America at 250: Due Diligence

Steve Herman & Bill Bernardoni
  • 4.5 (8)
  • Politics
  • Updated Weekly

The United States turns 250 this year. America at 250: Due Diligence has a simple premise: the anniversary means nothing without a clear-eyed accounting of where the country actually stands. Hosted by nationally syndicated radio host Bill Bernardoni and former Voice of America White House Bureau ChiefSteve Herman, each episode of Due Diligence examines one of the foundational questions that has defined — and divided — American democracy from the beginning: What does government owe its citizens? How has the promise of the Constitution been kept, broken, or rewritten over 250 years? And where does the country stand today? The program brings together leading historians, former lawmakers, policy experts, and advocates who have lived these debates from the inside — in Congress, in city halls, in courtrooms and in communities. The format is rigorous and fair: each episode presents multiple perspectives, from the historical record through to the sharpest contemporary arguments on all sides. America at 250: Due Diligence is a program for listeners who want more than hot takes and name calling — who want to understand how the country arrived at this moment, what the founding generation actually intended and what serious people across the political spectrum believe the next 250 years should look like.

  1. 3d ago

    It's Time

    Spring forward. Fall back. Twice a year, Americans change their clocks, and twice a year, we ask the same question: Why are we still doing this? But the debate over who decides what time it is goes back much further. In early America, towns kept their own time based on the sun. Then came the railroads, the telegraph, and the need for a nation to operate on the same clock. Bill Bernardoni and Steve Herman explore how America went from local time to standardized time zones with historian Michael O'Malley of George Mason University, author of Keeping Watch: A History of American Time, including the origins of daylight saving time and why the debate continues more than a century later. Then, physicist Chad Orzel of Union College, author of A Brief History of Timekeeping: The Science of Marking Time, from Stonehenge to Atomic Clocks, explains how atomic clocks keep our modern world running, from GPS satellites and smartphones to the technology we depend on every day. We've never been better at measuring time. So why can't we agree on what to do with it?

  2. 3d ago ·  Bonus

    You Might Also Like: The Next Five

    Introducing Sovereignty, Data and Code: Who's in Control? from The Next Five. Follow the show: The Next Five Throughout history, statecraft was defined by borders, battlelines, and territory. In the 20th century, global power shifted to financial capital and energy reserves. Today, with the digital revolution well underway, does real authority now belong to those who control our data and code? And what does sovereignty now mean in a fast changing AI landscape? Back in the day it used to mean keeping data in a local server room. But today, frontier AI models are advancing at pace, some argue at a speed we can’t control and regulatory lines are being redrawn across the world to try and keep up. Governments and boardrooms now face a fundamental question: who’s controlling who? And what can we do about it? Joining host Tom Parker is Charlie Giancarlo, Chairman and CEO of Everpure, Sana Khareghani, Chief Strategy Officer at Era4, Professor of Practice in AI at King’s College London, AI Policy Lead for Responsible AI UK and Former Head of UK Government Office for Artificial Intelligence and Clare Schramm Fergus, Managing Director, Transaction Banking Technology Platforms, Lloyds Banking Group and Board Member of OpenUK. Sources: FT Resources, Wired, TAIDE, Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, UK GOV Sovereign AI Fund, Politico This content is paid for by Everpure and is produced in partnership with the Financial Times' Commercial Department. The views and claims expressed are those of the guests alone and have not been independently verified by The Financial Times. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. DISCLAIMER: Please note, this is an independent podcast episode not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced in conjunction with the host podcast feed or any of its media entities. The views and opinions expressed in this episode are solely those of the creators and guests. For any concerns, please reach out to team@podroll.fm.

    You Might Also Like: The Next Five

  3. Oct 17

    MAIL IT IN: 250 YEARS OF THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE

    Before there was a United States, there was an American postal system. Benjamin Franklin helped build it, the founders used it to conduct a revolution, and for 250 years, the mail helped connect a growing nation. But with fewer letters being sent, rising costs, and mounting financial challenges, can the Postal Service continue to deliver? Bill Bernardoni and Steve Herman are joined by U.S. Postal Service historian Stephen Kochersperger to explore the fascinating history of American mail, from the Revolution and westward expansion to the Pony Express, rural free delivery, ZIP codes, and even some unusual attempts to deliver letters. Then, Mike Plunkett, president and CEO of the Association for Postal Commerce, examines the challenges facing today's Postal Service. Is its current business model sustainable? Could Americans eventually see fewer delivery days, higher postage rates, or major changes to the system? From the institution that helped build America to the difficult decisions that could shape its future, this episode explores how the Postal Service has survived 250 years of change—and whether it can do so again.

  4. Oct 10

    The Little Red School House

    The Little Red Schoolhouse The Constitution never explicitly gives the federal government responsibility for education. So how did America's public schools become such an essential part of our democracy? In this episode of America at 250: Due Diligence, Bill Bernardoni and Steve Herman trace the evolution of American public education, from the one-room schoolhouses of the early republic to the modern debate over the federal government's role in the classroom. Historian Johann Neem, author of Democracy's Schools: The Rise of Public Education in America, explores why the founders believed an educated citizenry was essential to self-government, how Horace Mann helped transform public education, and the role religion, immigration, and local communities played in shaping American schools. Then, constitutional law scholar Derek W. Black, author of Dangerous Learning: The South's Long War on Black Literacy, examines the darker side of America's educational history. From laws that criminalized Black literacy to the fight for schools during Reconstruction, Brown v. Board of Education, and the expansion of federal oversight, Black explains how education became inseparable from the struggle for freedom and equal citizenship. It's a story about far more than reading, writing, and arithmetic. It's about the relationship between education and democracy, and a question Americans have wrestled with for generations: Who is responsible for educating the citizens who ultimately govern the nation?

  5. Oct 3

    A Chicken for Every Pot

    From George Washington buying beer, rum, wine and brandy for voters to the famous 1928 "A Chicken for Every Pot" advertisement supporting Herbert Hoover, American campaigns have long wrestled with the line between persuading voters and improperly influencing them. Historian Andrew Robertson joins Bill Bernardoni and Steve Herman to trace how American elections evolved from public voting, treating and political spectacle to secret ballots, political parties and modern election safeguards. Then UCLA election law expert Richard Hasen examines where the law draws the line today between vote buying and campaign promises — including what happens when a candidate promises voters a direct financial benefit. It's a look at how Americans have tried to win votes across nearly 250 years, and why the distinction between a political promise and an illegal inducement still matters.

  6. Sep 25

    The Forgotten Women of the Founding

    When we think of America's founding, the same names tend to dominate the conversation: Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, and Madison. They signed the documents, commanded the armies, debated the Constitution, and held the nation's highest offices. But the American Revolution and the creation of the United States were far from exclusively male endeavors. In this episode of America at 250: Due Diligence, Bill Bernardoni and Steve Herman continue their Forgotten Founders series by turning their attention to the women whose contributions helped shape the revolution and the early republic, even as they were largely excluded from formal political power. First, Karen Kedrowski, professor of political science at Iowa State University and director of the Carrie Chapman Catt Center for Women and Politics, joins us to explore the remarkable roles women played in securing American independence. From Mercy Otis Warren's influential political writings and Phillis Wheatley's groundbreaking poetry to the women who raised money for the Continental Army, gathered intelligence, and endured the hardships of military campaigns, their contributions extended well beyond traditional expectations. We also examine the legal restrictions women faced, the surprising history of women's voting rights in early New Jersey, and Abigail Adams's famous appeal to her husband to "remember the ladies." Then, historian Cassandra Good, associate professor of history at Marymount University and author of Founding Friendships and First Family, takes us inside the personal relationships that helped shape the new nation. How did women exercise political influence without holding office or casting a ballot? What role did Abigail Adams play in her husband's political career? And could Elizabeth Willing Powel's friendship with George Washington have helped persuade him to seek a second presidential term? We also explore the private world of the founding generation, from the friendships between prominent men and women to George and Martha Washington's family life and the social customs of the early republic. Along the way, we revisit Benjamin Franklin's famous declaration, "A republic, if you can keep it," and the historical uncertainty surrounding the woman who may have prompted it. The story of America's founding is often told through its great documents, celebrated battles, and famous statesmen. But behind those familiar events were women who wrote, organized, financed, petitioned, advised, and challenged the men making the decisions. Their stories offer a different perspective on the founding and raise a larger question: What does political participation really mean when most of the population is excluded from formal power? As America marks its 250th anniversary, we look beyond the familiar names to uncover the women whose contributions belong in the story of the nation's founding.

  7. Sep 19

    The Miranda Question: Rights, Police and Interrogation

    "You have the right to remain silent." Few Supreme Court decisions have produced words as instantly recognizable as Miranda v. Arizona. But sixty years after the landmark 1966 ruling, the constitutional argument behind those words is still very much alive. On this episode of America at 250: Due Diligence, Bill Bernardoni and Steve Herman examine how Miranda changed police interrogation, why the Supreme Court believed a new safeguard was necessary, and whether the Fifth Amendment actually required the rule the Court created. Dr. Richard Leo, professor of law and psychology at the University of San Francisco, takes us through the history of police interrogation — from the physical brutality of the old "third degree" to psychological coercion, false confessions, and the modern interrogation room. He explains why the Court sought a clear rule and why, despite early warnings that Miranda would cripple law enforcement, police departments largely adapted. Then Professor Tom Hogan of South Texas College of Law approaches the case from a different constitutional perspective. Before Miranda, courts already excluded involuntary confessions obtained through physical or extreme psychological coercion. Hogan asks whether the Warren Court went beyond the text and original meaning of the Fifth Amendment by creating an additional constitutional rule. Along the way, we revisit the Supreme Court's later decision in Dickerson v. United States, the continuing importance of confessions in criminal investigations, and the tension between protecting suspects and giving law enforcement the tools to solve serious crimes. Sixty years later, Miranda remains the law — and part of the American vocabulary. But the deeper question remains: even if Miranda is a good rule, was it the Supreme Court's rule to make?

  8. Sep 12

    The Exception: The 13th Amendment and Prison Labor

    The 13th Amendment abolished slavery in America — but not completely. Buried in its text is an exception allowing involuntary servitude "as a punishment for crime." That language would become enormously consequential after the Civil War, as Southern states built systems of Black Codes, vagrancy laws, convict leasing, and prison labor that pushed thousands of newly freed Black Americans back into conditions that often looked strikingly similar to slavery. Bill Bernardoni and Steve Herman are joined first by Damon Root, senior editor at Reason and author of Emancipation War, to trace the political fight that produced the 13th Amendment, Abraham Lincoln's evolution on slavery, and why the amendment's punishment exception was included in the first place. Then University of Mississippi Associate Professor Marvin King examines what happened after ratification — how Reconstruction gave way to new systems of racial and economic control, how the criminal justice system became part of that structure, and how those choices helped shape inequality for generations. Finally, the episode looks at the modern effort to remove slavery and involuntary-servitude exceptions from state constitutions — and why, more than 160 years later, the debate over the 13th Amendment is still not over.

See All (23)

Trailer

4.5
out of 5
8 Ratings

About

The United States turns 250 this year. America at 250: Due Diligence has a simple premise: the anniversary means nothing without a clear-eyed accounting of where the country actually stands. Hosted by nationally syndicated radio host Bill Bernardoni and former Voice of America White House Bureau ChiefSteve Herman, each episode of Due Diligence examines one of the foundational questions that has defined — and divided — American democracy from the beginning: What does government owe its citizens? How has the promise of the Constitution been kept, broken, or rewritten over 250 years? And where does the country stand today? The program brings together leading historians, former lawmakers, policy experts, and advocates who have lived these debates from the inside — in Congress, in city halls, in courtrooms and in communities. The format is rigorous and fair: each episode presents multiple perspectives, from the historical record through to the sharpest contemporary arguments on all sides. America at 250: Due Diligence is a program for listeners who want more than hot takes and name calling — who want to understand how the country arrived at this moment, what the founding generation actually intended and what serious people across the political spectrum believe the next 250 years should look like.

Information

You Might Also Like