Welcome back to This Week on ICE. Farewell to Dolly Parton — a true legend not only in music but also in the power of kindness. Hours before recording this week’s episode, we learned of the passing of country music star and humanitarian Dolly Parton. Through building up countless charities and donating to important causes, Dolly was a firm believer in giving everyone in this country a chance to thrive. It was this same dedication to making the lives of others better, her insistence on compassion and generosity toward others, and her ethic of goodwill that underpins the mission of this show. Rest in peace, Dolly, and may we all tumble out of bed and stumble in the kitchen tomorrow, ensuring our “9-to-5” fulfills the massive legacy you have left behind. There’s a lot to cover this week. Let’s get into it. Support This Week on ICE Podcast The top line: The Trump administration makes a historic mass visa revocation gambit. On Monday, the U.S. State Department announced the Trump administration is preparing to revoke the business and tourism visas of foreigners who applied for or are currently seeking asylum in the country between 2016 and 2026. While the Department itself didn’t confirm how many visas would be affected, the Associated Press found that this could affect up to 200,000 people. If carried out, it would be the largest single mass revocation of visas in U.S. history. “This seems to underscore the Trump administration’s goal of making asylum virtually impossible to obtain, and to create a narrative in which asylum is perceived to be a lax and unvetted process. It isn’t.” — Kelly The Trump administration is likely to face a mountain of legal challenges against this move, especially given that it is not illegal to apply for asylum after entering the United States on a B-1 business visa or a B-2 tourist visa. Per the USCIS website, “any person who is physically present in the United States may request and apply for asylum regardless of their current immigration status or how they entered the country.” “If we look back at the Cold War, many people who did manage to defect from behind the Iron Curtain or from other totalitarian regimes were able to do so initially on tourist visas and [later through asylum] in the United States. There was no problem with it then. Sometimes you have to hide from your own regime when you want to leave the country. There are plenty of good reasons to go through this specific route that involve the person in question’s safety.” — Matt Support This Week on ICE Podcast As we saw with the Trump administration’s failed attempt to revoke birthright citizenship earlier this year, a consistent tactic has unfolded: hit the public with something outrageous — like revoking B-1 and B-2 visas for those who have claimed asylum in the last 10 years — then drag it through the courts, and lose. “But in this process, the administration ultimately emboldens its strongest base and then creates a narrative that is undergirded by misinformation about immigration and immigrants in America,” Kelly explained. [Listen to our episode about the SCOTUS birthright citizenship debate here.] Also on our radar: A new and expensive era for highly-skilled immigrant workers On Monday, the White House announced that it was rolling out a plan to charge $103,000 for H1-B visas, which allow about 65,000 foreigners, plus another 20,000 foreign students attending U.S. universities, to work and live in the United States full-time. (It is also a major way U.S. companies can hire workers from abroad, especially in specialized roles.) If you’re having a bit of déjà vu, that’s because courts already struck down a previous attempt to charge six figures for the visa back in June, but the White House is insisting this plan is necessary “to recover the costs” of immigration. “ Why the Trump administration is going after them, I think, is part of a larger project to discourage migration. … We’re talking about [targeting] people who help design frontier, breaking-edge technology that helps the U.S. stay the most competitive economy in the world. If you were thinking about this in terms of a college sports team, you’re ruling out your best possible recruits. ” — Matt Interview: The team tracking every city taking creative measures against ICE. At 20:24, we sat down with Hannah Alexander, who is the Deputy Legal Director at Local Progress. Local Progress is a vast network of elected officials — from mayors and district attorneys to county commissioners, city council members, and school board members — across 47 states and Washington, D.C., all working to advance racial and economic justice. With ICE arrests surging to 50,000 in July alone, Hannah and her team have been closely tracking what elected officials and community members across the country are doing to protect their communities, such as creating from so-called “ICE-free zones”, non-cooperation policies, and restrictions on detention infrastructure. “ This is the manifestation of communities and their elected leaders saying that they do not support the Trump administration’s mass deportation agenda, thinking very critically about their local power, wondering ‘how can we ensure no local infrastructure is used for that agenda, and what local power do they have to protect their residents?’” — Hannah Support This Week on ICE Podcast Here are just a few cities they’ve tracked: Monterey, CA, prevented county employees from collaborating with ICE; ended the county’s participation in the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP); and explored ways to limit local law enforcement’s collaboration with ICE. Lehigh County, PA, banned ICE agents from using county-owned property as staging areas or operational bases for immigration enforcement. Minneapolis, MN, rejected a pilot drone program involving the Minneapolis Police Department and Skydio, a surveillance company with ties to DHS. Newburgh, NY, approved a resolution opposing DHS’s use of a local warehouse for detention enforcement. [Catch up: Listen to our episodes covering how local law enforcement is incentivized to cooperate with ICE here, here, and here.] “Based on research done by the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, the capacity in your community dictates enforcement. So, if you want to protect your community from ICE patrolling through your communities,you should make sure you don’t have ICE using your local infrastructure.” — Hannah That’s it for us this week. Keep sending us your questions, comments or tips to thisweekonice@gmail.com. Thanks for listening. Stay safe, look out for your neighbors, and we’ll see you next time. — Kelly and Matt P.S. - We’re building a community with official TWOI Instagram, YouTube and TikTok accounts. Give us a follow if you’d like to get to know other fans of the show! Get full access to This Week On ICE Podcast at thisweekonice.substack.com/subscribe