The Town Square Podcast

Trey Bailey, Gabriel Stovall
  • 5.0 (13)
  • NEWS COMMENTARY
  • UPDATED BIWEEKLY

Not just another podcast, but a place to meet in the messy middle and have difficult discussions with transparency and diplomacy where the outcome is unity, not uniformity. The primary topics will be the local interests of Newton County, Georgia residents and those in the surrounding community.

  1. 2D AGO

    Richard Wright: The Limping Rapper, CPA, and Moderate Democrat | Candidate Conversations — Episode 84

    There are some interviews where you can feel within the first two minutes that the conversation is going to be different. That was this one. In Episode 84 of The Town Square Podcast, Trey Bailey welcomed Richard Wright, Democratic candidate for Lieutenant Governor of Georgia, into the studio for a conversation that was funny, thoughtful, policy-heavy, personal, and refreshingly unpolished in the best possible way. Wright’s campaign describes him as a financial professional and community-minded leader running to bring “common sense leadership” to Georgia. By the end of the episode, listeners got a strong sense of what that means in his own words.  This episode is part of The Town Square Podcast’s ongoing Candidate Conversations series — a public-service effort to help voters hear directly from candidates in a long-form, less combative setting. Rather than sound bites, gotchas, or rehearsed talking points, the format invites candidates to explain who they are, what shaped them, and how they think. Richard Wright did exactly that. A statewide race with a very personal story The office of lieutenant governor is a big one in Georgia. The position presides over the State Senate and helps shape the flow of legislation in a meaningful way. As Trey noted early in the episode, this is one of those offices that most citizens know is important, but many couldn’t fully describe day to day. Wright’s candidacy is for a statewide seat, and that alone made this conversation significant for your audience in Newton County, Rockdale, DeKalb, Jasper, Morgan, and beyond. Georgia voters will choose their next lieutenant governor in the 2026 cycle, with the primary scheduled for May 19, 2026.  But Wright didn’t begin by trying to impress listeners with credentials. He began with a story. And it is a story. He told Trey that he moved to Atlanta from North Carolina in 1997 with no real career plan beyond trying to make it in music. He came to the city hoping to become a rapper and, if that failed, maybe walk on at Georgia Tech. It already sounds like an unusual opening chapter for someone now running for lieutenant governor, but the story got even more memorable as Wright explained how he injured his ankle playing basketball just before moving, arriving in Atlanta not as a rising star, but as what Trey jokingly called “the limping rapper.” The humor worked because Wright embraced it. He laughed at himself, talked about his old rap names, and let listeners hear the messiness of the journey before the success. That matters. In a political environment where too many candidates sound polished to the point of lifelessness, Wright came across as someone who actually remembers where he came from. From dropped out student to CPA One of the strongest parts of the episode was hearing the arc of Wright’s educational story. He openly said he dropped out of high school. He also described the jobs he worked, the instability of those early years, and the influence of his mother, whose prayers and persistence clearly helped redirect his life. Eventually, he went to college, earned an undergraduate degree, later earned an MBA, became a CPA, and also attended Georgetown Law School, all details that line up with how his campaign presents him publicly as an experienced financial professional rather than a career politician.  And that’s one of the central contrasts he seems to want voters to notice. Richard Wright is not running on the claim that he has spent years climbing a partisan political ladder. He is running on the idea that his life experience, financial background, and ability to talk to ordinary people give him a different kind of credibility. That theme surfaced again and again throughout the episode. He framed his CPA background not merely as a résumé line but as preparation for governing. He talked about budgets, tax structures, incentives, and return on investment in a way that felt natural. Whether listeners agreed with every proposal or not, there was no mistaking that this is a candidate who enjoys thinking through how money moves and how policy affects real people. A “moderate Democrat” in the messy middle At several points, Trey and Wright locked in on one of the themes that has become central to both The Town Square Podcast and this campaign: the political middle. Wright describes himself as a moderate Democrat. His website makes the same case — that Georgia needs leadership centered on “common-sense solutions,” collaboration, and helping working families rather than feeding the loudest extremes.  That opened the door to one of the best stretches of the interview. Trey, who often speaks from that “messy middle” perspective himself, noted that many people on both the left and the right would hear the phrase “moderate Democrat” and wonder if such a thing even exists anymore. Wright leaned into that tension. He argued that the far right and far left often dominate attention, fundraising, and headlines, but that most Georgians are more practical than ideological. In his framing, the loudest people may get the microphones, but they do not necessarily represent the majority of people trying to raise families, pay bills, and live responsibly. That idea clearly resonated with the tone of the show. Wright repeatedly emphasized that people want effective schools, reasonable taxes, economic opportunity, and practical leadership. He argued that the middle is not weak or confused; it is just underrepresented and often drowned out. That is exactly the kind of conversation Candidate Conversations was built to host. Civility as a governing strategy One of Wright’s clearest arguments for why he should be the Democratic nominee centered on civility. Georgia’s lieutenant governor presides over the State Senate. In the current political environment, that means leading in a chamber where partisan tension is real and often public. Wright acknowledged the challenge directly. He said a Democrat walking into a Republican-controlled Senate must have emotional intelligence, self-awareness, and the ability to build consensus. He argued that his experience as an outsider to the legislature could actually be an advantage. In his telling, existing relationships between some candidates and current lawmakers may already be damaged or hardened by partisan history. He suggested that he could enter the chamber with a different tone — not surrendering principles, but also not defining success as constant combat. That doesn’t mean he presented himself as soft. It means he presented himself as strategic. He said he would always listen, even if he did not always agree. He described himself as someone willing to work with Republicans when the policy helped people and willing to push back when it didn’t. In a race where many candidates may define themselves by how fiercely they fight, Wright is trying to distinguish himself by how effectively he can govern. Healthcare, Medicaid, and rural Georgia If there was one policy area Wright kept circling back to, it was healthcare. He believes Georgia must do more, especially on Medicaid expansion, rural hospital support, and healthcare access for working families. His campaign platform likewise includes healthcare-related priorities and positions expanding Medicaid as part of helping Georgia’s economy and families.  In the interview, Wright tried to break the issue down in practical terms. He talked about how reimbursement delays can hurt hospitals and providers, especially in rural communities where cash flow is already tight. He argued that state government should think more creatively and proactively about keeping rural hospitals open, not simply because healthcare is morally important, but because healthy communities are also economically viable communities. That was one of his recurring strengths in the conversation: he linked issues together. For Wright, healthcare is not just about compassion. It is also about workforce development, business recruitment, rural stability, and long-term economic growth. If a region has poor healthcare access, employers notice. Families notice. Doctors notice. Young professionals notice. In his view, Georgia cannot claim to be one of the best states for business while underperforming on the health side of the equation. He also spoke at length about how existing income thresholds and program structures can discourage marriage or leave working families stuck in a gap where they earn too much for one program but not enough to comfortably afford the alternatives. That part of the conversation was especially detailed and reflected the kind of numeric thinking Trey kept drawing out of him. Rural hospitals and the “Georgia Jobs Act” idea Wright also introduced a broader idea he called a Georgia Jobs Act, tying job creation and healthcare access together. He argued that helping hospitals stay open, especially in rural areas, is essential not only for current residents but also for future economic recruitment. Again, he connected the dots: If rural hospitals close, communities become less attractive for new business. If communities are less attractive for new business, population and investment lag. If population and investment lag, the tax base stays weak. If the tax base stays weak, public services struggle. Whether one sees that as a sweeping vision or an ambitious political stretch, it was undeniably a coherent one. He wants voters to see public policy not as disconnected line items, but as an ecosystem. Housing affordability and private equity Another standout moment in the episode came when Trey asked Wright about affordability and housing. Rather than stay at the surface level, Wright launched into a detailed explanation of private equity, carried interest, tax incentives, and how large-scale institutional ownership can reshape the housing market. He argued that private equity has become a major factor in housing

    59 min

  2. 4D AGO

    Alan Fowler: Jobs, Hobbies, and Hope | Candidate Conversations — Episode 83

    In Episode 83 of The Town Square Podcast, Trey Bailey and Gabriel Stovall continue their Candidate Conversations series with Alan Fowler, Republican candidate for the Newton County Board of Education District 5 seat. With current board chair Abigail Coggin retiring from the position, Fowler will appear on the November ballot, and this episode gives listeners an opportunity to hear directly from him about his background, philosophy, and vision for public education in Newton County. For many in the community, Alan Fowler is already a familiar face. After all, he spent 26 years at Eastside High School, where he served as band director and helped shape generations of students. But this conversation goes much deeper than résumé lines or campaign language. It offers a look at the heart of a longtime educator, husband, father, music leader, and community member who believes deeply in public schools and the people they serve. The episode begins with Fowler sharing the personal foundation of his life: his family. He describes himself first as the father of two daughters and the husband of his wife, Susan. That opening set the tone for the rest of the discussion. Before Alan Fowler is a candidate, he is a family man whose life in Newton County has been built over decades of service, relationships, and roots. Fowler and his wife moved to Newton County in 1995 after graduate school. He took a job at Salem High School, while Susan began teaching at Livingston Elementary. Not long after, the band director position at Eastside High School opened, and Fowler moved there the following year. That transition would become one of the defining turns in his life and career. What started as a professional opportunity became a long-term commitment not only to one school, but to an entire community. One of the more charming stories from the interview involved the couple’s first introduction to Newton County. While looking for a house, they picked up a copy of The Covington News and read about a July 4th concert by the community band on the Square. Fowler recalled that one of their earliest experiences in the county was attending that celebration, meeting local people, and seeing the community gather around music. Looking back, it feels fitting that his introduction to Newton County came through the arts and public life—two things that would define his years here. Listeners also got a fuller picture of Fowler’s background before Newton County. He was born at South Fulton Hospital, spent part of his childhood in Delaware, graduated from North Clayton High School, and later attended the University of Georgia. Both he and Susan were involved in the Redcoat Marching Band, though they somehow never met until their senior year despite overlapping in the same organization for three years. Their eventual connection, sparked by a key to a storage room and followed by a whirlwind early romance, made for one of the most memorable and warmest parts of the conversation. As the conversation shifted toward education, Fowler offered a thoughtful reflection on what he learned over more than three decades in the classroom. He described three major lessons that shaped him. The first was that leadership is not about the individual—it is about the team. He traced that lesson all the way back to his early days at Eastside, when he was tasked with building a marching band program from the ground up, with students who had never marched before and without much funding. He quickly realized that success would require teamwork from students, staff, helpers, graduates, and the broader community. That mindset clearly still guides him today. The second lesson came through fatherhood. Fowler spoke candidly about how becoming a parent made him a better educator. When his oldest daughter was born, he said he immediately understood with greater clarity that he was teaching other people’s children—their “little babies”—and that realization carried a new weight of responsibility. Later, when his daughter moved through the school system and eventually joined the band program, the work became even more personal. His students were no longer just young people he was helping along their journey; they became part of his own journey too. The third lesson may have been the most philosophical and perhaps the most revealing. Fowler shared how deeply he had been influenced by the statement often heard from Principal Jeff Cher at Eastside High School: “There’s no such thing as an unimportant person or an unimportant day.” Over time, he came to believe that the statement was even more powerful without the limiting phrase “at Eastside High School.” In his view, there is no unimportant person or unimportant day anywhere—not at Eastside, not at Newton, not at Alcovy, and not in any school or community. That belief seemed to capture the heart of his public service philosophy: people matter, every day matters, and every school matters. When asked how those lessons inform his decision to run for elected office, Fowler’s answer was straightforward. The same values that shaped him as a teacher and statewide education leader are the values he would bring to the Board of Education. In his current role as Executive Director of the Georgia Music Educators Association, he leads an organization with approximately 3,500 members. He spoke about the importance of supporting educators, staying connected to students, and making sure people feel heard. It is clear that he does not see school board service as a place to impose himself, but as a place to collaborate, listen, and help lead responsibly. That idea came into clearer focus when the hosts asked about the actual responsibilities of a school board member. Fowler identified four key areas: fiscal responsibility, policymaking, climate management, and strategic planning. He emphasized that no single board member arrives and changes everything alone. Instead, school board work is team-based work. It requires relationships, consensus-building, and a willingness to move the group forward together. Because of his years in education and his current statewide work, Fowler brings a broad view to local issues. He has visited 216 schools in the last three and a half years, keeping himself closely connected to what is happening on the ground in Georgia schools. That exposure has given him both appreciation for what Newton County does well and awareness of where improvement may be possible. On the positive side, Fowler said Newton County Schools compares favorably when it comes to school safety protocols. He noted that not all school systems have the same level of controlled access and security procedures, and he was direct in saying Newton County is doing well in that area. That kind of comparative perspective is particularly valuable because it comes not from theory, but from firsthand observation. He also pointed to areas where other systems may have advantages. One was stronger support for fine arts professional development and staffing, particularly in districts that have dedicated fine arts supervisors. Another was the idea of direct feeder patterns from elementary to middle to high school. Fowler said there is great value in systems where students grow up with a strong sense of where they are headed—academically, athletically, artistically, and socially. He acknowledged the complexity of Newton County’s current structure but clearly sees feeder alignment as an idea worth considering. The conversation turned next to major challenges facing students and school systems. Fowler framed the issue in two connected parts: the challenges facing schools and the challenges facing students are deeply related. One major challenge, he said, is financial pressure—doing more with less in a time when the cost of everything continues to rise. He did not pretend that these issues are easy or avoidable. Rather, he spoke about them as real and pressing. That perspective is informed by his own leadership experience. When Fowler took over at the Georgia Music Educators Association, the organization had run deficits for seven consecutive years. He shared that they are now about to report a fourth straight year in the black. Again, he was quick not to make it about himself alone, but the experience clearly gives him credibility when it comes to watching budgets, asking hard questions, and helping organizations regain financial stability. He also addressed another modern challenge: technology and screens in schools. Fowler was careful not to demonize technology outright, but he did express concern that schools across the country may have leaned too heavily into screens after COVID. He talked about the need to “rein that in” and preserve forms of teaching and learning that involve real interaction, discussion, movement, and presence. It was a nuanced answer—one that recognized the usefulness of technology while still asking whether too much screen-based learning can come at the expense of human development. Teacher support and retention were another major topic, and Fowler’s answer there was one of the clearest and strongest in the episode. He said teachers are professionals and should be treated like professionals. He also stressed that they need to be heard. That line resonated in the conversation because it reflected both respect and practical wisdom. Supporting teachers is not just about compensation, though pay matters. It is also about listening, honoring expertise, and building a system where educators feel valued. Fowler also praised the district’s efforts to recognize support staff, particularly through recent Hero Awards that honored people such as custodians and school nutrition employees. He clearly sees schools as whole communities, where success depends on far more than classroom instruction alone. One of the most memorable sections of the conversation came when Fowler articulated his philosophy of education in

    57 min

  3. APR 16

    Alana Sanders: Ready on Day One | Candidate Conversations — Episode 82

    In Episode 82 of The Town Square Podcast, Trey Bailey and Gabriel Stovall continue their Candidate Conversations series with Georgia House District 113 candidate Hon. Alana Sanders. Representing a district that now covers only Newton County, Sanders joined the show to talk about her story, her preparation for state office, and the issues she believes matter most to local families. As with the best Town Square conversations, this one was not just about policy. It was about purpose, pain, perseverance, and public service. Sanders shared a deeply personal story of loss, a strong vision for Newton County, and a clear message to voters: she believes this role is not a place to learn on the job, but a place to arrive prepared and ready to work. A story shaped by family, education, and loss Sanders begins by sharing her roots. Originally from Louisiana, she moved to Georgia in 1999 and to Newton County in 2007. She comes from a family of educators. Her father was a history teacher and band director, and her mother taught economics and social studies. Education, she said, was never optional in her household. That foundation shaped the course of her life, but so did tragedy. Sanders lost both of her parents when she was still very young—her mother around the time of her high school graduation, and her father about a year and a half later. She described a frightening head-on collision the night of graduation, the emotional weight of her mother’s terminal diagnosis, and the painful reality of walking through those seasons while still trying to become an adult. Those experiences, she explained, forced her to grow up quickly. They also deepened her sense of purpose. Rather than becoming defined by grief, Sanders chose to carry forward her parents’ legacy of service, advocacy, and investment in young people. Why Newton County became home Though she first purchased a home in Henry County, Sanders said a friend introduced her to Newton County in the early 2000s. After visiting and seeing the area for herself, she made the move and has now spent years raising her daughter and serving the community here. That long local connection has shaped the way she sees public service. Over the years, residents have known Sanders in a variety of roles: commissioner, professor, lobbyist, organizer, and community advocate. Throughout the conversation, that wide range of experience came through clearly. She did not speak like someone new to public life. She spoke like someone who has spent years learning how systems work and how decisions affect everyday people. A leader built in many rooms One of the most interesting parts of the interview was hearing Sanders describe how her different roles have prepared her for higher office. Before serving locally, she worked behind the scenes in political organizing and on campaigns for state representatives. As a lobbyist, she has spent time at the Capitol fighting for issues, navigating legislation, and building relationships. As a professor and trainer, she has taught and presented on policy, technology, and leadership. She said all of those experiences have prepared her for what would be a different level of public service in the Georgia House. Unlike county government, where a commissioner works with a small board, the legislature requires navigating far more personalities, more competing interests, and broader coalitions. Sanders argued that because she has already been in those rooms and already worked on legislation, the transition would not be a dramatic learning curve. That readiness became one of the recurring themes of the episode. People over politics Again and again, Sanders returned to a phrase that captures her political philosophy: people over politics. For her, the biggest issues facing families are not truly partisan issues. Housing affordability, mental health, Medicare, education, and property taxes are not just Democratic or Republican talking points, she argued. They are people issues. That framework fit neatly with the spirit of The Town Square Podcast, where Trey and Gabriel often talk about the messy middle—the place where disagreement does not have to destroy relationships and where public conversation can still be civil. Sanders echoed that same posture, saying that elected officials should be able to fight hard for their districts and still sit down together afterward. Politics should not be personal. It should be purposeful. What success would look like in the Georgia House When asked what the most important responsibilities of the job would be, Sanders focused first on communication and accountability. She said state legislators should host pre-session and post-session town halls so constituents understand what their representatives are supporting, how they are voting, and what actually happened during the legislative session. In her view, representation is not just about casting votes in Atlanta. It is about keeping residents informed, educated, and engaged. She also emphasized that civic responsibility goes both ways. Elected officials must create spaces for accountability, but residents must show up. In one of the strongest parts of the conversation, she challenged voters not to complain about public decisions while also refusing to participate in the public process. That two-way relationship—between elected officials and the people they serve—was central to her vision of representative government. Housing affordability and property tax pressure If one issue came up more than any other, it was affordability. Sanders spoke at length about the housing crisis, rising rental costs, and the pressure many homeowners—especially seniors—feel from increasing property tax bills. She argued that the American dream of homeownership has become much harder to reach and much harder to sustain. One example she shared was especially powerful: seniors who have paid off their homes but still need loans or part-time work just to keep up with property taxes. In her view, that signals that something is fundamentally wrong with the way home values are being assessed and taxed. She also challenged the current system of assessments in Georgia, saying “the math is not mathing.” For Sanders, this is not simply a local complaint. It is a statewide policy problem that calls for legislative attention and reform. Public education and school funding Another major section of the interview focused on public education. Sanders made clear that she supports giving families options, but not at the expense of underfunding the schools most families rely on. She defended public education as essential not just academically, but socially. Schools provide mentoring, meals, stability, and support for young people whose needs go far beyond a classroom lesson. For many students, school is one of the only consistent places where caring adults are present in their lives. That perspective connected with Trey’s own role on the school board, and the conversation turned toward how the state could better support local systems. Sanders argued that school funding and property tax strain are deeply connected and that state leaders need to understand the practical consequences their choices create for districts like Newton County. Infrastructure: planning before growth Infrastructure readiness was another major campaign issue Sanders discussed. She argued that Newton County has often approached development backwards—allowing large-scale housing growth and then scrambling afterward to widen roads, build schools, and address public safety needs. In other words, the county has often been reactive instead of proactive. As a potential state representative, Sanders said part of her role would be helping bring the right funding to the county while also working more closely with local officials, the school system, law enforcement, fire services, businesses, and cities. One of her sharpest observations was that too many public bodies operate in silos. They are not talking enough before major decisions are made. For a fast-growing county, she sees that lack of coordination as a major problem. Data centers: not against them, but against the current approach The podcast also turned to one of Newton County’s hottest topics: data centers. Sanders made an important distinction. She said she is not anti-data center. She understands that AI, cloud computing, and digital infrastructure are not going away. In fact, given her background in education and technology, she has taught others how to incorporate AI tools into their work. Her concern is not the existence of data centers. It is the lack of regulation and the way they are being placed and approved. She praised local officials for taking steps like moratoriums to slow the process down and create space for better research and regulation. She argued that local governments need clearer rules, especially around water use, proximity to neighborhoods, and long-term environmental and infrastructure impacts. Her position was one of the more nuanced moments of the episode: acknowledging technological reality while insisting that growth must be handled responsibly. Transparency and truth-telling Another defining theme of the conversation was transparency. Sanders described herself as someone who tells the truth plainly, even when it rubs people the wrong way. She said transparency is not optional for healthy public trust. Residents deserve to know what is happening in their county and why public officials are making the decisions they make. That led to one of the most memorable lines of the episode: the difference between a public servant and a politician. In Sanders’ telling, public servants serve the community; politicians serve themselves. That framing sums up how she wants to be seen—and how she wants to govern. Youth programming and recreation When asked what issue does not get enough attention in Newton County, Sanders pointed immediately to youth progra

    56 min

  4. APR 14

    Everton Blair: A New Generation of Leadership | Candidate Conversations — Episode 81

    The Candidate Conversations series continues on The Town Square Podcast with a conversation that widens the lens beyond local races and into the national arena. In Episode 81, Trey Bailey sits down with Everton Blair, a Democratic candidate for the United States House of Representatives in Georgia’s 13th Congressional District. For listeners in Newton County and across the district, this conversation offers something the modern political cycle rarely provides: time. Time to hear a candidate explain not just what he believes, but why he believes it. Time to hear the story behind the résumé. Time to move beyond campaign signs, social media posts, and party talking points into a fuller picture of a person asking to represent hundreds of thousands of people in Congress. Blair enters the race with a background that combines public education, local governance, and community-rooted leadership. He is not new to public service, and he is not unfamiliar with the pressures that come with leadership during turbulent times. In fact, some of the most compelling moments in the episode come when he reflects on serving on the Gwinnett County Board of Education during the pandemic and how those years shaped his perspective on what it means to lead during uncertainty. A Homegrown Story Rooted in Family and Community One of the first things listeners learn is that Everton Blair’s story is deeply rooted in metro Atlanta. Born and raised in the Snellville and Stone Mountain area, Blair is the son of Jamaican immigrants who made their home in Gwinnett County during a very different era in the county’s history. As he describes it, he grew up watching a community change and diversify around him. That experience clearly shaped his identity. He attended Shiloh Elementary, Middle, and High School and describes himself as both a high-achieving student and a student leader. He was the kind of kid teachers noticed — the kind of student whose path was made possible in part because educators believed in him, challenged him, and opened doors for him. That early support mattered. It gave him both opportunity and perspective. From there, Blair went to Harvard, an experience that widened his exposure to ambition, talent, and influence. But instead of following many of his peers into finance or consulting, he chose a different route. He came back home and became a high school math teacher at KIPP Atlanta Collegiate. In the episode, he describes that work as both his most difficult and his most rewarding job. That detail matters, because it reinforces something listeners hear throughout the conversation: Blair’s public identity is not built primarily around political ambition. It is built around service, systems, and a desire to make institutions work better for ordinary people. From Public Education to Public Leadership Blair’s background in education is central to the conversation. Trey, as a fellow public education advocate and school board member, is able to engage him in a way that opens up some of the most substantive moments in the interview. Blair explains that he was first elected to the Gwinnett County Board of Education in 2018, a historic moment in several ways. He became the youngest person ever elected to the board, its first person of color, and its first openly gay member. He was not just entering office; he was entering as a symbol of change in one of the largest and most diverse school districts in the state. But as he notes, being first is not always easy. The “first” can quickly become “the only,” and being the only often comes with pressure, scrutiny, and weight that others do not have to carry. Still, he stepped into the role. And then, just a few years later, he found himself in one of the most difficult leadership contexts imaginable: chairing the board during the COVID-19 pandemic. For listeners who served in public leadership during those years — especially in education — this part of the conversation will resonate. Trey reflects on his own experience during that same period, and both men acknowledge something many in the public still may not fully appreciate: just how difficult those decisions were. School boards were making choices that affected children, families, teachers, budgets, safety, and the emotional well-being of entire communities. In Gwinnett’s case, that meant making decisions for roughly 185,000 students. Blair talks about the pressure, the uncertainty, and the importance of using federal relief funds to provide hotspots, laptops, meals, and flexibility for families and staff. He also expresses confidence in the decisions he and the board made, even when those decisions were unpopular. That willingness to stand by difficult choices is part of the leadership profile he brings into this congressional race. Why Congress? Why Now? One of the clearest themes in the interview is Blair’s argument that Congress needs generational change. He does not dance around that point. He argues that too many elected officials stay in office too long, become disconnected from the realities of daily life, and fail to respond to the speed at which society, technology, and the economy are changing. In his view, that disconnect is especially dangerous right now, as the nation navigates rising costs, technological disruption, public frustration, and deep political division. For Blair, this race is not simply about party alignment. It is about whether Georgia’s 13th District will be represented by someone who is present, responsive, and able to communicate clearly with the people he serves. He describes the district as both diverse and dynamic — the kind of place that needs a representative who understands its complexity and is willing to do the work of staying connected to it. That includes Rockdale County, parts of Newton County including Covington, Porterdale, and Oxford, and portions of Henry, Clayton, and Gwinnett. It is a large district, a diverse district, and in Blair’s view, a district ready for fresh leadership. The Primary Matters Another important thread in the episode is the role of the Democratic primary. Trey and Blair both emphasize that in a district like Georgia’s 13th — one where the Democratic nominee will likely have a major advantage in the general election — the primary is where the real choice happens for many voters. That means the election date matters. It means early voting matters. And it means voters need to do the work of learning about the candidates before November. That emphasis fits perfectly with what your Candidate Conversations series is trying to accomplish. The podcast is becoming a resource for local voters who want more than slogans and mailers. In that sense, this episode serves not just as an interview, but as part of a broader civic education effort. Term Limits and Accountability One notable portion of the conversation centers on term limits. Blair says plainly that he supports them. He argues that if the Constitution sets a minimum age for office, it makes sense to also have some limit on how long someone should remain there. In his view, a reasonable cap would be around 12 years, enough time for someone to do the work while still ensuring regular opportunities for renewal and accountability. This part of the conversation ties into one of his larger concerns: incumbency can create passivity. When officeholders remain in place for decades, voters may assume they are still active and effective simply because they continue to see their names on the ballot. Meanwhile, Blair argues, communities can be changing rapidly while their representation remains stagnant. Whether listeners agree with him or not, this section offers insight into how he thinks about leadership — not as possession, but as stewardship. A Foundation in Servant Leadership When Trey asks where Blair’s servant-leader mentality comes from, the answer is deeply personal. Blair describes himself as a “church boy,” raised in a family where faith, service, profession, and education were closely intertwined. His mother is both a pediatrician and a minister. His grandfather is a Pentecostal bishop who had also worked as a carpenter. That example — of vocation and calling working together — clearly shaped his view of life and leadership. He recalls hearing throughout childhood that the two most important things you could have were a good salvation and a good education. That line stands out because it gives listeners a window into the moral and cultural framework beneath his politics. It also helps explain why education and public service remain so central to the way he understands his role in the world. “People Before Profit” Perhaps the biggest policy theme in the episode is Blair’s emphasis on affordability and his phrase “people before profit.” This is where the conversation becomes especially substantive. Blair argues that many of the systems shaping daily life in America — the tax code, labor conditions, housing markets, healthcare access, and even food systems — increasingly serve the wealthy few rather than working families. He pushes back against traditional economic indicators like the Dow and unemployment rate as incomplete measures of prosperity, arguing that they often fail to reflect what life actually feels like for people trying to pay bills, buy groceries, raise children, and maintain stable housing. In his view, the real questions are more practical: Can one full-time job support a family? Can a person afford a doctor visit? Can a young adult buy a home? Can a family build wealth across generations? These are the questions, he suggests, that should define economic policy. Blair supports raising the minimum wage, expanding child tax credits, and shifting the tax burden more heavily onto billionaires and large corporations. His core argument is simple: ordinary families are already paying enough, while the wealthiest institutions

    49 min

  5. APR 9

    Brett Mauldin: Faith, Freedom & Local Control | Candidate Conversations — Episode 80

    The Candidate Conversations series continues on The Town Square Podcast with Brett Mauldin, Republican candidate for Georgia House District 114. Covering Morgan County and parts of Newton and Walton counties, House District 114 includes communities that are deeply shaped by agriculture, small-town identity, conservative values, and growing concerns about development, taxation, and the future of local control. For many listeners in Newton County, this episode may have served as their first introduction to Mauldin. Trey Bailey and Gabriel Stovall opened the conversation by helping listeners understand exactly who he is, where he comes from, and what motivates him to run for office. What followed was a candid, often personal conversation about family, faith, business, public service, and the kind of government Mauldin believes Georgia needs. A Small-Town Background Rooted in Family Mauldin described himself as a “small town guy,” someone who grew up around Greene, Putnam, and Morgan counties and who still identifies deeply with the country mindset and rural values of the region. He comes from a small-business family and says those experiences shaped the way he sees money, responsibility, and leadership. He also spoke warmly about his family. He and his wife, Candice, recently celebrated 20 years of marriage. They have three children, and throughout the conversation Mauldin returned again and again to the importance of family life, raising children well, and creating a future worth passing on to the next generation. His story included a year of football at the University of West Georgia, time at Lee University near Chattanooga, and a few laughs about his rugby days. But beneath the humor was a clear theme: his life has been shaped by discipline, teamwork, faith, and a willingness to work hard. Leadership Shaped by Listening One of the more interesting parts of the conversation came when Mauldin reflected on how different perspectives have shaped him. He spoke about the influence of his wife, noting that she came from a different socioeconomic background than he did. That experience taught him that leadership requires openness, humility, and a willingness to listen. He shared a line from a mentor that captured his philosophy well: “Minds are like parachutes. The only time they work is when they’re open.” That outlook has informed both his personal leadership style and the way he runs his business. Rather than surrounding himself with “yes men,” Mauldin said he values challenge, input, and honest disagreement. In his words, if all he wanted was agreement, he could just buy a parrot. That idea carried throughout the episode. Even while articulating strong convictions, Mauldin presented himself as someone who believes leadership is strongest when it is accountable, participatory, and rooted in listening to others. Business Experience and Decentralized Leadership Mauldin currently leads his family’s cabinets and countertops business, which travels throughout the Southeast. He discussed the company’s journey, including the hardships of the Great Recession and the lessons learned through navigating both challenge and growth. The company was recently recognized as a Family-Owned Small Business of the Year, but Mauldin was quick to redirect praise to his team. He described his leadership style as “decentralized command,” emphasizing that not every decision should run through one person. Instead, he believes strong organizations invite participation, encourage buy-in, and empower others to lead. That same principle showed up repeatedly in the conversation as he described how he thinks government should work. In business and in government, Mauldin believes the closer power is kept to the people affected by it, the better the results will be. Why He’s Running Mauldin said the opening of the House District 114 seat created an opportunity for someone new to step forward and serve. But for him, running is about more than filling a vacancy. He believes good people must be willing to step into public life, especially when politics feels frustrating, divisive, or dirty. He argued that one reason many good people avoid politics is because they do not want to deal with the messiness of it all. But in his view, that is exactly why strong, grounded men and women should be willing to step up. He believes public service should not be left only to the ambitious or the loudest voices, but should include people with real-world experience, strong values, and a desire to serve. Throughout the episode, Mauldin emphasized that disagreement is not the problem. In fact, he sees disagreement as healthy. What matters is whether leaders are willing to challenge ideas honestly while still working toward the common good. Protecting the Vulnerable One of the strongest recurring themes in the interview was Mauldin’s belief that a just society protects its most vulnerable people. He connected this conviction both to his Christian faith and to his broader political philosophy. He spoke emotionally about children in particular, arguing that society has a moral duty to defend those who cannot defend themselves. He referenced a friend who worked to rescue children from sex trafficking and said those realities deeply affect how he thinks about leadership and responsibility. He also used an illustration about archaeologists discovering healed bones in ancient civilizations. For him, those healed bones reflect a society willing to care for those who could not survive on their own. In Mauldin’s view, civilization is measured in part by how it treats the weak, the elderly, children, and the vulnerable. That theme surfaced in several policy areas he mentioned, including human trafficking, drug trafficking, support for law enforcement, and his views on unborn children. Property Taxes, Fixed Incomes, and Staying in Your Home When the conversation turned to issues facing District 114, Mauldin quickly raised concern about property taxes. He made the case that rising property values are putting serious pressure on people who have lived in their homes for decades, especially seniors and those on fixed incomes. Even when millage rates remain the same, he noted, rising assessments can create a growing tax burden that many families simply cannot absorb. He argued that older residents who spent years contributing to schools and communities should not be forced out of their homes because taxes continue to rise faster than their income. Rather than framing the issue in abstract budget terms, Mauldin spoke about the emotional and generational cost: losing not only a house, but a lifetime of memories. Trey added his own perspective from the public education side, noting the tension between providing property tax relief and fully funding schools. Their exchange created one of the more substantive parts of the episode, as both acknowledged the need for thoughtful reform that protects taxpayers without undercutting education. Government Efficiency and the Cost of Red Tape Another major focus for Mauldin was government inefficiency and bureaucratic red tape. He spoke bluntly about frustrating state processes that slow down business and create unnecessary burdens for citizens. One example he shared involved dealing with the Secretary of State’s office over a paperwork issue involving capitalization in a business name. Another involved identity verification questions so strange they became laughable. His broader point was that government processes often waste time and money in ways that frustrate ordinary citizens and business owners alike. Mauldin said he wants to reduce those burdens and make state government more efficient. He argued that taxpayers deserve a government that serves them well, not one that creates obstacles for the sake of procedure. He also floated ideas around incentivizing better stewardship inside government agencies. Rather than simply cutting budgets with a blunt instrument, he suggested looking for ways to reward efficiency and redirect savings toward priorities like employee compensation or taxpayer relief. Growth, Development, and Preserving Rural Character One of the most important parts of the conversation centered on growth. District 114 includes places experiencing change, pressure from metro expansion, and concern over what development may do to local culture and land use patterns. Mauldin made clear that he is deeply proud of the district’s agricultural heritage. He spoke about Mansfield, Newborn, Morgan County, and the Social Circle portion of Walton County as places shaped by farming, land stewardship, and a way of life worth protecting. He expressed concern that too often “the only thing growing is concrete,” and he pushed back on development philosophies that prioritize dense residential and industrial expansion without enough regard for the communities already there. At the same time, he did not present himself as someone trying to impose a one-size-fits-all answer. Instead, he returned to the principle of local control. In his view, local communities, mayors, city councils, county commissioners, and other local officials are best positioned to decide what kind of growth fits their area. That means his role as a state representative, as he sees it, would not be to dictate local outcomes, but to help facilitate what local communities actually want. Local Control as a Governing Philosophy If there was one phrase that tied the whole interview together, it was this: keep power closer to the people. Mauldin repeatedly returned to the idea that authority should move downward whenever possible. Powers unnecessarily concentrated in Washington should be brought back to the state. Powers unnecessarily concentrated at the state level should be returned to local governments. He believes the more local the decision-making, the more accountable government becomes. People can more easily meet with city council members

    47 min

  6. APR 7

    Karla Hooper: Integrity, Healing & Representation | Candidate Conversations — Episode 79

    The Town Square Podcast continued its Candidate Conversations series with Karla Hooper, candidate for Georgia House of Representatives District 113. As Trey Bailey and Gabriel Stovall explained at the top of the show, the goal of this series is not to create more political noise, but to give voters a fair, thoughtful way to hear directly from the people asking to represent them. In a climate where partisanship often drowns out substance, this episode aimed for something different: a calm, honest conversation about background, motivation, policy, and public service. That framing fit Hooper’s tone well. Throughout the episode, she presented herself not as a career politician chasing office, but as a longtime community advocate who sees this campaign as an extension of work she has already been doing for years. Hooper began by sharing a little of her story. Born in Arkadelphia, Arkansas, she moved to Georgia in 1992 as a student at Emory University and eventually decided this was where she wanted to build her life. She has now lived in Newton County for more than 24 years, longer than she lived in her hometown in Arkansas. Her daughters were born and raised here, and she made clear that Newton County is not just where she lives, but home in the fullest sense. Her entry into community involvement came from a very local frustration. After returning from a trip, she noticed a cell tower had appeared near her subdivision and wanted to know why and how that had happened. That curiosity led her to attend a Board of Commissioners meeting, which opened the door to understanding how decisions are made in local government. What started as one concern in her own neighborhood eventually grew into a broader commitment to civic engagement and public advocacy. One of the most memorable parts of the episode came when Hooper discussed her father’s role in the Civil Rights Movement. She shared that he was among a small group of men from Arkansas who traveled to Alabama to march in Selma. In an especially moving story, she explained that seven years ago, on the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, reporters were looking to interview her father because he was believed to be the last surviving member of that group. Remarkably, he passed away the very day they were trying to reach him. Hooper said she did not even know about his role in Selma until she was in middle school and interviewing him for a school project. She recalled him telling her that when Dr. King spoke, it felt as though even the leaves stood still to listen. But she also explained that he and others were pulled over and jailed on the way back from Alabama, and that much of what followed was likely wrapped in trauma he never fully unpacked with his children. That family history clearly shaped her understanding of justice, advocacy, and public responsibility. She connected that legacy to her own path. Hooper described herself as someone who has long felt drawn to leadership and service, whether in school, work, church, or the broader community. She mentioned being the first Black student government president and first valedictorian in her hometown, and later working for Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign in 1992. Rather than treating public service like a new interest, she framed it as part of a lifelong throughline. Professionally, Hooper serves as Executive Director of the Diabetes Association of Atlanta, where she has worked for more than 18 years. That work gave depth to much of what she said later in the conversation about healthcare, working families, and affordability. She talked about seeing firsthand how many people do what society tells them to do — work hard, support their families, and check all the expected boxes — yet still cannot afford the medications, supplies, or insurance coverage they need. She described this reality as one that keeps her grounded and connected to the struggles of ordinary people. That theme of groundedness came up repeatedly. Hooper pushed back on the idea of being seen mainly as a politician, saying she identifies more with being a public servant. She described her candidacy as something that came through prayer, reflection, and a sense of calling. In one striking moment, she said that when something burdens you so deeply it moves you to tears, you have to respond. She gave the example of calling a developer about another proposed gas station in an area already saturated with them. As she spoke to him about what the community needed, she became emotional — not because of political theater, but because of genuine concern for the people who live there. When asked why she is running again after a previous campaign, Hooper said this moment feels different because Newton County needs healing. That word became one of the episode’s anchors. She spoke candidly about the tension, disappointment, and frustration many residents feel after years of conflict, rapid change, and difficult public debates. In her view, the next chapter of leadership in Newton County has to include bridge-building and unity, not just partisanship or slogans. Importantly, Hooper did not describe unity as pretending differences do not exist. Instead, she said it begins with listening to understand rather than listening to respond. She shared a story from canvassing in which an African-American woman told her she had once voted Democrat but now supported Donald Trump. Hooper admitted that, for many Democrats, that could have become a moment to shut down the conversation. Instead, she listened. By the end of the exchange, the woman said she was considering pulling a Democratic ballot this time. Hooper’s point was not that persuasion is easy, but that real listening creates opportunities to find shared concerns. That same instinct shaped how she talked about governing. In the standard candidate questions segment, Hooper said that if elected, one of the first things she wants to do is listen and learn. She does not want to arrive at the Gold Dome acting as though she already knows everything. At the same time, she said she is already building relationships and expects to continue working not only with Democrats, but with Republicans as well. She understands that if she wants to accomplish anything in a Republican-led legislature, bridge-building will not be optional. When the conversation turned to policy, Hooper identified several issues that are clearly central to her campaign. First was mental health. She said that as she has talked with residents, one of the concerns she hears more than expected is the need for better mental health resources, especially for families with young adult children who are struggling. She linked that issue not only to families in crisis, but also to broader challenges like homelessness and lack of treatment capacity. Second was affordability, which she described as the big umbrella issue covering much of what people are dealing with right now. She spoke about the strain of property taxes, especially on seniors, and said she is researching legislation and examples from elsewhere that might help relieve some of that burden. She also discussed housing affordability and the barriers facing first-time homebuyers. She contrasted today’s realities with her own experience buying a home at a young age through assistance programs that gave people a foothold. In her view, younger generations need that kind of pathway again. Third was healthcare. Because of her nonprofit work, Hooper spoke with conviction about Georgia’s ongoing struggles around access and cost. She expressed support for Medicaid expansion and emphasized that many people who appear financially stable on paper are still one medical crisis away from serious hardship. The conversation also spent time on public education, a subject especially important to Trey Bailey. Hooper said education remains close to her heart because she once planned to become a teacher and even completed student teaching before her path shifted. She praised educators and acknowledged the tension between senior concerns over property taxes and the local reliance on those taxes to fund public schools. Rather than offering easy answers, she said she wants to understand why the state continues to fall short in this area and how stronger state support could help close those gaps. On economic development and growth, Hooper struck a balanced tone. She did not reject growth outright, but argued that residents must have meaningful opportunities to be heard. In her view, when people are allowed to speak but feel ignored, frustration grows and misinformation spreads more easily. She said public input has to feel real, even when government cannot grant every request. She also emphasized that companies and industries coming into Newton County should be investing in the community through workforce development, internships, training, and opportunities for local students. On communication and transparency, Hooper said she wants to stay accessible long after the campaign ends. She has already begun hosting gatherings she calls Coffee, Community, and Conversations, and said she plans to continue that model if elected. She also mentioned a future newsletter and regular community engagement as ways to keep constituents informed about legislation and local concerns. She defined accountability not only as telling the truth and avoiding overpromising, but also as showing up, voting, doing the work, and being honest when something cannot be accomplished. As the episode wound down, Hooper delivered perhaps her clearest message to voters. She said she wants people to know: I see you. I hear you. I feel what you are feeling. Whether the issue is medication costs, grocery prices, property taxes, or mental health concerns, she wants residents to know she is paying attention. She argued that her life, work, and previous community involvement have prepared her for this role, and that her campaign is rooted in integ

    47 min

  7. MAR 31

    Councilman Dwayne Turner: Transparency, Tradition & Growth — Episode 78

    In Episode 78 of The Town Square Podcast, Trey Bailey sits down with newly elected Covington City Councilman Dwayne Turner. With Gabriel Stovall away on assignment, Trey leads a one-on-one conversation designed to help listeners get to know one of Covington’s newest public servants, understand what drives him, and hear how he is thinking through some of the city’s most debated issues. Turner is still early in his first term, but he is already stepping into the kind of tough, public-facing decisions that come with city leadership. In this conversation, he talks about his background in public service, what led him to run for office, how his experience in law enforcement shapes his perspective, and why he keeps coming back to a few key themes: transparency, representing the people, protecting Covington’s traditions, and making sure growth doesn’t outpace infrastructure. From Pennsylvania to Covington Turner shares that he is not originally from Newton County. He was born in a small town in Pennsylvania south of Pittsburgh, later lived in New York, and then joined the Army. After 11 years of military service and living in different places, he eventually landed in Covington, where he decided to put down roots. That journey matters because it helps explain how he views public service. Turner comes from a family deeply connected to service-oriented professions. His father served in the military and law enforcement. His mother and grandmother worked in nursing. Other family members served in transportation and public-facing roles. For Turner, service was not some abstract idea. It was modeled for him throughout his life. That background ultimately led him into law enforcement, which he still describes as his dream job. Today, he works in investigations with the Rockdale County Sheriff’s Office, a role he says he genuinely loves. A Neighborhood Mindset That Became a Citywide Campaign One of the more interesting parts of the conversation is how Turner explains the leap from local neighborhood involvement to elected office. Before serving on city council, he was involved in HOA leadership, where he learned firsthand how quickly neighborhood concerns can pile up. What starts as a few complaints about trash, lawns, or rules can quickly become a full-time exercise in listening, explaining, and solving problems. Turner sees that experience as meaningful preparation for city government. In both spaces, people want to be heard. They want communication. They want follow-through. And often, they are frustrated not just by the issue itself, but by the feeling that no one is talking to them clearly. That theme of communication came up repeatedly in the episode. Turner says one of the most surprising things he heard on the campaign trail was that many residents did not even know who represented them. That realization helped sharpen his approach. If he was going to serve, he wanted people to know who he was, how to reach him, and how he was thinking through major votes. “It’s About People, Not Politics” One of Turner’s central campaign ideas was that public service should be about people, not politics. In the interview, he unpacks what he means by that phrase. For him, politics can become about holding a seat, protecting status, or building influence. People-first leadership, by contrast, means listening to the residents who put you in office and trying to act on their behalf. It means not silencing their voices, not hiding behind vague language, and not pretending controversial decisions are easy. Again and again, Turner describes himself as a representative. He says his role is not to impose his will, but to carry the concerns of the people who elected him. Whether the issue is fireworks, growth, a special use permit, or city fees, he insists that his first obligation is to the residents he serves. That representative mindset is one of the clearest themes in the conversation. Transparency as a Core Value If there was one word that surfaced throughout the episode more than any other, it was transparency. Turner acknowledges that transparency can sound like a buzzword, but he believes the reason it gets repeated so often is because the public is hungry for it. People want to know what government is doing, why decisions are being made, and what elected leaders actually believe. He says that desire for openness shaped his campaign and continues to shape his service. That is why he posts updates online. That is why he explains votes publicly. That is why he says he wants people to contact him directly if they have concerns. In Turner’s view, transparency is not just about releasing information after the fact. It is about bringing people into the process, listening before the vote, and being honest afterward. Growth, Development, and Infrastructure Turner also spends significant time discussing one of the biggest issues facing Covington: growth. He is clear that he is not opposed to development in principle. He understands that growth and economic activity matter. But he is concerned about infrastructure failing to keep pace with the speed of new residential and commercial expansion. He points specifically to traffic bottlenecks and roads that are already strained, especially in areas where apartment growth and neighborhood expansion are putting pressure on two-lane corridors. He describes situations where residents struggle to get out of their subdivisions because traffic has become so heavy. For Turner, “smart growth” means slowing down enough for infrastructure to catch up. It means asking whether the roads, intersections, and surrounding systems can actually support the projects being approved. It also means protecting what residents love most about Covington, especially the traditional character centered around the square. He repeatedly returns to the idea that Covington’s identity is tied to its traditions, and that those traditions should not be sacrificed carelessly in pursuit of rapid expansion. Preserving the Small-Town Feel Turner knows Covington is growing and that Newton County is not the same place it was years ago. Still, he says residents continue to value the “small-town charm” of Covington, especially the sense of tradition anchored around downtown. He does not define that charm simply as a lack of growth. Instead, he describes it more as a culture and a feel — a set of traditions and a way of community life that people do not want to lose. That is why the square matters so much in his view. It is the symbolic and practical center of Covington. When residents talk about preserving what they love, they are often talking about the experience and identity rooted there. Stormwater Fees, Taxes, and City Revenue Another major topic in the episode is Turner’s campaign promise to fight for relief on stormwater fees and taxes. He explains that one of his core ideas during the campaign was that new city revenue — especially revenue tied to major developments already in motion — should be used to reduce the financial burden on residents where possible. He points specifically to the Amazon data center as a potential revenue source that could help the city rethink how it funds certain services. Turner’s argument is not that infrastructure costs disappear. His point is that when a city gains a significant new stream of revenue, leaders should ask whether some of that money can be used to eliminate or reduce fees that residents strongly dislike. He frames this as both a financial and moral question. If the city is going to accept major development that many residents do not necessarily want, then city leaders should work hard to ensure the community meaningfully benefits from it. He also expresses strong sympathy for seniors and long-time residents who feel increasingly squeezed by taxes and rising costs. In his view, part of leadership is finding creative ways to preserve affordability for the people who helped build the community in the first place. The Fireworks Debate One of the most interesting parts of the episode is Turner’s discussion of Covington’s controversial fireworks decision. Turner makes clear that he values tradition and would prefer to preserve major community events where possible. At the same time, as someone with a law-enforcement background, he also takes public safety seriously. His perspective is that the issue should not be framed too simply. Rather than assuming the event could not be done safely, he believes the city should consider whether better planning, more experienced event support, or stronger coordination could help improve outcomes. He compares large public gatherings in Covington with major venues that also handle crowd control and safety concerns. Turner is careful not to dismiss the city’s safety concerns. But he does suggest that if the will exists, leaders should keep searching for solutions before abandoning a long-standing tradition entirely. That balance — tradition on one hand, public safety on the other — is exactly the kind of messy local issue this podcast is built to explore. The Tattoo Shop Vote Another local issue discussed at length is the debated special use permit for a tattoo and piercing studio on the square. Turner’s comments here reveal the tension that often comes with representative government. He openly admits that his personal view was not strongly opposed to the business itself. He says he does not have a broad philosophical problem with someone opening that kind of business. But when it came time to vote, he says he felt compelled to follow the wishes expressed by the residents who contacted him. In other words, even though his personal opinion may have leaned one way, he believed his duty as a councilman required him to vote the other way. That is a revealing moment in the episode. Turner describes it as a real internal struggle. He says he could not vote for himself in that moment; he had to vote for the people he

    1 hr

  8. MAR 24

    Dr. Adam Phyall: Access, Accountability & Action | Candidate Conversations — Episode 77

    In this special edition of The Town Square Podcast, hosts Trey Bailey and Gabriel Stovall begin a new series designed to help voters better understand the individuals seeking to serve Newton County in public office. The goal is simple: create a space where candidates can share their stories, explain their priorities, and connect with the community in a meaningful way. Dr. Adam Phyall, a longtime educator and former Director of Technology and Media Services for Newton County Schools, joins the show as the first guest in the Candidate Conversations series. Now running for the District 5 seat on the Newton County Board of Education, Dr. Phyall brings decades of classroom, district, and national education experience to the conversation. But before discussing policy or campaign platforms, the conversation begins where it always does on The Town Square Podcast — with story. From Tutoring Classmates to Teaching Students Dr. Phyall didn’t originally set out to become a teacher. While attending Tuskegee University, he began tutoring fellow students in math. What started as a simple act of helping others quickly revealed something deeper. He discovered joy. Not the kind of satisfaction that comes from personal achievement, but the fulfillment that comes from watching someone else succeed. That moment changed everything. Instead of pursuing occupational therapy, he shifted his focus to education — eventually earning a degree in general science education and beginning his teaching career in 2002. That decision would shape the rest of his professional life. Finding a Home in Newton County After several years teaching in Clayton County, Dr. Phyall and his wife began searching for a place to raise their family. They found it in Covington. He described the community as a “Hallmark town” — the kind of place where families could grow roots, build relationships, and invest in the future. In 2006, he joined the staff at Alcovy High School, where he taught biology, chemistry, and other science courses. His favorite students? Juniors. Not because they were easier to teach, but because they were beginning to understand life. That transitional moment — when students start thinking seriously about their future — became one of the most rewarding parts of his work. The Moment Technology Changed Everything One of the most powerful stories in the episode centers on a laptop. While in college, Dr. Phyall received a scholarship from the United Negro College Fund. Along with financial support, the scholarship included something that would alter the trajectory of his career: A computer. At the time, his mother was battling breast cancer. That laptop allowed him to stay connected with her, research medical information, and communicate in ways that hadn’t previously been possible. It wasn’t just technology. It was connection. That experience shaped his understanding of what technology could do — not as a replacement for teaching, but as a tool to make learning more meaningful and accessible. Innovation in the Classroom Years before podcasting became mainstream, Dr. Phyall was already experimenting with new ways to engage students. In the early 2000s, he introduced podcasting into his classroom — encouraging students to create audio content explaining biology concepts. The project quickly became a success. One student discovered that listeners from Ireland had downloaded their podcast. That single moment changed the way students saw themselves. Their voices mattered. Their work reached beyond the classroom. And their learning suddenly felt real. Leading the One-to-One Technology Initiative As his career progressed, Dr. Phyall transitioned into district leadership roles, eventually becoming Director of Technology and Media Services for Newton County Schools. One of his most significant contributions during that time was helping lead the district’s transition to a one-to-one technology model — providing every student with access to a digital device. The decision wasn’t easy. It required careful planning, financial discipline, and long-term vision. But the result was transformative. Students gained access to resources that had previously been limited to computer labs or libraries. Teachers gained new tools for instruction. And the district built a foundation for future innovation. A National Perspective on Education After years serving Newton County Schools, Dr. Phyall accepted a position with Future Ready Schools, part of the national education organization All4Ed. In this role, he works with school systems across the country — helping districts improve technology integration, expand access to resources, and prepare students for the workforce of the future. Despite working at the national level, he remains deeply connected to Newton County. He still collaborates with district staff, shares best practices, and advocates for opportunities that benefit local students. Why Run for the Board of Education? For years, Dr. Phyall had considered serving on the Board of Education. But it wasn’t until recently that the opportunity aligned with his sense of timing and purpose. He described the decision as deeply personal — shaped in part by a cancer diagnosis that forced him to reevaluate his priorities. Rather than waiting for the future, he chose to act. In his words: “We’re the ones we’ve been waiting for.” His Platform: The Three A’s Throughout the conversation, Dr. Phyall repeatedly returned to a simple framework that defines his campaign: Access Accountability Action These three principles guide his vision for the district. Access Ensuring every student has the resources and opportunities needed to succeed — regardless of background. Accountability Maintaining transparency in budgeting and decision-making. Action Identifying what works, eliminating what doesn’t, and continuously improving. Supporting Teachers and Staff One of the most consistent themes in the conversation was the importance of people. Dr. Phyall emphasized that student success ultimately depends on the adults who serve them. Teachers. Bus drivers. Custodians. Support staff. Creating a culture where employees feel valued and supported, he said, is essential for improving retention and performance. Technology and the Future of Learning The conversation also explored one of the most pressing questions facing education today: How should schools balance technology use with traditional learning? Dr. Phyall believes the answer lies in intentional use. Technology should enhance learning — not replace it. He stressed that devices are tools, not solutions. Real progress comes from strong instruction, engaged teachers, and supportive communities. Artificial Intelligence and Education Artificial intelligence was another major topic. Rather than viewing AI as a threat, Dr. Phyall sees it as an opportunity — provided students learn how to use it responsibly. He encouraged families and educators to focus on critical thinking and curiosity. Not just asking questions. But asking better questions. A Vision for Newton County Schools Ultimately, Dr. Phyall’s vision is simple: Make Newton County Schools the best place for students to learn and families to live. He wants the district to become known for: Strong academicsCareer readinessSupportive teachersSafe learning environmentsCommunity prideAnd he believes that vision starts with collaboration. Final Thoughts This episode marks the beginning of the Candidate Conversations series — an effort to give voters direct access to the people seeking to serve their community. Whether listeners agree or disagree with a candidate’s positions, the goal remains the same: Create space for thoughtful dialogue. Encourage informed decisions. And strengthen the community through conversation. Because at the end of the day, public service isn’t about politics. It’s about people. Episode Sponsors: Relevant IT Website: https://relevantsvcs.com Appalachia Insurance Group bobby@appgroupins.com

    1h 9m
See All (84)

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
13 Ratings

About

Not just another podcast, but a place to meet in the messy middle and have difficult discussions with transparency and diplomacy where the outcome is unity, not uniformity. The primary topics will be the local interests of Newton County, Georgia residents and those in the surrounding community.

Information

  • Creator
    Trey Bailey, Gabriel Stovall
  • Years Active
    2024 - 2026
  • Episodes
    84
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © All rights reserved.
  • Show Website
    The Town Square Podcast

You Might Also Like