Critical Theory in Context

Centre for Social Critique in Berlin

What are the crucial conflicts of our time? What hopes and wishes for a better future are expressed within these conflicts? The podcast Critical Theory in Context combines analysis of the present with perspectives on societal transformation. We host conversations with theorists and activists about social crises and the possibilities of their emancipatory overcoming.

  1. Gegengemeinschaften: Neue revolutionäre Subjekte?

    2D AGO

    Gegengemeinschaften: Neue revolutionäre Subjekte?

    Das klassische revolutionäre Subjekt ist von der Bildfläche verschwunden. Was ihm nachfolgte, wurde vom Kapitalismus absorbiert. Doch wer tritt heute an die Stelle des Proletariats, um die Verhältnisse, in denen der Mensch ein geknechtetes Wesen ist, umzuwälzen? Der Philosoph Daniel Loick schlägt hierfür das Konzept der „Gegengemeinschaften“ vor. Jenseits der Institutionen der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft schließen sich die Unterlegenen gegen Diskriminierung und Marginalisierung im alltäglichen Kampf zusammen. Dabei entsteht ihre Überlegenheit, die sie prädestiniert, gegen die herrschenden Verhältnisse aufzubegehren und neue Infrastrukturen der Fürsorge und somit der Rettung des menschlichen (und nicht-menschlichen) Wohlergehens zu bilden. Doch was verbirgt sich hinter der paradox anmutenden „Überlegenheit der Unterlegenen“? In dieser Folge spricht Sabine Nuss mit Rahel Jaeggi ausgehend vom Konzept der Gegengemeinschaften über das Potenzial neuer kollektiver Handlungsfähigkeit, die Fallstricke des Gemeinschaftsbegriffs und das Bild des unermüdlich grabenden Maulwurfs. Anlass dieser Folge war die Veranstaltung „Krise und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit. Ein Gespräch zur Politik von Gegengemeinschaften“ vom 22. Januar 2026 in Berlin, mit Daniel Loick, Rahel Jaeggi und Thomas Seibert, moderiert von Charlie Ebert. Der Mitschnitt der Veranstaltung findet sich unter: https://criticaltheoryinberlin.de/en/event/krise-und-kollektive-handlungsfaehigkeit-ein-gespraech-zur-politik-von-gegengemeinschaften/

    53 min
  2. The Grounds of Planning PART II: Aaron Benanav on Utopia, Socialism, and Rationality

    FEB 28

    The Grounds of Planning PART II: Aaron Benanav on Utopia, Socialism, and Rationality

    Should we be making recipes for the cook shops of the future? In part two of this series on planning, Jacob Blumenfeld speaks with Aaron Benanav about utopian thinking, economic rationality, and what it might actually mean to plan beyond capitalism. Moving between Marx, critical theory, and the history of utopian socialism, the conversation returns to figures like Thomas More, Edward Bellamy, and William Morris to ask what utopias do for political imagination—and where they fall short. Benanav argues that although one should not concoct too rigid a blueprint for the future, it is worse to have no plan at all. Instead, he outlines the idea of a multi-criterial economy: an economy that recognizes that economic decisions involve multiple, often conflicting values—autonomy, sustainability, efficiency, care, for instance—and cannot be reduced to a single metric like money or utility; they are intrinsically political choices. The episode takes up concrete questions that utopian debates often avoid: trade-offs, investment, transition, and implementation. How are priorities set? Who decides? What role should money play, if any? And how can democratic decision-making function under conditions of uncertainty and disagreement, without collapsing into technocracy or abstract moralism? Against neoclassical economics and rational choice theory, Benanav insists that rationality is not about finding the “optimal” solution, but about collectively negotiating priorities in a world of limits. Utopia reappears here not as a final destination, but as a critical tool—helping us think about feasibility, coordination, and political choice without pretending that conflicts can be engineered away. Special thanks to JÜRG MEISTER (recording, editing, editorial support, mixing, mastering)

    59 min
  3. The Grounds of Planning PART I: John O’Neill on the Socialist Calculation Debate

    FEB 27

    The Grounds of Planning PART I: John O’Neill on the Socialist Calculation Debate

    What does it mean to plan an economy rationally—and who gets to decide what counts as rational? In part one of this series on planning, Jacob Blumenfeld speaks with political economist and philosopher John O’Neill about the socialist calculation debate and its legacy. Starting from Otto Neurath’s plans for socialization and in-kind calculation, the conversation revisits the classic critiques of planning advanced by Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek, while questioning the very assumptions about rationality, value, and knowledge on which those critiques rest. Against the idea that markets, money, and prices provide a neutral or exhaustive measure of social reason, O’Neill reconstructs a forgotten strand of the debate—one centered on value pluralism, incommensurability, and the material conditions of human need. The discussion ranges across ecology, intergenerational justice, expertise and democracy, pseudorationality, and the limits of formal and instrumental reason, drawing on figures such as K. William Kapp, Karl Polanyi, Max Weber, Max Horkheimer, and Otto Neurath as well. Rather than asking whether markets or planning “won,” the episode asks what was lost when rationality was reduced to optimization, information, and price signals, and how alternative conceptions of planning might help us think through today’s ecological and social crises. But before the interview begins, Rahel Jaeggi and Jacob Blumenfeld discuss the “Grounds of Planning” workshop from December 2025, organized by the Centre for Social Critique, and some of the key themes concerning needs, rationality, and democracy.

    1h 29m

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
2 Ratings

About

What are the crucial conflicts of our time? What hopes and wishes for a better future are expressed within these conflicts? The podcast Critical Theory in Context combines analysis of the present with perspectives on societal transformation. We host conversations with theorists and activists about social crises and the possibilities of their emancipatory overcoming.

You Might Also Like