Berserk is a difficult series to discuss critically because a significant portion of its audience was introduced to it through the 1997 anime adaptation, and not everyone has engaged with the manga to the same extent. This distinction matters when discussing the continuation, because Berserk is fundamentally Kentaro Miura’s work, and its identity extends far beyond its characters, plot developments, and major narrative events.
I can understand why some readers appreciate the continuation being produced by Kouji Mori and Studio Gaga. There is an understandable desire to see the story reach some form of conclusion, especially after Miura’s passing. However, that desire should not place the continuation beyond criticism or make it equivalent to the work Miura himself created.
I find many of Skullkast’s criticisms well-founded, particularly regarding the continuation’s storytelling, characterization, pacing, and ability to preserve the subtleties that defined Miura’s writing. Even if Mori is working from conversations he had with Miura, knowing the broad direction of a story is not the same as possessing the creative judgment necessary to execute it. Miura’s use of visual storytelling, character psychology, and thematic nuance was inseparable from his authorship. These are not qualities that can necessarily be reconstructed from “remembered” plot points.
There is also a legitimate discussion to be had about the commercial interests involved in continuing Berserk. Hakusensha is a publisher with a financial interest in maintaining one of its most valuable properties. That does not, by itself, prove that the continuation is motivated by profit rather than a sincere desire to honor Miura. However, neither should the stated intention of honoring his legacy exempt the project from scrutiny. Good intentions do not automatically justify the artistic decisions being made, nor do they guarantee that the resulting work faithfully represents its creator’s vision.
For me, Episode 364 marks the conclusion of Berserk as a work directly authored by Kentaro Miura. Everything published afterward belongs to a fundamentally different category: an interpretation of his unfinished story by other creators. Readers are free to appreciate that interpretation, but I reject the idea that it should be treated as an unquestionable extension of Miura’s work.
Episode 386 has only reinforced my concerns about the direction of the continuation. My objection is not simply that Berserk is being continued without Miura, but that the differences in execution are substantial enough to undermine the very qualities that made the original work exceptional. And as those differences become increasingly apparent, I find it harder to accept the continuation as a satisfying or artistically faithful conclusion to Berserk.