Strategic Simplicity Podcast

Pranay Vaddi

Trying to explain new and old, arcane and obscure international security issues in a conversational format. strategicsimplicity.substack.com

  1. Role, Reliance, and War on the Rocks

    3D AGO

    Role, Reliance, and War on the Rocks

    We rarely take liberties as co-hosts to talk about arcane and didactic international security subject matter. Or perhaps we do that every episode. At least we usually don’t spend a lot of time engaging in definitional combat. Austin, Matthew, Vipin, and I tried to do a little bit of that in Part I of this episode where we discussed the role of nuclear weapons vs. reliance on (or, because of Vipin, “salience of”) nuclear weapons. We asked ourselves whether these terms matter anymore, and if their relevance is fading, what does that say about the state of nuclear policy debates in DC and worldwide, the expert community’s interest in how nuclear weapons fit in national security strategy, and the level of understanding among international counterparts debating nuclear policy at fora such as the NPT Review Conference? Some authors who’ve touched on the subject in recent years - largely in advance of nuclear posture reviews or policy processes - and i’m sure there are many more, but not many recently: Brad Roberts: “On Adapting Nuclear Deterrence to Reduce Nuclear Risk.” 2020. Sophia Becker and Elisabeth Suh: “How Biden’s Plan to Limit the Role of Nuclear Weapons Challenges NATO.” 2021 Matt Costlow: “A Net Assessment of ‘No First Use’ and ‘Sole Purpose’ Nuclear Policies.” 2021. Adam Mount: “ The Biden Nuclear Posture Review: Obstacles to Reducing Reliance on Nuclear Weapons.“ 2022. Amy Woolf (formerly of CRS): “U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy: Considering “No First Use.” Updated 2022. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit strategicsimplicity.substack.com

    41 min
  2. APR 26

    Analyzing a new Stimson report, "Why Strategic Superiority (Still) Doesn’t Matter"

    The gang got together this weekend to talk about a new Stimson Center report, “Why Strategic Superiority (Still) Doesn’t Matter: Nuclear Crises and the Failure of Theory.“ The new report by Chris Preble, Senior Fellow and Director of the Reimagining US Grand Strategy program at the Stimson Center, and Lucas Ruiz, a recent Herbert Scoville Jr. Peace Fellow in the same program, analyzes the role nuclear weapons played in four crises: the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Sino-Soviet Border Conflict of 1969, the 1973 Arab-Israeli (Yom Kippur) War, and the Kargil Crisis. Based on our read, the report functions as a rebuttal to a 2018 book by Georgetown professor Matthew Kroenig, titled "The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy: Why Strategic Superiority Matters." The report advocates for “sufficiency” as a north star for U.S. nuclear force planning - a secure second strike capability - rather than “superiority” is suggests has dominated U.S. nuclear thinking to date. The authors note that superiority “does not enhance security; it signals offensive intent, invites countermeasures, and erodes the stability that deterrence is supposed to protect.” We talk about the report's analysis of a few of these crises, the consequences of a "sufficiency" approach, especially for extended deterrence and nonproliferation, how non-nuclear weapons states may react to these obscure nuclear strategy debates in Washington, and discuss the connection between nuclear posture and arms control. Take a listen, and read the report below: https://www.stimson.org/2026/why-strategic-superiority-still-doesnt-matter/#elementor-toc__heading-anchor-0 and here's a link to Kroenig's book too: https://academic.oup.com/book/5898 This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit strategicsimplicity.substack.com

    1h 8m
  3. MAR 28

    Thinking about a future Iran Nuclear Deal

    NTI’s Eric Brewer joins us to unpack how Iran’s nuclear program has transformed since the JCPOA era — and what that means for any future nuclear agreement, which we acknowledge may be quite far off. We talk about Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium, the lack of IAEA access, new underground facilities, and years of experience with advanced centrifuges, and how these changes create a fundamentally different technical baseline than negotiators faced a decade ago. The three of us also talk about Iran’s intentions moving forward, summarizing recent public reporting and the disappearance of the IC’s long‑standing assessment that Iran was not pursuing key weaponization activities. We also discuss the ongoing conflict, starting with Operation Midnight Hammer, and how these events may have shifted Tehran’s strategic calculus with the old deterrence architecture weakened—its proxy network and missile forces have been degraded—whether Iran’s leadership might now view a nuclear weapon as the only reliable insurance policy. Finally, we talk about what a future deal (and additional policy measures) would actually entail. We cover building blocks on the topics of weaponization bottlenecks, regional missile transfers, and a more muscular counterproliferation posture, as well as what may be an exponentially more difficult verification mission, with new mechanisms for access, dispute resolution, and monitoring of military‑linked sites. Show notes and a few publicly available resources we referenced: We started out hoping to go into slightly more technical detail on JCPOA and future JCPOA provisions, but kept the conversation at a higher level for the sake of greater appeal to a wider array of listeners. However, if you would like to see more text… * JCPOA Full Text (U.S. State Department archive) * IAEA Additional Protocol (verification baseline): Reporting on Iran’s Program (2024–2025) * Wall Street Journal reporting on Iran “closing knowledge gaps” in weaponization * ODNI “Iran’s Nuclear Weapons Capability and Terrorism Monitoring Act,” assessment regarding Iran’s nuclear activities report (Nov 2024) Press on negotiations: * NYT, “United States Said to Have Sent Iran a Plan to End the Middle East War” * The Guardian, “UK security adviser ‘attended’ US-Iran talks and judged deal was within reach“ Foreign Affairs articles * Vaddi & Narang, “The North Korean Way of Proliferation” * Nicole Grajewski and Ankit Panda “The Stunning Failure of Iranian Deterrence“ Intro/outro music licensed by Soundstripe: “The Iron Curtain” by Wicked Cinema. Recording and edits through Riverside.fm. Strategic Simplicity is a collection of content provided for free by experts, many of whom worked with one another in a variety of USG jobs. The written or podcast content is solely for educational purposes, and reflects the personal views of contributors. Nothing on this Substack reflects the views of the U.S. government, MIT, or other entities. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit strategicsimplicity.substack.com

    1h 12m
  4. JAN 28

    Part III of our series on New START

    To close out (for now…) our three part series on New START and its pending expiration, Rebeccah Heinrichs and Frank Miller join Vipin, Austin, and I to explain why they think the United States should let the agreement expire without a continuation of the central numerical limits, as Russia has proposed. Our conversation touched upon Russia’s behavior in implementing the treaty, compliance record, the relevance of New START-like limits given the dilemmas facing the United States, the study of nuclear weapons policy and deterrence and the role arms control plays in this domain, and advice for new students and professionals looking to contribute to the field. As always, please feel free to leave us comments and questions and we’ll look to address them in an upcoming podcast. Background reading: Frank Miller and Eric Edelman, “No New START: Renewing the U.S.-Russian Deal Won’t Solve Today’s Nuclear Dilemmas.” Foreign Affairs. Frank Miller and Eric Edelman, “Time to End the Last U.S.-Russia Nuclear Treaty.” The Bulwark. Rebeccah Heinrichs, “New Start and Trump’s Nuclear Test.” WSJ. Strategic Simplicity is a collection of content provided for free by experts, many of whom worked with one another in a variety of jobs. In no way does written or podcast content reflect the views of the U.S. government, MIT, or other entities. Intro/outro music licensed by Soundstripe: “The Iron Curtain” by Wicked Cinema. Recording and edits through Riverside.fm. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit strategicsimplicity.substack.com

    58 min
  5. JAN 24

    Part II of our three part series on New START

    Arms control diplomacy is, like many other areas of government policy-making, hard to understand without experiencing directly. How defense strategy, political science, technology, and area studies combine with personalities, time pressure, and interagency tensions is difficult to describe - but these elements collide together in a highly concentrated fashion during an arms control negotiation. Greg Dwyer and Mike Albertson both served on the New START delegation at different points in their careers, and shared their experiences in part II of our New START series. Both spent time early in their careers “backbenching” the treaty negotiations in Geneva, and then carried leadership responsibilities on behalf of their agencies as part of the regular New START delegation that would travel to Geneva to engage in implementation discussions with Russian counterparts in the Bilateral Consultative Commission, a body created by the Treaty to ensure both parties had a venue to raise and address implementation and compliance questions. We all worked together on New START, so there is a fair amount of reminiscing in this episode, but Greg and Mike also provide a detailed glimpse into the work that goes on behind the scenes in arms control negotiation and implementation. I hope young professionals wondering what it’s like to work in this field take particular interest in this episode. As always, please feel free to send comments or question our way here or in the subscriber chat. Background reading (stuff I haven’t shared in previous posts, but seem pertinent to New START expiration). * I really hope DoW doesn’t get rid of this resource - a searchable treaty text with can help you go down a few of the rabbit holes we referenced during the podcast. * a 2024 RAND report on post-New START options. * Erin Dumbacher’s recent CFR post on managing Putin’s offer to maintain New START limits. * Frank Jones’ book “Obama on the Bomb,” covering New START and arms control efforts during the Obama administration. Strategic Simplicity is a collection of content provided for free by experts, many of whom worked with one another in a variety of jobs. In no way does written or podcast content reflect the views of the U.S. government, MIT, or other entities. Intro/outro music licensed by Soundstripe: “The Iron Curtain” by Wicked Cinema. Recording and edits through Riverside.fm. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit strategicsimplicity.substack.com

    1h 9m

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
9 Ratings

About

Trying to explain new and old, arcane and obscure international security issues in a conversational format. strategicsimplicity.substack.com

You Might Also Like