Crime Stories with Nancy Grace

I enjoy listening to this podcast, however, I can do without the “expert’s” analysis- Bethany Marshall, Caryn Stark and especially Dr. William Morrone. Have they ever said anything of value? Listening to them proves that ANYONE can be a psychoanalyst/therapist. They state what everyone is thinking and speculate about ridiculous scenarios. No “shrinks” needed to understand anything Nancy questions because their analysis are just thoughts anyone with common sense can come up with.

As someone who has educated in homicide investigations M performed a few preliminary criminal investigations, and hundreds, if not, thousands of investigations of a non-criminal nature . I tend to only view the evidence and statements of witnesses that can be supported by other eyewitness account, testimony of expert witnesses, or evidence. I’ve been interviewed by many in the US and by members of other international media concerns regarding the case of the State Of California vs.Scott Peterson, as a result, I can say that I have learned something based on my reasonable degree of experience. I know this about Nancy Grace. She’s one of the best if not the best when it comes to getting to the truth/facts. Many would accuse her as being a biased individual, but I would say that her biases is rooted in her desire to bring out truth. As we all should know there can never be a separate truth and a separate fact. Nancy does her best I think to make sure that there is 0° of separation from the truth/fact, and that which is not truth/fact

Nancy! Thank you for using your platform to take the opportunity to speak sanity concerning the value of life. The sad, Snelling case is prime example of the evil that creeps in to the actual crime and the assessment/investigation. Humans are equally valuable no matter the stage, size, or location. God bless your efforts.

Bias is showing. Disappointed and disgusted. Cherry picking the crimes you cover is not a great way to prove you have integrity, Nance.