The Alerting Authority

Eddie Bertola and Jeannette Sutton

The Alerting Authority is a podcast dedicated to improving how we warn the public when seconds matter. Hosted by Jeanette Sutton, a leading researcher in public alerts and warnings, and Eddie Bertola, an expert in emergency communications technology, the show brings together practitioners, policymakers, technologists, and thought leaders shaping the future of public alerting. Each episode dives deep into real-world challenges behind creating, issuing, and delivering life-saving alerts. From Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) and the Emergency Alert System (EAS) to IPAWS implementation, crisis messaging, public behavior, and alerting policy, the hosts explore what works, what fails, and why. Rather than focusing solely on tools or software, The Alerting Authority examines the “human side” of emergency communication—decision-making under pressure, message design, training gaps, coordination across agencies, and the psychology of how people interpret warnings. The podcast aims to empower emergency managers, communicators, and public safety professionals with actionable insights, practical guidance, and candid conversations with the people who have shaped, studied, and experienced alerting at every level. Whether you’re responsible for issuing alerts, designing systems, researching risk communication, or simply interested in how warnings save lives, The Alerting Authority is your go-to source for understanding and improving public alerting in a complex and rapidly evolving world.

  1. 2d ago

    The Cost of Getting Emergency Alerts Wrong — Lessons from Oregon

    What happens when an emergency alert goes to the wrong people—or never reaches the people who need it most? On this episode of The Alerting Authority, host Eddie Bertola welcomes William (Will) Chapman, Oregon's Statewide Interoperability and Watch Center Manager, for an in-depth conversation about emergency communications, lessons learned from major disasters, and building a more reliable statewide alert and warning system. Drawing on his experience in 911 communications, law enforcement, fire, EMS, and emergency management, Will shares how Oregon has transformed its alerting capabilities following the COVID-19 pandemic and the devastating 2020 Labor Day wildfires. The conversation explores: How disasters exposed critical gaps in Oregon's emergency alerting infrastructureThe development of OR Alert, Oregon's statewide alert and warning programWhy training, preparedness, and preapproved message templates matterHow emergency managers should respond when alerts are issued incorrectlyThe importance of collaboration between state, local, and tribal governmentsHow multilingual alerts and geographic targeting improve emergency communicationsThe future of public warning as technology and communication platforms evolveOne of the biggest takeaways? Effective emergency alerting isn't just about having the right technology. It's about building relationships, preparing before disaster strikes, and creating systems that empower people to act confidently when every second counts. Whether you're an emergency manager, public information officer, first responder, or alerting authority, this episode offers practical insights into making emergency communications more effective. Subscribe to The Alerting Authority for more conversations with the people shaping the future of public warning. #EmergencyManagement #EmergencyAlerts #PublicSafety #IPAWS #ORAlert #EmergencyCommunications

  2. Oct 8

    Why Some Emergency Alerts Fail — New Research Explains What’s Missing - Part II Discussion

    What makes an emergency alert actually work — and what happens when critical information is left out? On this episode of The Alerting Authority, Jeannette Sutton and Eddie Bertola welcome back Dr. Hugh Walpole for Part 2 of their conversation about risk perception, warning messages, and the science behind how people respond during emergencies. The conversation explores groundbreaking new research examining the individual pieces of an emergency warning message and what happens when one of those pieces is removed. The research tested six major warning-message components: source, hazard, hazard impact, location, time, and protective-action guidance. The biggest finding? While complete messages consistently performed best, three pieces of information were particularly important: • What the hazard is • How the hazard could affect people • What people should do to protect themselves The group also discusses risk perception, self-efficacy, response efficacy, confirmation bias, trusted sources, evacuation terminology, “milling,” wildfire warnings, and why incomplete messages can cause people to spend precious time searching for additional information instead of taking action. They also discuss the Warning Lexicon, a freely available research-based resource designed to help emergency managers and public information officers build clearer and more complete warning messages. For emergency managers, public information officers, meteorologists, alert originators, researchers, and anyone responsible for communicating risk, this episode offers practical lessons backed by research about how to design warnings that help people understand the danger and take protective action. Because when every second counts, the information inside an alert matters. Subscribe to The Alerting Authority for conversations about emergency alerts, warnings, risk communication, preparedness, and the people working to make communities safer. #EmergencyManagement #EmergencyAlerts #RiskCommunication #PublicSafety #WarningMessages #DisasterCommunication #EmergencyPreparedness

  3. Oct 3

    Your Emergency Alerts Aren’t Good Enough — Here’s Why - Reality Check

    Emergency alerts are supposed to help people make fast, potentially life-saving decisions. But what happens when the alert itself is vague, incomplete, or confusing? In this Alerting Authority Reality Check, Eddie Bertola tackles one of the most basic — and most overlooked — parts of an effective emergency warning program: TEMPLATES. Too many agencies are still trying to write critical messages from scratch while an emergency is unfolding. Eddie explains why that needs to change and how well-designed, pre-approved templates can help alerting authorities communicate faster, more clearly, and more consistently when every second counts. In this episode: • Why emergency alert templates are NOT optional • What information belongs in a complete warning message • Why vague alerts like “danger in the area” aren't enough • WEA, EAS, SMS, email and other alert formats • Why local authorities can't simply rely on National Weather Service messaging • Preparing templates for your community's most likely hazards • Building evacuation, shelter-in-place, update and all-clear messages • Why templates should be reviewed and updated regularly • Preparing multilingual alerts BEFORE an emergency happens • How pre-approved templates can reduce delays during a crisis • Free resources available to help improve message design The goal isn't to create a template for every emergency imaginable. It's to prepare for the situations you can reasonably predict before the pressure is on. And emergency information shouldn't only work for people who speak English. Templates can allow agencies to prepare translations ahead of time so more members of the community can receive critical information in a form they understand. Your community deserves clear, actionable and complete emergency information. If you work in emergency management, public safety, alerts and warnings, risk communication, or crisis communications, ask yourself one question: When was the last time you actually reviewed your alert templates? Subscribe to The Alerting Authority for more conversations and Reality Checks about emergency alerts, warnings, public safety, risk communication, preparedness, and building stronger alerting programs. #EmergencyManagement #EmergencyAlerts #PublicSafety #CrisisCommunication #RiskCommunication #WEA #IPAWS #EmergencyPreparedness

  4. Oct 1

    Why People Ignore Emergency Warnings — Even When They Understand Them

    Why do people make the wrong decision during an emergency — even when they understand the warning? On this episode of The Alerting Authority, Jeannette Sutton and Eddie Bertola are joined by disaster scholar Dr. DeeDee Bennett Gayle to explore groundbreaking research using virtual reality to study how older adults respond to emergency warnings in real time. Instead of simply asking people what they think they would do during a disaster, researchers placed participants inside virtual emergency scenarios involving a hurricane and a chemical spill — allowing them to observe how people actually seek information, interpret warnings, and decide whether to evacuate or shelter in place. The results raise some fascinating questions. Why do people seek multiple sources before taking action? Why might someone understand an emergency warning but still choose a different protective action? And what can emergency managers do to make alerts and warnings more effective? The conversation explores wireless emergency alerts, the Emergency Alert System, NOAA Weather Radio, television, social media, warning comprehension, risk perception, protective action decision-making, older adults, and the future of virtual reality in emergency preparedness. Because sending the warning is only the beginning. What matters next is whether people know what to do — and actually do it. Subscribe to The Alerting Authority for more conversations about emergency alerts, warnings, risk communication, preparedness, and the people working to make communities safer. #EmergencyManagement #EmergencyAlerts #PublicSafety #DisasterPreparedness #RiskCommunication

  5. Sep 17

    How Do We Know If an Emergency Alert Actually Works? | The Science of Warning Messages

    How do we actually know whether an emergency alert works? In Part 1 of this special two-part episode of The Alerting Authority, Dr. Jeannette Sutton and Eddie Bertola are joined by research scientist Dr. Hugh Walpole for a deep dive into the science behind emergency warning research. Hugh breaks down qualitative vs. quantitative research, experiments, representative sampling, risk perception, and how researchers determine whether changes to an emergency message actually make a difference. But the conversation leads to an even bigger question: Should the success of an emergency alert really be measured by whether people comply? The answer is more complicated than it sounds. The group explores why researchers focus on understanding, belief, personalization, and decision-making—and why getting people to make themselves safe may be a much better goal than simply getting them to “do what they're told.” In this episode: • Qualitative vs. quantitative emergency communication research • How emergency alert experiments actually work • Why representative samples matter • The dangers of relying on anecdotal feedback • The Warning Response Model • What motivates people to take protective action • Why “compliance” can be a misleading metric • How real-world context changes emergency behavior • The ethics of emergency communication research • How better research can lead to better warning messages This is Part 1 of our conversation with Dr. Hugh Walpole. Part 2 will dive into the latest research from Dr. Sutton's lab and content mapping for emergency messages. Subscribe to The Alerting Authority for conversations about emergency alerts, warnings, risk communication, research, policy, and the people working to make communities safer. The Alerting Authority — Every Second Has a Story.

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
4 Ratings

About

The Alerting Authority is a podcast dedicated to improving how we warn the public when seconds matter. Hosted by Jeanette Sutton, a leading researcher in public alerts and warnings, and Eddie Bertola, an expert in emergency communications technology, the show brings together practitioners, policymakers, technologists, and thought leaders shaping the future of public alerting. Each episode dives deep into real-world challenges behind creating, issuing, and delivering life-saving alerts. From Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) and the Emergency Alert System (EAS) to IPAWS implementation, crisis messaging, public behavior, and alerting policy, the hosts explore what works, what fails, and why. Rather than focusing solely on tools or software, The Alerting Authority examines the “human side” of emergency communication—decision-making under pressure, message design, training gaps, coordination across agencies, and the psychology of how people interpret warnings. The podcast aims to empower emergency managers, communicators, and public safety professionals with actionable insights, practical guidance, and candid conversations with the people who have shaped, studied, and experienced alerting at every level. Whether you’re responsible for issuing alerts, designing systems, researching risk communication, or simply interested in how warnings save lives, The Alerting Authority is your go-to source for understanding and improving public alerting in a complex and rapidly evolving world.

You Might Also Like