After the ‘End of History’

After the 'End of History'

After the ‘End of History’ is a podcast about International Relations Theory and History. 

  1. 5h ago

    How Ruhollah Khomeini Constructed the Islamic Republic

    Welcome back to After the End of History. This discussion was recorded on August 27th, 2026. The many false starts and stops of the war on Iran tell us, unhappily and perversely, that this conflict will stretch well into our future – just as we recognize its long past continuity from the 2016 strikes on Syria to the war on Iran in 1980 just after its revolution. This follows recent episodes where we talked to Brandon Wolff -Hunnicutt about the Iraq wars, and Nicholas Mulder about sanctions often preparing and precipitating total war. The long draw up to this war, and its likely duration, suggest that Iran’s sin against the West is not only its success in outmaneuvering sanctions but the Islamic Republic itself as a future-orientated form, birthed by necessity, that contributes a heretofore unknown model of popular democracy underwritten by religious law. Our guest today describes the life and ideas of Ayatollah Khomeini, founder of the IR, which initiated a process that continues to develop and deepen even in a war against the world super-power. Dr. Nura Hossainzadeh is the author of the 2016 dissertation in Political Science at UC Berkeley, “The Constitutionalism of Ruhollah Khomeini's Theory of Guardianship.”  (read it here: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4rg2c49c ), as well as recent articles in Middle East Eye: www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/how-boogeyman-mullahs-trope-led-us-war-iran In conversation with our own Pat Cabell, she describes the constitutionalist responses to Iran’s early 20th Century occupations by imperial powers, and how conceptions of anti-imperialism turned to the Islamic tradition for guidance. This is a rich and rarely heard perspective on Iran as not disfigured by its battle with the empire but emboldened to inaugurate a new stage in the journey of spirit, and a new chapter of revolution, akin to the historical role of the Mexican and Russian peasants at the beginning of the century. A partial list of works mentioned in this discussion: - Homa Katouzian. Iran and the Revolution (2026) - Vali Nasr. Iran's Grand Strategy (2025) - Eskandar Sadeghi-Boroujerdi. Revolution and its Discontents: Political Thought and Reform in Iran (Cambridge University Press, 2019) as well as https://phenomenalworld.org/analysis/mosaic-of-deterrence/ - Ruhollah Khomeini. (anonymous) Kashf al-Âsrâr (unveiling of secrets). 1943. - Khomeini. Hukumat-i Islami: Velayat-e faqih (Governance of the Jurist). 1970. Hawks and Sparrows is a research collective that has been publishing and podcasting about international relations, Marxist and conservative political philosophy, history and aesthetics since 2020. Our primary archive can be found at the Patreon page for the After the End of History podcast patreon.com/afterhistory where you can also subscribe and support our work. ATEOH on X https://x.com/after_history Support the show

    How Ruhollah Khomeini Constructed the Islamic Republic
  2. Feb 13

    Geoeconomics and the Future of Sanctions: Interview with Nicholas Mulder

    Nicholas Mulder is an Assistant Professor of Modern European History at Cornell University. His previous book is The Economic Weapon: The Rise of Sanctions as a Tool of Modern War and he is currently close to completion on a book entitled The Age of Confiscation: Making and Taking Property in the Creation of the Modern World. He also started a Substack last year which contains some of the best commentary on the geo-economic conflicts unfolding before our eyes, often with very useful historical analogies for thinking about sanctions, embargoes and tariffs. It is called WeltinnenPolitik.  It is hard to imagine a book being published at a more perfect time than Nicholas Mulder’s 2022 book The Economic Weapon: The Rise of Sanctions as a Tool of Modern War. After the start of the February 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and subsequent announcements of massive US-NATO sanctions against Russia, many of us turned to Mulder’s book to try to make sense of our period of great power tensions, economic and technological competition, and major war in Europe. The Economic Weapon brought readers a fresh and technical analysis for interpreting the breakdown of peace in the interwar period and the dashing of liberal visions of international cooperation. Most importantly, Mulder’s book did not just reaffirm the well-known cliches of liberal orthodoxy about free societies versus totalitarianism, but situated economic sanctions as a paradoxical tool of coercion and warfare - sometimes conceived as preventing war, while other times as precipitating it.  His story begins with the efforts of British naval officials and financial authorities during WWI to leverage British naval power to enforce a blockade against the Central Powers: Germany, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire. The central paradox of his narrative is how a tool originally designed to escalate a total war strategy and coerce civilian populations would come to be thought of as a tool in preventing aggression in the League of Nations. While sometimes effective, Mulder also shows how diplomatic wrangling, ideological competition and the Great Depression often blunted multilateral commitment to use the economic weapon properly. And fear of sanctions by the late 1930s itself became a driver of strategic visions that saw territorial expansion as the only way to secure the energy, food and extractive resources that could maintain the viability of revisionist states. While far from any kind of apologia for the actions taken by the Axis powers, there is something in your account of the spirit of AJP Taylor’s Origins of the Second World War in which the Allied Powers are not absolved of some blame.  Support the show

Trailers

5
out of 5
37 Ratings

About

After the ‘End of History’ is a podcast about International Relations Theory and History. 

You Might Also Like