Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Based Camp is a podcast focused on how humans process the world around them and the future of our species. That means we go into everything from human sexuality, to weird sub-cultures, dating markets, philosophy, and politics. Malcolm and Simone are a husband wife team of a neuroscientist and marketer turned entrepreneurs and authors. With graduate degrees from Stanford and Cambridge under their belts as well as five bestselling books, one of which topped out the WSJs nonfiction list, they are widely known (if infamous) intellectuals / provocateurs. If you want to dig into their ideas further or check citations on points they bring up check out their book series. Note: They all sell for a dollar or so and the money made from them goes to charity. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG basedcamppodcast.substack.com

  1. 1d ago

    Telegraph: It's Healthy for Wives to Cheat! (Guess How That Worked Out For the Writer?)

    Today on Based Camp we examine a Telegraph article by anthropologist Wednesday Martin proposing that husbands give wives a Christmas cheat pass. We review her arguments from her books Untrue and Primates of Park Avenue, then test them against evolutionary data, child outcome studies, and historical patterns of non-monogamy. Our discussion covers female desire patterns, parental investment risks, and why such arrangements often lead to separation rather than stability. Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins:telegraph, why men should give their wives the cheat pass for Christmas. By Wednesday, Martin, whose latest book, untrue Wednesday? Simone Collins:Wednesday? Malcolm, we know Wednesday. Malcolm Collins:Oh, it is? Simone Collins:Oh my god. Wonderful. It... Who wrote the primates of Park Avenue. Oh my god. We know her. Oh my god. Malcolm Collins:We know her. She is so nice, and I like primates of Park Avenue. Simone Collins:Wonderful. I love Wednesday, but this also is exactly something Wednesday would write. That’s Malcolm Collins:that’s correct. Exactly something Wednesday would write. Simone Collins:Okay. Okay. Go on. Oh my god. Wednesday. Malcolm Collins:Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today, we are going to be discussing an article, and what has happened since it’s writing Uh-oh. Which is in the telegraph, why men should give their wives the cheat pass according to a US anthropologist for Christmas. Simone Collins:This is Malcolm Collins:why for Christmas, you should give your wife a pass to cheat whenever she feels like cheating. And, when I first got this article, was like, this is wild. Then I saw it was written a while ago. It’s written, back in 2018. What? So it likely did the rounds at some point when... But I never saw it when I was watching. And then I got to look at what happened to this woman in her relationship post to this article to see if she was right or wrong. Wait. Simone Collins:Was this written by a married woman who is basically saying, I want a cheat card for Christmas? Malcolm Collins:Yes. But she... Don’t worry. She said, but I don’t want him to cheat on me. Simone Collins:Don’t worry. What? Wait. What? Well, was she gonna cheat with a woman? Like, usually, that’s when women get the cheat code from their husbands. Malcolm Collins:no. You did... This all appears to be driven by her, and what she actually argues in this article and in her book that this article was sort of done around is that women desire sex outside of marriage more than men desire sex outside of marriage, which evolutionarily makes no effing sense and doesn’t align with the majority of the data. There’s a few, like, ways you can try to massage the data to say this. but, no, if if you feel that way as a woman, it means that you likely, do not, like, genetically want your man. Right? Like, that’s not a normal thing to feel, I would say. It is a normal thing for men to feel from an evolutionary perspective. And I love the... Like, when people try to argue, like, why women would want this. They’re like, well, it leads to more genetic diversity in her offspring. Like, what if a disease comes through? And, like, her husband’s genes were uniquely susceptible. And I’m like, do you not know how to do math? Like, that actually doesn’t make any sense at all. Just in case you don’t understand why that makes no sense at all. statistically speaking, suppose I, as a woman, have sex with one guy and have 10 kids with that one guy. Okay? And then suppose I have sex with a number of other guys and I have 10 kids with 10 different men. Okay? And you don’t know what diseases are going to hit your community, and presumably, every member of the community has some chance of having a resistance to any individual illness that’s coming through the community. Okay? The woman, what is the probability that your children die? Like, what... A percent of your children die due to an illness that is tied to genetic susceptibility. It’s actually exactly the same in both scenario. The reason why it’s exactly the same in both scenario is because you don’t know what illness is gonna come around. It could be the illness that your husband who you were faithful to and had 10 kids with happened to have a resistance to. And if it was that, then that ends up weighing that... Basically, it’s a higher risk, higher reward scenario if you have all your kids with one guys. But evolution can’t easily distinguish between higher risk, higher reward scenarios and lower risk, lower reward scenarios. Simone Collins:Well, I think also the stats that you see on how kids do when raised by, one, single, like, female parents or their moms, but then male parents that aren’t theirs, they fare way worse. What you want is they wanna die at really high rates. You want them to be raised by their mom and their biological dad, super importantly. So I I can’t... I don’t see how anyone could reasonably justify a woman mixing it up genetically. Malcolm Collins:This finding that she’s talking about here is true cost culturally. So, like, it’s it’s an evolutionary truism that kids just die at really high rates when they’re not being raised by their biological father, and you have other negative outcomes when that happens. So that that there could be a benefit to this. Like, all of the negatives, even if if even if you could find an argument that there is some genetic benefit to the low... The the low risk, low reward strategy of spreading out your genes if all you care about is immunity resistance. The problem is is that would not at all make up for all of the other negatives of having children with multiple men. From just one, the disease risk of sleeping with multiple men, especially in a historic context, especially if those men are sleeping with multiple women, the disease risk... Any disease benefit that you have gotten from the immunity diversification is lost there, but then you have the parental investment decrease, which matters a ton. Speaker 9:Note here, she bases some of her ideas here that you would actually have higher parental investment because of a very narrow study from Barry and Archie, where you had eighty percent survival to 15 when you had one secondary father and only a sixty four percent when you had only one primary father. The problem is is that this rate starts to go down when you get more than one secondary father to the point where it’s worse than one father. So, it doesn’t align with the type of behavior that she wants to undertake. This is about having two fathers being ideal. And it’s confounded by the fact that the women who get the secondary partners are typically the higher status women, so they’re already getting the better partners. But what’s really a problem here is that it doesn’t align at all with the other research that look at stuff like this. Like, if you look at doggone molly, the odds of child deaths are seven to 11 times higher in polygynous work eat groups than a monogamous one, Straussmann. In multi country demographic and health surveys, children of polygamous married mothers had higher mortality, often sixteen percent or more elevated risk under the age of five. And in historic samples, Nigerian Igbo, Utah Mormon polygamy, Pakistan, West Africa, etcetera, consistent positive correlation between polygyny and infant child mortality are seen. it’s just not good in any of the other data. This... My guess is just an outlier, and I wouldn’t take it very seriously. Speaker 10:And not just an outlier, but an outlier in a very, very unusual situation where you have extremely high risk of mortality, extremely low, resources in the region, and where they’ve been practicing this for many, many, many generations, so they might be evolutionarily more optimized for it. Malcolm Collins:And this is just Simone Collins:And it’s like a... Just a catastrophic risk. I say, the... Like, say you have one husband who’s willing to provide for you, but, like, then you try to switch it up. I think then th… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

  2. 2d ago

    Haiti Gangs Crawl to Mommy UN After F*ing Around with El Salvador

    Today on Based Camp, we discuss how El Salvador’s president Nayib Bukele deployed forces to Haiti following an ambush on Salvadoran personnel, showcasing the country’s aggressive anti-gang approach that previously slashed its homicide rate by over 90 percent. We examines Bukele’s domestic success in transforming El Salvador through mass incarceration and prison reforms, alongside economic gains in tourism and investment. In light of Bukele’s other strategically successful crime and punishment measures, we therefore speculate over how this Haiti operation could serve as a demonstration for exporting security services, prison management, and training to other nations facing similar challenges. What do you think? Will El Salvador evolve into the world’s new enforcer-for-hire? Is the military action in Haiti effectively an infomercial for military-for-hire? Will President Bukele pull off his sales pitch and launch an entire new industry for El Salvador built around prisons and military enforcement? Would love your thoughts! Show Notes What is El Salvador’s track record going into this? Crime: (Per the UN Refugee Agency) * Following the March 2022 crackdown, the official homicide rate fell from 18.1 per 100,000 people in 2021 to 1.3 in 2025—approximately a 93% decline. * Gang control, street robbery, and extortion also diminished substantially. * Homicides were already declining before the mass arrests, so the entire improvement cannot be attributed to them. Economic growth (World Bank): * Real GDP grew 3.5% in 2023, 2.6% in 2024, and approximately 3.9% in 2025. * The World Bank credits improved security with supporting investment and business activity, alongside record remittances and construction—not a security-driven economic miracle alone. Tourism and investment: (per the World Bank again) * Visitor arrivals rose from 2.4 million in 2022 to 3.4 million in 2023 and exceeded 4 million in 2025. Private investment grew an estimated 26.2% in 2025; improved security helped make previously dangerous areas more accessible and business conditions more predictable. Percentage arrested: (Per Wikipedia-sourced stats) * Authorities reported roughly 93,000 cumulative arrests under the emergency regime by late 2026—approximately 1.5% of the population, or 1 in 65 residents, using the 2024 census population of 6.03 million. * This counts arrests over several years, not people still incarcerated. Percentage actually incarcerated: (Per the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights) * There is no transparent, verified current total. * The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights reported a civil-society estimate exceeding 130,000 prisoners in April 2026—roughly 2.2% of the population, or 1 in 46 residents. * This includes prisoners jailed before the crackdown, so it is a different measure from the cumulative arrest count. * Bukele announced a potential release program in October, but an announcement does not establish how many have actually left prison. Important qualifications: * The security improvement came with suspended due-process protections, widespread detention without trial, and documented custodial deaths. * Official homicide statistics also exclude police killings, prison killings, and bodies discovered in clandestine graves, limiting comparisons with other countries and earlier periods. What happened with Haiti? * On October 18, gunmen ambushed four Salvadoran Air Force aviation technicians in Croix-des-Bouquets, near Port-au-Prince (Responsible Statecraft). * They were serving with El Salvador’s small contingent attached to the UN-backed Gang Suppression Force (GSF), mainly doing medical work (AP via ABC News). * According to El Salvador’s armed forces, they escaped the vehicle after it caught fire, but contact with them was then lost. Bukele subsequently described them as hostages and launched the deployment as a rescue operation. Their whereabouts and condition were not independently established. (BBC) * Bukele sent thousands of troops to find them, saying the immediate priority is bringing the four home (Haitian Times). * Bukele also vowed to “teach the gangs a lesson, these gangs that are making the Haitian people suffer” (Haitian Times). * On November 11, Bukele said his forces destroyed a home of Wilson Joseph, leader of the 400 Mawozo gang: “We kept our promise” (Africanews/AP). * The technicians’ fate is still unconfirmed: Joseph claims, without evidence, they are dead; El Salvador believes they are alive (Americas Quarterly). * Human remains were recovered during the search. An October 24 New York Times report said burned remains might belong to the missing men, but identification would require testing. Bukele disputed that they were his personnel, and the international force said it could not confirm the remains belonged to them. (BBC) * Also, the Associated Press’s November 11 report added that a gang leader had said they were dead, without reporting a verified recovery or identification. (WXPI) The Reaction Locally The people of Haiti are THRILLED! * There’s dancing in the streets * People in Haiti are expressing their happiness in interviews * And at least at first, Haiti’s PM Fils-Aimé was pleased: “Hats off to President Nayib Bukele, for your support and commitment to the national fight against gangs” (Africanews/AP). Internationally USA + Dominican Republic * Trump reportedly told Bukele “Do what you have to do”; the US and Colombia gave logistics and transport, per Axios (secondhand) (Haitian Times). * Dominican President Abinader: “We are collaborating with President Bukele and supporting him with logistics and intelligence” (Africanews/AP). The UN is a little more… cagey in their response: * The UN keeps its distance: most of the new troops fall outside the GSF’s mandate and reporting (Americas Quarterly). * UN spokesman Dujarric: “People’s rights need to be respected as you conduct security operations” (AP via ABC News). The Media The media is happy to frame this as negative, with points like: * Foreign military surges in Haiti have repeatedly caused new harms, from the 1915–1934 US occupation to UN-introduced cholera (Responsible Statecraft). * Bukele’s home model jailed “tens of thousands of suspected gang members at home without due process” and reportedly rested on secret gang deals (Responsible Statecraft). * In dense slums with civilians “trapped between the lines,” unclear command means nobody answers for mistakes (AP via ABC News). * A failed or bloody operation could give skeptical Security Council members grounds to kill the GSF itself (Americas Quarterly). The Gang * The cornered gang wrote to the UN asking for dialogue and mediation, which analysts read as pressure being felt (Americas Quarterly). Is a long-term occupation coming? Maybe? * Maybe El Salvador *IS* going for a long-term occupation or shadow occupation because Haiti’s Prime Minister started expressing some criticism: * Le Cour said the actions of El Salvador could set a damaging precedent for multilateral missions: “Governments may conclude that the risks of joining are rising while the political rewards go to those who act alone.” (AP via ABC News). * There’s no stated end date: the deployment has no clear timetable, and its legal terms are not public (Americas Quarterly). * Analyst Romain Le Cour: nobody knows “who commands these troops, under which rules of engagement, or for how long” (AP via ABC News). * A long stay could raise neutrality questions with Haitian elections set for July 18, 2027 (Americas Quarterly). What’s in it for El Salvador * Obviously the surface reason was to rescue the four ambushed men (Haitian Times). * But El Salvador also got: * Goodwill with Washington: Trump’s backing and US airlift tie the operation to the White House (Haitian Times). * An opportunity to showcase how Bukele’s security model might be exported, his forces now outnumbering Haiti’s Gang Suppression Force (GSF) (Responsible Statecraft). * And this might be a meaningful way for the government of El Salvadore to make money Could El Salvador Profit from Exporting its Model? Could El Salvador become known as some sort of … This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

  3. 3d ago

    Women: “It's Not Torture if They're MY Kids!” (Kate Plus 8)

    As a family with controversial parenting methods that is presently having a documentary team film their lives, we often ask ourselves: How is this all going to play out for us and the kids? This makes us uniquely interested in what other highly public families have gone through and it also grants us unique insight into what these families might be experiencing behind the scenes (since we usually only hear their polished PR speak or criticism of lifestyles presented by outsiders) We therefore invite you to join us on a Based Camp exploration into the allegations from Colin Gosselin’s tell-all book about his experiences growing up on the reality show John and Kate Plus Eight. While exploring Colin’s allegations, we discuss patterns of parental behavior, over-medication of children, and why some mothers believe they can act without consequences. We also cover the background of the TLC series, debate specific claims from the book, public responses, and chat about broader questions about family dynamics and accountability in high-profile cases. Show Notes Hat tip to Cheere Denise for reading In the Shadow of EightI aloud for people to listen to for free—all while including snarky commentary. Sadly that series was taken down, but now she’s doing a new one on an earlier book on Kate Gosselin. The Context Kate Gosselin became famous through the TLC reality series Jon & Kate Plus 8 (later Kate Plus 8), which documented her life raising twins (born 2000) and sextuplets (born 2004 via fertility treatments) with then-husband Jon Gosselin. * She made a ton of money through this * Starting out at 2,000 per episode and then going up to $22,500/episode by later seasons * She made around $2.5M for the first five seasons, not including extras. * After her divorce, when the show became “Kate Plus 8” Kate was making up to $250,000/episode (though more typically 40,000+) You can already tell she was unethical given the sextuplets, as anyone who really cared about the wellbeing of her children would not transfer more than one embryo at a time—at most two. But you can also probably guess she was going to yield issues when you realize images of her are literally the template for the Karen haircut. Even on the show, she is both cruel to her husband and her kids (e.g. getting annoyed by her husband’s breathing). The Allegations Here are some of the allegations Collin makes in his book In the Shadow of Eight: Surviving the Reality of My Childhood, which is doing gangbusters on Amazon and which I am listening to via the dramatic readings of Cheere Denise, my favorite snarky YouTuber. Toys given and then withheld * He covered a particular lego car toy that he was eventually given for Christmas, only for his mother to take that car away. He never saw it again. * ALSO: After a school incident involving a swollen/purple ear (which Collin attributes to Kate yanking it) led to Children and Youth Services involvement, he was temporarily pulled from school and banned from playing with the family’s LEGO sets. * The unfinished basement room where he was confined had “no toys, let alone any furniture. Just books.” * He was isolated from normal play with his siblings. The basement cell After the family got wealthy and moved to a mansion, Collin was first set up in a nice bedroom with two of his brothers, but then told to sleep on an air mattress in a part of the basement where they kept all their paper towels and supplies. Kate later had walls installed and an interior lock, plus a camera inside the cell that corresponded to a wearable small screen she wore around her wrist or handed off to nannies when out of the house. * He spent roughly 70% of his time here from ages 9-11 * If he wanted to go to the bathroom, he would ask for help and sometimes had to wait a long time * At one point he was left alone so long he just wet himself * This was after spending the morning asking for help and asking to be let out while he heard the rest of his siblings milling about the house, playing, etc. Medications prescribed Collin alleges that around age 11 (roughly February–April 2016), Kate had him take a daily cocktail of psychiatric drugs he was not fully informed about. He later learned he was prescribed over 13 medications, including antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, antidepressants, and anti-anxiety drugs. Specific ones named include: * Aripiprazole (antipsychotic, often for mood stabilization) * Lamotrigine (mood stabilizer, commonly for bipolar) * Lorazepam (anti-anxiety) * Wellbutrin (antidepressant) * Buspirone HCl (anti-anxiety) * Quetiapine fumarate (antipsychotic, often for sedation/mood) He describes difficulty swallowing multiple pills at once and claims Kate sometimes pinched his nose and pushed on his neck in a rubbing motion “the way I’ve seen people administer meds to dogs.” Medication continued heavily during his institutional stay (leaving him feeling “soft and cloudy” and “like a zombie”); he was later weaned off after transfer to another facility. Is there an industry of this? Sort of? * Numerous sites, blogs, and organizations (ADHD and autism resource centers, special-education guides, parent forums) coach parents on what to say and document when seeking evaluations. * Typical advice includes bringing specific examples of behaviors, using precise language that matches diagnostic criteria, requesting referrals firmly, and preparing notes so concerns are not dismissed * Forums, Facebook groups, Reddit communities, and similar spaces frequently discuss strategies for presenting symptoms to doctors, schools, or evaluators. * Parents share what phrasing, checklists, or examples “worked” to obtain a diagnosis, IEP/504 accommodations, or medication Zip-tie use * After an escape attempt at age 11 (when he returned because he had nowhere else to go), Collin alleges Kate bound his wrists and ankles with black zip ties, pulling them tight enough that circulation was cut off (he recalls a “snappy” sound, burning, and the sensation that his hands and feet were disappearing). * She then allegedly pulled him up by the wrists and threw him down, slamming his tailbone on the hard floor, while calling him a “burden” to the family, crazy, dangerous, and other names. * She left him bound in the dark locked room for hours, telling him to “think about what [he’d] done.” He describes this as the last time she physically put her hands on him; it immediately preceded his removal from the home. Disproportionate chore application * While largely confined, the limited time Collin spent outside the basement room included cleaning up after everyone else. * He describes Kate “giving orders, making me clean, dragging me around the house like I was her servant.” * His routine outside the room was split between teacher meetings, eating alone, cleaning, or performing for cameras. Commitment to mental institutions * Days before his 12th birthday in May 2016 (he was 11), after the runaway/zip-tie incident, Kate had EMS transport him to Fairmount Behavioral Health System in Pennsylvania. * He remained there roughly 21–22 months (far longer than the days or weeks most peers stayed, per his account), under heavy medication, with limited family contact (Kate visited once). * He alleges further restraints and sedation there (including an injection patients called “booty juice”). * He was later transferred to George Junior Republic, where medication was reduced, before his father Jon secured his release and custody. * Collin frames the institutionalization as retaliation for resisting filming and threatening Kate’s image/income, rather than solely for “special needs” or violent behavior as publicly described at the time. Kate’s Pushback Kate’s public response has been indirect, defensive of the medical/safety rationale for past decisions, and focused on mental-illness framing rather than a point-by-point denial of the book’s details. * Under a TikTok video, she replied to fans calling the claims “terrible lies” or offering support: “Thank you so much. I know rational logical ppl or anyone who has dealt with mental illness understands what’s go… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

    Women: “It's Not Torture if They're MY Kids!” (Kate Plus 8)
  4. 4d ago

    Midterms Became a Referendum on the Jooish Question ... & No One Cares?

    Join us today for a detailed discussion on the recent decision to end US military aid to Israel, including the political timing around the midterms, the factions involved in delaying the move, and its potential effects on long-term alliances. Malcolm and Simone conversation explore historical precedents from Jewish history, civilizational differences, and strategies for navigating shifting political landscapes. Their conversation also covers the broader context of foreign policy shifts, identity considerations, and future geopolitical alignments between the US and Israel. Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins:Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Funny thing, a while back on Basecamp, I requested something. I said, this is what we as Republicans should stand for, and a bunch of people called me antisemitic. They said, how dare you? Now you hate on Israel too? And yet, about at the stupidest possible time, Netanyahu decides to go along with my suggestion. And I had laid out why they should have done it. And if they had listened when I told them to do it, Israel and the American Jewish population would be in a lot better place than they are now. Because, unfortunately, for a lot of people, this last midterm election was a referendum on Jews. That’s the way a lot of people are taking it. And even with the concession of cutting the military aid to Israel, which I had suggested in the past and got massive pushback for, Despite the fact that it’s what Jewish conservatives in Israel have wanted for a long time, it’s what Netanyahu has directly said that he wanted to pursue for a long time, and it’s obviously in our best interest. The the group that was preventing us from doing this was American Jews, not Israeli Jews. The the political factions in control wanted to end this a while ago in Israel, and we’ll talk about why they wanted to end it. but those groups, the idiotic American Jews that kept this, you know, ADL or whatever, or said, oh, how how dare you? The types of people who yelled at me when I said we need to stop this. they unfortunately have created a very dangerous situation for, the potential of a long term American Israeli alliance going into the future. Speaker 5:And I wanna be clear about this because I said this was gonna happen regardless earlier, and I said you need to do it now. You need to do it now. And people said, oh, Malcolm, you’re being anti Semitic. Everyone who said that, you’re a threat to the Jewish people. You’re a threat to Jews because I was right and you were wrong. Okay? It did happen eventually, and it happened at the worst conceivable time. Malcolm Collins:So when I requested that this be cut off, it was right after the Gaza war had ended. I say, let’s frame this as a day one. Like, their enemies are in disarray right now. We don’t need to move ahead with this. And if the Trump administration had done it then when I said to do it, they would have faced significantly less pushback for getting into the Iran war because they would have just made what would seem like a pretty significant concession to the don’t do what is... Whatever it is real tells you to do faction of the Republican Party. if they had done it near the beginning of the Iran war, that would be fantastic. But what Trump ended up doing was doing it the literal day of the election after most people had voted on a Fox News call in when most people, most conservatives don’t even watch Fox News. Simone Collins:According to him, it had been he decided months ago. Malcolm Collins:If he had, then they’re idiots. now as to the timing of it, you can be like, yeah. Shouldn’t they have waited till after the midterms? Well, they couldn’t really. Like, okay. Let... Let’s go into the various things here. If you if you were looking at the polling around the election and everything like that, one thing was very clear. Okay? There was going to be a lot of Democrats coming into power. Not a big deal. We’re gonna have a weekend episode on the midterms. I I don’t I don’t see the midterm blowout as that big a deal. The the the branch that really mattered in The United States right now is the executive branch, and the judicial branch. and we’re pretty good on both of those fronts for now, and we were actually going to probably perform much less worse in the next election cycle if the Republicans had an iron clamp on the government going into that, it it it would look very bad. Basically, you never win after something like that. so we sort of needed to lose these elections to have a shot at the next election cycle. Simone Collins:Honestly, kind of the harder you lose, the better you are likely to be able to get a swing back of people being mad at the new establishment. Malcolm Collins:At the new establishment. Simone Collins:Mad at the new establishment if the new establishment isn’t your opposing force. Malcolm Collins:Yeah. But going into this, first of all, basically, whatever Jewish faction was preventing this from happening before given that Netanyahu’s wanted this to happen for a while, I think they read the writing on the wall. Right? Like, the Democrats have become an explicitly anti Semitic party at this point. And with, you know, many ties to, you know, saying globalizing infatata, for the river to the sea, regular democratic events. Like, these are explicit calls for genocide. And, you know, they can say, oh, well, you know, not not exact... That’s the stuff. Democrats have gone out and said, oh, well, you know, the the people in the in the Middle East who are fighting this, like, the the Muslims, they don’t they don’t want explicit genocide. And leaders of those movements have pushed back, they’ve been like, I mean, we do. Like, I... You don’t speak for us, you upper class white person. Like, don’t you don’t you speak for our movement? Don’t you speak for our people? But we’re we’re seeing this more and more. It’s becoming more and more like yeah, everybody knows this is this is the play these days. And, by the way, I... I’ll just note because this gets me so annoyed with the people who are like, well, not all Jews are pro Israel. And I’m like, yeah. And the ones who aren’t don’t really often have a long term vested interest in the Jewish people. Like, it’s these these upper class, you know, wealthy reformed Jews in Manhattan with, you know, one kid or whatever that have these perspectives. Because anyone who has looked at Jewish history knows that, like, when Jews are in a country that is a non Jewish minority country, they typically had pogrom... Like, the Holocaust wasn’t like a one off event. You know? And then pogrom were constant for the Jewish people, for pretty much all of their outside of Israel history. The... To to think that, like, why would they want a place that’s their own? Like, there’s there’s a reason why you would want this if you have a vested interest in the long term success of of of the Jewish people. So I get really annoyed when when people come at me like that. I’m like, okay. Well, apparently, I care more about the long term interest of the Jewish people than you if that’s what you’re coming at me with. Because... Or or you just have... You you can’t project... Because even right now in The United you’re seeing attacks on Jewish students in schools. It’s not right wingers who are lading these attacks. Everybody knows it. But on on this topic... And by the way, one of one of the reasons why people can be like, oh, Malcolm, why why do you see any sympathy? When I see somebody going out there and protesting on a campus, you know, from the river to the sea, I I know exactly what they think about straight white men as well. Not not very... Not a lot. You know? The the the Fair. The hate’s a high overlap there. Right? You know, common enemy and all that. As I’ve as I’ve pointed out with my Harry Potter analogy. Okay? Suppose you care about the spell curve or the amount of in in the wizarding world, this is the amount of magic you have. Because… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

  5. 5d ago

    Boomer Women Mortified By Dating Market

    Today on Based Camp we break down a Washington Post article on boomer women returning to dating after divorce. As it happens, dating markets aren’t just broken for young people! Through the article, we examine high divorce rates among seniors, common challenges like ghosting and mismatched expectations, and real stories from women navigating the modern scene. The discussion covers age gaps, political differences, scammers targeting older daters, and broader patterns in the relationship market for this generation. Show Notes Then this gem appeared in The Washington Post yesterday, October 27, 2026:“Boomer women are dating after divorce. Men don’t always meet their standards.” (Archive) by Shane O’Neill. Its subtitle is: “In the 1990s, baby boomer women set records for divorce. Thirty years later, how’s their love life?” The piece interviews older divorced women about returning to dating, including disappointments with men’s maturity, ghosting and flaking, political incompatibility, and men who are separated but haven’t actually divorced. One woman, Kristyne Haver, 69, describes 18 years of dating after her divorce. It isn’t uniformly bleak—there are successful connections, too—but underwhelmed by their dating experiences” is the overarching theme. Choice Quotes “High divorce rates among boomer women have continued after the 1990s. According to an analysis of U.S. Census data conducted by Bowling Green State University, the annual divorce rate among Americans 65 and older more than tripled between 1990 and 2023. Today, nearly 1 in 6 seniors is divorced.” “Kristyne Haver, 69, dated for 18 solid years after she got divorced. “I was dating or semi-dating that whole time,” Haver said from her office in Reading, Pennsylvania, where she works as a controller. “I’ve had some interesting situations.” For several years, she dated a dad in California who was separated from his wife but dragging his feet on getting divorced. On Facebook, she met another separated man in Missouri, but their online courtship ended when his wife started harassing her and her friends. She reconnected with a college boyfriend on LinkedIn who lived in Tampa, but ultimately decided that long-distance love wasn’t for her. “And of course, you get the younger guys looking for — what, a sugar mama or whatever?” Not that Haver was opposed to age gaps. Over the years, she dated several younger men, including a Russian 25 years her junior whom she met in the parking lot of a grocery store, where she found him admiring her Porsche Boxster. A month into the relationship, he casually mentioned that the last woman he dated paid him $1,000 a month. That’s when she implemented a new rule: “I said, ‘From now on, they have to have been born when Kennedy was shot.’”” On Politics “In 2019, after her 45th high school reunion in Iowa, Haver received an unexpected message from a high school friend. He had missed the reunion, but saw photos of her celebrating and reached out. “He, for some reason, just decided to look me up on Classmates.com of all places,” she said with a shudder. “Horrible, horrible site,” she said. The online user experience was bad, but the conversation was good. “I would get in great political discussions with him, because he was a dyed-in-the-wool Republican and I was as far from that as possible, especially now,” Haver said. They married four years ago. For other women we spoke to, political disagreement did not translate to romantic frisson. Pearson Brown, 63, recently ended a 10-year postdivorce relationship with a man over political differences. “I knew his politics were different than mine, and we never really discussed politics very much,” Brown said from her home in Warrenton, Virginia, where she works in pharmaceutical PR and advertising. “But as my primary partner, I’d say ‘Groceries are high’ or ‘Gas is [expensive]’ and it would become a political conversation. ‘Pass the salt’ became a political statement,” she said. In February of this year, it became too much. They went their separate ways. The experience changed the way she now approaches online dating. “Some people say, ‘No MAGA’ and I’m like, ‘Okay, fine,’” Brown said. “Before, I used to say, ‘I don’t like anybody saying “No something.”’ No fat, no smoke, whatever. But now I’m like, ‘Okay, I just saved myself some time.’”” On Unwillingness to Change ““At this point, I have my house, I have my own space, I have my life,” said Lacey Wootton, who retired from her job as a professor at American University in May 2025. “It sounds small and petty, but I don’t think it is: I have dinner when I want to have dinner, and if I want to watch something on TV, I do, or if I want to sit and read, I do,” Wootton, 66, said. “And I have closet space.” Wootton agreed she sounded a little like Carol Burnett, who once told Joan Rivers, “If I ever got married again, he would have to live next door.” She’s currently dating, and she’s enjoyed some relationships with men that have lasted a few months. But her standards are high for settling down. “If, by chance, I met someone who was really amazing, I would think about that compromise,” she said. “But I’m also not hunting.” Wootton divorced amicably from her husband when she was 50. “I was really scared of being alone,” Wootton said. But gradually, she acclimated to single life. Very well. Now, 16 years later, she’s never been happier. She volunteers, she goes to the theater, she reads voraciously, and she has a circle of friends who share her interests. When we spoke, she was hours away from flying to Scandinavia for a two-week adventure. She’s not interested in a romantic partner who can’t keep up. “Men age more than women, and I don’t want to be a 72-year-old nursemaid,” she said. Wootton has also found that age does not necessarily bring maturity. She’s been ghosted and flaked on more times than she can count. “Some of those habits that older people maybe ascribe to younger people in terms of digital behavior, our age group does it, too,” she said.” Scams The article also talks about older women dating online getting scammed: “Part of her coaching involves looking out for red flags like refusing to meet in person or on video, love bombing, and introducing financial discussions early in the relationship. Of course, safety is the most important concern when it comes to dating at any age.” More… Extreme Cases “Some seniors are wilder than others. For some boomers, the counterculture never straightened out and the sexual revolution never stopped revolving. “I can tell you, there are girls in their mid-80s who are still in circulation, right?” said Renée Imperato, 78, from her apartment in Manhattan. “They’re still bumping the hump, you hear me?” When she was in her 20s, Imperato mostly dated older men. That is no longer the case. “Sometimes younger people say, ‘Renée, you’re the queen, you’re our elder, where are all the other people in your age group?’” said the retired Air Force veteran and longtime transgender rights activist. “And you know what my answer is? One word: AIDS.” Imperato has been married four times and has dated people of many genders. These days she “predominantly” identifies as a trans lesbian. She has “T4T” tattooed on her neck, signaling her preference for dating other trans people. And she’s currently dating a couple several decades her junior. When we spoke, she was recovering from a foot injury and shingles. She refuses to let such things slow her down. “Listen, honey, as long as I can do what I can do, I’m going to do it until I can’t,” Imperato said.” Episode Transcript Simone Collins:Hello, Malcolm. I’m very glad to be speaking with you today because we’re back for another episode of webinar terrible bonus boomer edition. Oh my gosh. So excited. Malcolm Collins:This is on the glamorization of hag... Because I said hag maxing, Simone’s like, I’m a hag. I max it. This isn’t what we’re talking about. Simone Collins:This is an insult to the concept of hags because what we’re going to be talking about today i… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

    Boomer Women Mortified By Dating Market
  6. Nov 6

    I Was Wrong: P*rn Can Destroy Your Life

    Today on Based Camp, we explore how specific types of adult content (namely, sissy hypno) can influence personal identity and life choices over time. Drawing on research studies, first-person accounts from both those who transitioned and detransitioners, and real-world examples involving online creators, Malcolm highlights patterns in arousal pathways that appear more likely to lead to significant changes. Our conversation covers methodology used in certain online communities, the role of compulsive consumption and secrecy, and contrasts these with other categories that show fewer long-term risks. Malcolm also shares practical strategies for recognizing early signs and redirecting focus toward alternatives that support stable relationships and family goals. Also: Hat tip for Zouken for the funny comic, made with the RFab.ai comic creator! Episode Transcript Simone Collins [0:00]:Hello, Malcolm Collins [0:02]:Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today, we are going to be exploring the question of whether certain types of pornography can lead to gender disassociation And eventual gender transition. And this would be a major update for me because, generally, the approach I have taken to [bleep] is as long as it doesn’t involve real people, you know, you’re not supporting the OnlyFans industry. You’re not supporting the human sex worker industry. You’re not supporting any of that. I generally saw it as a protective thing because it was a way for kids to engage with arousal and their sexuality that didn’t put them in as much danger as as some of the other pathways. I now am significantly updating that after doing more research here Oh. To which I am going to update it to some arousal pathways are entirely safe to experiment with and play with. Other arousal pathways are very, very dangerous to explore. Simone Collins [1:07]:Including sissy hypno? Does sissy hypnos hypnotize you to Malcolm Collins [1:10]:become a sissy? That’s one of the things we’re gonna... I don’t I don’t think it... The main topic of this is gonna be sissy hypno, but it’s... It was really inspired for me more by thinking about the Amber Paradox situation and whether or not this is it... Because... And I try to think about it with as much empathy as possible. I feel really bad for him. I feel really bad that this happened to him. I do not think that he went into any of this with a malicious intent. and I feel like he sort of got trapped in it. And and part of it for me, if you look at this, you know, him questioning his gender identity and whether or not he’s trans and whether or not he wants to go down that pathway, I feel in a way... This isn’t the only YouTuber this has happened to. there was another YouTuber who, when he was younger, wanna say Freddie or something, he would dress up as a girl, like, once every month for, like, some streams. Some of the viewers got off on him dressing like a girl. Good. And so they did things to encourage him doing it more and more and more. And as he got into this girl mind space, he eventually decided he’s trans. Speaker 3 [2:12]:he originally presented this as a humorous gag and swore to be cisgendered, as time went on, the story took an odd turn as the streamers started hanging out with trans individuals who would eventually be accused of crimes against minors. On top of this, a wealthy donor started appearing in his chats offering him an ever increasing amount of money to fully embrace his female persona to the point that they legitimately offered $300,000 for Finster to get a breast augmentation surgery. Within five years, what started as a supposed goof was now the young British lad’s entire life. Presenting as a woman full time, getting intensive gender affirming surgery, struggling with alcohol abuse, and filming hardcore adult content for those willing to pay. Malcolm Collins [3:00]:And what we’ll be exploring here is the way that groups of guys... Because this is a fetish, and it is a fetish that we’ve we’ve had on our show. Well, we never aired the episode because the guy was really boring. But, like, the transvaccine community seems to... The guy who leads the transvaccine community, for people who do not know, is a cis male. Speaker 14 [3:19]:This is a community dedicated to try to convince incels that their life will be easier if they just become a woman. Even if they are an uglier or whatever woman, because they are trans, it’s still easier than being a male incel, which is a compelling argument to a lot of young guys online. what really... When I first heard it, it sounds like, yeah. That makes sense. And then I learned that the community is run, and the manifesto trying to convince people to transition is run by somebody who didn’t transition themselves And that’s when I was like, oh, this is a fetish thing. Malcolm Collins [3:52]:And if you look at the trans vaccine manifesto, it is very clearly written by somebody who gets turned on by the idea of convincing guys to transition. We also saw this really clearly with the giggling Gooner clown files, but those aren’t the only instances. Turkey Tom Giggly Goon Clown Files [4:09]:A year later, the boy joined Tumblr to participate in fish communities. This exposed him to sissy hypnosis Yet, there was still a sense of shame as he attempted to quit masturbating several times. Before I was 17, I would delete all my, like, once every few months in a no fat fit, trying to get my life back together. And I would just come back over and over. That all changed one fateful night when he finally gave in. Speaker 30 [4:31]:And I’d point out here even with the giggling Gooner files, you see an association between intense feelings of shame around pornography consumption and going off and becoming a full. These two things are very closely linked to each other. And if you don’t accept that shame in the beginning, you appear to, other episodes on this, have less of a chance of going off the deep end. Turkey Tom Giggly Goon Clown Files [4:59]:I remember going outside completely naked except for my shoes at around 3AM. Eventually, I came, I shouted quite loudly, hell Satan. This wasn’t something I planned beforehand. It just happened in the heat of the moment. The first excerpt comes from DMs Every single trans girl is a horrible pervert to some extent. I haven’t ever heard of one who isn’t. I should become a t slur too just to pile on. And women don’t feel safe around you, dude. They just know they’ll be canceled if they don’t act that way. God. every t slur finds out one way or the other. All it took was for you to realize sexual predator equals t slur. OMG, I love pretending to be a girl. I don’t care if it’s predatory or whatever. Don’t blow up our spot, bro. All tslers are like that. You can trust me around your kid, it’d be transphobic not to. Me with daycare tots. Jack broke up with his girlfriend, was on estrogen, and had an OnlyFans. Orion was the manager of said OnlyFans, coursing him every step of the way. This is apparent by how he talked about him to others. Has he started hormones yet? Yes, but not effectively. I guess it’s what you’d expect just telling a... Or to buy hormones. They bought estrogen but no anti androgen. It would have been more fun if he started hormone blockers at like 12. Isn’t that true for everyone? Don’t worry. I’ll make him into a good girl. here they are praising an infographic It’s genuinely really good grooming advice. On 04/04/2023, postcard reveals he’s in contact with four minors aged nine to 13. I’ve so far sent it to four minors between the ages of nine and 13. I hope it encourages them to transition. He gloated about actively grooming them weeks later through EPI. Can you send me furry HMVs? Any Useni will be forwarded directly to a minor. Malcolm Collins [6:29]:Right? Like, this is not that unusual of a fetish, actually. And so I look at these communities and look for the methodology that they’ve been using to effectively transition people. And, essentially, wha… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

  7. Nov 5

    Zoomers Yearn for the Empire: Why?

    Today on Based Camp we break down the delightful Anakin Skywalker memes sweeping social media, especially among young men. We explore why the prequel trilogy resonates as a critique of bureaucracy, institutional failure, and generational divides, with the Empire positioned as an aspirational alternative. Our chat examines themes of loyalty, competence, and long-term visions for human civilization through a Star Wars lens, covering historical parallels from old MTV segments, deeper cultural shifts toward rebuilding institutions, and Malcolm’s own sci-fi universe in the upcoming game Broodfall (which we would love for you to wishlist on Steam!). Show Notes The Premise Elon Musk: This is what they stole from us Makes sense, seeing as, like Anakin, they find themselves shackled by an ossified bureaucracy that stifles him and fails to defend the people he loves. The Jokes The jokes are hilarious: * Sir Doge of the Coin: My politics in 2020 // My politics now * Colonel Otaju Gatekeeper: The Sand People gave us Curry & Kebabs Anakin * Joel Webbon: “But we won WWII, Anakin!” “It doesn’t look like won.” * Thaulos: ““Jar-Jar Binks is just as intelligent as you Anakin, he just needs proper education”” The Padme Commentary There’s even Padme commentary: * Milena Z: “Had Padme used her female intuition and been a supportive wife, she would’ve told Anakin to get rid of both the jedi and that manipulative backstabbing creep Palpatine so they could rule the galaxy together.” * Joel Webbon: Padme didn’t die from a broken neck from Anakin. She died from a broken heart because Anakin turned out to not support gay race communism. She epitomizes the liberal woman who chooses ideology over her own marriage and family. Jokes aside, this is deeper than what many would assume on the surface—it’s part of a much longer-term shift in youth sentiment that hints at what the long-term future of human civilization may look like, so let’s get into it. The Discourse Some choice posts on X: Why Zoomers Relate * Modern Vitalist: From the Zoomer perspective the Jedi are evil Anakin was born of a Virgin, conceived by the Force, the Jedi Council knew he was the Chosen One.. Yet still, they rejected him… Why? Because he was more powerful than them Imagine they had loved him, trusted him, and recognized his Divine Destiny Instead they: -forbid him to reproduce -allowed his mother to be sold into slavery and viscously murdered by “sand people” -watched the Democratic Process of the Republic evolve into a powerless stalemate -traded Ancient Prophecy in favor of a modern interpretation thereby mocking the very Tradition they claimed to protect They got what they deserved. Long live the Empire. Hail Lord Vader * Rich:Extremely talented and competent white man being lectured by a diverse cast of DEI hires who are objectively inferior to his skill and power at this point in his life. Yet he’s locked out of pursuing a greater destiny by a geriatric bureaucracy with rules even it doesn’t seem to understand why it enforces anymore. Windu aggressively telling Anakin to “take a seat” as if he could force the superior Skywalker to do anything he didn’t want to do. The Council talks down to him because of some arbitrary organizational title they give each other - again, all while being inferior to him. The Council, standing for peace and progress, stood in the way of both. It’s no wonder Anakin would turn his back on this organization and why it’s so relatable to young men in this society. * Adeptus Liberatus: In his first meeting with the Jedi Council, Anakin is asked if his “thoughts dwell with his mother.” To this, Anakin responds, “I miss her.” Keep in mind Anakin is a child who has just been separated from his mother for presumably the first time and is now on an entirely different planet. He expresses one of the most basic and human emotions a boy could express in that moment. Within 30 seconds, Yoda is telling him he is full of fear and on the path to the Dark Side. Fast forward to Episode 2. Anakin wants to save his mother from slavery after promising her in Episode 1 as a little boy he would come back and free her. It would be very easy to do. He’s served and learned under the Jedi for 10 years, and despite his hotheadedness and youthful mistakes, he remains loyal. What do the Jedi do? They let his mother die at the hands of alien savages. He has to witness her dying moments. Yeah, but sure, Anakin is weak. Oh yeah, and how did Luke wreck Vader btw? Vader threatened to turn Leia to the Dark Side which enrages Luke. Luke defeats Vader in a fit of pure, unadulterated, white hot rage. There’s no stoic virtuee in Luke during the final seconds of his duel with Vader. It’s the most belligerent and furious we ever see Luke across all three movies. Finally, you cannot call Anakin weak and claim to understand the story. Anakin is true identity: it’s the boy who loves his mother, the young man who fell in love with Padme, the student who trained under Obi Wan, the prodigy pod racer, the Chosen One. That identity was destroyed by the very order that he fought for and was loyal to until it broke him for their corrupt purposes. The Boomer Jedi view of the world will die and we are going to win. The Leftist Hate * Tons point to the “killing kids” thing * Dalton Pruitt: “I can explain the Anakin thing. Right wingers are really f*****g stupid.” * S. Foster: “Anakin was the epitome of weak men creating hard times.” * Project Liberal: “Anakin was gaslit and manipulated by people smarter than him. So this makes perfect sense actually.” This is Not New In a 2005 episode of MTV True Life there’s a disaffected 20-something young man whose boomer dad spends “too much time playing with toys” and who loves 2:25: Dad’s caught up in this whole Jedi Knight thing (timestamped) And ultimately they go to a convention together Jump forward to some cuts where they show the son clapping when fans in Imperial cosplay get engaged and the son wonders why “they don’t have more of those” referring to USA flag stormtroopers: (timestamped) And he goes on to saying how he’s more pulled to the dark side and he says he wants to be stormtrooper. Then he tries on armor and his dad is legit disappointed and insistent that he’ll convert him: (timestamped) Analysis and Larger Meaning An Outsider’s Analysis Katherine Dee’s take: “why now, why these images? What happened to the, well, meme-ier, more 4chan-feeling stuff?” Her two theories: “The Online Right has been mined by a lot of different interest groups — podcasters, hipsters, people like myself looking to grow their TikTok followings, Elon Musk, the government itself, Boomers who run think tanks, et al. This caused a sort of “Eternal September” of the e-right, that is, opened the floodgates for new people. Fandom of this type is the lingua franca of the everyman. In other words: demographic shift. It’s some kind of pre-midterms op. The Powers That Be fully believe in meme-magick post-Trump, see: Ron DeSantis, the shameful way our administration tweets. The problem is that the secret is out. It’s not going to work anymore. I have a whole convoluted theory about how the magic of the Internet has been drained; magic phenomena doesn’t like to be seen or controlled or explained in the way people are trying to.” What I think Katherine Dee is missing is this isn’t people supporting the establishment right or some vague form of the right, it’s people who want and fully intend to build a new world order. Analysis from the Inside In Tom Foe’s coverage of this (Anakin Was Right About Democracy), he agrees that: * Anakin serves as a symbol of frustrated young masculinity (complete with awkwardness i.e. Anakin saying: “I don’t like sand.” to Padme—arguing that the awkward lines are more relatable than they are poorly written) * The Star Wars prequels are an indictment of the democratic establishment * Security and personal loyalty take precedence over democratic principles He also: * defends Anakin’s massacre of the Tusken Raiders as vengeance for his mother and draws an analo… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

  8. Nov 4

    ‘How To Trans Without Mom Knowing’ Letter Sent to 4.2M Kids

    A large-scale mailing of a Texas transgender and LGBTQ student resource guide reached households across the state right as early voting began for the midterms. The envelope listed a nonexistent return address and pointed recipients to groups and programs for support outside the family, including emancipation details and out of state care options. Intriguing, right? In this episode of Based Camp, we examine the competing claims about who created and distributed the materials, review the pamphlet contents, and cover new reporting on networks that help families access transition related services despite state restrictions through telehealth and alternative medical coding. Ultimately, who sent the Texas mailer is less important to us than the fact that many far-left movements now operate underground, below the radar, meaning that the most important counteraction involves shedding light on their agenda and actions. Show Notes What Was Sent Out A large-scale mailing of “Texas Trans & LGBTQ+ Student Resource Guide” pamphlets has hit Texas households (addressed to “Students Of The [Family Name] Family”) as early voting opened for the November 3, 2026 midterms. * Recipients were across Texas, including the Dallas-Fort Worth area, Houston region, San Antonio, the Texas Panhandle, Texarkana, and Southeast Texas * The sender is listed as the Texas Transgender Student Union with a return address of 1611 W. Airport Blvd., Suite 123, Meadows Place, TX 77477— * an address that does not exist (it is close to a real UPS Store mailbox address associated with other groups). * The materials have sparked outrage, investigations, and speculation that they are a political dirty trick timed to the election. What the Mailer Says It is a glossy fold-out brochure. The cover reads “TEXAS TRANS & LGBTQ+ STUDENT RESOURCE GUIDE,” shows clasped hands against pink/blue graphics, and states: “You are not alone. There are people in Texas who will help you find support.” Key sections (drawn from photos and reporting) include: * If you are “trans, nonbinary, or questioning and your family, school, or community isn’t supportive”: “YOU DON’T HAVE TO FIGURE EVERYTHING OUT BY YOURSELF.” It positions itself as a starting point for supportive people, youth programs, legal information, and community, with a note that laws change quickly. * “WHAT TO DO IF YOUR PARENTS DON’T SUPPORT YOU”: “First: You deserve support even if your parents don’t understand or agree with you.” It advises finding a “safe adult” (trusted teacher, counselor, relative, friend’s parent, therapist, or youth organization staff member) and contacting groups including TENT (transtexas.org), OutYouth, Montrose Center/Hatch, and Resource Center Dallas. * Emancipation: “WHAT IF I WANT TO BE EMANCIPATED?” It outlines Texas law allowing minors to petition if they are 17, or at least 16 and living separately, self-supporting, managing their own financial affairs, and if the court finds it in the minor’s best interest. It links to Texas Law Help. * Hormones/gender-affirming care: Advises finding a trusted organization rather than trying to obtain medication yourself, so they can explain current Texas rules (which ban hormone treatment for gender dysphoria in minors) and connect to legal, healthcare, and support resources. * Out-of-state care: Notes that for those under 18, parental consent, custody, and the laws of both states matter; it recommends talking to a legal organization first (linking TENT, Lambda Legal, and ACLU of Texas). * It promotes TENT’s “Trans Texas Takeover” Fall Tour with dates and locations (McAllen, Lubbock, Amarillo, Austin, Houston, Fort Worth, Dallas, Tyler, etc.). * Closing panel (“ONE FINAL THING”): “You don’t need to have everything figured out. You don’t have to know whether you’re definitely trans. You don’t have to decide about hormones or surgery right now. You don’t have to convince your parents. Your job right now is to stay safe, find people who will listen to you, and give yourself time to figure out who you are. … Even if your family doesn’t accept you as you are, groups like these are ready to become your found family.” It heavily features TENT branding, websites, QR codes, and resources, plus mentions of other groups. The Accused “Trans Union” / TENT’s Response * There is no legitimate, preexisting Texas organization called the Texas Transgender Student Union. * The real group repeatedly named and linked is the Transgender Education Network of Texas (TENT), a statewide trans-led advocacy organization (active since around 2010) that provides education, resources, and advocacy on issues such as schools, bathrooms, bullying, and Texas laws affecting transgender people. * TENT has repeatedly and strongly denied any involvement. * Its statement (posted on its website around October 17) says: * “We are aware of text messages and now physical mailers that have been circulated concerning TENT that appear to have been issued by or on behalf of the organization. These text messages and mailers were not authored, authorized, approved, or distributed by TENT and are not affiliated with our organization. The texts do not represent the official position or communications of the organization.” * It has described the materials as impersonations, faced online hate and threats of violence, locked down much of its website (in some reports to a single statement page), paused or adjusted its statewide tour for safety, and sent cease-and-desist letters related to unauthorized texts. * Other groups named (including OutYouth) have also denied involvement * Some temporarily closed spaces due to backlash. * TENT is sought a court order to compel information from the LLC and messaging providers to identify the sender before Election Day. * Its attorney has called the campaign “dirty, unethical tricks” timed to early voting. Does the mailer reflect TENT’s views? * TENT says no—the materials do not represent its official position and were not authorized by it. * Its own publicly available resources focus more on navigating existing Texas restrictions (e.g., bathrooms, school policies, parental rights laws) and support for families than on guiding minors toward emancipation or certain forms of advice against parental involvement. * Critics (including some conservative outlets and commentators) argue the messaging is consistent with broader themes in some transgender advocacy materials (support networks outside the family, resources for care, minimizing parental gatekeeping). * The mailer explicitly directs readers to TENT and promotes its tour. Also, it’s plain wrong for pro-trans groups to pretend that they’re not creating an underground railway for gender transition * City Journal recently released the findings of an undercover investigation by Christina Buttons in an article titled: “Inside the Network Helping Families Evade Bans on Pediatric Gender-Transition Treatments” * The article details the work of an alleged a nonprofit-led network that helps families access gender-transition treatment for minors despite state bans * It also reports that some participating clinics go beyond arranging lawful out-of-state care to discuss potentially unlawful workarounds * Detail from Christina’s findings * The central organization is the Campaign for Southern Equality (CSE). Its Trans Youth Emergency Project connects families with providers and helps cover travel and treatment costs. According to the article, it works with more than 130 partners and has provided over $1 million in travel grants to more than 1,200 families. Grants typically amount to $500, potentially available four times annually. * Christina posed as a parent seeking care for a fictional 11-year-old in Tennessee who had recently begun identifying as nonbinary and had not undergone a professional evaluation. * A collaborator posed as an Idaho parent seeking testosterone and chest surgery for a 16-year-old. * CSE staff offered referrals and financial assistance; the reporters did not accept money * Some clinic representatives reportedly discussed using general “endocrine d… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit basedcamppodcast.substack.com/subscribe

    ‘How To Trans Without Mom Knowing’ Letter Sent to 4.2M Kids
4.3
out of 5
162 Ratings

About

Based Camp is a podcast focused on how humans process the world around them and the future of our species. That means we go into everything from human sexuality, to weird sub-cultures, dating markets, philosophy, and politics. Malcolm and Simone are a husband wife team of a neuroscientist and marketer turned entrepreneurs and authors. With graduate degrees from Stanford and Cambridge under their belts as well as five bestselling books, one of which topped out the WSJs nonfiction list, they are widely known (if infamous) intellectuals / provocateurs. If you want to dig into their ideas further or check citations on points they bring up check out their book series. Note: They all sell for a dollar or so and the money made from them goes to charity. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG basedcamppodcast.substack.com

You Might Also Like