EUVC

EUVC is your go-to podcast for everything European VC. Co-hosted by Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva, EUVC features some of the most prominent people from the European VC industry, giving you a fresh new perspective on the industry and geo we love. Follow us and stay in the loop with everything European VC on eu.vc

  1. قبل ٨ ساعات

    EUVC Live at GoWest | The Outlook for European Capital Sovereignty feat. Olivier Tonneau, Jeppe Høier, Paolo Pio, Fergus Bell and Prashant Agarwal

    In this EUVC Live at GoWest episode, Olivier Tonneau, Founding Partner Quantonation, Jeppe Høier, Co-Host at EUVC Corporate, Paolo Pio, Co-founder and General Partner at Exceptional Ventures, Fergus Bell, Founder and Managing Partner at The Players Fund, and Prashant Agarwal, Chairman and Managing Director at Scandian xplore one defining question: How does Europe turn frontier innovation into global scale? Across quantum, corporate capital, longevity, and sport, the same pattern emerges: Europe doesn’t lack talent or research. It lacks the capital and market architecture required to scale strategic industries fast enough to stay independent. Olivier opens with Europe’s quantum paradox. Europe supplies a meaningful share of deployed quantum computers globally, with strong startup and research clusters across the Nordics, France, Germany, and the UK. The science is world-class — but the financing is breaking. Over the last 12 months, the funding ratio between Europe and the US has shifted from roughly 1:2 to nearly 1:7, accelerating US scale-up, public listings, and acquisition pressure. Europe has 12–24 months to respond — not to avoid failure, but to avoid becoming the lab while others become the market. Jeppe shifts the lens to corporates. Corporate venture capital represents roughly 25% of global VC volume, yet the average lifespan of a CVC unit is only 3.7 years. His argument is blunt: most corporates launch venture arms believing they are “doing VC,” when they are actually building a strategic instrument without the operating system required to sustain it. Without durable governance — and a clear Build, Buy, Partner model — corporate venture becomes fragile instead of strategic. Paolo reframes health and longevity as deep tech moving at software speed. Genome sequencing has collapsed from decades to hours. mRNA proved that biology timelines can compress dramatically. With AI now embedded in diagnostics and discovery, health is entering an exponential era — and venture is being pulled with it. The session closes with a thesis most investors still underestimate. Fergus and Prashant argue sport is no longer entertainment — it is venture infrastructure. Athletes and rights holders are becoming capital allocators and distribution rails. Elite sport has evolved into a real-world deployment environment for deep tech, health tech, AI, and performance systems — where validation happens under pressure and at global scale. The takeaway across all five perspectives is clear: Europe invents early. But scale requires architecture. Late-stage capital depth. Liquidity. Corporate integration. Coordination. What’s covered: 00:30 Europe’s scale question — five lenses on one problem 02:00 Quantum’s paradox — Europe leads in science, not in financing 05:00 The 1:7 funding gap — why the next 12–24 months matter 07:00 What Europe can do — capital architecture, procurement, scale funds 11:30 Corporate venture — 25% of global VC, but structurally fragile 13:30 Why CVCs fail — the 3-year vs 6-year test and governance gaps 16:30 Longevity as deep tech — health moving at software speed 21:30 AI in health — diagnostics, discovery, and exponential biology 27:30 Sport as venture infrastructure — athletes and rights holders as rails 34:30 Deep tech in sport — validation, performance systems, adoption under pressure 40:00 Final takeaway — Europe has innovation; it needs scale architecture

    ٤٣ من الدقائق
  2. قبل يوم واحد

    EUVC Live at GoWest | Europe Wants Defence Tech Without Saying “Defence”: Karl-Christian Agerup, NATO Innovation Fund & Nicholas Nelson, Archangel Ventures & Sebastian von Ribbentrop, Join Capital

    Is Europe’s defense investment wave real, or is it simply venture capital wrapped in a Ukrainian flag? The debate featured Nicholas Nelson, General Partner at Archangel Ventures, and Sebastian von Ribbentrop, Founding Partner at Join Capital. At stake is more than narrative. It is about capability, returns, sovereignty — and the structural future of European capital markets. Until recently, defense investing in Europe was controversial. Many institutional LPs avoided the sector. ESG mandates were interpreted narrowly. Defense was often softened under the label “dual-use.” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine changed the landscape. Defense budgets rose. Political rhetoric shifted. Venture capital began flowing into the sector at unprecedented levels. But the central question remains: Is this a structural capital reallocation — or a short-term momentum trade? The debate crystallizes around one fault line: defense-first vs dual-use. Nicholas argues Europe’s hesitation to embrace defense-first investing is both strategically and financially misguided. Defense-only startups, he contends, have historically outperformed. Dual-use often dilutes focus by forcing two distinct go-to-market motions. Real capability requires designing directly for the warfighter — not adapting commercial products later. In his view, dual-use in Europe often functions as a reputational hedge rather than a strategy. Sebastian counters that dual-use is not compromise — it is risk management. Advanced technologies can serve both industrial and defense customers without duplicating entire teams. Diversified revenue reduces concentration risk. Non-dilutive defense contracts can substitute late-stage equity rounds in a region where growth capital remains thin. And Europe’s comparative advantage may lie less in building vertically integrated primes — and more in dominating high-precision subsystems. As the conversation escalates, it moves beyond product strategy into a deeper structural issue: scale capital. Even where early-stage defense investment has improved, later-stage funding remains limited. Several leading European defense startups have relied heavily on US or Middle Eastern growth capital. Which raises uncomfortable questions: Can Europe build independent defense champions without foreign growth capital? Will its strongest companies inevitably “pick a flag” as they scale? Is fragmentation across 30+ procurement regimes Europe’s structural disadvantage? Without coordination at scale, even strong early-stage ecosystems struggle to produce global champions. What’s covered: 00:30 Framing the question — structural shift or narrative trade? 02:00 From taboo to trend — ESG optics and the Ukraine inflection point 04:15 Defense-first vs dual-use — the core strategic divide 07:30 The defense-first case — focus, procurement alignment, and capability building 11:00 The dual-use counterargument — diversification and risk management 14:30 Subsystems vs primes — where Europe’s advantage may lie 18:00 The growth capital gap — reliance on US and Middle Eastern funding 21:00 “Picking a flag” — sovereignty vs scale 23:30 Procurement fragmentation — 30+ regimes and scaling friction 26:00 Final takeaway — Europe’s defense future depends on capital conviction and coordination

    ٢٤ من الدقائق
  3. قبل يومين

    EUVC Live at GoWest | The New European Sovereignty Stack: Energy, Minerals, Compute feat. Danijel Višević, Heidi Lindvall, Narina Mnatsakanian, Dr. Isabella Fandrych & Moritz Jungman

    Europe is not facing a crisis of ideas — it is facing a crisis of industrial depth. In this EUVC episode, Danijel Višević (Co-Founder & General Partner, World Fund), Heidi Lindvall (Founder & General Partner, Pale Blue Dot), Narina Mnatsakanian (Partner & Chief Impact Officer at Regeneration VC), Dr. Isabella Fandrych (Co-Founder and General Partner at Nucleus Capital), and Moritz Jungmann (GP at Future Energy Ventures) confront one of the defining questions of 2025: What does sovereignty actually mean? Danijel opens with history. In 1951, coal and steel powered conflict — so Europe integrated them. That integration was not symbolic. It was structural coordination under pressure. Europe repeated this reflex after the Berlin Wall, during COVID, and following the Russian gas shock. Europe does not collapse under pressure. It coordinates. But today, coordination must extend beyond policy — into capital markets and industrial systems. The structural gaps are stark. Europe produces less than 10% of the semiconductors it consumes. It imports the vast majority of rare earth materials. It raises significantly less venture capital than the United States. Only a fraction of European climate tech startups reach Series B. Europe can invent. It struggles to industrialize. Heidi reframes venture capital itself. Performance is necessary, but insufficient. Her equation is clear: Success = Performance × Trust. Trust — expressed through brand, values, and measurable impact — acts as a multiplier. Venture does not simply fund companies. It allocates the future. Narina reinforces the LP perspective: pension funds seek returns, but pensioners also seek stability, sustainability, and systemic resilience. Capital allocation is no longer purely financial. It is strategic. Dr. Isabella Fandrych shifts the conversation to materials. The energy transition is not just about electrons — it is about minerals: copper, lithium, nickel, manganese. Extraction today is geopolitically concentrated and environmentally destructive. Biology offers alternatives: microbes separating metals from rock, engineered proteins extracting minerals from waste streams, plants accumulating metals for harvest. Industrial decarbonisation is chemistry as much as energy policy. Jordan makes the case for baseload energy. Europe has reduced emissions partly through deindustrialization and outsourcing production. If Europe wants manufacturing, AI data centres, electrified transport, and economic resilience, it needs dense, dispatchable power. Renewables are essential — but intermittent. Nuclear remains one of the few proven zero-carbon baseload sources operating at scale. The debate, he argues, should be practical — not ideological. Moritz closes on infrastructure. Europe has built renewable capacity quickly. The constraint is no longer generation. It is grid orchestration. As energy systems decentralize, operators must manage volatile, distributed flows. The opportunity lies in software: orchestration, optimization, dynamic throughput management. Energy sovereignty is not just about producing electrons. It is about system design. Sovereignty in 2025 is not a slogan. It is an investment strategy. What’s covered: 00:30 Sovereignty redefined — from symbols to supply chains03:00 Europe under pressure — integration as a structural reflex06:00 The industrial gap — semiconductors, rare earths, and scale-up capital10:30 Venture as allocator — Success = Performance × Trust15:00 The LP lens — systemic capital and long-term responsibility19:00 The materials bottleneck — why decarbonisation is mineral-intensive23:00 Biology as infrastructure — new extraction paradigms27:00 Baseload power — nuclear as industrial policy32:00 The grid constraint — orchestration, optimization, software-defined systems38:00 Sovereignty as coordinated capital and industrial depth

    ٤٣ من الدقائق
  4. قبل ٣ أيام

    EUVC Live at GoWest | The Case for a United European LP Strategy feat. Philippe Tibi, Chris Elphick, Christina Brinck, Daniel Keiper-Knorr, Joe Schorge, Michiel Scheffer, Adem Yakisirer and Mia Grosen

    Introduced by our very own Andreas Munk Holm, this EUVC Live at GoWest session brings together policymakers, institutional investors, GPs, corporates, and public capital leaders around one defining question: How does Europe mobilise its own capital to secure its technological future? Across every session, one theme emerges repeatedly: Europe does not lack talent. It does not lack innovation. It does not lack savings. It lacks coordination. In The Case for a United European LP Strategy, Philippe Tibi (The Tibi Initiative; French Ministry for the Economy, Finance and Recovery; Professor at École Polytechnique Paris) lays out the macro argument. Europe holds more than €35 trillion in household assets, yet its top companies often scale under foreign ownership. The problem is not capital scarcity — it is capital allocation. Pension funds and insurers must treat venture and technology as core asset classes — for returns and sovereignty. In The Path to a United European LP Strategy, Chris Elphick (BVCA) and Philippe Tibi explore why mobilisation is slow: regulatory conservatism, fragmented mandates, cultural risk aversion, and weak cross-border coordination. Institutional allocations to venture remain near zero in many countries. Reform is structural, not optional. Succeeding in Venture as a Long-Term Capital Investor shifts from policy to portfolio construction. Christina Brinck (Volvo Group VC), Daniel Keiper-Knorr (Speedinvest), and Joe Schorge (Isomer) examine how to underwrite European venture in a fragmented but maturing ecosystem. Themes include diversification across cycles, power-law return dynamics, patience as structural advantage, and strategic alignment with industrial direction. Venture is positioned not as optional exposure — but as infrastructure for technological transformation. Public capital enters the equation in The Role of Public Capital in European Venture Outcomes, where Michiel Scheffer (European Innovation Council) explains how the EIC funds deep tech, underserved geographies, and growth-stage gaps. Public capital, he argues, is not distortion — it is market completion. In Catalyst or Competitor? Adem Yakisirer (European Investment Fund) outlines how EIF has backed more than 1,600 fund managers, building a financing continuum from pre-seed to pre-IPO. In a candid exchange with Mia Grosen (Venture Partner, SuperSeed) moderated by Andreas, the tension surfaces: Is Europe becoming too dependent on public anchors? Does institutional backing signal quality or complacency? From LP mobilisation to cross-border collaboration, one message is clear: If Europe wants technological sovereignty and long-term competitiveness, capital must move with intent, alignment, and scale. What’s covered: 02:30 Europe’s savings paradox — why the issue is allocation, not scarcity 05:00 Philippe Tibi — €35T in household assets and the case for a united European LP strategy 10:30 Venture as sovereignty infrastructure — why pensions and insurers must move 15:30 Chris Elphick + Tibi — the real blockers: regulation, mandates, culture, coordination 22:30 Why allocations stay near zero — institutional inertia across Europe 27:30 Christina Brinck — underwriting venture across cycles 33:00 Daniel Keiper-Knorr — power-law returns, patience, and portfolio construction 38:00 Joe Schorge — long-term capital behaviour and strategic alignment 43:00 Michiel Scheffer — the EIC as market completion in deep tech and underserved geographies 49:00 Growth-stage gaps — why public capital anchors where private markets hesitate 53:30 Adem Yakışırer — EIF’s role: 1,600+ managers backed from pre-seed to pre-IPO 58:30 Mia Grosen — dependency vs signal: when public anchoring becomes a crutch 1:02:30 Final takeaway — Europe’s challenge is coordination: capital must move with scale and intent

    ١ س ٤ د
  5. قبل ٤ أيام

    E695 | This Week in European Tech with Dan & Mads (feat. Sam Marchant)

    Welcome back to another episode of Upside where Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen of SuperSeed and Lomax Ward of Outsized Ventures go behind the headlines shaping European tech, capital, and power. This week is an AI-heavy sprint with a guest who’s right in the Gulf capital flow: Sam Marchant. Anthropic’s monster round is the headline, but the more interesting story is underneath: enterprise AI is becoming workflow-sticky, while OpenAI feels like it’s drifting toward consumer monetization experiments. Then we get into the “AI productivity” paradox: why generative tools aren’t giving us leisure, they’re giving us more output… and more work. From there: Alphabet’s 100-year bond and what it says about tech becoming a utility, plus the uncomfortable European angle — our savings funding US hyperscalers while we debate sovereignty. Finally, Europe sovereignty vibes: Mistral’s enterprise ramp, the 28th regime rhetoric, and whether political systems can actually execute. We close with space: Orbex collapsing, “data centers in orbit,” and why maybe civilization needs billionaires burning capital on high-variance cathedral projects. This is Upside, where optimism is earned, not assumed. Share What’s covered: 00:21 Anthropic’s $30B: why the market can’t stop throwing money at enterprise AI 03:42 The real shift: OpenAI → consumer/ads vibes, Anthropic → coding + enterprise execution 04:50 Gulf capital dynamics: OpenAI relationships vs QIA showing up in Anthropic 07:21 Claude vs ChatGPT: switching costs are collapsing… until workflows become the moat 10:54 HBR’s “AI intensifies work”: why productivity becomes pressure, not leisure 12:19 Autonomy + mastery + dopamine: AI as the ultimate short feedback-loop machine 13:25 Practical use cases: research across languages, idea stress-testing, “AI as a first hire” 22:05 Alphabet’s 100-year bond: tech is now priced like infrastructure 24:51 The pension problem: Europe’s savings financing US scale while Europe underfunds Europe 32:44 Europe’s GDP gap is a tech gap: productivity isn’t the issue, tech scale is 39:51 Mistral’s enterprise ramp: sovereign AI or local services + transformation advantage? 45:37 The 28th regime: big words, hard execution — can Europe actually push reform through? 50:32 Space data centres: PR-on-steroids or physics-defying inevitability? 53:07 Orbex collapses: why “mid-sized countries” can’t win launch alone 55:20 Fusion/quantum: Europe’s deep R&D edge, blocked by capital markets structure 56:25 Deal of the week: Olex’s $1B+ moment and Europe’s chip-shaped ambition

    ٥٠ من الدقائق
  6. E694 | Pedro Ribeiro Santos, Armilar: 25 Years of Iberian Tech & The Next Chapter with Fund IV

    ١٢ فبراير

    E694 | Pedro Ribeiro Santos, Armilar: 25 Years of Iberian Tech & The Next Chapter with Fund IV

    Welcome back to the EUVC Podcast, where we bring you the people and perspectives shaping European venture. In this pitch episode, Andreas Munk Holm sits down with Pedro Ribeiro Santos, Partner at Armilar, to walk LPs through the story, strategy, and succession plan behind Armilar Fund IV — the firm’s new pan-European early-stage fund. Armilar is one of Europe’s longest-standing independent tech VCs and Portugal's original venture firm. Born inside a bank 25 years ago, spun out almost a decade ago, and now a multi-generational partnership, the firm has backed some of Portugal’s most important tech companies and quietly built a track record of dragons (fund-returners), not just unicorns. Fund IV doubles down on what the team knows best: early-stage, tech-intensive companies across data, digitalization, and connectivity, with a strong focus on Portugal & Spain and selective investments across the rest of Europe. Share Here’s what’s covered: 01:17 | What is “Armilar”? 02:30 | Origins & Spinout 03:40 | Why being based in Portugal with almost no local ecosystem 04:50 | From US to Europe, Then Back Home 07:22 | Fund IV in a Nutshell 09:44 | Geography & LP Backbone 11:41 | Track Record, DPI & Dragons 13:51 | Selected Portfolio & Staying Power 16:19 | Team & Generational Design 21:38 | Iberia’s State of Play (Portugal & Spain) 27:45 | Golden Visa & LP Angle 29:29 | Closing & What LPs Should Care About

    ٢٨ من الدقائق
  7. E693 | Alex Dang, The Venture Mindset: How Corporates Can Beat VCs in the AI Race – The Venture Mindset in Action

    ١١ فبراير

    E693 | Alex Dang, The Venture Mindset: How Corporates Can Beat VCs in the AI Race – The Venture Mindset in Action

    Welcome to another episode of the EUVC Podcast! Today, we’re diving into How Corporates Might just be able Beat VCs in the AI Race. Or maybe more importantly, how we can collaborate. Our guest is Alex Dang, co-author of the bestselling book The Venture Mindset: How to Make Smarter Bets and Achieve Extraordinary Growth. Alex is a seasoned technology executive and innovation advisor with over two decades of experience. He was a product leader at Amazon, where he launched new businesses across e-commerce, supply chain, and AI; a partner at McKinsey, helping Fortune 500 companies build digital ventures; and today advises corporate leaders and investors on AI strategies, venture building, and applying VC principles to large organizations. In this conversation, Alex shares provocative insights on why the venture mindset is now non-negotiable for corporates in the AI era, where incumbents hold hidden advantages over VCs, and how to avoid “innovation theater” while turning data, distribution, and scale into real venture wins. Let’s jump in! Here’s what’s covered: 01:56 | The Venture Mindset in one frame with nine principles from 20 years of Stanford VC research: uncertainty → portfolios → outliers 03:44 | The post-book update Alex wishes he had added time compression: “days, not weeks,” and the rise of the “one slice team” 05:53 | Venture mindset applied to AI 07:34 | Why “adding AI” is the wrong framing; start customer-backward, not tech-backward 08:43 | “AI theater”, innovation theater and press release strategies vs real product value 11:19 | The European corporate trap: regulation, consensus, and downside protection as the enemy of transformation 11:56 | The right AI rollout sequence with start in back office to learn and protect trust, then go customer-facing at scale 15:21 | Why CVCs die after 3.7 years: incentives, leadership fear, and why corporate venturing fails structurally 17:24 | AI is now the world’s most democratized intelligence: everyone has the same tools; the gap is execution 18:47 | Where corporates fit in venture + startup ecosystems: strengths: data, distribution, enterprise scale 20:38 | When corporates should build in-house, when to partner, and why AI must become an internal muscle 25:24 | Incentives drive behavior: why executives won’t take venture-style risks unless failure is structurally safe 28:18 | AI-native teams and corporate reskilling among smaller, senior teams + digital workers replacing junior tasks 35:24 | What happens to the average corporate employee: tasks disappear, workflows evolve, but people still matter 38:50 | If Alex were CEO: how to move a workforce into an AI-safe future and target 25% profit uplift through AI 44:01 | Most counterintuitive venture principle — “drop bad ideas fast” and why persistence is sometimes the wrong discipline 46:05 | What top CEOs are doing right now: coding with Claude, learning by building, and staying close to users 49:00 | The compounding effect: “what was impossible 6 months ago is normal today” and why constant feedback loops win

    ٤٩ من الدقائق
٥
من ٥
‫٤ من التقييمات‬

حول

EUVC is your go-to podcast for everything European VC. Co-hosted by Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva, EUVC features some of the most prominent people from the European VC industry, giving you a fresh new perspective on the industry and geo we love. Follow us and stay in the loop with everything European VC on eu.vc

المزيد من EUVC

قد يعجبك أيضًا