Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law
  • 4.7 (51)
  • Society & Culture
  • Updated Weekly

Join Steve Palmer, a seasoned criminal defense lawyer, as he shares valuable legal insights on DUI, traffic stops, and your rights in the legal system. For more, visit www.palmerlegaldefense.com. Recorded at Channel 511 in Columbus, Ohio: www.channel511.com

  1. 1d ago

    How a Battery-Operated Taxi Sparked Legal History in 1897

    Learn how a 19th-century London taxi accident led to the world’s earliest recorded DUI and changed public safety laws. Steve Palmer brings a fascinating and little-known story from legal history: on September 10, 1897, London cab driver George Smith made headlines as the first person ever charged for driving under the influence—crashing his electric taxi on New Bond Street. Before official DUI laws even existed, Smith was fined under public safety legislation, setting a precedent for how our legal system would approach intoxicated driving. Key Moments Covered: The details behind the 1897 London taxi crash and the first-ever DUI charge 00:00How the case was handled before DUI statutes were written 00:41The legal workaround: charging drivers for public safety violations 00:59 Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com. Recorded at Channel 511. Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

  2. 2d ago

    Jury Deadlock in the Clancy Case: What Are The Next Steps?

    Discover why the Clancy case ended in a mistrial, how the Aliunde Rule works, and what happens when jurors disagree. Could one juror really change a case? The Clancy mistrial reveals what happens when jury deliberations break down. And what legal protections kick in to safeguard verdicts. Steve Palmer discusses the recent mistrial in the Clancy case, digging deep into why one holdout juror can cause a legal deadlock. A key theme that emerged was the explanation of the Aliunde Rule. This is a legal principle that protects the privacy of jury deliberations and makes it challenging to overturn a verdict based on jurors’ statements alone. Several points are raised, including what happens after a mistrial, how defense and prosecution respond to hung juries, and why strategic decisions, like plea bargaining, come into play when a case fails to reach a unanimous verdict. Key Takeaways: The Aliunde Rule prevents overturning a verdict based solely on what jurors say about deliberations; outside evidence is required 01:04.In the Clancy case, 11 out of 12 jurors leaned toward not guilty by reason of insanity, highlighting difficulties in proving the case 05:10.After a mistrial, it’s up to the prosecutor to decide whether to retry the case or negotiate a plea bargain 03:06.Defense strategies change after a mistrial because both sides have now seen each other’s tactics 04:03.Plea negotiations are likely, especially after a jury signals strong doubts about the prosecution’s case 05:14. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com. Recorded at Channel 511. Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

  3. 3d ago

    How to Respond to Law Enforcement Intake Questions Safely

    Wondering if you must share your personal or social media info with police? Steve Palmer breaks down your rights. When taken into a police department, you might receive paperwork asking for your name, email, address, and even your social media accounts. Do you have to fill it all out? In this frank, practical Q&A, Steve Palmer explains your rights, why you should exercise them, and the dangers of sharing too much—no matter how innocent you are. What’s Inside: Discover why you can, and often should, refuse to share personal or online information with police at 00:22.Understand your 5th and 6th Amendment rights and how to assert them at 01:29.Learn why staying silent protects you, and how giving information to the police can never be “taken back” at 02:19.Hear why prosecutors cannot use your silence against you in a courtroom at 02:08.Get clear steps for what to say and do if pressured by law enforcement. Key Takeaways: You do not have to provide email or social accounts to police at intake without legal advice.Ask for a lawyer and stay silent until you speak to one; invoke your constitutional rights early.Police can ask for basic info (name), but further details, especially about your online presence, should not be shared without counsel.Information given to police can’t be “unrung”—protect yourself by being cautious.Your silence cannot legally be used against you in court. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com. Recorded at Channel 511. Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

  4. Sep 9

    Why Everyone’s Talking About House Bill 492 and Passenger Rights

    Ohio’s new House Bill 492 lets police ask passengers for ID during traffic stops. Here’s what you need to know. Is Ohio’s House Bill 492 Changing Your Rights at Traffic Stops? House Bill 492, recently passed in Ohio, is causing a stir by allowing police to require passengers to show ID if there’s reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation. The conversation focused on clarifying the law, debunking misconceptions, and addressing heated listener reactions. Here’s what you’ll learn: The episode breaks down what “reasonable suspicion” means under House Bill 492 01:16, referencing Terry v. Ohio, and the types of situations where a passenger might be required to identify themselves (e.g., not wearing a seatbelt) 01:33.One concept discussed was the potential for the law to create a “gateway” for police to circumvent Fourth Amendment protections, raising concerns about abuse of discretion 01:45.The discussion explored listener questions such as whether the law applies to front seat only or all passengers 03:26, and addressed misunderstandings about what the law actually says.Several points were raised, including worries that the new statute empowers law enforcement to overreach, and skepticism over officers possibly fabricating reasons for ID requests 03:41.A key theme that emerged was encouraging informed debate and participation, with an open invitation for comments and questions 04:42. Key takeaways: Ohio HB 492 allows police to request passenger ID if there is reasonable suspicion of a traffic violation.“Reasonable suspicion” is grounded in established legal precedent, not just police discretion.The law applies to all passengers, not just those in the front seat.Concerns remain about the impact on Fourth Amendment rights and possible police overreach.Listeners are encouraged to get informed, participate in discussion, and understand the nuances behind the headlines. 5 Frequently Asked Questions about House Bill 492 What is House Bill 492 in Ohio? House Bill 492 changes Ohio law to allow police to request identification from vehicle passengers during traffic stops if there is reasonable suspicion of a violation 00:13.Do passengers have to show ID during an Ohio traffic stop? Passengers only have to show ID if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the passenger committed a traffic violation, such as not wearing a seatbelt 01:16, 01:33.Does this law apply to all passengers or just the front seat? The law applies to all passengers, not just those seated in the front 03:26.What does 'reasonable suspicion' mean in this context? Reasonable suspicion means the officer must have a clearly articulable reason to believe the passenger committed a violation, not just a vague belief 01:18.Does House Bill 492 violate the Fourth Amendment? The episode discusses concerns that the law could be used to bypass Fourth Amendment protections, especially if officers falsely claim a violation. Legal challenges may arise over time 01:45, 04:05. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com. Recorded at Channel 511. Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

  5. Sep 8

    Judge Finds Probable Cause in Tyler Robinson Homicide Case

    Let's explore the latest developments in the Tyler Robinson case with insights into probable cause, the death penalty, and plea options. Steve Palmer breaks down the latest developments in the Tyler Robinson and Charlie Kirk homicide case out of Utah. After a lengthy preliminary hearing, the judge has determined there's enough evidence, probable cause, to move forward on all charges, including the death penalty. Steve Palmer unpacks what that means, why the judge took time to issue a written decision, and how both the defense and prosecution approached arguments around aggravating circumstances, prosecutorial conduct, and media coverage. Plus, get insight into what happens next, with trial preparation underway and the real prospect of plea negotiations on the table. Whether you’re a legal enthusiast or just trying to keep up with a high-profile case, Steve Palmer brings clarity, expertise, and a behind-the-scenes legal perspective you won’t find anywhere else. Key TakeawaysJudicial decisions on probable cause serve as crucial checkpoints before full trials and protect against unsupported prosecutions 00:14.Death penalty specifications require aggravating factors; in this case, the threat to others was the central argument 02:20.Prosecutorial misconduct, such as violating court orders on pretrial publicity, can result in contempt charges but not necessarily dismissal of charges 05:11.The defense may still pursue plea deals, especially related to the death penalty and information on potential involvement of others 07:14.Preliminary hearings often limit the scope of defense arguments, which may be reserved for the actual trial 07:02. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com. Recorded at Channel 511. Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

  6. Sep 7

    Inside the Clancy Trial: Hung Jury, Insanity Defense, and Legal Strategy

    Discover what really happens in a hung jury as this episode breaks down the Clancy trial’s most complex legal moments. I focus on the unique dynamics and legal strategies unfolding in real time, bringing valuable context for anyone curious about the intersection of criminal law and the real-world drama of high-stakes cases. I explain the “dynamite charge” or Allen charge, a tool judges use to encourage deadlocked juries to reach a verdict. If you’ve never been on a jury, get a behind-the-scenes look at how (and why) judges try to push jurors toward consensus, even when tensions are high and compromise feels impossible 00:56. I discuss the unique procedures in Massachusetts. Unlike other states, after multiple failed attempts to reach a verdict (even after the dynamite charge), the judge must ask if further deliberation will actually help. If jurors say no, it’s likely a mistrial will be declared 05:32. What does this means in the real world? Delays, rescheduling, and the massive difficulty of lining up expert witnesses for yet another round 09:06. I explore how the insanity defense works differently in Massachusetts. In most jurisdictions, the defense bears the burden of proving insanity (with a lower standard of proof). In the Clancy case, once insanity is claimed, prosecutors have to disprove it beyond a reasonable doubt, an extra challenge for the state that can sway the course of a trial 13:40. Takeaways:Real-world stories bring legal procedures to life.The structure of jury instructions can make or break a case.Legal nuances matter, what’s routine in one state could turn everything upside down in another. We’ll be following the Clancy case and reporting on new developments. Tell us if you’ve been through a hung jury adventure of your own! 5 Frequently Asked Questions About The Nuances Around A Hung Jury Trial What is a "dynamite charge" in a jury trial? The dynamite charge is a special instruction given by a judge to encourage a deadlocked jury to continue deliberating and attempt to reach a verdict 00:56.How does Massachusetts handle a jury that can’t reach a verdict? After standard instructions and a dynamite charge, Massachusetts judges must ask jurors if further deliberation will help; if the answer is no, the jury is discharged 06:01.What makes the insanity defense in Massachusetts unique? Once the defense raises insanity, the prosecutor must disprove it beyond a reasonable doubt, differing from most states where the burden is lower or on the defense 13:44.What happens after a mistrial or hung jury? The prosecutor decides whether to retry the case with the same charges or negotiate a plea deal, often informed by the jury's split 06:38.Why is retrying a criminal case challenging? Retrying involves logistical hurdles, such as rescheduling witnesses and experts, and can be burdensome for the legal teams, especially in complex cases 08:39. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com. Recorded at Channel 511. Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

  7. Aug 24

    Divorce Lawyers Handling Narcissists and High-Conflict Spouses

    Learn how to manage complex divorces, navigate custody disputes, and protect yourself from narcissistic spouses with seasoned legal insights. Ready to end a toxic marriage, but worried your spouse will turn the process into a nightmare? In this episode, Jim Hanneman, a specialist in domestic relations law, offers clear, experience-backed strategies for managing high-conflict divorces, especially when narcissistic personalities or mental health issues are involved. You'll get a front-row seat to the tough realities of family law, hearing why some cases drag on for years, how to spot classic narcissistic behaviors, and how the wrong lawyer can worsen the conflict. Jim Hanneman arms you with step-by-step advice for handling manipulative or unreasonable exes, safeguarding your children, and finding peace through the legal process. Key takeaways: How to spot narcissistic and manipulative traits in divorceWhy setting and holding legal and personal boundaries is crucialThe role of experienced attorneys, guardians ad litem, and the court systemWhy “bulldog” lawyers and litigating for the sake of vengeance often backfireHow to balance finality, finances, and emotional health in custody and asset negotiations If you’re struggling through a difficult divorce or facing a toxic co-parent, this episode is a must-listen. Learn to protect your interests, advocate for your children, and avoid costly legal and emotional traps. 5 Frequently Asked Questions about divorcing a narcissist 1. How do I know if I’m divorcing a narcissist? According to Jim Hanneman, a specialist in domestic relations law, look for behaviors like always needing to be right, never apologizing, controlling or manipulative actions, gaslighting, and making unreasonable demands. 2. What should I do before starting a divorce from a difficult or abusive spouse? Gather information, consult an experienced family law attorney, and consider seeking counseling for emotional support and practical coping strategies. 3. How do courts handle unreasonable or narcissistic spouses in custody cases? Accorindint to Jim Hanneman, a specialist in domestic relations law, courts may appoint a guardian ad litem, use psychological evaluations, and can order attorney’s fees against parties who act unreasonably or drag out litigation. 4. Is getting a “bulldog” lawyer the best approach in high-conflict divorces? Not necessarily. Jim Hanneman, a specialist in domestic relations law, says aggressive lawyers often prolong conflict and increase costs. Instead, choose an experienced, reasonable attorney with a track record managing difficult personalities. 5. Can a prenuptial agreement protect my assets in case of divorce? Yes, but it must be in writing, fully disclose assets, allow each party to consult counsel, and be executed without duress, preferably well before the wedding. Need more advice or representation? Contact Jim Hanneman at divorceanddissolution.com or call 614-932-5000 to get expert help with your family law case. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com. Recorded at Channel 511. Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

  8. Aug 20

    Breaking Down Kohberger: Legal Strategies When Withdrawing a Guilty Plea

    Steve Palmer is joined by private investigator Scott Shepherd of Justified Investigations for the inaugural installment of our new series, "What Would We Do?" Together, they dig deep into the highly-publicized case of Bryan Kohberger, the man who pled guilty to the infamous quadruple homicide of University of Idaho students, but is now seeking to withdraw his plea. Steve Palmer and Scott Shepherd walk listeners through their approach if Kohberger called on them for help: Would they take his case? What are the legal standards around withdrawing a guilty plea? How would they investigate claims of mistakes or missed evidence, and is there any hope for overturning such a high-profile conviction? Drawing on real-world experience with post-conviction and appellate cases, the duo explains the legal and investigatory checklists they’d follow, what pitfalls and optics matter, and the hard realities of mounting a defense when the evidence seems stacked and the system favors finality. This episode offers a rare, insider perspective on handling notorious cases, the science around DNA and forensic evidence, and the cold calculus of criminal defense. 3 Key Takeaways: Thorough Post-Conviction Review Is Essential: The process isn't about simply retrying a case. It means digging deep, ordering transcripts, analyzing legal standards, and determining if any manifest injustice occurred. Every angle, document, and expert report must be scrutinized anew.Scientific Evidence Requires Expert Re-examination: DNA, forensic, and cell phone evidence must be independently re-analyzed, not just accepted at face value. Even seemingly overwhelming DNA evidence can be misinterpreted or inconclusive without proper expert consultation.Finality vs. Justice: The justice system is structured to resist reopening resolved cases. Unless there's a clear showing of manifest injustice, such as newly discovered exculpatory evidence or demonstrable ineffective counsel, courts are unlikely to allow plea withdrawals. Moments 09:36 Proving manifest injustice 12:39 Examining plea advisement and relief 17:28 Analyzing DNA Evidence 21:52 Gas station surveillance clues 29:47 Consulting with a medical expert 36:48 Lab testing and protocol differences 40:45 Investigator's approach to facts 48:19 Analyzing vehicle video evidence 52:14 Covering up evidence activities 58:28 Negotiating plea deals 01:02:34 Discussing legal challenges in evidence Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com. Recorded at Channel 511. Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense. Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com

See All (499)

Trailer

4.7
out of 5
51 Ratings

About

Join Steve Palmer, a seasoned criminal defense lawyer, as he shares valuable legal insights on DUI, traffic stops, and your rights in the legal system. For more, visit www.palmerlegaldefense.com. Recorded at Channel 511 in Columbus, Ohio: www.channel511.com

Information

  • Creator
    Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law
  • Years Active
    2018 - 2026
  • Episodes
    499
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © Copyright 2026 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law
  • Show Website
    Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

You Might Also Like