Unbiased Science

The flimsy arguments against this podcast only serve to highlight the misinformed narratives that inform the identities and egos of ignorant and credulous gullibles who are anything but the critical thinkers they esteem themselves to be. I see arguments from popularity, personal incredulity and authority that all demonstrate the pretentious arrogance of credulous gullibles who are confident that they know that which they demonstrably do not. I appreciate the playful whimsy and vulnerable transparency of the hosts. I feel that they get most things right or close enough and when they are wrong, they have corrected themselves on multiple occasions. That is what should happen on a science based skeptical podcast. Just because they didn’t offer a correction for your sacred cow doesn’t make the show less believable, it makes your sacred cow, bias confirmation and special pleading less believable. The good news is that ignorance is a curable disease. I wish everyone all the best in curing their own ignorance.

I really appreciate that the hosts (and guests) use scientific grounding as the basis of their arguments. In a day and age where politics are so divisive, it’s refreshing to have a podcast that dishes me the facts and expert opinions, and then gives me the tools and information so that I can make my own evidence-based conclusions about each topic they discuss. So grateful for the hosts who sift through the clickbait and present scientific facts.

I ran to this podcast after finding them on IG. For years I’ve been scared of pesticides/heavy metals and other toxins in our food supply. I wanted to hear an unbiased report about it all. I’m starting to wonder if they’re owned by Bayer (Monsanto) bc they have a couple of episodes about organic vs. conventionally grown produce and they never mention the word glyphosate even once! I can’t fathom how you could discuss the pros/cons of organic foods without talking about glyphosate. Lost all credibility for me. They also don’t ask their guests the deeper questions that listeners of a science podcast want to hear. They’ll have doctors and scientists on that they basically chat with instead of asking the tough, real questions. Disappointing.

And not rigorous or analytical in their approach.