Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters

Steph Curnow for BABCP

The podcast that brings you all the latest CBT research published in the BABCP Journals

  1. Jun 8

    Caught between services: bridging the gap between Talking Therapies and substance use services with Rich Pione

    In this episode of Research Matters, Steph Curnow speaks with Rich Pione, clinical psychologist and co-author of a service evaluation titled A reciprocal consultation model for integrated care: NHS Talking Therapies and substance use services published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, part of the journal's special issue on CBT and addictions. Rich and Steph explore what it looks like when Talking Therapies and substance use services work together, rather than in silos. They discuss why so many people with co-occurring mental health and substance use needs struggle to access the right support, and how a model built around reciprocal consultation and shared working can make a real difference. Rich reflects on what the pilot taught him, what he would do differently, and what he hopes clinicians will take away from the paper. Links and resources Read the full paper here Pione R, Adjovu P, Dolan C. A reciprocal consultation model for integrated care: NHS Talking Therapies and substance use services. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. 2026;19:e16. doi:10.1017/S1754470X25100469 Dame Carol Black's Independent Review of Drugs can be found here Explore more from The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist here Stay connected: Find our sister podcasts and all our other episodes in our podcast hub here: Have feedback? Email us at podcasts@babcp.com Follow us on Instagram & Bluesky: @BABCPpodcasts If you found this episode helpful, please rate, review and subscribe so more people can discover these important conversations. Credits: Music is Autumn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF

    25 min
  2. Apr 2

    Using CBT with adult survivors of human trafficking with Francesca Brady and Rachel Witkin

    In this episode, Steph Curnow speaks with Fran Brady and Rachel Witkin about their paper, A phased approach for using CBT with adult survivors of human trafficking, published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist.  The discussion explores why the paper was developed, highlighting the significant gaps in access to mental health care for survivors of human trafficking and the risks when trafficking experiences go unrecognised in clinical settings. Fran and Rachel emphasise that trafficking is often hidden in plain sight and more common than many realise, with survivors frequently remaining vulnerable to further exploitation. The authors outline a three-phase model of care, focusing on establishing safety, remembrance and supporting reconnection and recovery. They also stress the importance of building trust through approaches such as bridging referrals, and reflect on the emotional impact of this work, highlighting the need for strong support systems for clinicians. Resources: Read the full paper here: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/article/phased-approach-for-using-cbt-with-adult-survivors-of-human-trafficking/C9701086F9429323A91EF058E640B40B Brady, F., Gratton, J., Witkin, R., & Walsh, E. (2025). A phased approach for using CBT with adult survivors of human trafficking. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 18, e57. doi:10.1017/S1754470X25100329 Witkin, R., & Robjant, K. (2022). The Trauma-Informed Code of Conduct for All Professionals Working with Survivors of Trafficking and Slavery. Fran's co-authored paper on experience of trust in trafficking can be found here Explore more from the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist Stay Connected: Find our sister podcasts and all our other episodes in our podcast hub here: Have feedback? Email us at podcasts@babcp.com Follow us on Instagram & Bluesky: @BABCPpodcasts If you found this episode helpful, please rate, review and subscribe so more people can discover these important conversations. Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF

    41 min
  3. Common misconceptions about CBT-E for eating disorders with Dr Rebecca Murphy

    12/12/2025

    Common misconceptions about CBT-E for eating disorders with Dr Rebecca Murphy

    In this episode of Research Matters, Steph talks with Dr Rebecca Murphy about her forthcoming paper, Evolving perspectives on CBT-E for eating disorders: clarifying ten key points – misconceptions and communication gaps explored, published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Rebecca is a clinical psychologist and Research Director at the Centre for Research on Eating Disorders at Oxford, where she specialises in developing and disseminating evidence-based treatments for eating disorders, particularly CBT-E. Rebecca discusses why she and her colleagues wrote the paper and identifies that there are not just misconceptions around CBT-E but areas where more clarification could be helpful for clinicians. Steph and Rebecca explore three of the most common misunderstandings, including concerns about rigidity, questions about the applicability of CBT-E in real clinical settings and therapist worries about treating people with co-occurring conditions. Rebecca explains how flexibility within fidelity supports truly individualised care, why outcomes in routine settings can match research trials, and how clinicians can deliver CBT-E effectively even when presentations feel complex. Links and resources The paper discussed is: Murphy, R., Bailey-Straebler, S., Dalle Grave, R., Calugi, S., Osborne, E. L., & Cooper, Z. (2025). Evolving perspectives on CBT-E for eating disorders: clarifying ten key points – misconceptions and communication gaps explored. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 18, e50. doi:10.1017/S1754470X25100299 The full version of the article can be found freely available here: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-cognitive-behaviour-therapist/article/evolving-perspectives-on-cbte-for-eating-disorders-clarifying-ten-key-points-misconceptions-and-communication-gaps-explored/47CC468578C77CD65064DAFFE151A0B9 CBT E training and resources: https://www.cbte.co If you enjoy the episode, please rate, review and subscribe. You can contact the podcast at podcasts@babcp.com or follow @babcppodcasts on Instagram and Bluesky. Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF

    34 min
  4. Ten misconceptions about CBT for psychosis with Dr Katherine Newman-Taylor

    11/12/2025

    Ten misconceptions about CBT for psychosis with Dr Katherine Newman-Taylor

    In this episode, Steph talks with clinical psychologist and CBT therapist Dr Katherine Newman-Taylor about her paper "Ten Misconceptions About CBT for Psychosis", recently published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Katherine shares insights into how CBT for psychosis has evolved from its early days, when psychological approaches were thought to have little place in treating psychosis, to its current role as a recommended, evidence-based therapy. They discuss some of the most common misunderstandings that still persist today including: ·        The myth that CBTp is about "thinking positively" or correcting thoughts ·        Misconceptions around the role of the therapeutic relationship in CBTp ·        The belief that some people are "too complex" for CBTp Katherine discusses why these misconceptions matter, how they can lead to people missing out on effective therapy, and what clinicians can do to challenge them. She also reflects on the importance of delivering high-quality, full-dose, evidence-based CBT for people with psychosis, ensuring that all clients receive the same standard of care we'd wish for our own loved ones. Read the paper: 10 Misconceptions About CBT for Psychosis in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X25100275 Feedback or questions: podcasts@babcp.com Follow us: @babcppodcasts on Instagram and Bluesky Don't forget to subscribe, rate and review the show. And check out our sister podcasts — Let's Talk About CBT and Practice Matters — for more conversations on CBT in practice and research. Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF

    34 min
  5. 07/30/2025

    Integrating religious beliefs and practices in CT-PTSD with Katherine Wakelin

    In this episode of Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters, Steph speaks with clinical psychologist Katherine Wakelin about her recently published clinical guidance paper, Cognitive therapy for moral injury in post-traumatic stress disorder: integrating religious beliefs and practices, in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Together, they explore how therapists can compassionately and effectively incorporate clients' religious beliefs into cognitive therapy when working with moral injury. Katherine shares the motivation behind writing this paper, guidance on involving spiritual leaders in treatment, and practical tips for therapists who may feel apprehensive about discussing religion in therapy. Read the full paper here Wakelin, K. E., & El-Leithy, S. (2025). Cognitive therapy for moral injury in post-traumatic stress disorder: integrating religious beliefs and practices. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 18, e2. doi:10.1017/S1754470X24000436 Explore more from the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist Find our sister podcasts and all our other episodes in our podcast hub here: Have feedback? Email us at podcasts@babcp.com Follow us on Instagram & Bluesky: @BABCPpodcasts If you found this episode helpful, please rate, review and subscribe so more people can discover these important conversations. Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF Transcript: Steph: Hello and welcome to Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters, the podcast that explores some of the latest research published in the BABCP journals with me Steph Curnow. Each episode, I'll be talking to a recently published author about their research, what was the motivation behind it and how they hope it will impact the world of CBT. In this episode, I am joined by Katherine Wakelin. Katherine is lead author of the paper Cognitive therapy for moral injury in post-traumatic stress disorder: integrating religious beliefs and practices which was published in the cognitive behaviour therapist Hi, Katherine Welcome to the podcast. Katherine: Hello. Thank you for having me Steph. Steph: Thank you for coming. So just before we start, would you please tell the listeners a little bit about yourself and the areas that you work? Katherine: Sure. My is Katherine, Katherine Wakelin, I'm a clinical psychologist. I did my training at the University of Surrey and since then have always part of training and after training worked in a range of different specialist trauma services, so I guess certainly work in PTSD has been a specialist interest of mine for quite a few years now. I currently work in a community mental health team in Hampshire, and I guess my role within the team is in a specialist trauma place there as well. And by the time this airs I'll also be working at the University of Southampton as part of their doctorate programme as well. So that's a bit of my background and yeah what I'm currently doing. Steph: Great. And congratulations on your new role then. That's exciting. So I probably collared you about this paper this time last year, maybe we were at the conference, because it was in progress. And I really wanted to chat to you about it, because I thought it was a really interesting paper. And I was like, if it gets published, do you want to come on the pod? You very, very kindly agreed. So often on the podcast, we often talk to people about research papers, what they did, why they did it. This is slightly different because this is a clinical guidance paper where you're giving actually practical guidance for CBT therapists on how to work with this client group. So was there any particular motivation behind writing this paper, how did this come about? Katherine: Definitely. Well, I guess it probably brewed over a few years. I think the first case I worked with, which was a PTSD case using cognitive therapy for PTSD, where moral injury was a big component in it, was when I was working at the Traumatic Stress Service in South West London with my colleague Sharif, who co-authored the paper with me. And I guess that certainly was a really exciting piece of clinical work where I drew, with lot of Sharif's encouragement and support, but drew on the client's religious beliefs that were largely underpinning and driving the moral injury that initially we'd overlooked that aspect. And then I guess as time has gone on, worked with similar cases across different religions and different religious backgrounds, but really clearly seeing this theme, particularly when working with moral injury, actually the real value if religion is a key part of somebody's identity, then the real relevance to their PTSD and their distress and that ongoing maintenance, unless that's considered. So that's something that over time kept coming up and with Sharif's encouragement, he'd been saying all along, we should publish a paper on this. And I was like, yeah, yeah, sure. But then I guess when, over time when that kept coming up, we thought, okay, this is an idea actually that I think is a key part of the missing puzzle that perhaps didn't seem to be written about or widely talked about within the PTSD world or CBT world either. Steph: So I'm sure that many people will be familiar with the term moral injury, but just in case for anyone who isn't, would you mind just saying a little bit about what we mean by moral injury and how this might present when working with clients with PTSD? Katherine: Definitely. So I guess the paper or the definition our paper drew on throughout was Litz's definition of moral injury, which is sort of the leading in the field generally and how it's defined is the profound psychological distress that arises from very extreme events which violate somebody's very deeply held morals. This could involve somebody maybe perpetrating acts or failing to prevent acts or even bearing witness to acts that really violate their own moral code. So that could be for example somebody, it's really common in the veterans I've worked with, perhaps who've been part of events whether it be civilians are injured or killed or unintended consequences of actions, accidental car crashes or accidents where others are hurt or harmed or even where you've been a bystander of events and you've been unable to intervene and you've watched something very horrific play out. Or I guess even being subjugated to other people maybe betraying you or treating you in ways that  severely violate your own moral code. So I guess that's the definition that's talked about in the paper, consistently refers to you throughout. But certainly Hannah Murray, has written a very fantastic paper on moral injury in cognitive therapy PTSD so I would certainly read that and our paper definitely leans on that a lot as a foundation and introduction to work in moral injury which was I think Hannah's paper was one of the first I think really clearly and explicitly laid out conditions of how you might be able to routinely be working with this for PTSD and then I guess mine and Sharif's paper expand on that and think particularly in the realm of working with clients with religious beliefs and that's a part of the identity. And actually the paper highlights the intro but Litz's actually original definition of moral injury, I guess defines it as profound as a whole list but profound psychological, biological but also like spiritual distress is named in that which I think the clues in the name, isn't it? If we're not considering someone's spiritual religious beliefs as part of working with this deeply, deeply held distress that is very relevant to somebody's moral code, then we're missing an obvious piece of the puzzle. Steph: So in the paper, you offer several practical ways of incorporating religious beliefs into therapy in the context of moral injury. Would you be able to just talk through a few of those? Katherine: Yeah, definitely. I guess the paper tries to of walk readers through how they might consider religion at various different aspects of somebody's treatment. In the beginning, certainly holding that in mind when you're formulating distress with clients. And I guess the formulation is always a work in progress. So certainly I've been, I've certainly missed that to start off with somebody in our initial formulation. And as our work's progressed actually we've come back to formulation, added that in actually that perhaps maybe a fear of a higher order judgment or condemnation based on acts they've perpetrated perhaps is actually really fuelling that current threat in their PTSD that might have been missing initially. And I guess it's been really I guess some of the guidance by Griffiths talks about listening out for the sacred but I guess the idea of clinicians more routinely listening out for sort of language that might imply religion or spiritual beliefs, people talking about maybe being deserving or mentioning prayer or religious communities at all. I guess really listening out for that in your sessions as natural points to then pick up on and just explore I guess, if religion is part of their identity. So listening out for religion, I think it's really important. But then certainly when you're getting into the work and when moral injury is a big theme of that, because that's not always necessarily obvious when you first begin. And I guess these are things that people may never have ever admitted or talked about before because the traumas and the shame and the guilt could be so profound. It might not be obvious you're going to be working with moral injury until you get into the work. I guess as you get into that that often feels an actual place also to just gently prompt and open up conversations around religion. I guess you can give really good psycho education around moral injury and Hannah certainly lays that out in her paper really nicely. But then sort of opening up a

    32 min
  6. How to treat someone suffering with PTSD following rape in adulthood with Dr Kerry Young

    06/12/2025

    How to treat someone suffering with PTSD following rape in adulthood with Dr Kerry Young

    In this episode, Steph Curnow is joined by consultant clinical psychologist Dr Kerry Young to discuss the paper "How to Treat Someone Suffering with PTSD Following Rape in Adulthood", published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Kerry shares the motivation behind the paper and reflects on over two decades of clinical experience in trauma services. Listeners will gain insight into: Why evidence-based trauma-focused therapy for PTSD following rape is so effective Common myths that prevent therapists from engaging in this work Practical guidance for assessment and treatment using CT-PTSD The importance of addressing dissociation, self-blame, and shame Strategies therapists can use to protect their own wellbeing while doing this work The powerful impact this intervention can have on clients' lives This episode also highlights the invaluable video resources linked to the paper, which show exactly how to put the guidance into practice. Kerry offers encouragement to therapists: if you know how to do CT-PTSD, you already have the skills to help survivors of rape and it's some of the most rewarding work you can do Read the full paper here Explore more from the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist Find our sister podcasts and all our other episodes in our podcast hub here: Have feedback? Email us at podcasts@babcp.com Follow us on Instagram & Bluesky: @BABCPpodcasts If you found this episode helpful, please rate, review and subscribe so more people can discover these important conversations. Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF Transcript: Steph: Hello and welcome to Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters, the podcast that explores some of the latest research published in the BABCP journals with me Steph Curnow. Each episode, I'll be talking to a recently published author about their research, what was the motivation behind it and how they hope it will impact the world of CBT. Today I'm talking to Dr Kerry Young. Kerry is one of several authors on the paper How to Treat Someone Suffering with PTSD Following Rape in Adulthood published in the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Hi Kerry, welcome to the podcast. So, it's so nice of you to come on and talk to us today about this paper. I think most people will probably know who you are already, but for any listeners that don't, would you mind just introducing yourself and telling everyone a bit about you and the areas that you work in? Kerry: Yes, hi. So I'm Kerry Young. I'm a consultant clinical psychologist and I've worked in specialist trauma services. I worked it out just now for 28 years. I'm a bit tired. And at the moment I run a PTSD service for refugees and asylum seekers in West London near Paddington station. Steph: So, the paper we are talking about today is How to Treat Someone Suffering with PTSD Following Rape in Adulthood. That's the title of the paper and it does exactly what it says on the tin. So, I really wanted to get you onto the podcast to talk about it because it's such a comprehensive and helpful paper. Would you mind just talking a little bit about where the motivation to write this paper came from? How did it come about? Kerry:  Yeah, so as I said, I've been working in trauma services since the late 1990s. And I think when you start out working in specialist trauma services, you really appreciate how treatable PTSD is. So we would be expecting, if we treat PTSD for someone really not to have any symptoms anymore. So it really is a wonderful thing to treat. And over the years, I've done more and more supervising in other services. And in fact, I've been part of the NHS England funded top up for NHS Talking Therapies to work with PTSD. And what I think all of our supervisors noticed doing this is that people are a bit sheepish about treating PTSD following sexual violence. There's lots of myths and there's lots of things that get in the way, but for good reasons, I think. But we were, all of us, I think, feeling really worried, not just in NHS Talking Therapies, but in other people we supervise that, you know, if someone has PTSD to rape or sexual violence, their chances of getting someone to treat it in an evidence-based way were quite variable, I think. And I just found that really upsetting really, because you'll hear all of these stories about people being raped, you know, maybe in their teens, in their twenties, and it changing the whole course of their life. And them going through the rest of their life really feeling to blame for what happened or feeling really bad about themselves. And this sort of one moment really kind of can change the course of someone's life and that's very particularly the case if they have PTSD. And so what I was noticing is that people are flashing back to being raped day in, day out, dreaming about it when they're asleep. And it's reinforcing this, they're feeling really bad about themselves, feeling really responsible for what happened and then, making choices about their life on the basis of that. And I just sort of thought, I think we all thought, oh my God, you know, if we could just 10 sessions and the person will stop re-experiencing it, they'll be able to make choices about themselves and their lives that aren't based on re-experiencing rape. And we just thought, how can we get people to do this evidence-based therapy? And it's not just me that's written the paper, you'll see there's an enormous number of people who've written it. So don't think for a minute it was just me, but we thought, well, look, I think the problem is that people really just don't know quite how to do it. They don't know how to ask these questions about body parts and stuff. And there's lots of myths about what you should and shouldn't do. So we thought, look, we'll just tell them. We'll just tell them how to do it and show them how to do it. And so what's brilliant about this paper is this film showing you how to do it. And then hopefully people will just have a go. So that was what was behind it. Steph: Yeah, yeah. And that really nicely segues into my next question then, which was to say, in the beginning of the paper, you do talk about, about therapist fears and maybe some myths around working with sexual violence. I think it'd be really helpful if you could just take us through some of these and actually what might be barriers for therapists working with these clients. As you just said, you know, there are so many that are shy about working with this. Kerry: Yeah, and I just want to make it clear that we're all a bit shy of working with sexual violence. When they invent the thing that means we don't have to talk about it with people, I'll be the first to sign up but there isn't anything else that works as well as trauma-focused therapy. Please don't, I don't want people to think I'm thinking they shouldn't, you know, not want to talk about this stuff because I think it's very natural. There's lots of myths, I think. People often think that someone has to be stable to be able to do this work. They need to be in stable housing. They need to not be waiting for a court case. It all needs to be well in their life. And actually, so often that's the reason why people don't do the therapy. And actually, that is not the case at all. And there's very good evidence in fact, there was a great systematic review that came out last year by someone called Vanessa Yim that really looked into that and found out that actually even when you're in a war zone or even when you're still in a domestically violent relationship, you can still benefit from trauma-focused therapy. So the stability thing is a myth. Now obviously some people might not want to do it when they're unstable, but we shouldn't make that choice for them. In other myths, the things like you can't sort of on a similar vein, you can't treat people who've been raped and have PTSD if they're substance misusing. Again, that's one of those really kind of widely put about beliefs. And actually, again, the evidence not only doesn't back it up, but backs up the opposite, that people can benefit from trauma focused therapy while they're still actively substance misusing. And if you treat the PTSD, the substance misuse comes down alongside it. those sorts of things. So people don't have to be stable. They don't have to not be drinking or taking drugs. And then I suppose the main thing that people worry about is, because the therapy involves talking about the rape in some detail, people think it will be too shame inducing for the client. And on the surface, that makes perfect sense. You think, yeah, no, fair enough. But if you just think about it a little bit more, what the problem with rape is nobody can really tell anybody about the details of it. Not even your best friend, I don't think would you would say this happened and then this and then this. And so people tend to feel ashamed when they've been raped and they never really get the chance to tell anyone exactly what happened. And then, so if you actually, you're with a therapist and you tell a therapist exactly what happened and the therapist goes, oh no, I'm so sorry, poor you, that's just dreadful, what a horrible man. I'm so sorry that happened to you. And the therapist remains compassionate and caring and doesn't blame them and doesn't run out of the room horrified, the client learns that actually the person isn't judging them, and it actually reduces their shame. So the act of telling something that you're ashamed of tends to actually reduce the shame because someone reacts nicely to it. And indeed there's research that backs that up that actually talking about sexual violence reduces the shame associated with it, doesn't increase it. So I think that's the big one. And I suppose related to that, people often think as well that talking about sexual violence will be too much for the c

    42 min
  7. 04/16/2025

    Is it time for a more individual approach to adolescent eating disorder treatment – with Dr Daniel Wilson

    In this episode of Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters, Steph speaks with Dr Daniel Wilson, a clinical psychologist and researcher based in Brisbane, Australia. Dan is the lead author of the paper "CBT-E following discontinued FBT for adolescents with eating disorders: time for a more individual approach?" published in The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Steph and Dan explore key findings from the study, which compared the effectiveness of CBT-E (enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy) for young people who had previously discontinued FBT (family-based treatment) versus those who had not tried FBT at all. The research offers important insights into treatment options for adolescents with eating disorders and highlights the value of providing alternative pathways to recovery. Links & Resources: Read the paper: "CBT-E following discontinued FBT for adolescents with eating disorders: time for a more individual approach?" - https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X24000400 Explore more from the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist Find our sister podcasts and all our other episodes in our podcast hub here: Have feedback? Email us at podcasts@babcp.com Follow us on Instagram & Bluesky: @BABCPpodcasts Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF Transcript: Steph: Hello and welcome to Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters, the podcast that explores some of the latest research published in the BABCP journals with me Steph Curnow. Each episode, I'll be talking to a recently published author about their research, what was the motivation behind it and how they hope it will impact the world of CBT. In this episode, I'm talking to Dr Daniel Wilson. Dan is lead author on the paper CBT-E following discontinued FBT for adolescents with eating disorders: time for a more individual approach? Which was published in the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. Hi Dan. Welcome to the podcast. Dan: Thank you very much. Thanks for having me. Steph: It's really exciting to have you on. Actually, you are our first guest from Australia. So would you like to tell the listeners a little bit about yourself, maybe where you work and your research areas? Dan: Yep. Sure. So I'm a clinical psychologist. I'm from Brisbane, Australia, and my work here in Brisbane, I do a little bit of a mix. So I am working at Children's Health Queensland at a specialist eating disorders clinic for our child and youth mental health service and I work clinically there as part of the CBT-E team. I'm on a research fellowship for the last two years and we're researching eating disorders generally and what factors contribute to treatment outcomes amongst adolescent eating disorders. And also do a little bit of work in private practice as well. Steph: Okay, brilliant, thank you. So I was really keen to get you on the podcast. It was Eating Disorders Awareness Week here in the UK a couple of weeks ago. And, as we just talked about off air, we also recorded a Practice Matters podcast with Rebecca Murphy, which you said you listened to as well for Eating Disorders Week, talking all about it. So I thought this would intersect really nicely with that. We don't actually get many eating disorders papers into the journal as well, so I thought it'd be really nice to showcase this one and talk about what you do. So could you tell us a little bit about how this paper came about? Was there any particular motivation for the research? Dan: Yeah, so I guess in part, it was on behalf of our young people, on behalf of the treatments that we offer as well. I think unfortunately still with all the evidence we've got with treatment with eating disorders, sometimes they can get a bit of a bad rap. Not so much within our service, but they can be perceived as people that are hard to treat, or the treatments don't work, or people don't recover, despite there being like really good evidence for outcomes. And so what in particular we noticed as well was with family-based treatment, it's a treatment that a lot of people have heard of. It's probably the most well studied treatment for adolescent eating disorders and when it's not going well or it hasn't completely worked, then that kind of perception that, oh, they're not going to recover, can be even worse. And sometimes when family-based treatment doesn't go well, it can not look too good. There can be a lot of distress, there can be a lot of like argumentativeness so that the perception- this is very much anecdotally- is well, if they haven't been able to recover with full family support, what hope is there? And that they're not suitable for an individual treatment. But within our service, what we noticed was that when we'd had sort of some young people that hadn't done quite so well with FBT and we gave them a chance for CBT-E, a good proportion of them did really well and engaged really well on the treatment. So we thought that was really important to be able to demonstrate to give the families and to also clinicians hope that, even if their family-based treatment hasn't worked, then the young people can still achieve full recovery through a treatment like CBT-E. Steph: That's probably a really good point then to just talk about the two treatments a little bit. Would you be able to just sort of talk a little bit about the differences between the two for those who might not be so familiar, and actually maybe why family-based treatment might not work as well? I'm quite intrigued to some of the reasons why. Dan: Yeah, sure. I think that's, that's a really important distinction between the two treatments to make. And I think that's also a really great, to have two treatments that contrast quite differently. I think a lot of times in psychology there's a large overlap between the treatments and it's like one hasn't worked then the other one maybe is also quite similar. But with FBT and CBT-E, there's some really striking differences there, which I think might give some rationale for why if one doesn't work, the other one might work. So with FBT to start off with, the theory behind the two treatments are quite different. With FBT, they take the medical model, the disease model. So with that model, the eating disorder is conceptualised as an illness that the young person has, they don't have any control over, and the symptoms of the illness are the eating disorder behaviours, which might be the concerns overeating, the concerns over weight and shape and the desire to restrict. So according to that model, if you've got the disease, it's something that's external to you that you have no control over. It's a little bit like having covid or something, you don't choose to have a sniffly nose, you don't choose to have a cough, you don't choose to feel awful. It's an illness that you've contracted so you need some form of external medicine, external control to recover from the illness. So when you've got covid, you take whatever medicine's going to help you recover from that. According to the FBT model, it's the eating disorder that is causing these symptoms. It's not something that the young person's chosen to have, but they need some sort of external force to regain control. And according to FBT, the food is the medicine, and the family is that external support that's required to help the young person regain control from their illness and achieve recovery. So there's a lot of advantages to that model, in that because it's conceptualised an illness like no one's to blame. It's no one's fault. It's something that's happened. So the young person isn't to blame the families aren't to blame. And according to that model, you can garner the resource of the whole family to, to help the young person recover. So it's a good model and the evidence is that it works but it's also quite different to the CBT-E model where we take that psychological approach. So rather than it being an illness that you've got no control over, we think according to the CBT-E model, that there's reasons why this young person might be really concerned about their weight, concerned about their shape and want to engage in eating disorder behaviours. And it's not because they've got an illness or got something that's external to them. It's according to the CBT-E model we usually conceptualise it as being a maladaptive schema of achieving self-worth. So it's a way that the young person has learned to feel good about themselves. And if they can control their eating, if they can control their shape and weight, then they feel really good about themselves and they feel in control and they feel great and that's why they want to engage in the behaviours, and that's why they're so concerned. But there's also mechanisms that maintain it and can make it a problem. So according to that model, it's the road to recovery isn't through an external force being required. It's the road to recovery is understanding what the mechanisms are that the maintaining the eating disorder as a problem. Making the decision, okay, I want to explore other ways of achieving my self-worth. Other ways of feeling better about myself that don't rely on just controlling eating, weight and shape and then applying the strategies to be able to change them. Steph: Yeah. So it sounds like it gives them more autonomy. Dan: Yeah. Yeah definitely. And, yeah, in that early on in the stages of FBT, it's very much kind of parents are in control and that they need to be, because according to that model, the young person doesn't have any control. Whereas with CBT-E, it's all about autonomy from the very first session, it's like you are in control here, you are making the decisions through treatment and it's your decision to, to literally sit down in session one and talk about what's going on. And then if you want to hear more and make the decision to engage and it's your decision to go on from that. So, yeah

    23 min
  8. Flashforward Mental Imagery in Adolescents with Dr. Alex Lau-Zhu

    02/18/2025

    Flashforward Mental Imagery in Adolescents with Dr. Alex Lau-Zhu

    In this episode of Research Matters, host Steph Curnow talks to Dr. Alex Lau-Zhu, lead author of the paper "Flashforward Mental Imagery in Adolescents: Exploring Developmental Differences and Associations with Mental Health," published in Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. Alex discusses his research into flashforward mental imagery—vivid mental pictures of future events that can be intrusive and emotionally powerful. We explore how these flashforwards relate to anxiety in adolescents, why mental imagery isn't always a focus in CBT, and how young people may benefit from imagery-based interventions. Guest Bio: Dr. Alex Lau-Zhu is an MRC Clinician Scientist Fellow at the University of Oxford's Department of Experimental Psychology and a clinical psychologist supporting young people affected by trauma. His full list of publications and research areas can be found here: https://www.psy.ox.ac.uk/people/alex-lau-zhu Links & Resources: Read the paper: "Flashforward Mental Imagery in Adolescents: Exploring Developmental Differences and Associations with Mental Health" - https://bit.ly/3Eysxd0 Explore more from Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy –https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-and-cognitive-psychotherapy Find our sister podcasts and all our other episodes in our podcast hub here: https://babcp.com/Podcasts Have feedback? Email us at podcasts@babcp.com Follow us on Instagram & Bluesky: @BABCPpodcasts Credits: Music is Autmn Coffee by Bosnow from Uppbeat Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!): https://uppbeat.io/t/bosnow/autumn-coffee License code: 3F32NRBYH67P5MIF Transcript: Steph: Hello and welcome to Let's Talk about CBT- Research Matters, the podcast that explores some of the latest research published in the BABCP journals with me Steph Curnow. Each episode, I'll be talking to a recently published author about their research, what was the motivation behind it and how they hope it will impact the world of CBT. Today, I'm talking to Dr. Alex Lau-Zhu, Alex is lead author on the paper "Flash Forward Mental Imagery in Adolescence: Exploring Developmental Differences and Associations with Mental Health" which has been published in Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. I really enjoyed this chat with Alex. We talked all about his paper, and we also talked about maybe why mental imagery isn't explored so much with adolescents, or even in CBT in general. It's a really interesting listen, so I hope you all enjoy. Hi Alex. Welcome to the podcast. Alex: Hi Steph, thank you for having me. Steph: You're welcome. So, before we get into talking about your paper, would you mind introducing yourself to the listeners and telling us a little bit about who you are and the areas you work in? Alex: Yeah, of course. I'm currently an MRC clinician scientist fellow at the Department of Experimental Psychology at the University of Oxford, and I also work as a clinical psychologist in our local county in Oxfordshire, supporting young people who are affected by trauma. Steph: Thank you. So we're talking today about the paper that was published in the last issue of Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, which is about flash forward mental imagery in adolescents. So could you tell us a bit about how this paper came about? Was there any particular motivation for the research? Alex: Yeah so I work with a lot of young people in my clinical work and often find that they sometimes struggle with expressing themselves, sometimes around identifying what goes on in their minds in particular, which is really a key part of doing CBT, for example. And speaking to other clinicians, also working with young people, it seems like actually sometimes they do find thinking on mental images perhaps a bit easier to thinking about, for example, using visual mediums or drawings to express how they feel and what they think, but sometimes it goes to be around talking about mental images that they experience inside their mind, just describing what is it that they see, what is it that they hear, as a way to then better understand some of those thinking processes or what we might call as distortions in CBT. And that led me to think kind of more broadly around how much do we know about these sorts of processes in young people. And actually, we know incredibly little. There's some really I think exciting work that has happened in the last 20 or 30 years in working with adults and doing CBT with adults around thinking about mental images, not just verbal thinking. But that knowledge somehow hasn't really trickled down to working with young people as much. So I'm really curious more generally in, in understanding mental imagery in young people and whether that can help us improve our treatments. Steph: And would you mind just explaining what flash forwards are for anyone who might not be aware of the term? Alex: Yeah, I think it's probably a term that if once I explain what it means, then you might realise it's something that you're familiar with, you just perhaps haven't used this term to describe that before. So, the simplest way to think about it is the opposite of what a flashback would be. So a flashback is, you know, often a mental picture, often very visual, of the past, of a stressful, traumatic past event that just popped back into mind. So we think of flashforward as the almost the opposite of that. So again, mental images that just pop back. They're depicting something stressful and threatening, but they are about the future rather than about the past. And so perhaps another term that have been used in the literature or in clinical practice is intrusive images that are specific around the future. So one example would be, let's say, perhaps, last night before coming to the podcast, I had a flash forward of being on this podcast and perhaps, I don't know, my, my voice breaking, the technology not working, you know, something happens and maybe it's going live and I could kind of see your face or the laptop running out of battery. That's what I can see in my mind. And naturally that if someone has a very sticky image like that, then it's going to be very anxiety provoking. But if we take that to clinical case, let's say with young people that I work with, they might have flash forwards of having to do a school presentation later in the week and feeling like people are not really paying attention because they find that presentation boring, maybe laughing at them for not really knowing perfectly what they're talking about. So that's perhaps that, that brings about in terms of social anxiety, for example, and we can think about different types of flash forwards of different content for a range of anxiety presentations. Steph: Yeah, it's interesting you saying that mental imagery hasn't been explored in adolescents so much because you would imagine the kind of flash forwards being quite prominent in clients with OCD, for example, you would imagine that they would often quite have flash forwards about what might happen if I don't do this or if I don't do that. So it's interesting that in adolescents has not been explored so much. Alex: Yeah, and I don't really know why exactly that's been the case. I think there's something about imagery work that, that, well, you know, by now we know that imagery can be really emotionally powerful, in our therapies. I've been reading actually some very old work by Aaron Beck, who was still developing CBT in the early 70s. And actually, I didn't know, maybe other people do know, but he had a psychoanalytic sort of background right before breaking into CBT. But a lot of his clinical work in the early stages of CBT used loads of imagery. So, asking his patients about imagery, finding ways to interrupt those images and manipulate those images, changing the ending of a lot of images, like the way you would do that in imagery rescripting, for example, for those who are familiar with that technique. He was doing a lot of that sort of, not typical kind of CBT techniques and somehow then that got lost as CBT became more developed and disseminated and other researchers, you know, expanded on that thinking. I don't really know why. I wonder whether there's something about imagery that, that it kind of feels like it has too many links to psychoanalytic thinking, thinking about dreams and fantasies and CBT was perhaps trying to move away from that, but I think Beck always said that cognition is not just verbal thinking, it can also be imagery. Somehow the verbal thinking took over as CBT expanded, and actually, it would be great to be able to talk to Beck about what he was thinking. But I think for young people in particular, imagery is helpful and powerful for all ages, I believe. But for young people, I think, particularly relevant because I think it could be really creative work, it could be really imaginative, it could be really playful and fun, and young people often like therapists that has that kind of greater sense of agency on what they can bring to therapy. Steph: So I imagine imagery work as well must be really subjective too, and so that must be really helpful for adolescents to be able to sort of think, oh my therapist isn't just going to tell me what to do, they're going to ask me, you know, how to describe something, and if I can't, imagery might be a really helpful way to kind of get this out and to explain myself. Alex: Yeah, exactly. I mean, how you might want to change the content of an image, you know, from a more negative to more positive ending, for example, that the young person can become the director of their own film and I think at an age where agency is quite important, to me, it feels like imagery techniques really lend themselves to that developmental sensibility. Steph: Yeah, absolutely. Okay, so we'll get into talking about the paper a little bit then. You very helpfully laid out some very clear hypotheses in your paper, which were very helpful

    29 min

About

The podcast that brings you all the latest CBT research published in the BABCP Journals

You Might Also Like