The Realist Lens - For Researchers Who Keep It Real

Alejandro Arguelles Bullon

The Realist Lens is a podcast that makes realist evaluation and synthesis accessible and easy to follow. Through relaxed conversations with expert guests, students, and practitioners, we explore key realist concepts like mechanisms, context, and outcomes. Whether you're new to realist approaches or more experienced, this podcast offers practical insights, real-world examples, and thoughtful reflections to support your learning and curiosity—one conversation at a time.

  1. 27 APR

    Episode 26 – Realist Approaches in Arts and Mental Health Recovery with Louisa Peters

    What role can the arts play in recovery? And how can realist approaches help us understand the deeper processes behind healing, identity, and lived experience? In this creative and thought-provoking conversation, Alejandro is joined by Dr Louisa Peters, a researcher who brings together psychology, community arts, and realist thinking. Louisa’s work draws on her background in musicology, community arts practice, and her PhD research exploring recovery in serious mental illness. Louisa shares how realist approaches allowed her to movebeyond asking “does it work?” to exploring how and why arts-based interventions support recovery. She highlights how community arts create safe, trusting spaces that promote coping, acceptance, and positive emotional engagement, while also acknowledging the complexity and non-linear nature of recovery. Drawing on her research, Louisa discusses innovative methods such as arts elicitation interviews, poetry, and visual approaches, showing how creative expression can uncover mechanisms that are difficult to articulate. She also reflects on navigating complexity in realist research through mapping,causal loop diagrams, and embracing a flexible, adaptive approach. Whether you’re a researcher, clinician, or interested in theintersection of arts and health, this episode offers rich insights into embracing complexity, valuing lived experience, and using realist thinking to explore meaningful change.

    35 min
  2. 2 MAR

    Episode 22 — Realist Evaluation in a Time of Transformation with Robert Sandler

    In this episode of The Realist Lens, Alejandro is joined by Dr Robert Sandler, medical doctor and recent PhD graduate from the University of Sheffield, to explore how realist evaluation can help make sense of major changes in healthcare. Rob shares his doctoral research examining the impact of ETI for people with cystic fibrosis in the UK, a treatment that has rapidly transformed health outcomes and, in turn, reshaped clinical care, patient experiences, and treatment decision-making. The conversation explores what it means to conduct realist research in a fast-moving and uncertain context. Rob reflects on how the introduction of ETI, alongside the wider disruption of COVID-19 and the shift toward virtual care, created a dynamic environment that required continual theory development and adaptation. Rob discusses how he developed and refined programme theory using multiple methods, including multi-centre interviews with clinicians, targeted single-site interviews, a national patient survey, focus groups, and secondary quantitative analysis. He explains how realist logic guided the sequencing of these methods and how each contributed to theory refinement. The episode also explores keyfindings from the study, including tensions between clinicians and patients in how health and treatment decisions are understood, what Rob describes as “epistemological dissonance.” He reflects on the role of habit formation intreatment adherence, the challenges of maintaining intervention fidelity in changing contexts, and the importance of reflexivity as a clinician-researcher. Rob concludes by sharing practical advice for clinicians and researchers working with realist approaches, including the value of formal training, building supportive networks, and staying grounded in real-world complexity. This episode will be valuable for anyone conducting realist evaluation, working with mixed methods, researching complex interventions, or navigating research in rapidly changing healthcare environments.

    43 min
  3. 16 FEB

    Episode 21 — Keeping It Real Part-Time with Michele Wood

    In this episode of The Realist Lens, Alejandro is joined by Michele Wood, art psychotherapist in palliative care and part-time PhD researcher at Lancaster University, to explore what it really means to undertake a realist PhD alongside work, life, and personal commitments. Michele shares her journey into doctoral research after more than 30 years in clinical practice, where her interest in the role of technology in palliative care, particularly following the rapid changes during COVID-19, led her to investigate how and why new practices are adopted (or resisted) in complex healthcare settings. The conversation focuses on the realities of doing realist research part-time, including managing competing demands, navigating the iterative nature of realist thinking, and sustaining momentum over what Michele describes as a marathon rather than a sprint. She reflects candidly on the personal and professional contexts that shaped her journey, and how realist philosophy helped her make sense of complexity across different levels of experience. Michele also shares practical strategies that have supported her along the way, including reflective journaling, memoing, “deep work” practices, and what she calls leaving “pebbles through the forest” to stay connected to evolving ideas. This is an episode for anyone considering or undertaking a part-time PhD, working with realist approaches in practice-based settings, or trying to balance rigorous research with the realities of everyday life.

    27 min
  4. 19 JAN

    Episode 19 - A Unicorn or an Oxymoron? The Realist Trial with Sebastian Lemire

    In this episode of The Realist Lens, Alejandro is joined by Sebastian Lemire, evaluator and methodological pluralist, to explore one of the most contested questions in contemporary realist inquiry: Is the realist trial a methodological impossibility, or a rare but viable unicorn? Drawing on his extensive experience in theory-based evaluation and a review of published realist trials, Sebastian shares his pragmatic view on the long-standing debate between realist evaluation and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Rather than taking sides in ontological disputes, Sebastian invites listeners to focus on what different forms of evidence can do and how they can be meaningfully integrated. The conversation traces Sebastian’s journey from theory driven evaluation into realist-informed work and unpacks how the debate around realist trials reflects deeper divides about causation, evidence, and credibility in evaluation. Together, Alejandro and Sebastian examine why the topic remains so divisive, what distinguishes the rare “unicorn” realist trials, and how integration can occur at the level of evidence and analysis rather than philosophical purity. This episode does not seek to close the debate. Instead, it keeps the conversation open, offering a thoughtful, empirically grounded perspective on how evaluators might navigate complexity, pragmatism, and explanation without becoming trapped by methodological dogma.

    23 min

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
6 Ratings

About

The Realist Lens is a podcast that makes realist evaluation and synthesis accessible and easy to follow. Through relaxed conversations with expert guests, students, and practitioners, we explore key realist concepts like mechanisms, context, and outcomes. Whether you're new to realist approaches or more experienced, this podcast offers practical insights, real-world examples, and thoughtful reflections to support your learning and curiosity—one conversation at a time.

You Might Also Like