Crime Snob Podcast

Sandra & Alice

True Crime 

  1. Sep 7

    Ep. 21: Lindsay Clancy Part 4: 11 to 1, a Holdout Juror & the Mistrial

    We thought Part 4 would be simple: the jury would return with a verdict, we’d talk about what it meant, and after nearly six weeks of trial coverage, the Lindsay Clancy case would finally be over. That is not what happened. After seven days of deliberations, three separate deadlock notes, a woman arrested for allegedly filming members of the jury, a Tuey Rodriguez instruction, an 11 to 1 split, a dispute over a holdout juror, and one final courtroom battle between Kevin Reddington and Judge Sullivan, the first Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial. In Part 4, we break down exactly what happened inside and outside the courtroom during those final seven days, why the alleged conduct of one juror became such a major issue, why Kevin tried to take the fight all the way to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, what a mistrial actually means for Lindsay, and what could happen next. We also talk about the much bigger conversation this case has created around postpartum mental illness, criminal responsibility, motherhood, women’s rights, true crime culture, and the increasingly disturbing way people have been speaking to and about each other online. Because understanding how something horrific happened is not the same thing as excusing it. Three children, Cora, Dawson, and Callan, remain at the center of this story, and whatever anyone believes about Lindsay Clancy, that should never be forgotten. This is the final chapter of our four part Lindsay Clancy trial coverage… at least for now.

  2. Aug 24

    Ep 19. The Defense Begins: Was Lindsay Clancy Criminally Responsible? | Part 3

    In Part 3 of our Lindsay Clancy trial coverage, the prosecution rests its case and the defense finally begins to answer the question at the center of this trial: what was happening in Lindsay’s mind on the night she killed her three children? We break down the first full week of the defense case, including emotional testimony from Lindsay’s mother and family members about the drastic changes they saw in the months leading up to the tragedy, her worsening anxiety and insomnia, medication concerns, and the moments they now recognize as warning signs. We also get into the battle of the experts. Mental health professionals offer dramatically different interpretations of Lindsay’s condition: including testimony about psychosis, command hallucinations, criminal responsibility, and whether she was capable of understanding the wrongfulness of her actions or controlling her behavior. Plus, we discuss the medical examiner’s testimony about Lindsay’s injuries from the fall, disputed accounts involving voices Lindsay allegedly heard, and some of the most important moments from cross-examination. This is not a question of whether Lindsay killed Cora, Dawson, and Callan. She did. The question the jury now has to answer is much more complicated: was she criminally responsible when she did it? We’re breaking down the testimony, the evidence, the contradictions, and the questions this case raises about postpartum mental health, psychiatric care, and whether this tragedy could have been prevented. This is Part 3 of Crime Snob’s coverage of the Lindsay Clancy trial.

  3. Aug 18

    Ep 18: The Lindsay Clancy Trial: Part 2: Psychiatric Testimony, Digital Evidence & What Her Doctors Knew

    The Lindsay Clancy trial entered a new phase this week as the focus shifted almost entirely to her psychiatric treatment, the people who were caring for her in the months before the deaths of her children, and the digital evidence investigators recovered from her devices. The jury heard from psychiatrist Dr. Jennifer Tufts, psychiatric nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta, therapist Latiesha Dukes and others who treated Lindsay while her mental health was deteriorating. Their testimony raised new questions about whether bipolar disorder was being considered, whether Lindsay’s providers had the full picture of her symptoms, how much they knew about her suicidal thoughts and crisis calls, and whether important warning signs were missed. In this episode of Crime Snob, we break down the biggest moments from the week, including Dr. Tufts’ controversial cross-examination, Lindsay’s worsening condition the day before the killings, the lack of communication between some of her providers, the theory that she may have been coached to report hearing voices, and the emotional autopsy testimony. We also take a deeper look at Lindsay’s phone and internet history, including searches involving psychosis, hallucinations, suicide and the carotid artery, as well as a separate set of suicide-related searches found on a computer that investigators could not definitively attribute to either Lindsay or Patrick. We discuss the context surrounding those searches, the family’s doctor appointments, and a heartbreaking private note Lindsay wrote about feeling disconnected from motherhood, struggling to bond with Callan and desperately wanting to feel like herself again. We also separate some of the biggest claims circulating online from what was actually established in court. As the psychiatric evidence becomes more complicated, the central question remains the same: Was Lindsay Clancy mentally ill but still legally responsible for killing her children, or had her illness progressed to the point that she was no longer criminally responsible for what she did? We’re going through the testimony, the digital evidence and the most controversial moments of the week so you can decide what you think for yourself. Content warning: This episode discusses the deaths of children, suicide, mental illness, postpartum psychiatric conditions and autopsy testimony. Listener discretion is advised.

  4. Aug 11

    Ep. 17: Lindsay Clancy: Postpartum Psychosis, Premeditation & the Case Against Her

    In January 2023, Lindsay Clancy’s husband left their Duxbury, Massachusetts home to pick up dinner and medication. When he returned, he found a scene that would become the center of one of the most complicated and heavily debated criminal cases in recent years. Lindsay, a labor and delivery nurse and mother of three, was accused of killing her three young children before attempting to take her own life. In the months leading up to the deaths, she had been struggling with her mental health, seeking psychiatric treatment, taking multiple medications, and expressing concerns about postpartum anxiety and depression. Her defense now argues that she was suffering from severe mental illness, including postpartum psychosis, and was not criminally responsible for what happened. Prosecutors tell a very different story, one of planning, awareness and deliberate action. In this episode of Crime Snob, we break down the Lindsay Clancy case from the beginning and examine the evidence now being presented at trial. We discuss her psychiatric treatment and medication history, appointments in the days before the deaths, attempts to contact a suicide hotline, the family’s pediatrician visit on the day of the killings, Patrick Clancy’s testimony, the prosecution and defense theories, and some of the details that have fueled intense discussion online. At the center of the case is an extraordinarily difficult question: Was Lindsay Clancy experiencing a psychiatric crisis so severe that she could not understand or control her actions or does the evidence show that the deaths of her children were planned? We’re going through the testimony, the timeline and the evidence so you can decide what you think for yourself. Content warning: This episode discusses the deaths of children, suicide attempts, mental illness and postpartum psychiatric conditions. Listener discretion is advised.

4.6
out of 5
22 Ratings

About

True Crime