Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Based Camp is a podcast focused on how humans process the world around them and the future of our species. That means we go into everything from human sexuality, to weird sub-cultures, dating markets, philosophy, and politics. Malcolm and Simone are a husband wife team of a neuroscientist and marketer turned entrepreneurs and authors. With graduate degrees from Stanford and Cambridge under their belts as well as five bestselling books, one of which topped out the WSJs nonfiction list, they are widely known (if infamous) intellectuals / provocateurs. If you want to dig into their ideas further or check citations on points they bring up check out their book series. Note: They all sell for a dollar or so and the money made from them goes to charity. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG basedcamppodcast.substack.com

  1. 2 ngày trước

    Why Do Indians **** At Such High Rates? Why Is A Country of Such Smart People So Poor?

    Simone and Malcolm walk through a widely circulated write-up on izzat—the North Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi honor/reputation system—after Homath quote-tweeted it. They treat it the same way they treat critiques of Western hookup culture, Chinese face, or American individualism: as a cultural technology that can either support or sabotage flourishing. They read the original Kiwi Farms post, then fact-check it. Izzat is a real, documented concept of collective family/clan honor. It is not practiced by all Indians. It is concentrated among many Hindi and Muslim communities in the north and is a poor fit for Jain, Christian, and Buddhist communities. Admitting fault can be treated as humiliating the whole group. Disputes can escalate past the original slight. Police and officials sometimes avoid taking sides. Honor killings are the part the original post underplayed: UNFPA and NGO estimates put worldwide honor killings in the thousands per year, and peer-reviewed work ties izzat to those cases in India and Pakistan. The 2017 Delhi toilet/urination murder they cite is a real case. They also cover jugaad (workaround culture that can mean frugal innovation or cheating the rule), H-1B co-ethnic hiring and the Cognizant discrimination findings, Air India training scandals, and why a high-performing Indian diaspora can coexist with a country that still struggles with public goods and trust. Malcolm’s secondary explanation: License Raj and the post-independence decision to treat British rule as synonymous with capitalism. Firsthand: their travel business had clients from many countries. Indian sub-agencies, they say, repeatedly broke vendor contracts, hid large bills, and scammed end customers—including after second chances. They live in a majority-Indian neighborhood and like their neighbors. The argument is about norms and selection, not “all Indians.” They close by comparing this to Africans, Chinese, and Indians criticizing Western individualism and hookup culture, and by arguing that slapping “racist” on a pattern debate makes the backlash worse (Streisand effect), especially after Canada’s diploma-mill wave. Weekend episodes and citations: Patreon / Substack.Books: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG Show Notes The Izaat Post On November 2nd, 2025, @XJosh posted three recent Kiwifarms screenshots to X, saying: Kiwi Farms user breaks down ‘Izzat’, the Indian subcontinent’s cultural honor system. It effectively explains every single trope about Indian behavior: they all participate in an invisible clout-chasing game that involves screwing over everyone as much as possible. Worth the read The screenshots, showing a post by GluttonousManSlob read: Hi. I didn’t see this term mentioned in the thread, so I wanted to share this all with you. It’s about Izzat. Some posts have mentioned ‘saving face’, which is Izzat, but I wanted to elaborate on it. Izzat has no direct translation into English. We only have terms that can broach the same concept such as ‘honour’ or ‘reputation’ or ‘face’. Izzat is so much more than that. It’s a zero-sum game of collective honour shared by whole groups of people, all of whom take it very, very seriously. A system like this isn’t just foreign to Enlightenment values, but I’d argue it’s antithetical to every sensible form of governance on the planet. It will destroy any system that assumes good faith. Izzat conflicts are not about who is right and who is wrong. It’s about who wins and who loses. This means it’s a zero-sum game where just about any action is justified (including murder) to restore the lost Izzat. Izzat is a limited social currency and the easiest way to get it is to take it from someone else. Winning is righteous in Izzat. Losing is unrighteous. This means that if someone plays the game of izzat well enough, they can get away with just about anything (murder, rape, scamming, cheating, stealing). The only morality in Izzat is the protection of your group’s collective ego. The only appropriate response when your Izzat is attacked is the complete destruction of whoever insulted it. Two people get into an argument. They might escalate, but chances are it won’t be that bad. i.e. ‘Sorry I broke your garden gnome.’ With two Indians in an argument, the stakes are always deadly thanks to Izzat. Neither of them can back down, nor can they admit fault. Admitting fault is seen as deliberately humiliating yourself. Not only that, but because Izzat is shared, you are shaming everyone who shares your Izzat. So, admitting fault or taking responsibility for a problem is a form of social suicide. This means even if the dispute was over something completely f*****g stupid or trivial (like a broken garden gnome), it could spiral into a decades long honour feud. Izzat is also the reason why police are reluctant to get involved in disputes. Because Izzat is a zero-sum game, all participants are involved in the game. If a policeman sides with one family over another in an Izzat dispute, this means that he’s deliberately taking the side of that family and dishonouring the other. This marks him for retribution by the offending party. Without parties being able to be impartial, then centralized authority cannot effectively function. Let’s say someone in India complains about a broken water pipe. Instead of the problem being addressed, the official responsible for the water pipe denies it’s a problem and counterattacks him instead, because daring to question his efficacy in his role was challenging his Izzat. So the official destroys the person who brought the problem up. The water pipe never gets fixed. Izzat is also the reason why Indian managers are so infamous for hiring more Indians. It’s because from the manager’s perspective, he’s using his position to gain an invisible social currency. Merit and actual qualifications come second to that idea. If he hired a westerner, he would not gain or even lose Izzat by doing so. He has a very strong cultural incentive not to be impartial. Meanwhile, if he can strong-arm dozens of Indians into a company, he is gaining huge quantities of Izzat and conspirators who owe an absolute debt to him. It’s not uncommon to see Indians gloat about their success in the west. And yes, izzat is very much a system that enables short term success. But the fundamental reality is the prosperity that these Indians find so attractive in the first place wouldn’t exist if the west practiced something similar to Izzat. Our systems can only exist on the assumption of good faith, and not a majority of people exploiting them for destructive short term gain. On top of that, if an Indian causes the systems and companies he comes into contact with to collapse, then he can just go back to India with his plunder. He has no stakes in the long-term prosperity, functionality or stability of these systems. The stakes are completely asymmetrical in the Indian’s favour. You all know about that infamous video of that Indian scamming a food bank. Once again, winning is righteous. Losing is not. By employing ‘clever’ means (jugaad), he successfully extracted more resources for himself and his family. From the perspective of jugaad, a rule is not something to respect, but merely an obstacle to the Indian’s own gain. Since he cheated the system and wasn’t caught, he is seen as a righteous and dignified man in the Izzat framework. * We can attest to this being an issue: One of the businesses we ran had clients from all over the world: The USA, Spain, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, Argentina, and India * While we had occasional issues with Venezuelan clients getting in trouble by helping people flee the country (pretty reasonable) for the most part our agency clients were reasonable * However, our Indian clients were so systematically scammy that we had to completely change our terms * They violated major vendor contracts so egregiously we almost lost key vendors that were crucial for our business operations * One racked up $60,000 in expenses in a way that was obscured from us and then disappeared, leaving us with the bill * We also started hearing from these clients’ direct customers, who were being scammed by them I read a story in India about a man offering to pay another man to use a public toilet instead of defecating openly. The latter left and came back with several friends and beat the former to death. The problem was not that he was defecating openly, but that he was criticised for doing so. And with Izzat, it’s not an eye-for-an-eye. Izzat is often an eye-for-a-whole-head. Disproportionately and brutally annihilating your enemies is the correct move to make because you take back your lost Izzat and then some. This kind of vindictiveness would be rightly seen as horrifying and disgusting in most of the world. There was a greentext from 4chan (I don’t have it so bear with me). Anon knew an Indian. This Indian would make outlandish claims (he could benchpress 500kg, he was a billionaire, he did arms deals with the US government). Anon said he didn’t believe the Indian. The Indian reacted with righteous indignation. The situation escalated to the point where the Indian was emailing Anon death threats. Anon responded by forwarding the emails to the police. The Indian killed himself. Anon was left baffled at the whole situation and had no idea what the f**k just happened. So, without Izzat, this looks like an utterly insane and pointless sequence of events. But with Izzat? The Indian’s actions suddenly make sense. He was boasting to increase his Izzat, and when Anon simply stated his disbelief, it was seen as a vicious attack on his Izzat. The Indian escalated the situation to restore the lost Izzat. When the police got involved, the dispute had become public, so the Indian’s shame had increased to unbearable levels. He committed suicide in order to save his remaining Izzat. Anon had

    Why Do Indians **** At Such High Rates? Why Is A Country of Such Smart People So Poor?
  2. 3 ngày trước

    How Erasing Blackface Erased Black Culture: The Uncle Tom Effect

    Target pulled a kids’ Halloween costume after people said it looked like blackface. Malcolm and Simone use that controversy as a jumping-off point for a much larger argument: that systematically scrubbing minstrel shows, cakewalks, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Song of the South, Splash Mountain, Aunt Jemima, and similar “tainted” material didn’t just remove racism — it severed Black Americans from large parts of their own cultural history and from the credit for innovations that built American popular music, comedy, and theater. They walk through: * What Uncle Tom actually does in Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel vs. what “Uncle Tom” means now * Cakewalk as plantation satire of white ballroom dance — and the line from that rhythm into ragtime, jazz, R&B, and rock * Minstrel structure as the ancestor of standup, the sitcom, and a lot of classic American slapstick * Brer Rabbit / Uncle Remus as West African trickster tradition (Anansi/hare) fused with Jack tales — and why replacing Splash Mountain with The Princess and the Frog trades one set of problems for another * Banjo origins, tap’s African + Irish fusion, “tar baby,” family-barbecue “caricatures,” and how labeling ordinary Black life as a racist stereotype pushed later generations toward the opposite * Why they think groups that treated every racially adjacent artifact as radioactive helped create a cultural vacuum later filled by gangster/rap identity Provocative, heavily historical, and not YouTube-algorithm-friendly. Watch at your own risk. RFab (editing, research, companions): https://rfab.ai/ Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins [0:00]:Hello, Simone. Recently, Target has been in hot water because they decided to release blackface as a Halloween costume. Simone Collins [0:08]:Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Malcolm Collins [0:09]:They’d say this was by accident, but it is it’s hilarious. But I wanted to take this opportunity. So we’ll go into this incident. But what’s more interesting is I wanna take this opportunity to explore how erasing blackface and mistrial shows from America’s memory and cultural identity was the tool that was used to erase most of black culture. And when I say this, people will think, oh, he’s exaggerating. Simone Collins [0:48]:No. They’ll think, oh, he’s speedrunning a YouTube ban, I guess. Malcolm Collins [0:54]:What are you doing? So I we I guess we’ll call it the uncle Tom effect is what I’ll call this. So when you hear No. Simone Collins [1:02]:Let’s call it the Aunt Jemima effect. Come on. She was our woman. She was our lady. Malcolm Collins [1:06]:Uncle Tom’s a much better example. When you hear the term uncle Tom, what do you think? Somebody calls someone an uncle Tom. Okay. What they are saying is that they are not a good black person. They are somebody who kowtows to white people. They are somebody who is obsequious to white people and tries to fit in with white society. Okay? Simone Collins [1:30]:Okay. I’m looking up uncle Tom’s cat. Malcolm Collins [1:31]:So uncle Tom in the book is a character who dies protecting black people attempting to escape slavery. Simone Collins [1:41]:Okay. Great way to go. Yeah. It’s it’s it’s an antislavery Yes. Oh, yeah. The antislavery novel it’s by Harriet Beecher Stowe. Malcolm Collins [1:47]:She was a But it’s not like the character is poorly written or anything. The book became one of the most popular books in American history. The character is introduced. He saves a white girl from drowning. He is then, sold to a very mean slave driver. Simone Collins [2:02]:Yeah. Away from his wife and children. Malcolm Collins [2:04]:So Away from his wife and children. And then he ends up being beaten to death, saving two other black women who were attempting to escape. And his last words are wishing to protect the the for for mercy on the people person who’s beating him to death. And it’s very clearly like a Jesus analogy. Right? Now this is not a figure that should be shamed in black culture. This is not a figure whose name should be associated with shame. Simone Collins [2:33]:No. I mean, it’s it’s a figure who was clearly mistreated by white slave owners. So Malcolm Collins [2:38]:He’s one of the most important figures, literary figures in blacks being freed from slavery to begin with. I and so Simone Collins [2:47]:why would he say why yeah. How? Malcolm Collins [2:48]:His name becomes synonymous if you talk to a black teen today Simone Collins [2:53]:Okay. Malcolm Collins [2:54]:With turning on black people. Simone Collins [2:56]:Right? Real? Oh, yeah. Know Victor Stowe was white. Okay. Sorry. Anyway, maybe that’s the problem. Malcolm Collins [3:00]:This is what we are going to continue to see, this particular effect around all of these critical moments of black history, if you remove the minstrel shows, you remove cakewalking. If you remove cakewalking, then you remove the Simone Collins [3:17]:link. Cakewalking? It’s a cakewalking. Is it is it an expression meaning that it’s easy? Malcolm Collins [3:24]:No. Cakewalking was a style of dancing that African slaves did. Now today, it’s considered very offensive, and no one does it because the very name of it came from the concept of, we will have the slaves come and dance against each other for a piece of cake that the master would give them. Simone Collins [3:41]:Oh, yeah. A a cakewalk is a nineteenth century African American partner dance that originated on Southern plantations, which also evolved into a modern idiom and a digital music software name. Okay. I okay. I just didn’t know. Speaker 3 [3:53]:I’m gonna get fancy now. Keep on swinging. Simone Collins [4:19]:I just heard cakewalk. Like, oh, it would be so easy. Malcolm Collins [4:21]:To be a cakewalk. Well, yeah, the the that that also the modern idiom is easy as a cakewalk became, like, what the slave owners said because they they’d looked too derisively at these. They would, you know, it was, like, entertainment for them to have the blacks do the cakewalk. But, anyway, so you Oh, it’s a cute dance. If you remove cakewalking from the cultural history, you remove the descendant forms of music that came from cake walking Simone Collins [4:46]:Oh. Malcolm Collins [4:47]:Which include ragtime, jazz Oh, ragtime’s great. Rock and roll. No. Basically, form of American music evolved from the cakewalk dances that were constructed. And so blacks can say, wait. Why did we erase this? It’s like, well, because clearly a racist derogatory thing they were doing. And it’s the same thing that happened with uncle Tom’s Cabin. So with uncle Tom’s Cabin, they began to hold Tom shows. Right? And this was the stage play production of uncle Tom’s cabin. Simone Collins [5:22]:Oh, okay. In the stage to Broadway. That’s great. Malcolm Collins [5:25]:Productions of uncle Tom’s cabin, you ended up having the the the characters would begin to act more comedically or more in ways that represented normal black tropes. And so they would act obsequiously. They would act in a way that where the uncle Tom moniker might make sense. And so black culture began to use the evoked set, what they had seen more recently, the stage play, instead of the critical character that sparked a huge part of the abolition movement. Wow. And they then denigrated the entire line because of this one connection to actual racism. Take something like the Mistral Show. If you take people are familiar with the Mistral Show where black people were well, first, it began with whites doing in blackface sort of caricatures that were derogatory of black people on stage. And then these evolved into often not necessarily derogatory, but endearing caricatures and caricatures which were the ancestor of huge amounts of what we today think of as the three stooges, for example. Most comedy of this period was done in the style that was pioneered by the minstrel show. Simone Collins [6:57]:And hold on. If I I’ll check this, but weren’t minstrel shows originally things that took place in England and Europe that, you know, there would be traveling minstrels, and they would make jokes around prevailing tropes at that time. So it’s kind Malcolm Collins [7:12]:of equal for the point being is is when you’re like, oh, this is a racist against black thing. Simone Collins [7:17]:No. No. No. This existed before slavery, like, black slavery in The United States. Right? Malcolm Collins [7:21]:Yeah. The the the it’s like when you have the NAACCP fighting to take down Andy and Amos, which a third of Americans watched at its height, which had caricatures that at its time were not dissimilar to the caricatures white comedians were playing. For example, the three stooges. For example, I could I’ll go through a list later of numerous white comedians that did similar bits, but it was just normal at the time. And it removed a huge amount of black representation, but then also removed the link in American history where you don’t see that this form of the the minstrel shows that did have racism in them, but it also launched the careers of the first major black actors in America. It also launched the first black theatrical company in America. It also brought black people to Broadway for the first time in America. and it it style that it pioneered later became the American sitcom. It later became the American night show. Simone Collins [8:32]:And I guess trying to erase that or disassociate them from any form of blackness removes both black credit and black influence, but also very positive connotations and and performances from black artists. Malcolm Collins [8:46]:Right. And what’s what’s worse is that black history the this is this is the bigger part, is that groups like the NAACP and WHO have been like, we’re gonna erase everything that is tied to racism. And it’s like, bro, black American culture is tied to racism. And when I say it’s tied to racism, it’s t

    How Erasing Blackface Erased Black Culture: The Uncle Tom Effect
  3. 4 ngày trước

    Aid Workers Keep Getting ** & It's Being Covered Up (The Data Is Scary)

    In this episode of Based Camp, Simone walks through a question most humanitarian orgs would rather leave off the annual report: how often are aid workers, Peace Corps volunteers, and refugee-support staff sexually assaulted — and why do official databases, NGOs, and political tribes treat some perpetrators as unspeakable?The episode starts with a 2024 r/rapecounseling post from a high-school volunteer who said she was assaulted by a man she had been helping at a refugee organization, then deleted the thread. From there Simone stacks official sources against what workers say to each other when they think no one is compiling a press release. Show Notes A July 2024 Reddit post in r/rapecounseling by a user identifying as a high-school-age female volunteer describes being raped for several hours and nearly killed by “one refugee guy” she had been helping weekly at a refugee support organization and temporary accommodations. * She wrote that she had been assisting families, talking with them and their children, and helping with integration; “uncomfortable things happened from some guys” but she continued because she felt she was doing good. * After the assault she lost her virginity to him, faced blame from some family/friends for volunteering in the first place, and questioned whether she had given “wrong signals” or dressed inappropriately relative to “their culture and religion.” * The post is unsubstantiated and received little engagement. OP ultimately deleted her post. Ultimately, when it comes to aid work: * Organizations seem to be systematically under-reporting cases of rape * Sometimes refusing to report it entirely * Most cases that get coverage have to do with organizational reporting, perhaps because it’s the one thing orgs think they can control * When it comes to attacks by outsiders, the only place you see people opening up candidly is among volunteers on places like reddit * And the craziest thing about women’s own accounts is both: * How universal and distressing the women find harassment to be * How ultimately dismissive they are of it, in a way that reminds me an awful lot of colonial-era texts I’ve read Let’s get into it. Scant Reporting The Aid Worker Security Database (AWSD) has tracked major violent incidents against aid workers since 1997, records rape/serious sexual assault as a category. * Here’s their 2025 report * The report does not provide a number of reported rapes in 2025. Its provisional mid-year figures report roughly 230 aid-worker deaths through 30 June 2025, but it does not publish a rape or sexual-assault total for that period. * The report does not say that rape was unreported, nor does it give a reason for omitting a 2025 rape total. * Rape and sexual assault are within AWSD’s tracked incident categories, but the report’s 2025 discussion and tables present only killings, serious injuries, kidnappings, and arrests/detentions—not a separate sexual-violence count. Therefore, no defensible 2025 rape total can be extracted from this report. * The report’s compilers explicitly flag underreporting as big problem in several contexts, especially in Sudan and with organizations refusing to report incidents because they might be nervous about losing funding * They also have criteria that make many genuine incidents not get counted * E.g. if someone was not kidnapped or detained for at least 24 hours, IT DOESN’T COUNT * If someone was assaulted and not “seriously injured” IT DOESN’T COUNT * Their full criteria * Killing * Kidnapping lasting more than 24 hours * Serious injury * Rape or sexual assault * Arrest or detention lasting more than 24 hours — a category AWSD began tracking distinctly in 2025. Known Cases SOMETIMES THEY ARE AMERICAN: In late 2014, Sarah Pierce (pseudonym), a U.S. aid worker with the Carter Center in a remote South Sudan field site, was raped in her tent by an American colleague. She reported it the next day. After speaking about the incident and criticizing the organization’s support, her contract was not renewed; she described feeling she was effectively punished for reporting. The organization stated it provided medical care and counseling and acted out of concern for her welfare. In February 2015, Canadian aid worker Megan Nobert was drugged (cocktail including morphine, codeine, oxycodone, and cocaine) and raped by a Syrian UNICEF contractor colleague on a UN base/Protection of Civilians site in Bentiu, South Sudan—an IDP/refugee-style camp setting. She woke up naked and ill with no memory of the assault. Toxicology confirmed the drugs. Her organization’s and UN response was described as dismissive; there was no meaningful investigation or accountability. Nobert later went public and founded Report the Abuse to collect other testimonies. The most prominent public incident occurred in July 2016 at the Terrain Hotel compound in Juba, South Sudan—a site used by foreigners and aid workers during the civil war. South Sudanese government soldiers killed a local journalist, looted the compound, and raped several foreign women. One Western woman reported being raped by 15 soldiers after being given the choice of sex or being gang-raped and shot. Associated Press interviews with eight survivors (three of whom described rape) and reporting by Human Rights Watch, NPR, and The Guardian documented the attack. UN peacekeepers stationed nearby did not respond to calls for help. Many survivors requested anonymity to protect themselves or their organizations’ ongoing operations. Underreporting, Reluctance, Cover-Ups Report the Abuse (founded by Megan Nobert, the woman who was raped by Syrian UNICEF contractor) collected over 1,000 self-reports from aid workers (mostly international). * Roughly 72% identified as survivors of sexual violence; around 13% of reports involved rape in some analyses. 87% knew a colleague who had experienced it. * Perpetrators were frequently colleagues (one analysis put this at ~64% of cases). A 2024 academic analysis of 62 public survivor testimonies found that in 45 of 60 cases the assailant’s behavior was described as condoned by supervisors or the organization. * 54 out of 60 indicated that no legal or even internal complaint process was pursued after the incident * Many victims were isolated or received no meaningful support. Shame, fear of career damage, not being believed, and “cowboy culture” in remote field settings are repeatedly cited barriers. * See: #AidToo, or when situation permits rape: sexual violence among humanitarian aid workers * They found that Incidents most often involve colleagues within the same organization; the next most common alleged perpetrators are staff from other agencies, peacekeepers, or armed groups. Assault by members of the local population is described as least common. Where They Talk About it Without Talking About it We do get a picture of reality when volunteers vent or trade advice online E.g. a post on /r/peacecorps titled “It’s Hard Being a Woman in PC” * “As I near the end of my two-year service I gotta say, I’m proud of myself. Because being a woman volunteer in certain host countries is freakin’ hard. I know male volunteers have their share of issues, but this post is for the women.” * “During my training, I feel my team did the best to educate me about the reality of being a woman during service. They highlighted the help lines offered, the numbers of safety & security, and assurances of therapy should we need it in the future. And they warned us on how the men acted differently than what we’re used to. They even acted out scenarios and how to approach them safely. But guys, I think it’s impossible for us to fully be prepared even with having the knowledge beforehand. The hissing, whistling, and catcalling is a type of harassment we’re not used to in the United States. Yes, we have our share of pervs, but it’s not as normalized.” * “While serving in Latin America, I’m always on edge. Waiting to be howled at, waiting to be approached by a sleazy male trying to hit on me. I can’t take a walk alone or do errands without men catcalling. It bleeds into professional situations as well where counterparts, teachers, and community members will proposition me during working hours (most married or with partners!). I need to adapt because the reality is that it’s a part of the culture. What I see as sexual harassment isn’t viewed the same way in my host country. Yet, I somehow need to set my boundaries while not alienating myself from my community. While I don’t feel unsafe, it’s simply an exhausting obstacle I need to overcome daily.” * “It can be challenging because you don’t want the actions of some to overshadow your whole experience as a volunteer. But it can be so damn hard. When I went home for vacation, the tension wasn’t there... It was...Quiet. I could walk with my friends in peace. Wear whatever I wanted, such as shorts. No men tried to get my attention or block my path to flirt with me. I could wait in line for a meal and not have a man ask for sex or a kiss on the lips in broken English. I felt like a human instead of some object to be pursued as an American trophy or a visa ticket. The United States is by no means perfect, but there’s privileges I never realized I had until doing service.” * COMMENTS * It is important to tell recruits to many, many countries (especially young, “conventionally attractive” women who are only known to host communities through “blue movies” and perceived to be loose): * You will get catcalled, proposed to, hit on, touched inappropriately on a DAILY basis by multiple men. Sometimes those men will be in your community and it’s difficult to navigate. Sometimes you’re in a good mood and can laugh it off and everyone thinks the joke is funny....And some days, it’s the 10th proposal of the day and you’re just done with the dehumanization of the

    Aid Workers Keep Getting ** & It's Being Covered Up (The Data Is Scary)
  4. 5 ngày trước

    Muslim Heaven Is WAY More Psycho Than You Think

    What does a traditional Afghan or Pakistani Muslim actually believe happens in heaven? Not the sanitized Western or progressive version — the classic one drawn from the Hadith and mainstream interpretations. Malcolm and Simone dig into the details: every believing man gets at least two wives (with no upper limit tied to piety), no woman in paradise is ever without a sister-wife, houris (created beings often described in highly physical terms), infinite sexual stamina, controllable pregnancy and aging for children born in heaven, the absence of bodily waste, the majority-female population of hell according to reports of Muhammad’s night journey, and the young male servants who attend the righteous. They also cover the process of death, the period in the grave, the immediate entry of prepubescent children, and the extremely graphic punishments of Islamic hell.The conversation then compares these beliefs to Mormon spirit-world ideas, traditional Christian heaven, and the Collinses’ own techno-puritan framework — examining how different afterlife incentives shape behavior toward spouses, non-believers, long-term civilization, and personal morality. Want to dive deeper? Check out this episode’s companion page on the Techno-Puritan website. :) Episode Transcript Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to learn what Muslims believe happens in heaven, and here I do not mean Western Muslims or apologist Muslims. I wanted to get an understanding of what your standard - Afghani man, Pakistani man would believe is going to happen to them after they die, and it is way crazier than you think, and it reframes for me why Muslims in Islamic culture and far progressive culture get along so well. What? Uh. You’re like... So first, just a few to throw out some crazies here. Okay. If I were to convert to Islam- Okay ... when I die, you would believe and I would believe that I get at least one additional wife. No- And I’m s- I’m okay with that allegedly ... no Muslim man in heaven has fewer than two wives. So wait, wait, wait. If I, an Islamic woman, a believer, choose to marry a man I know that I’m gonna have a sister wife in heaven, at least Absolutely. There is no getting around it. And- Unless he goes to hell. Do I get a sixth one? No, no, no, no. Even if he goes to hell, you, when you get to heaven, get married to a believing Muslim man as an extra one of his wives, and he will have at least two wives. Wait, hold- oh. No woman in heaven is in a relationship with a man withou- out a sister wife. So you can’t be a female single in heaven? Not allowed. You’re not allowed to be single in heaven? Not allowed to be single. And if a woman’s like, “But what if I don’t want that? Like, what if I get jealous?” What Muslims believe is a satisfying answer is, well, God just brainwashes you into being okay with it. So- ... you don’t even know. Which is cool. Everyone’s kind of poly in heaven. It’s fine. He, He, He, he messes with your brain so that you no longer experience jealousy. And- Everyone belongs to everyone else. Yeah, no, it really does feel like one of those scary, like the faculty or something like that where I think too an American mindset, especially like a backwards American mindset, if somebody comes to you and they’re like, “There’ll be no pain.” “There’ll be no suffering. There’ll be no...” And it’s like, but it’s not me anymore. Right. It’s something else. Yeah. It’s a pod person. It is so much better. There’s no fear or pain. It’s beautiful. And you We’ll be beautiful. No problems or worries. We want you. No pain, Stan? We’re gonna come in here and I’ll show you some f*****g pain! So you’re gonna kill me is what you’re trying to say. Yes. Other crazy facts about heaven. Okay. Well, the number of additional wives I get. So the crazy thing is if, if you help me be an extra good Muslim man- Okay the better I am as a Muslim man, the better you make me as your, my wife, the more additional wives you need to deal with. Oh, man. And the, the 72 wives that martyrs get- Right ... you could get way over 72 wives. Oh. It’s said that some men live in tents where there’s so many women that you can’t- Wait. All you get in heaven is a tent? name them all. Are, is this a FEMA heaven? What, what is this? Yeah, I’d ... It’s a, we’ll get to it. It’s weird. Oh, another thing. You can have babies in heaven. And- Oh, no ... you can have a baby, and you can make the gestation whatever lengths you wish. So you could make the gestation a day if you wanted to. Okay. You could make the gestation a week if you wanted to, and then you could have them age at any speed you want So there are no diapers in heaven if you don’t want them. Okay. Oh, well, also all of your uncleanness. You don’t menstruate anymore. I think you don’t pee or poo anymore. Oh. No pooping in heaven. But what’s really interesting about these babies born in heaven- Okay ... that gets me is they have human souls. Like, they are actual human-souled babies, but they don’t have to go through the trials that God made all of the rest of humanity go through- Oh ... to get into this heaven, which seems- So it’s just- Why did we all have to go through it and these souls don’t have to go through it? It seems bizarre and unfair. Yeah. But- Hmm ... then again, these people... Oh, another fun one about women in heaven. Okay. So Muhammad said that when he went to hell, he saw many more women in hell than men. Hell was majority female. And when he came out- Hell is female. That’s... ... he saw far fewer females. So, you know, straight up- No, how is that po- ... misogyny There cannot be far fewer females because every man has all these wives. Well- This is mathematically impossible ... hold on, because a lot of these wives might be hurers, or hur- hu- hur- Hurers? It sounds like w****s, okay? But it’s spelled like H-U-R-O something. The point being- From now on, we need to spell w****s that way ... is they are constructed beings that are not fully human. And they are meant to look like y- young, beautiful maidens. I- So they’re sex bots. You have sex bots in heaven. They are sex bots, yeah, and the Hadith spends a lot of time talking about, like, how nice their breasts are and that, They’re, they’re real dolls. They are real dolls in heaven. You, no, you as a man get infinite stamina for sex. Explicitly it says, “Infinite stamina for sex.” Wait, I thought... This is one of the circles of hell. This is, this is lust. Why are we lust maxing in heaven? Well, actually, this is the point I’m gonna get to. It made me realize that Islam is, above all else, a max hedonism religion. Yeah, no kidding. Like, I mean- No other religion is like, “Yeah, you get all the sex bots you want in heaven.” Right? Like, you- Even like, “Well, don’t worry. In heaven, you’ll be stripped of this licentiousness and these, these basal drives. You can rise above.” And, and- Yeah, no ... with Islam, they’re like, “Don’t worry. The entire point of all of this is to be super freaking hedonistic.” It’s infinite heaven sex, and then- Oh my God ... then you have all the babies you want. This is... Well, what kind of... I mean, that’s the... Ugh. I, I’m speechless I’m actually this is where I think it, it works pretty interesting with techno puritanism No, no, no Because- The twain shall never meet. I’m seeing that we are incompatible N- well, hold on, hold on. You might think we’re more compatible than you would think Okay. Sure. Explain this to me So within the techno puritan afterlife we haven’t done our full afterlife tract series yet, but I do have the research notes for it, because I’ve been doing a lot of research on it recently. And people know we think that you’re going to be raised again into a new body, and that that body will likely, because it’s described in the Bible as being neither physical nor spiritual, likely some form of simulation in an artificial environment that’s given. And so the question w- is, is what are those environments like? And we know that some people are given work in heaven, and some people reign over others in heaven, and some people reign over cities in heaven. And so what does that mean? And so what it could mean is that heaven is sort of like a tiered system. It’s very clear that souls are tiered in traditional Christian heaven, and so in techno puritan heaven, yes. This is our weird belief system for people who do not know. But what, because it says that some people can be like angels, we would think, well, some people, if you’re, like, good enough in this series of simulations, you leave the simulation and you reenter future society, potentially as an AI on a spaceship or something like that, or either in, like, a humanoid body or whatever- Yeah form the world has taken at that point. But Muslims would be forever trapped, even the good ones, in their heaven, and never brought into the real world again, because what they cared for more than anything was an afterlife of pure hedonism. And so their souls are permanently trapped in hedonistic simulations. Which is what they wanted anyway, so it’s not like we’re doing anything bad to them. You know, they, they did all of this so they could get the hedonistic simulation. But hold on. I’ve, I’ve... Big deviant here. I haven’t mentioned the young boys yet. You also get, Oh, I should talk more about the houris. So the, these things in heaven now some Muslims believe that every truly believing Muslim male gets at least two real women in heaven, and then they get houris on top of that. Whereas others think... And the math on that just doesn’t make sense. There’s no way you could have every true believing Muslim man get two women, and men are more righteous than women. That, that, that just doesn’t make sense. There’s slightly more wo

    Muslim Heaven Is WAY More Psycho Than You Think
  5. 6 ngày trước

    Guest Aydin Paladin: The First Right Wing Youtuber We Watched

    In this episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins sit down with longtime right-wing creator and social scientist Aydin Paladin (one of the earliest anti-woke voices online). They discuss her path from trying Norse paganism to Christianity after a near-death experience, starting her channel during the 2016 Trump campaign, the replication crisis in social science, and why the right needs its own researchers. Aydin shares details on the Beowulf Foundation’s projects—including Wolfings Publishing (reviving out-of-print and banned books), the Witan conferences, and upcoming parallel-economy tools like VPN and DNA services. The conversation covers the evolution of the online right: from libertarian edginess and Gamergate-era aesthetics to pro-natalism, tech optimism, monarchist thinking, and building real community instead of pure reaction. They also dig into what the left’s next major cause might be, the gender dynamics shift on the right, cancellations, the mentorship gap for young creators, and why democracy as currently structured is under strain. Check out Aydin channels (AydinPaladin + ScienceSibyl) and Wyflings Publishing for books by Ed Dutton, historical works, and more. Episode Transcript [00:00:01] Malcolm Collins: I am very excited to be with you all today. Today, we have on a guest, Aydian Paladin, who is a online right-wing content creator that I watched before we became right-wing. When we still voted Democrat, I watched her channel. So you can thank her channel in part for converting... [00:00:25] I don’t know what you did, Simone. But for converting both of us. And, and tha- this is one of the things that I often tell people about- Mm-hmm ... you know, you end up converting somebody between teams. , You often don’t think about it as just, like, a numbers game. But that person can then one day go on to be influential themselves, or, and I think the most important thing, is the positive impact it often has on individuals’ lives. [00:00:49] When they start being like, “Hey, you know what? Maybe I should do, like, a monogamous marriage.” Like, or, “That, that’d be neat.” And then you end up you know, having a bunch of kids and being like, “Oh, this is, is pretty fun.” But Welcome on the show. What I wanted to start with, because you’re very unique among the guests that we’ve had, in that you were part of wave one anti-woke, right? [00:01:14] Yeah. Like, Nux has been on the show, and he’s been making stuff for him forever, but he didn’t become a right-wing guy until fairly recently. Yeah, yeah. Right? But you were out there so long ago, and I actually find this to be very interesting the... Your contemporaneous voices were people like ShortFatOtaku when he was still somebody who people listened to in this space. [00:01:38] Simone Collins: Yeah. [00:01:39] Malcolm Collins: And I find the difference in both of your careers sort of since then, and both of your ideologies since then, to be sort of an interesting story in how this wider movement developed. So can you sort of talk about that? Like, what first got you into this? And, and a quick note for people, you used to be a... [00:02:00] actually, maybe a more interesting question. You used to be i- into Norse mythology. Like, that was your religion. Oh, [00:02:04] Aydin Paladin: yeah. What made you change? Well, I didn’t, I didn’t talk about it too much on the channel, but I, I, I was you know, I was trying to be spiritual, faithful, because I’d read the research on it, and it’s- it’s a positive thing. [00:02:15] Well, I never really believed in it, but I tried to convince myself of it. I had a near-death experience now six years ago. I was in hospital for months. And then I you know, saw that I thought that was my calling to Christ, and I’ve been a Christian ever since. So, you know, that was my path there. [00:02:29] Was it [00:02:29] Malcolm Collins: really just the near-death experience? Or were there- Yeah ... like, things you were reading around that time or other things you were doing? [00:02:35] Aydin Paladin: It may have been as well. I, I never f- felt anything for the, the Norse paganism stuff. It was, that was a response to research says that this is good for you, that this helps provide meaning in life and the sense of purpose. [00:02:47] But it didn’t... I, I guess I couldn’t really... I never really believed in it in the way that, you know, having a near-death experience, as many, as, as often reported will give people a, a different kind of perspective on things, right? [00:02:59] Malcolm Collins: Yeah. [00:02:59] Aydin Paladin: And going, “Oh, maybe I need to reconsider this a little bit more seriously as your weight of your soul is on it,” you know? [00:03:05] One way or another potentially. [00:03:07] Malcolm Collins: This is, it’s very interesting that you answer that way because it’s literally the same thing happened to us- Mm. Yeah ... where we first became religious because we were having kids- Mm-hmm ... and we were just like, “Well, all the research says they’re better off if they’re raised in a- Yeah [00:03:20] religious household, so we’ll pretend.” Yeah. And then we started reading the Bible and being like- Mm-hmm ... “Wait a second, this seems, like, weirdly true and sense-making- Yeah ... in a way I didn’t expect given the, you know, prejudices I had.” [00:03:34] Aydin Paladin: Yeah. It was- Same thing for me as well. Yeah, I, I’d grown up with, particularly growing up in the ‘90s, I think there was a lot of, at that period of time, and late ‘80s and 2000s as well, I guess, up until quite recently there have been these very negative connotations in public sort of mass media about Christianity being or, or any kind of faith as being ascientific. [00:03:54] Whereas actually I found that many things that are presented in the Bible and in you know, biblical [00:04:00] narratives going all the way back, ‘cause to, to the Christian story itself are actually- Yeah ... cogent with the scientific narrative as well. [00:04:06] Malcolm Collins: Yeah. But it- I, I often, you know, at, when I’m telling parents, like, how do you keep your kids in the religion and everything like that? [00:04:14] Arguing with the science is not a bad way to go, to be like, “In just reality, like, look at society right now. It doesn’t- Yeah ... seem to be working, right? Like, do you want to...” I, I wanted to get, when you created your channel originally, did you conceive it as, like, a science and psychology channel? [00:04:31] Aydin Paladin: No, I don’t. I, well, sort of. [00:04:32] At that time I was taking a sabbatical from doctoral school. I had been in doctoral school at the time. I, it, I ended up just leaving, but at the time it was just a sabbatical ‘cause I was really stressed out and I was, I was talking to my... I used to call my dad every day and I’d talk to him about... It, this was during 2016. [00:04:48] I, I, or it would’ve been 2017. It was right before the election. Mm-hmm. Trump’s first election. And it was during that el- that campaign cycle. I would just call him every day and I’d talk to him about politics, and he said, “Why don’t you go make a YouTube channel and talk to people in the ether instead of calling me up every day and talking to me about it?” [00:05:05] Malcolm Collins: What a thing for a parent to say. Oh my God. [00:05:07] Aydin Paladin: Well, I wasn’t, I wasn’t in grad or that would’ve been doc school. I wasn’t in doctoral school at the time ‘cause I was taking some time off, and I just ended up, I really liked doing it. I was very stressed out with doc school, so I just decided not to go back, and I got to do what I wanted, which was talk into the ether about politics you know, as as it interested me, but also be able to talk about my first passion and what my background is in, which is social science and statistics, and talk about how, you know, even though it’s social science I think this is a, a bit of a, something I lament with the right wing more broadly. [00:05:38] There’s sort of a distrust of science, and particularly- Mm ... a distrust of social science. That is warranted. Yeah. And it is the replication crisis is 49.3% of all studies in behavioral science can be replicated, so it, there’s a major, major problem in social science, and there’s a lot of political bias that goes into it. [00:05:55] But if you know how to read the studies and look sort of through the BS and just look at statistics, then you can actually find a lot of useful information, and largely it aligns with right wing perspectives on the world because- Of course it does. So, you know- [00:06:10] Malcolm Collins: Well, no, I, I, I think that this is a really important point I wanna flag here, which is yes, the field is heavily captured, but that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t be doing as much research into it as possible. [00:06:23] Mm-hmm. Because with understanding how people think, how society moves, the differences between men and women- Mm-hmm ... we can act in a way and build systems that are better in the long term. Yes. And so- Yeah ... that requires that we have our own people out there doing stuff. Before we get too far into this, I want to now plug this new thing you’re working on- Yes [00:06:48] ‘cause it’s really cool. And it fits this idea of we need to have our own social scientists, but not just our own social scientists, but when, you know, people are getting canceled all the time, and people pulling sponsorships from them, and recently I’ve been like, “You know what I wanna do? I wanna get our company to a place where we can just give people sponsorships whenever they lose one.” [00:07:06] And we can just make a product for whatever product that’s been pulled from them. And you’re already working on a wider project like this. Can you talk about that? [00:07:14] Aydin Pa

    Guest Aydin Paladin: The First Right Wing Youtuber We Watched
  6. 21 thg 8

    Andrew Tate Truth Bomb Drops: Worse Than Anyone Thought Possible

    In this episode of Based Camp, Simone and Malcolm Collins break down Heidi Blake’s exhaustive New Yorker investigation “Andrew Tate’s Empire of Abuse.” They examine the documented pattern of rape, strangulation, underage exploitation, financial and psychological control, human trafficking, and the systematic teaching of “pimping” through the War Room. Key accounts include Lauren Southern’s experience in Romania, the early UK cam-house abuses, the recruitment and abuse of Romanian schoolgirls, the use of female enforcers, the coercion and reputation-destruction of women who tried to leave, and the real-world violence linked to Tate’s content. The discussion also covers Tate’s conversion to Islam, the Taliban’s public support, the double standard with Jeffrey Epstein, the failure of parts of the online right to apply consistent standards, and why “maximum masculinity” as an identity is a reliable red flag for dangerous actors. Sensitive content warning: detailed discussion of sexual violence, underage exploitation, trafficking, and child abuse. Show Notes For the full thing, read: Andrew Tate’s Empire of Abuse How the defining figure of the manosphere built a fortune—and became a political force—by systematically exploiting women By Heidi Blake, published June 8th In this article, Blake “pieced together an account of Tate’s activities from thousands of private messages, internal documents, sealed prosecutorial files, and court records—as well as scores of interviews with the Tates, their associates, and more than a dozen alleged victims” “I’ve done this with over 100 girls,” Tate said, about compelling women into sex work. “I almost sound evil. But I’m not.” The Lauren Southern case In case you’re not familiar with Lauren Southern: “She had become a darling of the manosphere at the age of nineteen with a video titled “Why I Am Not a Feminist,” in which she argued that men were the real victims of an unjust society. She followed up with a series of videos in which she trolled women who marched against sexual violence, ridiculing their views and holding up a sign saying “THERE IS NO RAPE CULTURE IN THE WEST.”” After getting introduced by Tommy Robinson, Andrew Tate got Lauren Southern to fly to Romania. “She told me that she flew to Bucharest without knowing much about Tate; Robinson had simply said that a kickboxer in Eastern Europe wanted to finance her work. When they arrived, Tate was waiting in one of his supercars, and he insisted on taking her out for lunch alone. Over steak, he told her “everything that you would want to hear as a conservative right-wing woman,” talking about the importance of family and praising her work. “You’re saving Western civilization,” she remembers him saying.” “After lunch, they headed to Tate’s compound. At a long table, Southern listened as the brothers laid out their proposal: they would fund a new right-wing media venture, with her and Robinson in charge, if she would use it to pump a cryptocurrency they were planning to launch. The idea, she recalls, was, “basically, we’re going to create a European-nationalist outlet to fleece all these idiots for money.”” Hmmmmmm….. That’s not what our community does “That evening, the Tates took Southern to a club, where they ordered bottle service. After a couple of shots of vodka, she recalls, she suddenly felt “like my consciousness was collapsing.” Tate carried her to his car, and when she came to they were on the bed at her hotel.” “Tate started kissing Southern and pulling off her clothes. She told me that she tried to push his hands away, but he wouldn’t stop. Then he hooked his arm around her neck and started to squeeze. She remembers thinking, “Oh, s**t, this guy actually is going to rape me.” Southern was anti-abortion, and was terrified of getting pregnant. She began pleading with him: “I know what you’re gonna do here. Please just wear a condom. Please.”” “Southern remembers fading in and out of consciousness as Tate raped her unprotected and choked her. Afterward, he sat on the edge of the bed and said, “Don’t tell the press I raped you.” She remembers saying, “My whole brand is literally talking about how stupid b*****s get themselves in situations like this. There’s nothing I can say without destroying my career. So congratulations.”” “In the car to the airport, Southern said, she discovered burst blood vessels around her eyes and marks on her neck. Back in Toronto, she was examined by a nurse who specialized in sexual assault. On an assessment form, the nurse recorded that Southern had been raped and strangled by a “well known male” at a hotel in Romania and had suffered an intimate injury. She noted that Southern seemed to be experiencing “personal struggles with her belief system” as a result.” “Southern told me that she tried to apply her political convictions to her experience, telling herself that she was at fault for drinking with a man she didn’t know. A month later, she texted Tate. “It was really s****y what you did that night in Bucharest,” she wrote. “I’m not going to tell anyone obviously because I was an absolute moron, but I hope you don’t do that to anyone else.” ““What did I do?” Tate replied. “I expected tons better from you. This msg is some liberal #metoo b******t.”” “You literally strangled me when I said I didn’t want to have sex,” Southern wrote. “You literally told me in the morning ‘don’t tell the press I raped you.’ ” “You’re absolutely embarrassing yourself,” he wrote. “Tate denied raping Southern, but he bragged to the War Room about spending the night with her, saying that he had invited her to Romania to discuss a business deal but “didn’t invest a f***ing penny.”” The Depravity He assaulted and raped women becuase he thought it would lead them to not require payment in exchange for camgirl work * This started with two young women, Walker and Navvaro, in the UK he recruited after learning from one of his girlfriends how much he could make * “But Tate was already coming to resent paying Navarro and Walker a cut of their earnings. Hruskova let him keep “100% of the f***ng money,” he later said. But, he complained, “once you get bigger, you start hiring girls who don’t love you.” He decided on a strategy: “I have a financial incentive to f*** as many as I can.” * NOTE ABOUT HRUSKOVA: “He reported in private chats that her live streams had made him around two million dollars, but all she got was pocket money for coffee and manicures.” * Even before this, when he did give them money, he immediately took them to malls and told them to go on shopping sprees, which meant they lacked funds to get away * What it was like to be in the house: * “One morning, Navarro [who was stranded at the house because the Tates would not drive her home and she lacked money or a car to get out] woke up to Tate and Walker having sex next to her. She shushed them, and Walker got up and went into the bathroom. When she was gone, Navarro said, Tate put her in a choke hold and raped her for a second time. Though she clawed at his arms, he wouldn’t release his grip. “I was scared that he was going to kill me,” she told me. Then Walker emerged from the shower, and he rolled off her. * Later, Navarro said, she was working on camera when she heard strange noises and went to investigate. Through the open bedroom door, she saw Tate strangling Walker on the bed. Walker’s face was red and puffy, and her body was limp. Navarro said that she felt a strange paralysis. “I was, like, There’s nothing I can do about it,” she told me. She went back to work.” * “The following morning, Navarro and Walker were putting on makeup in the bathroom when they noticed clusters of red spots around their eyes. Walker searched online and saw that petechiae—burst blood vessels—can be a sign of acute pressure in the head from strangulation. The women began to panic. Hearing a commotion, the Tates came to the door. When they saw the marks, they laughed. “You’re such dumb b*****s,” Navarro remembers them saying. “That’s from sleeping on the silk sheets.”” * “Navarro said that Tate started attacking her at random moments. Multiple times, when she slept late, he whipped her with a belt. Time became a blur, and the world outside the apartment seemed to recede. But, one day, Navarro had a moment alone, and something snapped: she walked out the door and never went back.” * This was BEFORE he stopped women from escaping Tate abused women on camera “In one video, Tate lay on a bed and ordered Hruskova to show the camera her tattoo. “Why does it say ‘Tate’?” he asked. “Because I’m his w***e,” she replied. “Why’s your ass got a bruise on it?” “Because my daddy hits me.” Tate picked up a belt and began whipping Hruskova as she lay in the fetal position, sobbing. “B***h, look at the camera,” he told her, yanking her head back by the hair. “This is what happens when you don’t f***ing listen.”” When footage of this video was released online, Andrew Tate “said that Hruskova was an ex-girlfriend, and shared a photo of her holding a belt inscribed with the words “But I love when Andrew spanks me.”” SHE WAS 15 YEARS OLD IN THAT PHOTO HE BEAT HER SO MUCH HE MADE A THEMED BELT FOR IT Tate Raped Underage Girls There was a LOT of underage stuff. Consider the testimony of Irina Pavel (name changed): * “When Pavel was fifteen, she told investigators, she had accompanied a school friend to a party hosted by the Tates, which was full of young girls. Her friend paired off with Tristan, leaving her with Andrew, who was so drunk that he spat as he talked. He pulled her into a bedroom and raped her, she said. Afterward, some of Tate’s “female friends” persuaded the g

    Andrew Tate Truth Bomb Drops: Worse Than Anyone Thought Possible
  7. 20 thg 8

    1 A**hole Can Make a Chud: Yukiwaru Tells All

    Yukiwaru joins Based Camp after going viral for saying the quiet parts out loud: men can’t get periods, and tomboys are good. In this conversation, Malcolm and Simone talk with the VTuber about why she refused to apologize or walk anything back, the toxic “friend”/artist who kept centering themselves and walking all over her boundaries (including on her birthday stream), and what it felt like to finally stop walking on eggshells. They also cover:• How she started streaming (just a unique voice playing League) and became a snow-leopard VTuber• Losing old friends and artists vs. the new community that actually let her be herself• Desexualizing her model and why that grew her channel• Building an authentic audience instead of a flirty persona• Reaction content, cop slop, pony play, and streamers as the next wave of cultural influencers• Tomboy identity, the pressure to invent special labels, and why “just a straight white female” suddenly felt lame Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins [0:00]:Hello. I’m excited to be here with you today! Today, we have Yuki Waru with us who recently went viral. There’s been a few red videos on her because she made the bold claim that men cannot get periods and that tomboys are good. And anyone who knows our channel, we we are so pro tomboy on this channel that I actually had a fan email me a detailed list of bible quotes trying to argue that the bible says you should only take tomboys. And I was like, that is that is another degree. But what makes her so interesting and why I was excited to talk with you is you were before saying this, you never really got into politics that much on your channel. Uh, you never really got into, like, the this kind of, like, political spicy opinion. And something really unique happened because the Internet decided to go after you for these takes. And normally, the reaction historically of, like, a nonpolitical VTuber would have been to either apologize or at the very least, if they’re not going to apologize, not lean into it, not watch the rev review of her, not come on Basecamp or something like that. And yet you go in this other direction, and it seems to have worked out really well for you. But I’m wondering why you went in this direction. Like, would do you think that this is just like the ethos now, or is this an intentional decision you made or what? Yukiwaru [1:29]:Well, for me, I mean, saying my thoughts and my point of view felt really freeing. And I feel like I’ve been walking on eggshells around people for so long worrying about everyone’s feelings, and, like, it’s been really, like, debilitating for me trying to just, you know, watch out for everyone’s feelings. And I was just like, you know what? I’m over it. And I said what I said. I I would I’m not gonna say something if I don’t mean it. And if I’m not gonna stand by it, that’s a waste of time and energy. I mean, why say something if you’re not gonna stick by it? I don’t see that point. Malcolm Collins [2:07]:Well, a lot of oh, continue. Continue. Yukiwaru [2:11]:Oh, I was just gonna say, I I don’t say something then back down. I’m gonna stick with it. I don’t care what people think, and I’m so sick of trying to, like, watch out for people. I mean, like, I respect people’s feelings, but, like, god, like, I have had to be so careful and, like, really think through what I say and, like, like, make sure I get, like, pronouns and stuff correctly because, you know, I I do respect how people feel and stuff, but it felt so good to let it out. Oh my god. No. It’s so so free. Malcolm Collins [2:45]:It it really this is a pathway that I feel like has happened to a lot of people. So we my wife and I used to be, like, very mainstream leftist, and then we ended up going viral a number of times for talking about birth rate collapse. Just like fertility rates are really low. This is gonna affect social security systems. And we got absolutely piled on. The the the Internet decided that that meant that we were white supremacists or whatever or, like I I don’t know. Right? Um, and so, uh, what ended up changing our mind is, at first, we weren’t like you. We hedged all of our points. We were like, well, with this and keep in mind this and keep in mind this. But as time went on, we begin to notice that there was, like, this community of people who just, like, cared about what was true. And they were, like, shockingly nice to us, um, even when we had a lot of differences of opinions with them. And this feeling that you’re talking about of, like, oh my god. I can just say whatever I think now It’s such such a weird place that we were in a society where it was normal to not feel that way. I mean, I I did did did you find yourself, like, self censoring a lot before? Was it was it the being called out that put you in a position where you could talk about things more? Like, was it was that what made it possible for you? Yukiwaru [4:16]:I did feel better really, you know, stating how I I’ve never really been one to censor. I’ve always been known for being, like, forward, bluntly honest, just saying how I feel. Because I I mean, personally, I don’t really understand other people’s feelings, like or empathy or compassion, you know. I just it doesn’t come natural to me. I think I felt empathy once in my entire life, and I didn’t understand what was happening. My dad, like, had to explain it to me like I was a kindergartner, learning how to feel and stuff. It was Oh. Simone Collins [4:52]:It was Yukiwaru [4:52]:a weird thing. But yeah. I mean, even now, I’m still kind of paranoid of my own pronouns. I I find myself referring to everyone as them, they just to be careful and cautious. It’s just in my head that I’m gonna say something and mess something up, and they’re gonna, like, come after me for it even if they are a friend or not. Malcolm Collins [5:16]:Well, your story was really interesting because it started with like, it seemed like this really started with a specific toxic individual in your life. And they go on your birthday stream, and somebody accidentally misgenders them, and they decide to make the birthday stream all about themselves. Mhmm. And I also wanna note here before I go all trans people do that. Like, I know some totally normal, cool, based trans people, and they don’t do this s**t. When somebody accidentally misgenders them, they’re just like, whatever. Like, it’s just not even important. It’s not even in the room of of of issues. Yeah. And then there’s this, like, other group that uses it to try to center themselves and, like, move past other people’s consensual boundaries and recenter and the your emotions because I thought it was very interesting the way that you talked about it. You’re like, this made me feel really bad when that happened. And it wasn’t the first time when this individual had made you feel really bad in this way. There was you were talking all the way back to when you first got partnered with Twitch. Yukiwaru [6:29]:Mhmm. Malcolm Collins [6:30]:And they hadn’t gotten the partnership, and they made you feel bad about celebrating, which is probably one of the biggest events in your life. Mhmm. Getting just interested to hear your thoughts on all this from the from, like, experiencing it and and moving primarily because of, like, one other individual pushing you into saying this stuff. Mhmm. Yukiwaru [6:57]:I became friends with them. They were they had more viewership than I did when we started becoming friends. And and at some time, I started surpassing them in viewership and growing more than they were. And, you know, at some point, they were viewer ing high where they could’ve gotten Twitch partner, but something happened where everything just dropped for them. And they they had been streaming longer than I have. So when I was, you know, growing more than them, I felt, like, guilty, like, because I felt, you know, they would always tell me how hard they’re trying and, like, mentally how they’re feeling. Like, they don’t understand. And, also, I understand that because even though I had Twitch partner, things dropped after my partner pushed. My views dropped, and I was like, alright. What am I doing wrong? What do I gotta change? But when I got the email for Twitch partner, was in a collab, and they were in my collab because, you know, I love including my friends. I love supporting my friends Yeah. Being there for them. And I got the email, and I started freaking out. And everyone in the collab was, like, so enthusiastic and so energetic and so celebratory. And then they came, and they’re like, what’s going on? And they’re like, oh my god. You just got Twitch burner. And they’re like, oh, good job. And I was like, Malcolm Collins [8:21]:Can can you explain for our audience who might not understand the significance of getting partnered with Twitch what this means for you as a creator? Yukiwaru [8:28]:I mean, besides having a really cool badge, not necessarily too much. It means that you were able to keep an average of a high viewership for a certain amount of time and complete the requirements. Malcolm Collins [8:44]:Doesn’t it change, like, the monetization or, like, the way the pathways you have to contact them? Yukiwaru [8:49]:From what I understand, when it comes to monetization, you do get more opportunities. But then it also you know, you have to do Twitch plus to get a bigger half of what you make on Twitch. If you don’t get Twitch plus, it really isn’t that much of a difference. And to get get Twitch plus, you have to hit goals of people subscribing and, like, gifting subs. Like, people need to spend money so you can get the different levels of Twitch plus to make more of the cut. So, Simone Collins [9:22]:like Oh god. Yukiwaru [9:23]:They changed it. Malcolm Collins [9:24]:I also just had a realization. You’ve been streaming for t

    1 A**hole Can Make a Chud: Yukiwaru Tells All
  8. 19 thg 8

    Islam vs Cell Phones: Down 25% In 10 Years

    In this episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins examine the rapid secularization underway in many Muslim-majority countries—often at a faster proportional rate than Christianity’s decline in the West. They walk through Arab Barometer and related data showing sharp rises in secular identification from 2012–2019 in Tunisia, Libya, Algeria, Morocco, and Egypt, followed by a partial rebound in the early 2020s. The conversation covers declining trust in Islamist parties (Muslim Brotherhood, Ennahda, Justice and Development Party), sub-replacement fertility across much of the region, and existential water scarcity in Egypt and Iran. They then dig into the drivers of deconversion: smartphone access to historical sources, the Islamic slave trade’s scale and character, Muhammad’s documented ownership of slaves (including Black slaves), Aisha’s age in the hadith literature, key Quranic verses on women, violence, sexual slavery, apostasy, and internal inconsistencies. Malcolm ranks the most common reasons people report leaving Islam, notes the heavy influence of modern egalitarian (“urban monoculture”) values, and offers a Techno-Puritan perspective on whether the tradition can be reconciled with reality-affirming religion. Simone adds her view on the ethical implications. The discussion is candid, data-driven, and frequently interrupted by family life. Based_Camp_-_Islam_Shiftsmp4 (1) [00:00:00] Malcolm Collins: Simone, I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are gonna be talking about a fascinating phenomenon, which is the collapse of Islam- Hmm ... in the Muslim world. And a lot of people are unaware that Islam has had as, as bad of a time as Christianity has had in the West. [00:00:21] Simone Collins: Yeah, [00:00:21] Malcolm Collins: it’s taken a beating. [00:00:21] At least proportionally, Islam is having a worse time in Muslim majority countries- Is it [00:00:29] Simone Collins: really? ... [00:00:30] Malcolm Collins: in terms of the speed of the collapse. So if you go from 2012 to 2014, all right? [00:00:38] Simone Collins: Okay. [00:00:39] Malcolm Collins: In Tunisia, you had 22% of people were secular. If you go to 2018 to 2019, so this is just less than a decade... Yeah, le- about... [00:00:52] What is it? Yeah, less than a decade later, it jumped up to 46%. [00:00:56] Speaker 3: Huh, huh. [00:00:57] Malcolm Collins: Okay. 22% to 46%. If you go to Libya, it’s 18% in the 2012 to 2014. Okay. 2018 to ‘19, it goes from 18% to 36%. Algeria, it goes from 13% to 24%. Morocco, it went from 4% to 22%. Stop. And in Egypt, it went from 3% to 18%. Now, I want people to understand that these are countries where you can be killed for deconverting from Islam. [00:01:32] Simone Collins: And- In... Wait, in which of these countries is that ki- like, in, in... ‘Cause I thought, like, caliphates only really existed in, at roughly, like... Okay, this is my uneducated, super unedu- it... I wanna say, I wanna say, like, Afghanistan and Iran Right? Like- Okay, [00:01:48] Malcolm Collins: countries that will kill you legally, not mob justice. In these other countries it can be mob justice. [00:01:53] But legally- But like ruled [00:01:54] Simone Collins: by Sharia law. [00:01:55] Malcolm Collins: Like- It’s the death penalty in Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Mauritania, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Somalia, the Maldives, Brunei, and some parts of Nigeria, and certain states in Malaysia. [00:02:08] Simone Collins: For what? For proselytizing Christianity or just being an unbeliever? [00:02:10] Malcolm Collins: No, [00:02:11] Simone Collins: for [00:02:11] Malcolm Collins: deconverting. [00:02:13] Simone Collins: How... How do they track that? And keep in mind, [00:02:16] Malcolm Collins: Iran appears to have a massive secular population now- [00:02:19] Simone Collins: Yeah. No, that- ... even [00:02:20] Malcolm Collins: though it’s the [00:02:20] Simone Collins: death [00:02:21] Malcolm Collins: penalty ... Oh, it’s, [00:02:22] Simone Collins: So wait, so like everyone like goes to the mosque regularly? Like how do they track... I mean, I’m just trying to figure out like how you make a case for having someone- [00:02:32] Malcolm Collins: The p- the point I’m making here is the numbers are almost certainly worse. [00:02:35] Now, what is interesting is many of these places many of these places have had a a boost post this happening. [00:02:44] Speaker 3: Oh gosh. Where did I, where did I post the, I’ll have to open it [00:02:47] Simone Collins: in Chrome again. Wait, did you get kicked again by a ghost? What, what, what was... [00:02:50] Malcolm Collins: No, something fell over. [00:02:52] Simone Collins: Wait. Shut up Was it a ghost? [00:02:55] Malcolm Collins: Was it [00:02:55] Simone Collins: a ghost? I’m so excited for ghosties. Ghosties. Spooky. Or... Oh, no, I should say jinn, because >. Jinn, jinn, jinn, jinn. So, if [00:03:11] Malcolm Collins: we look at wave three, we’ve seen a bit of a reduction. So 2021 to 2022. What is wave three? [00:03:16] Simone Collins: What... [00:03:17] Malcolm Collins: Oh. So if you go to Tunisia, it’s to 31% now. [00:03:21] If, if you go to Libya, it’s 24% now. You s- also saw a five-point drop in Algeria, a seven-point drop in Morocco, and a six-point drop in Egypt. So you- [00:03:34] Simone Collins: A drop in the number of atheists, in the percentage [00:03:36] Malcolm Collins: of atheists. A drop in the number of atheists. So you’ve had a [00:03:39] Simone Collins: slight drop- Wait, and over what year, over what year period, Malcolm? [00:03:42] Malcolm Collins: This is 2018 to ‘21, 2021 to 2020, so a fairly short time. Mm-hmm. So basically you had a big wave out, and a small wave back in, and we’ll see where the net is. But it’s worse than that, because you also have the problem of low [00:04:00] support of Islamic parties. So, If we look at the various things here, like the Egyptian Brotherhood, sorry, the, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. [00:04:10] Mm-hmm. In 2011, it had a trust rate of 44%. By 2018 to ‘19, it had a trust rate of only 17%. In the Tunisia, the Ennahda had a decline of 24 points since 2011, roughly down from a 40% range. And now with one detailed team survey showing it being at only 11 to 16% now. Wow. And in Morocco, the Justice and Development, the main Islamic party, went from 44% in 2013 to 25% in 2019. [00:04:42] A 20-point decline were reported for Muslim Brotherhood, Brotherhood groups in Jordan and Morocco as well. So You are basically seeing a lower degree of trust in the institutions that were meant to bring sort of Islam to everyone. And on top of all of this, we’re seeing fairly low fertility rates or extremely low fertility rates for the poverty in these regions across these regions as well. [00:05:11] Generally below the United States fertility rate. So Tunisia has a fertility rate of 1.53 to 1.58. Iran has a fertility rate of 1.6. Saudi Arabia has a fertility rate of 2.1 maybe, so they- they’re doing better than us. And UAE and other Gulf states have a fertility rate of 1.3 to 1.7, so very low. [00:05:34] Simone Collins: And- It’s lower than I’m sure anyone would expect, even in the case of the rare but still present above replacement country. [00:05:42] Because people think- Yeah ... Muslim country, and they’re like, “Oh, we’re talking families like six on average, right?” No. Like, no. [00:05:49] Malcolm Collins: No, no, nope. [00:05:51] Simone Collins: Yeah. [00:05:51] Malcolm Collins: We are seeing a collapse across the board. And it gets worse. We’re potentially better, and we should be grateful that this collapse is happening, or they should be grateful, is they’re also across the Arab world well, I should say Muslim world because it’s happening in Iran, too, about to run out of water. [00:06:12] Egypt right now, a- a- at current figures has a threshold of 490 to 500 meters squared per year in terms of the- the quality that puts it- it right below the scarcity threshold and less than half the UN water poverty line. Mm. And this has been a massive decline from historical levels. If you look at what does it mean to have, sorry, water levels at 490 to 500 meters, square meters, if we look at the 1960s, they had levels at 2,000 cubic meters. [00:06:47] Not good. If you look at the 1990s, it had fallen to 1,000 cubic meters, and now it’s at only 500 cubic meters And 98% of their fresh water comes from the Nile, which the country upstream of them can dam, and currently is damming. So it’s likely going to get worse. You have this at the same problem as Iran’s water problem that’s literally leading to giant sinkholes. [00:07:12] See our episode of, like, the hell on earth it is to live in Iran. R- this we did before the war talking about just how bad it’s gotten in Iran with their water situation. But we’re also seeing this across the region because, you know, oth- these regions are supplying other regions with water. The reason they’re doing the dam is ‘cause they’re also low on water. [00:07:31] Mm-hmm. And when a lot of these regions run out of water, there isn’t a lot they can do. They don’t have the economy or the economic capacity that a country like Israel does to run on desalination. Mm-hmm. So that sort of means that they don’t have a future. Like, when we did the Iran video, the answer to the future of Iran is Iran functionally has no future. [00:07:52] Mm-hmm. Y- there is no way that it can continue to operate at the population levels it’s operating at right now. Well, [00:07:57] Simone Collins: and, and with the water levels and [00:08:00] the, yeah, just the infrastructure issues at play. [00:08:03] Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So this has been a massive issue. So the question is, one, when we think about the future of the Muslim world, what’s gonna happen? [00:08:12] If we think about the future of Islam, what’s goin

    Islam vs Cell Phones: Down 25% In 10 Years
4,4
/5
157 Xếp hạng

Giới Thiệu

Based Camp is a podcast focused on how humans process the world around them and the future of our species. That means we go into everything from human sexuality, to weird sub-cultures, dating markets, philosophy, and politics. Malcolm and Simone are a husband wife team of a neuroscientist and marketer turned entrepreneurs and authors. With graduate degrees from Stanford and Cambridge under their belts as well as five bestselling books, one of which topped out the WSJs nonfiction list, they are widely known (if infamous) intellectuals / provocateurs. If you want to dig into their ideas further or check citations on points they bring up check out their book series. Note: They all sell for a dollar or so and the money made from them goes to charity. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG basedcamppodcast.substack.com

Có Thể Bạn Cũng Thích