Read by Example

Matt Renwick

A monthly podcast about literacy instruction and school leadership readbyexample.substack.com

  1. ١٠ يناير

    Penny Kittle and Micro Mentor Texts

    Listen to my conversation with Penny Kittle, author of Micro Mentor Texts: Using Short Passages From Great Books to Teach Writer’s Craft (Scholastic, 2022). This will be our book club selection for January - March 2026. Join the chat below. Full subscribers can also access the video recording of our conversation here. See a preview below. Brief Bio * Penny is a long time teacher at every level of education. She writes about her practice at https://substack.com/@pennykittle. * She is the author of several books, including Write Beside Them and 180 Days (with Kelly Gallagher, with whom she also co-hosts digital discussions). * Penny is also the chairman of the board for the Book Love Foundation, dedicated to providing “classroom libraries comprised of hundreds of books carefully chosen by the teachers to meet students where they are and lead them to the deep rewards of reading”. Check out the Book Love Foundation Podcast to learn more. * When not in the classroom, Penny enjoys spending time with her grandchildren in New Hampshire. Summary In this conversation, Penny talk about a variety of topics, including: * the importance of teachers being knowledgeable and able to problem solve, * how to build students’ confidence as writers by showing them the process of writing that you as a teacher use, and * simple strategies, such as prompt writing, that can lead to students engaged in deep conversations during book clubs. Educators will walk away with a renewed sense of hope and agency in their own work with readers and writers. What part of this conversation resonated the most with you? Share your thoughts in the comments. Enjoyed this conversation? Restack and share this post to let others know! Full Transcript Matt Renwick: Hi, this is Matt Renwick, and welcome to Read by Example, where teachers are leaders and leaders know literacy. And I'm joined today by someone I've met, I think a year ago in Wisconsin, when she was here doing a training around micro-mentor texts, Penny Kittle, long-time teacher, professor, all things education, literacy. So welcome, Penny.Penny Kittle: Thanks, Matt. It's good to be on your podcast. I enjoyed meeting you that day, that was a lovely day.Matt Renwick: Yeah, it was fun. I don't think it was on my schedule, but I'm like, I'm gonna make this on my schedule, like, I wanna hear Penny talk. Just all the good things I've heard from Reggie Routman, and just what I read about you, so I was not disappointed. It was a great experience, and I know the teachers walked away that I was working with, like, this is good, like, we want... and I'm still working with those teachers, actually.Penny Kittle: Oh, that's cool.Matt Renwick: Yeah, we still talk about the micro-mentor text, and just giving them that foundation, that knowledge that I think they were craving. They were looking for just a resource, and you really give them some nice ideas to build their practice, so...Penny Kittle: That's good.Matt Renwick: So I have been reading, as this year before, Micro Mentor Text through Heinemann, Using Short Passages from Great Books to Teach Writer's Craft.Penny Kittle: From Scholastic, just so they would want to know that.Matt Renwick: Oh, I'm sorry. I told you I'd mess something up, Penny.Penny Kittle: We all do.Matt Renwick: Yeah, I'm not gonna edit it out, though, so... Thank you for correcting me. Yeah, Scholastic. And, yeah, terrific book, very practical, very wise. I'm like, I think I'm highlighting the footnotes as much as the content.Penny Kittle: Oh, that's so funny. I had so much fun writing that with footnotes.Matt Renwick: Just the asides were just really cool, some of the cool stories from, like, Don Graves and Don Murray. But your subtitle says it pretty well, but what is your definition of a mentor text? Because I hear that tossed around a lot. What makes a mentor text micro?Penny Kittle: Yeah, I mean, I think that I always talk to students about, we're mentors to the authors and their craft, right? The text is just that particular vehicle, and we're using it to say, what kind of decisions do writers make? Are they things that I want to try? Are things that I want to imitate, or are these things that will make my writing stronger? So anytime we're studying anything, we're looking at pieces of work in that genre. You know, it's the idea of authenticity in a writing classroom. We're making things that exist in the world, and here are some people who make those things, and then what do our essays or poems or whatever we're writing look like next to them. And so, micro-mentor texts came about because I do quick writing with kids day after day, and I realized how much of the time, if I used a passage from a book, and said, what do you think of this? What do you... and used it instead of the whole, that I could get them interested in reading a book, but I could also, in a few minutes, look at craft. It was almost... I think we put a magnifying glass on the cover of the book, because I said it's like, a micro-mentor text is small enough that you can just look at it carefully. And you can't do that with a whole book. So, that is the idea, is that we look at a passage, we think about how does it work, and we imitate it.Matt Renwick: I used to teach 5th and 6th grade, and I would do, like, book blurbs, and I would read a small passage from it to promote it, to recommend it, but what you're saying here is you almost got, like, a two-for-one, like you're sharing great literature, but you're also honing in on those specific craft moves that writers do.Penny Kittle: It is definitely the way to combine a book talk with a little bit of writing. And I, you know, I honestly feel like I've taught more grammar through Micro Mentor texts than anything else. Because I'm often, when I ask them, what do you notice? Talk to each other, and I wander the room, they'll bring things up. You know, what is that? Is that the colon or the semicolon? What's it, you know, if it doesn't come up naturally, I often don't have to say anything, but I like that oftentimes this organic... Okay, do you see how this sentence is structured? Why is this such a long sentence, kind of thing. A really natural way to make grammar a decision, not a right or wrong.Matt Renwick: Yeah, you're pulling the lines away from the craft of it, you know, you're giving kids access to a writer, to the author's intentions.Penny Kittle: Right. And their choices.Matt Renwick: Yeah. So, let me frame it this way. I think with the science of reading, a lot of folks are concerned with decoding, and how kids learn to read, and I see less about actually helping kids comprehend text. I mean, it's there, but it's not as prevalent. And there's like this double-edged sword where I think literacy leaders, teachers want to get away from the 3-cueing system, we want to support kids with being good decoders. But I think what happens is we're not teaching kids to like read text for real, like once kids know to decode a word, what's the purpose of actually reading the text? And so what I like about your book is, you're using real text, you know, kids are reading it for real reasons, and so I'm wondering what are the connections between micro-mentor texts and the science of reading that you've been thinking about.Penny Kittle: I mean, I think for me, in the idea of what I do with a micro-mentor text, I'm not decoding it, right? Unless they're stopping and asking me. But I usually read it to them. And so I'm a fluent model, or another student in the room is a fluent model. And then we're diving into this idea of the pattern, the rhythm, what makes it interesting? And so to me, when you're looking at written text and thinking about writing text, you need fluency. And fluency is one of the pieces of the science of reading. So sometimes I'll have kids with me that are reading two and three years below grade level. And fluency was something that we never worked on. They're still word callers in high school. And so getting them to read with more automaticity and faster is gonna help comprehension because they're gonna have more energy and, you know, more focus to spend that effort on it, rather than in word by word. So my, you know, in the idea of the science of reading, I think that we have to first realize in secondary there are a lot of skills and strategies that I teach on a daily basis and a lot of kids lack. And so we have to keep teaching them and letting kids know it's okay to ask. You know, what does that word say? What is it? What does it mean? And when they hear us talk about it, then they learn, right? So I just think that there's a great emphasis on that 20 to 30 minutes of core instruction that, of course, is gonna support skills and strategies. But that then have a whole child, right? We can't just do 20 minutes of skills and strategies and think we've taught the whole learner. We need to get to comprehension, which is the whole point. And we also need to write, because when we're composing and creating text, we're adding to that power. The science of reading includes writing. It's not just about decoding. And I think sometimes that's where people come to rest. But of course, as you know, Scarborough's Reading Rope has both sides. And word recognition isn't any good without language comprehension. We need both of those things.Matt Renwick: So you do have like a routine in your book that you talk about. So you read text to kids. I've seen that example of you reading The Outsiders for example. But then what do you do after reading that text? What's the typical steps that you recommend?Penny Kittle: Well, I mean, the steps that I do are pretty simple. And I think that almost at any level, from elementary through college, you can do these steps. So I read a passage, or a student reads a passage. Then I say, turn and talk. What do you notice? And I give them time. And I try not to be the one that tells them. I want them to point out things. So they'

    ٣٣ من الدقائق
  2. ٢٨‏/٠٩‏/٢٠٢٥

    Beyond Debate: Fostering Civil Discourse in Classrooms for Stronger Communities

    In this episode of “Read by Example,” I sat down with educators and authors Joe Schmidt and Nichelle Pinkney to discuss their influential book, Civil Discourse: Classroom Conversations for Stronger Communities (Corwin, 2022). They explore the urgent need for structured, empathetic dialogue in K-12 classrooms, especially in today’s politically charged environment. Drawing from their extensive backgrounds in social studies education and leadership, Joe and Nichelle provide practical frameworks and strategies for teachers to foster productive conversations, empower student voices, and build stronger, more understanding classroom communities. Key topics discussed include: * The four foundational building blocks of civil discourse: Courage, Understanding, Belonging, and Empathy. * The crucial difference between “contentious” and “controversial” topics. * Strategies for moving classroom activities from debate to more inclusive discussions and dialogues. * The importance of grounding student opinions in evidence-based sources and curated text sets. * Practical advice for teachers on how to prepare for difficult conversations and build a support system within their school. * How administrators can create a supportive “sandbox” for teachers and the importance of transparent communication with parents and the community. After listening to this episode, you will walk away with a greater appreciation for supporting student conversations in every classroom. Take care, Matt P.S. Next week Thursday, 5:30pm CST, I speak with Jen Schwanke, author of Trusted (ASCD, 2025). Full subscribers can join us for this professional conversation! Official Transcript Matt Renwick: Welcome to Read by Example, where teachers are leaders, and leaders know literacy. I am joined by two colleagues and educators who I have looked forward to speaking with ever since I read their book, Civil Discourse: Classroom Conversations for Stronger Communities. Welcome, Joe Schmidt and Nichelle Pinkney. Joe Schmidt: Thanks for having us, Matt. Matt Renwick: You were both formerly high school classroom teachers and are now in leadership roles. Nichelle and Joe, would you share a little bit about your backgrounds? Nichelle Pinkney: Hi, I’m Nichelle Pinkney. I’m entering my 21st year of education. It’s hard to say out loud. I started teaching elementary for a year or two, then decided I wasn’t ready for that season and went to high school. I went from first graders to 12th graders and started teaching government and economics, then moved into AP Government and Econ. I’ve pretty much taught everything at the high school level. A few years ago, I wanted to help other teachers learn what I had, so I became an instructional coach at the middle school level. Now, I’m a curriculum director in my district, overseeing social studies and world languages, curriculum, professional learning, and teacher development. I’m involved in my state organizations, and I love social studies and students learning about the world we live in. Matt Renwick: And you were just elected president of that organization? Nichelle Pinkney: Yes, I’m president-elect of the Texas Social Studies Leadership Association, starting in February. I’m super excited because my dream has always been to fight for social studies, and I’ll get to do that through work with legislation. Matt Renwick: Well, congratulations. Joe? Joe Schmidt: I started as a high school teacher in rural Wisconsin. My first year was 9th grade, my second was 10th, and my third was 11th. I had one student seven times across our block schedule in those three courses. I left the classroom after nine years to become Madison, Wisconsin’s first Social Studies Curriculum Coordinator. I was also the state specialist for Maine, and since then, I’ve worked for a couple of national non-profits. I’m currently the president-elect of the National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS) and will become president on July 1st, 2026, three days before America turns 250. I will be the lead host for the Chicago conference in 2026. This December, NCSS will also have a conference in Washington, D.C. (link to conference here). NCSS is the largest professional organization for social studies educators, with more than 8,000 members. I went from being a classroom teacher where people said, “You have good ideas,” and I felt like I was just making it up, to a district coordinator, to the state level, always feeling that same way. That’s why I say teachers are humble heroes; it’s very rare for them to toot their own horn. I do more than 100 trainings with over 2,000 teachers a year, and almost without fail, someone will share something brilliant they “just made up.” Anytime I can help teachers celebrate and recognize their own expertise is a good day. That’s what has driven me: finding different venues to not only support teachers but celebrate them. Matt Renwick: We have two knowledgeable individuals in the social studies realm here, and I’m honored. As a former principal, I learned that there’s so much knowledge in every classroom. It’s not about improvement but about surfacing that expertise so everyone can benefit. It’s great you’re in positions to connect colleagues. I had your book for a couple of years after we did a statewide book study on it. I’ll be honest, I didn’t read it until I went to the Sphere Summit through the Cato Institute. I brought the book, and it connected perfectly with the sessions. I was back in my hotel room reading it while everyone else was out. It just really clicked for me. It feels like your book is so needed right now, especially as I see teachers self-censoring and avoiding certain books because they don’t want to deal with the politics or conflict. I’ll start with how you frame your book around four building blocks of civil discourse: Courage, Understanding, Belonging, and Empathy. Can you say a little more about how you came to those four guiding principles? Nichelle Pinkney: I’m an acronym junkie. Joe is very intelligent, and he’ll explain things, and I’ll say, “Okay, it’s got to be simplified.” We were on a call with our author mentor, Julie Stern, and I was just writing down words, trying to make it simpler. We knew all these components had to be there, but it had to click. It was broken down this way because a lot was going on when we were writing this during COVID. We were at home—I think we were just stir-crazy. But seriously, the ideas of courage and understanding were huge. I think understanding and belongingness are huge because you can’t have the necessary conversations in our world today without them. And the courage part—as you said, you were at the conference, you had the book, and you felt a need for it. That was courageous. Then, instead of going out, you dug deeper into the book. You took the courage to build understanding, and now you’re applying the other pieces—belongingness and empathy—so these things can happen in a bigger venue. Matt Renwick: So it’s like a simple first step. You don’t have to start by talking about immigration on day one. Maybe the first step is just to get your book or another resource to become more knowledgeable. Joe Schmidt: Part of the impetus for the book was that as COVID hit, I was doing a lot of virtual sessions. People kept asking for sessions on what is now civil discourse. We were heading into the 2020 election, and people would say, “I told my department not to talk about the election; it’s too contentious.” I thought, “They’re not going to get this in math class.” We can’t just abdicate our responsibility. But we had to acknowledge that this isn’t easy. It’s important, but it’s not easy. We always start there. We know this is hard, but it is worth it. We don’t want people to think there’s a judgment if you’re not doing it. The point is, let’s just do it. It’s hard, and we’re not going to be perfect at it. We made mistakes. But don’t just jump in on day one with the most controversial topics. That’s how you end up on the news. That takes you through the progression: Is there understanding? Is everyone on the same page? Does everyone feel like they belong? Otherwise, you can’t have the conversation. My favorite, which is often overlooked, is what we put under empathy: students need to know that we can disagree and still be friends. This is not a zero-sum game. If I could get every kid to understand that their classmates, people online, and people in their communities are all human beings trying to do their best, that would be the greatest gift we could give society. Matt Renwick: I’m thinking about schools that have banned cell phones. What are you going to do in the classroom in the meantime? How are you changing instruction? The kids want to talk about these topics, but they need structure and support. You mentioned “controversial,” and I liked how you differentiated it from “contentious.” What’s the difference? Joe Schmidt: I was doing a presentation and realized the words felt different. A woman told me to look at the Latin sub-roots. The root of “controversial” is “quarrelsome,” which to me is fighting. But the root of “contentious” means “to strive,” which I believe is a striving for understanding. We can either be quarrelsome or strive for understanding. Even if the definitions don’t feel different, I’ve never met someone who wants a controversy in their classroom. We strive to have contentious conversations. I’ve had to get on a soapbox recently to say that social studies is not controversial. Teaching history is not controversial. Is it contentious? Do people disagree? Yes, absolutely. That goes back to courage—this isn’t easy. But teaching this is not controversial, and I don’t ever want a teacher to have to apologize for teaching. Nichelle Pinkney: I agree. The minute you say, “We

    ٣٨ من الدقائق
  3. ١٢‏/٠٩‏/٢٠٢٥

    The Monthly Log: Timeline and Intentions

    In this video demonstration, I share key journaling tools - simple tracking tools and intentions for success - to start my month. The ultimate goal is improving outcomes for teachers and students. That includes a sense of well-being, not just achievement. When others feel supported and successful, so do I as a coach and a leader. A written explanation is also available below if you prefer to read vs. watch. Page 1: Monthly Timeline This idea comes from The Bullet Journal Method by Ryder Carroll. It is a calendar for the month in a list format. On the first page of the month in a dot journal, I document one thing I did each day that stood out to me. For example, yesterday (Monday, September 1st, or “1M”), I took a tour of a stone cottage with my family with a realtor. It’s not a calendar; I don’t typically add planned events ahead of time unless they are important. That’s what my digital calendar is for. The function of the timeline comes after you add your activities. It’s a tool for reflection. During weekly and monthly reviews (which I will share more about next month), I examine how I am spending my time and make changes if I am not happy with my actions. One way to facilitate this reflection is to separate the monthly timeline into two columns: personal and professional. This helps me quickly assess where I am giving more of my attention and time: to work or to personal commitments. If you are limited on space in your journal, you can use a highlighting system to differentiate between the two, such as green for personal. Finally, I like to track my key habits on the side of the timeline. For me right now, that is writing (W), exercise (E), and budget ($). I put a dot under each column. Again, a simple and visual way to track the positive habits I am trying to build. Page 2: Monthly Intentions I use the word “intention” purposefully. In the past, I have titled this page “goals”. The problem with this language, at least for me, is that my goals aren’t always in my zone of control. For example, I would like to hit a certain weight. While that is a great goal, a lot of factors and influences go into making that happen: watching my diet, exercising, and eating healthy foods. So, intentions are not the same as goals, and they are more than just projects. They cannot be accomplished with one or a couple of steps. They exist somewhere above both goals and projects. More importantly, they are an aspiration for what I want to accomplish this month. It’s easy to fall into the “goal/project” list. For instance, in my current set of intentions (also divided by personal and professional), I initially listed “clean out attic” and “set up yearlong P.D. schedule”. These are projects. I revised them with clearer intentions: “Create the start of a studio space for art, storage, etc.” and “Provide high-quality learning experiences for colleagues”. They are more motivating and open. Projects and goals can exist within them. Note: I don’t have more than a handful of intentions listed at any one time. I have dozens of projects saved in a task management app (Todoist). What I want to accomplish this month, I migrate over to my intentions page for the month. I aim to have no more than ten (10) intentions, an idea that comes from Four Thousand Weeks by Oliver Burkeman. It’s a good constraint: just the right amount of options to choose from in the moment. We experience decision fatigue and procrastinate when we have too many options, for example, 20 different kinds of ketchup at the grocery store. From there, my daily log should at least partially reflect these intentions. In the example below, from yesterday, I documented a tour my wife and I took of a stone cottage in our small city. We are exploring the idea of downsizing. This wasn’t part of our plan when I created my intentions list. Seeing that it is important to us, I will add it. Not as something to accomplish to prioritize. That means it will get more of my attention than other, lesser requests for my attention. Likewise, today (9.2.T), I noted that I wanted to capture insights from my interactions with coaches and leaders during school visits. So I created a custom collection on the next page as a simple tool for this purpose. This became another intention on my monthly list. When this coaching log is complete, I can review all the insights and determine what the common needs are with clients. I may use A.I. to help me with this analysis (I masked the names). While technology is helpful in this way, I find paper and pen to be most beneficial for seeing everything all at once. Digital tools have a way of hiding my commitments - out of sight, out of mind. Next month (October), I will share more about daily logs, as well as how to start a brand new notebook! Let me know what questions come up for you from this post in the comments. Paid subscribers can also join me for an “Empower Hour” on Thursday, September 25 at 4:00pm CST to discuss these topics in real time. Register below. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit readbyexample.substack.com/subscribe

    ١١ من الدقائق
  4. ٣٠‏/٠٨‏/٢٠٢٥

    The Power of Belonging in Schools

    Matt speaks with Regie Routman, longtime educator and author of many books, including The Heart-Centered Teacher, for the inaugural episode of Literacy Unscripted. This podcast series challenges traditional approaches to literacy teaching and leadership. In this professional conversation, Regie and Matt explore the meaning of belonging in schools, the impact of a single teacher, and the crucial difference between curriculum as a conversation versus a rigid script. Listeners will walk away with an appreciation for creating joyful and empowering learning environments for every student. Key Discussion Points: * The Power of Belonging: Regie and Matt share personal, resonant stories about the first time they felt truly seen and valued by a teacher, highlighting how these moments can alter a person's life trajectory. Check out Regie’s latest article for MiddleWeb on belonging in schools here. * Beyond the Script: They advocate for professional knowledge over prescriptive curriculum, likening skilled teaching to a chef who can create a masterpiece with limited ingredients by mastering the basics, rather than simply following a recipe. * Celebrating All Strengths: The conversation emphasizes the importance of seeing every individual—from students to bus drivers and cafeteria workers—as a valuable contributor with unique gifts to share, fostering a sense of shared ownership and equity within the school community. * Trust and Autonomy: They discuss the transformative power of giving students genuine agency, citing a real-world example of students managing their school library, which led to increased literacy, empathy, and leadership skills. Read here for more information about the school library book budget project. Take care, Matt P.S. Join other school leaders and me this October for the first cohort of my new course based on my book Leading Like a C.O.A.C.H. Over four weeks, you will learn key strategies and skills for engaging in coaching conversations that lead to lasting schoolwide literacy excellence. Join the waitlist today to secure your spot for this fall. Official Transcript Matt: Welcome to Read by Example. This is a special series called "Literacy Unscripted." So, I'm talking to literacy experts in the field who have pushed back on a prescriptive approach to literacy instruction. And it's very appropriate that my first conversation is with Regie Routman, who I've spoken with multiple times—a colleague, a good friend, just the person I go to whenever I have a question in this regard. So, welcome, Regie. Regie: Thank you, Matt. It's great to have a conversation with you and not have it be about a technology problem. Matt: Always happy to help there, too. But you've got an article with MiddleWeb about building a culture of belonging, and I just thought it was very appropriate for this time of year. If I were still a principal, you know, I'm trying to motivate my staff or to help staff kind of take a step back and think about what's really important. I'm looking at one of your articles that you've written in the past. And this one is also so good around belonging in schools. And we were chatting before we hit record about when the first time we felt a sense of belonging in our educational experience. And I thought your story resonated with me. So if you don't mind sharing, Regie. Regie: You know, I don't. It's a great question, actually, because I think when I think back about when did I feel a sense of belonging, it wasn't until I was an adult and I had attended an International Reading Association conference. I'll tell that story. But when I was went through the grades, I never thought that I was had any kind of special talent. I don't remember forming a close relationship with any teacher K-12 or even in college. Part of that, I think, was that I didn't grow up in an intellectual atmosphere. And my parents were fine with me just going to college and finding a husband. And I did really well in that regard, but they weren't really interested in what I was going to do with my mind. And I hadn't thought that much about it. You and I are very different generations, and you know, my mother didn't work. And so they just thought, well, you know, you'll find a nice husband and you'll be a good cook and a good mother. And I didn't have anybody in... I never had a teacher who said, "You can be more than that," which I think is so important. I never felt even in high school that I belonged with any particular group. I didn't mind. I wasn't a member of the popular club, but I think I didn't know that I was missing that until I went to my first International Reading Association meeting, which was after I was married and had two children. And the only reason I was able to go—I was working as a reading specialist in Shaker Heights, Ohio—was that every seven years they sent the reading specialist, but my term came up because I couldn't have afforded to go. And I think the thing that was shocking, because I had never been to a national conference or even a local conference, was seeing women intellectually challenged. And I met Marie Clay and seeing what was going on across the world. It was just eye-opening for me. And so I think that was the first time that I felt a sense of belonging. Not initially, because I didn't feel that I was any part of that, but I was so inspired. And I was inspired by leaders. I just have this picture here. This was the person that made me feel that I could belong. Regie: So he was the father of shared book experience. He at one time was in charge of Scholastic Australia, and he told me that he never should have been in charge of a publishing company because he said he ran them into the ground. I mean, he was great. He was a brilliant literacy professor, and he was just such a kind person. And he saw something in me. He showed up. When I was speaking about belonging, I knew I had to get back to the International Reading Association. I was so stimulated by the people that I met and what was happening all over the world that I didn't have an idea about. I'd been reading about it, but to actually meet the people that were, like Don Holdaway, like Marie Clay, that were making things happen, and that they were so forthcoming and treated me as an equal. And I knew the only way I could get back to the conference, and I was really feeling this sense of, "I want to be part of this," was to get my district to send me. And the only way that that would happen is if I wrote a proposal, which is what I did and got accepted. It took two years. I didn't know how to write a proposal because that's its own genre, right? And so then when I didn't make it, then the next year, and Don Holdaway showed up at my session. I couldn't believe it. He said, "I've come to learn from you." And I'm like, "What are you doing here? I don't know anything yet." And we became close friends, and he became my most important mentor. And I think that was because he wasn't just about literacy. He was all about bringing joy into learning. And nobody was really talking about that then. We're going back many, many years, bringing joy into learning and also the importance of the social-emotional. It was all together. He was teaching in a one-room schoolhouse for kids that were not learning to read well. And he had like K through 8 all in one room together. And he invented the shared book experience where he created a big book and so had the kids gather regardless of their age around. And so they could see the print as he was reading. And it was that whole bedtime experience, very nurturing, very loving, very comforting. And so that was a big deal. And he was at my house, and I brought him into the district, and we really became close friends and colleagues. And I felt that was the first time because I was not... I don't have a PhD. It was the first time I thought, "Well, maybe I could be an influencer. Maybe I could write a book." You know, and then I was encouraged to do that. But not by any of my teachers K-12. It was when I saw, you know, sort of the broader world. Matt: You had to seek out your own mentors. Regie: Yeah, I really did. What about you? When was the first time? It's a great question. When did you experience belonging? Matt: I remember in high school, one of my economics teachers... And I was not like a straight-A student. I wasn't a bad student, but I was, you know, I struggled at times with attention. And I remember my economics teacher said, "Oh, hey, Matt, you're getting an A at the top of the class." And I said, "Oh." And he looked at me, and I was very surprised. And he's like, "Why are you surprised?" And he's like, "That's where you belong." You know, and just that phrase of like, "This is where I expect you to be." And I kind of... It's not the same experience, but a similar experience where I didn't feel like there was a hierarchy between, as much as, you know, as we typically have, between teacher and student. And it sounds like a similar relationship with Don Holdaway. You know, "I had high expectations for you." Regie: Yeah, I didn't see myself as that smart. Nobody had ever said, and I didn't think about it. But one teacher can do that. My granddaughter, Katie, who graduated college several years ago, had an economics teacher who saw something in her and had her stay after class and say, "You know, Katie, have you considered economics as a field? Don't let those boys in the class that are talking over the girls. Don't let that. You have a good brain. You have a lot to offer." That one teacher caused her... She never thought about economics. She majored in economics, has a degree in economics, and is working in economics. And it was a teacher who saw that, and it was a female teacher encouraging another female. I think women, it's still hard to get the same recognition, unfortunately, that men do, especially if you're a person of color, you know. Matt: For sure, yeah. It's much harder. It's not

    ٣٢ من الدقائق
  5. Literacy Unscripted: Reclaiming Professional Wisdom in the Age of Mandates

    ١٠‏/٠٧‏/٢٠٢٥

    Literacy Unscripted: Reclaiming Professional Wisdom in the Age of Mandates

    In this launch episode, host Matt explores the tension between literacy mandates and the messy reality of school leadership and teaching. Drawing from his experience as a principal and systems coach, Matt introduces the concept of "scripts" in education—from literacy curriculum programs to unwritten cultural rules—and examines how they can both support and constrain professional judgment. Matt shares why he believes educators need to move beyond being "curriculum deliverers" to reclaim their roles as thoughtful professionals who use resources as guides, not gospel. He outlines the four core themes this series will explore: recovering autonomy, identity, humanity, and agency in literacy education. Whether you're a classroom teacher feeling overwhelmed by mandates or a leader seeking to balance compliance with authentic learning, this episode offers a framework for going "off-script" in healthy, productive ways that put students first. Perfect for: Teachers, literacy coaches, and school leaders who want to restore professional wisdom to their practice while working within existing systems. Join the conversation: Monthly virtual discussions are free for all listeners, with implementation toolkits available for full subscribers. Duration: [6 minutes] Read by Example is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support this community, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Official Transcript: Earlier this month, I along with other coaches and consultants spent two days supporting three district leadership teams. Our goal was to help them develop a strategic improvement plan for the coming school year. If you've been through this process before, you can imagine the process: * Assess current reality through a data dig * Use systems mapping and root cause tools to identify the most important needs * Select an evidence-based improvement strategy (EBIS) to implement across the organization It's calming to put together a plan of action. You can see it written out on paper or on a screen. You can imagine the ideal journey that your school will take to achieve the desired results. And then you begin to imagine all the obstacles that can come up: all the other initiatives currently in place and also asking for your attention; the one teacher team that struggles to hear each other's ideas; the reality of your students arriving and caring little about your agenda as they have their own needs to be met. Yet even these areas of responsibility can be responsibly addressed with some careful planning. * Too many initiatives? Create a priority list with your leadership team, and break them down into manageable projects and next actions. * Teachers not getting along? Ensure staff meetings and professional learning days explicitly teach collaboration skills, using data and not egos to drive conversations. * Students displaying challenging behaviors? Set up bi-weekly student study meetings with your pupil services team to address these unmet needs with systems of support. Now we feel even more comforted, more in control. Having gone down this path for several years as a principal, I can say with confidence that as nice as these plans are, the journey we took as a school never followed these scripts. We have to be adaptive and responsive to the unpredictability of life. That requires a toolbox of skills and resources beyond any plan. As Seth Godin notes, strategic planning has nothing to do with strategy. And that's what these plans are really, right? Scripts. Actions, settings, and dialogue. They're everywhere in schools when you take a moment to think about it. * The literacy curriculum programs * The mandated and banned instructional practices * The behavior lesson plans for common areas Some of the scripts aren't written out but are still just as present and powerful. Who you can talk to and trust in a building, and who you cannot. What a school culture celebrates and what is taboo. To veer from the script invites risk: of not belonging, of being ostracized, even when what we want to say aloud supports what's right for each and every child. I am not entirely against scripts. For example, I often referenced our student handbook when making disciplinary decisions for students. The literacy curriculum resource we purchased and implemented at my last school had lots of culturally relevant texts and authentic tasks. But we used these resources as guides, not gospel. In the end, it was our wisdom, judgment, and sense of professionalism that determined whether we were successful as teachers and leaders. That's the purpose of this post and future ones within the new series Literacy Unscripted. It's a learning journey to discover how educators like you and me are going off-script in healthy and productive ways. It's an attempt to combat professional erosion to ensure students have access to excellent and engaging learning experiences. Specific themes I'll be exploring include: * Recovering a Sense of Autonomy - How do we create the conditions for staff and students to make meaningful decisions on behalf of teaching and learning? What opportunities are there within a scripted literacy experience for authentic choice as readers and writers? * Recovering a Sense of Identity - If a mandated literacy program does not adequately represent who students are and can be in our classrooms, where else can they see themselves and the world through text? What moves can faculty make within these constraints to truly serve as teachers and not merely curriculum deliverers? * Recovering a Sense of Humanity - How can we address harmful perspectives perpetuated by insensitive curriculum materials while not stressing ourselves out? How might we leverage our knowledge and position to create life-affirming professional spaces? * Recovering a Sense of Agency - When we see the disparities created by a scripted literacy experience, what tools and mindsets do we need to empower both ourselves and our students to resist? What oversimplified narratives about our students might we challenge through action research and student-led inquiry around meaningful projects and tasks? These are questions I will be pondering. I hope you will too, by joining me in this podcast series and learning journey. Here's how you can participate: * Join us for monthly virtual conversations around specific topics related to literacy and leadership. (free for all) * Engage in online professional dialogue through comments and the chat feature. (free for all) * Download an implementation tool kit that will accompany the video recording of our virtual conversations, to use as resources to support your school's PD plan. (full subscribers) More information to come. Please reach out with any questions you have. Take care, Matt This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit readbyexample.substack.com/subscribe

    ٦ من الدقائق
  6. ٢١‏/٠٤‏/٢٠٢٥

    The Monday Morning Memo #4: Be a Noticer, Not a Judger

    Happy Monday! This week’s focus is on being a noticer vs. a judger during classroom visits. 📚 PROFESSIONAL STRATEGY When informally observing classroom instruction, shift from judging to noticing. Start by acknowledging what you see and hear without evaluation: "I'm noticing..." rather than "This is good/bad..." Naming our observations keeps them at an objective level; noticing activates the brain’s prefrontal cortex which moderates emotional reactivity. We create mental space between what we observe and any premature conclusions we might draw about a teacher’s practice. We can respond then more thoughtfully with our feedback. From my Choice Literacy article: "Off the Hook: How to Engage with and Reframe Our Obstacles in Order to Reduce Anxiety and Stress” 🌱 PERSONAL TIP Start small in your observations if classroom visits are new to you. Begin with one aspect of instruction. Share what you noticed with the teacher, followed by a genuine question. This can lead to noticing/sharing two aspects of instruction, and so on. Build on success. 📢 FOR YOUR TEAM & SCHOOL Today's Quote: Joke for Announcements: Which month of the year is the shortest? May. It only has three letters. (Source: Reader’s Digest) Bonus: Check out the Four-Week Instructional Walks Tracker in the printable version of this memo below! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit readbyexample.substack.com/subscribe

    ٢ من الدقائق
  7. ٣١‏/٠٣‏/٢٠٢٥

    The Monday Morning Memo #1: Questions That Promote Reflection

    Happy Monday! This week’s focus is on promoting reflection through questions. 📚 PROFESSIONAL STRATEGY Spring is hectic. It is also a time for reflection and renewal. We can encourage teachers to explore the proverbial question "Why am I doing what I'm doing?" with thoughtful questions. During classroom visits, ask "How did you come to make this change in your practice?" or "What do you see as a possible impact on students?" These questions help teachers reflect on their decision-making and potentially explore new approaches. * From my article: "Using Questioning to Facilitate Reflection and Goal Setting with Teachers" 🌱 PERSONAL TIP When coaching teachers, replace interrogative "why" questions with more invitational phrasing like "What led you to choose this approach?" or "I'm curious about how you decided on this strategy." Alternatively, ask some questions by making statements, which can be less threatening for some. For example, instead of “What led you to choose this approach?” you could say, “Talk about what led you to choose this approach.” (h/t Regie Routman) Got additional tips for the community on this topic? 📢 FOR YOUR TEAM & SCHOOL This Week’s Quote: Joke for Announcements: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Have a great week, -Matt P.S. I’d love your feedback on this new project! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit readbyexample.substack.com/subscribe

    ٢ من الدقائق

التقييمات والمراجعات

٥
من ٥
‫٢ من التقييمات‬

حول

A monthly podcast about literacy instruction and school leadership readbyexample.substack.com