent. Applications opened in May, but TfL says it has received none for London, and it has not published any consent guidance. Daniel Abreu Marques asks Tym why nobody has applied yet, whether TfL could delay driverless services almost indefinitely, and how much time operators should really add to their plans. It ends with Tym's on-the-record prediction for London's first driverless permit: which operator, how many cars, and which part of the city. TIMESTAMPS0:00 - London's first robotaxi service still has a driver 1:13 - Why a newsletter wasn't enough: founding IFDT 5:11 - Why permits matter as much as the software 7:14 - Supervised vs. driverless under UK law 8:23 - Two laws: the 2018 and 2024 Acts 10:42 - Who does what: DfT, DVSA, VCA and TfL 13:27 - What fast-tracking the pilot scheme changed 15:39 - Testing in London without a trial permit 18:06 - What goes into a safety case, and who reads it 20:15 - The vehicle special order 22:52 - How Wayve and Uber carry passengers today 26:44 - Uber operates, Wayve drives: why the split matters 28:11 - The APS permit, and why DVSA issues it, not TfL 31:11 - Remote assistance and the legal meaning of self-driving 33:41 - Operational design domain vs. permit area 36:13 - From application to permit, and TfL's six-week clock 39:45 - Why TfL has received zero applications 41:37 - No consent guidance: the practical effect 43:56 - DfT vs. TfL: real tension or working as designed? 45:17 - Prediction: London's first driverless permit LINKS Tym's Substack: https://substack.com/@tympj The AV Market Strategist (my newsletter) - https://avmarketstrategist.substack.com #Robotaxi #AutonomousDriving #London #TransportPolicy #AutonomyInsiders

  7. Sep 16

    beti: The French AV Operator Behind WeRide's First European Robobus | Benjamin Beaudet, CEO beti

    Europe's first fully driverless commercial robobus runs in France. beti is a French operator of automated mobility networks, and a spin-off from Bertolami, a family coach business that has moved people around rural France for 75 years. CEO Benjamin Baudet explains the layer of the autonomous driving industry nobody photographs: the people and software that keep a driverless bus service running once the driver is gone. Before beti existed, the family studied its own routes and asked a simple question — if the driver is no longer on board, who does everything else? They counted 421 daily tasks that had nothing to do with driving. Autonomous driving technology replaces the driving task. It does not replace the operator. That finding became the company. What beti sells is people and software: field teams trained to deploy someone else's autonomy, plus two in-house platforms — OperaVision for the ground crew and HyperVision for remote monitoring. The conversation gets into the fleet operations numbers this layer rarely publishes: four vehicles per hypervisor on two-hour rotations, roughly 20% of operating effort spent on cleaning, charging, depot work and roadside recovery, and around 30% lower operating cost than a service with a driver — but only above eight hours a day and seven days a week. In October 2024 beti flew to Guangzhou to argue it was the right size of European partner. Four months later the Valence TGV robobus line launched with WeRide and Renault. Adapting a robobus designed for the Chinese market took a year of closing gaps on language, interfaces and data protocols. Plus: how French driverless permits came through in three months, why Keolis, Transdev and RATP are customers rather than competitors, how beti is preparing for robotaxi and goods transport alongside public transport, and the 2030 target Benjamin uses to measure success. This show is the interview half. The analysis lands every Monday in the newsletter. Free: https://avmarketstrategist.substack.com/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description&utm_campaign=ep27 TIMESTAMPS 0:00 - open: the gap in the leading pack is narrowing 0:59 - The service layer nobody photographs 1:53 - What beti actually sells 2:24 - Why a family coach operator started an autonomy company 3:32 - The 421 tasks that are not driving 5:01 - What transfers from a 75-year-old bus business 6:00 - The turnkey offer: people plus two software platforms 7:37 - Hypervision vs. teleoperation, and who owns the driving 8:52 - Why the control room sits in the same country 9:16 - Training customers to not need you 10:16 - What operators underestimate 11:12 - Four layers, and the two beti refuses to enter 12:13 - How many vehicles one hypervisor can handle 13:38 - What caps the ratio: human attention 14:18 - The ground crew: 20% of operating effort 14:54 - What stops WeRide or Renault building this themselves 15:55 - Valence 2025: how the WeRide deal came together 17:00 - Why that route, and the riders who became ambassadors 18:59 - Driverless permits in three months 19:59 - Rebuilding a Chinese robobus for Europe 22:02 - Navya, EasyMile, WeRide: a 20-criteria operator framework 23:31 - Roland-Garros 2026: a 100% beti operation 25:00 - Who the customer is, and who writes the cheque 26:11 - 30% below a driven service, with conditions 27:18 - When your supplier goes under 28:58 - Keolis, Transdev, RATP: customers, not competitors 30:13 - The 2030 target: 2,000 hypervision licences

  8. Sep 9

    Robot Pit Stops for Robotaxis | George Kalligeros, CEO Aseon Labs

    Everyone measures robotaxi progress in miles driven. Almost nobody measures the hours the vehicle spends not driving. George Kalligeros, co-founder and CEO of Aseon Labs, is building a robot that compresses a depot into a single parking space. When a robotaxi drops below its charge threshold, it leaves the zone it is earning in, drives three to five miles to a depot, queues, gets serviced, and drives back. In San Francisco, a compact city with unusually good infrastructure, that is roughly two hours out of service, and it happens several times a day. The driving stack is fully autonomous. Everything around it is still humans, real estate and deadhead miles. Aseon's answer is a six-metre box that occupies one charging bay, holds two six-axis robotic arms, and completes a reset in twenty to thirty minutes: inspection, charge, interior clean, item retrieval, data sync and reboot. George is unusually direct about what version one does not do. No exterior wash. No sensor detailing. Anything genuinely unpleasant goes back to the depot. Daniel Abreu Marques presses on the parts that decide whether this is a business or a demo: why Aseon operates a network instead of selling boxes, how the project-company and asset-backed financing model is designed to pull AV operators into owning part of their own infrastructure, and why a pod needs only about five resets a day — roughly 10% utilisation — to break even. The wider argument is the one this show keeps returning to. If more than half the cost of a robotaxi service sits in infrastructure and operations rather than in the driver, then autonomy economics are settled off the road, not on it. And once cities start tendering licences with a cap on vehicle numbers, "drive somewhere cheaper to charge" stops being a strategy. As George puts it: the infrastructure has to meet the vehicle, not the vehicle be taken to the infrastructure just because it drives itself. Plus: what four years at Tier taught him about who you can actually incentivise, why Europe's density makes it the natural market for this product, and why he is building the company in California anyway. TIMESTAMPS 0:49 - Introduction 1:26 - What Aseon is, and what an operator actually buys 1:52 - Inside the box: one bay, two robotic arms 2:41 - A 20-30 minute reset, bounded by charge rate 3:29 - What it replaces: two hours out of service, several times a day 4:50 - What they found inside real AV depots 5:31 - A third of the fleet offline at any given time 6:44 - Four years at Tier, and who you can actually incentivise 7:50 - Which jobs version one does, and which it refuses 9:47 - Interior resets: the 90% a robot can close out 10:55 - Getting power into a dense-city parking bay 12:00 - One pod, many platforms: ID Buzz down to Cybercab 13:55 - Orchestration: no queuing, just-in-time only 14:51 - When the pod fails with a vehicle inside 15:52 - Why Aseon runs a network instead of selling boxes 18:07 - How operators pay, and what makes it bankable 19:08 - Five resets a day: the utilisation math 21:02 - Where the $10M goes, and what 2027 has to prove 21:38 - $50M a metro: from venture equity to asset-backed debt 22:48 - Movable, permittable, live in eight weeks 23:55 - Lyft, Avis, Move: why route into a third-party network 25:20 - What stays in-house 26:14 - Are AV depots the new data centres? 27:39 - Is the cost really decided off the road? 28:55 - Curb space, cities and the traffic externality 30:53 - Europe: why build in the US, and when Aseon arrives here 32:52 - The one metric for the next twelve months

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
2 Ratings

About

Autonomy Insiders is the weekly podcast for people who need a clear view of autonomous driving, not recycled takes. Each episode features interviews with leaders across the autonomy ecosystem: robotaxi operators, OEMs, platform players, regulators, and investors. We go deep on Europe and China, markets that are often under-covered, and we always connect back to the US so you can compare playbooks. We talk about what changes outcomes: deployment constraints, unit economics, partnership strategy, safety cases, regulation, and the real work of scaling fleets and operations. You will hear what leaders are optimizing for, where they are stuck, and what they think is coming next. If you follow autonomous vehicles, this is built for you.

You Might Also Like