Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Based Camp is a podcast focused on how humans process the world around them and the future of our species. That means we go into everything from human sexuality, to weird sub-cultures, dating markets, philosophy, and politics. Malcolm and Simone are a husband wife team of a neuroscientist and marketer turned entrepreneurs and authors. With graduate degrees from Stanford and Cambridge under their belts as well as five bestselling books, one of which topped out the WSJs nonfiction list, they are widely known (if infamous) intellectuals / provocateurs. If you want to dig into their ideas further or check citations on points they bring up check out their book series. Note: They all sell for a dollar or so and the money made from them goes to charity. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG basedcamppodcast.substack.com

  1. 1d ago

    Analyzing the Theories of Professor Jiang (The Intellectual’s Candace Owens?)

    In this Based Camp episode, Malcolm and Simone Collins dive deep into the phenomenon of Professor Jiang (Jiang Qujin) — the Chinese-born educator turned geopolitical “oracle” with 2M+ YouTube subscribers. Is he a modern Nostradamus using psychohistory and game theory, or highbrow conspiracy slop for midwits? We break down his biggest theories: Illuminati coalitions of Freemasons, Jesuits, and Sabbatean Frankists engineering Western decline, Pax Judaica / Greater Israel, ritual child sacrifice in Gaza, secret societies controlling the world, and his mystical AI predictions. Malcolm delivers sharp historical corrections on Sabbateanism, Frankism, Jesuits, and Freemasons, while questioning if Jiang is a CCP-adjacent narrative pusher. Is he Candace Owens for pseudointellectuals? A sophisticated propaganda op? Or just a compelling midwit prophet? We also compare him to Whatifalthist (Rudyard), Peter Zeihan, and more. Join the conversation in the comments — are you Team Jiang or Team Collins? Show Notes Based Camp listeners keep asking us to talk about Professor Jiang, which is difficult, as we see his content to be oppressively boring, bordering on being impossible to consume, but to stop the requests, we’ll relent. How did a Chinese-born man who immigrated to Canada with a BA in English literature suddenly accrue over 2 million YouTube subscribers, the #1 world politics substack (with 44K subscribers in six months) and fame for being a geopolitical oracle and war forecaster? Fan site: https://jiangpredictions.com (“This is an independent fan project tracking predictions for educational and analytical purposes. We are not affiliated with or speaking on behalf of Professor Jiang.”) Is he just a version of Candace Owens for people who like to fancy themselves as a little more highbrow and clever (which is to say, is his success just a result of conspiracy-brained people online flocking to conspiracy slop), or is there are more concerted force pushing forward his content? Who is Professor Jiang? * Jiang Xueqin (江学勤, born 1976) is a Chinese‑Canadian who originally trained in English literature and spent much of his career as a teacher and education reformer in China. * In the 2000s and 2010s he worked on Chinese education reform, taught in various schools, and briefly edited for the New York Times’ China operation; he has also been associated as a researcher with Harvard’s Global Education Innovation Initiative. * Since 2022 he has taught at Moonshot Academy, a private high school in Beijing, and he is not a university professor despite the “Professor” branding. * In 2024 he launched the YouTube channel and podcast “Predictive History,” where he gives longform lectures on geopolitics, history and “structural” analysis, claiming to use game theory and Asimov‑style “psychohistory” to forecast world events. * He gained large international attention after correctly predicting Donald Trump’s 2024 re‑election and a U.S.–Iran war, leading some media to dub him “China’s Nostradamus” and bookers to put him on major Western podcasts. Jiang’s Reputation Several mainstream outlets and experts describe Jiang as a conspiracy theorist because many of his claims rely on hidden cabals and quasi‑mystical frameworks rather than conventional evidence‑based analysis * A profile in The Free Press explicitly labels him a conspiracy theorist and highlights his belief that a coalition of Freemasons, Jesuits and followers of the Sabbatean Jewish sect (an 17th‑century messianic movement) is plotting to rule the world from Jerusalem * The South China Morning Post notes that his lectures sometimes “veer into well‑trodden conspiracy theories on shadowy secret societies,” especially in a lecture titled “Pax Judaica” in his “Secret History” series. Jiang’s Conspiracy Theories Major Conspiracy Themes Attributed to Him From critical coverage and academic/media commentary, the main conspiracy themes associated with Jiang include: * Illuminati / Freemasons / Jesuits / Sabbateans * Jiang advances a meta‑conspiracy in which an “Illuminati” composed of Freemasons, Jesuits, and Sabbatean Jews, who allegedly manipulate Western institutions and ultimately aim to control the world from Jerusalem. (The FP covered this) * In his “Pax Judaica” lecture, critics say Jiang argues that after the U.S. is forced out of the Middle East, this Illuminati‑type network will dominate global power from a Greater Israel centered on Jerusalem. (from that South China Morning Post article referenced above) * IN HIS OWN WORDS * On the Illuminati as a coalition (from a Breaking Points interview, widely clipped): * “If you look at the Epstein files it’s clear that we are run by secret societies. You can call them Illuminati. And the Illuminati are composed of three major groups, okay? You have the Jesuits who control the Vatican. You have the Sabbatean Frankists who control the modern Israel today. You have the Freemasons which control the national security apparatus of the United States.”He adds that they see conflicts like those in the Middle East as key to “End Times” prophecies for creating “heaven on Earth.” * On origins and structure (from Secret History lectures): * He describes the Illuminati as emerging from alliances like former Jesuits (e.g., Adam Weishaupt) and others infiltrating Freemasons: * “What they will do together is create a new organization called the Illuminati. ... The Illuminati was able to penetrate the Freemasons.” * In another lecture: “Templars who became the Freemasons who then became the Illuminati who control...” (linking to broader historical continuity and goals like a one-world government in Jerusalem). * On Freemasonry and related groups: * He discusses the “33 grades of Scottish Rite Freemasonry,” noting that lower levels emphasize being a “good person” while higher ones involve deeper power structures. He ties Freemasonry to figures like Buzz Aldrin and historical influences on U.S. institutions.He also covers their “eschatological vision” of a one-world government based in Jerusalem. * On Sabbatean Frankists: * He has dedicated talks on how “the Sabbatean Frankists came to conquer the world,” linking Jacob Frank’s movement to broader secret society networks, including infiltration of Jesuits and alliances forming the Illuminati. * “Pax Judaica” and Greater Israel * According to reports, Jiang claims that the long‑term plan of these elites is to engineer a new world order where a Greater Israel replaces American hegemony, with Jerusalem as the seat of global governance. * Commentators describe this as echoing classic “New World Order” and antisemitic conspiracy tropes, repackaged in high‑concept geopolitical language. * IN HIS OWN WORDS * On Greater Israel and its biblical/eschatological roots (from interviews and lectures, e.g., shared in clips and transcripts): * “And so what will happen is then that Israel will achieve the Greater Israel project. The Israelis believe that the Middle East was promised to their ancestor Abraham by Yahweh their God. If you look at a map of the Greater Israel project it extends from the Nile to Euphrates. It encompasses Lebanon, Syria, parts of Turkey, and parts of Saudi Arabia and parts of Egypt. ... And then Israel will establish something called the Pax Judaica. A Pax Judaica is really the empire... a trading empire, financial empire, a technological empire based in Jerusalem and they see it as fulfillment of biblical prophecy.” * Defining Pax Judaica in context of empire transition (from Game Theory #16 and related talks): * “So what does the Greater Israel project mean? Well, it means control of [oil, trade, and technology].” (Framing it as Israel inheriting and expanding U.S. regional dominance amid American decline.) * He describes the process: U.S. forces get drawn into costly conflicts (e.g., with Iran), leading to withdrawal, allowing Israel to become the hegemon. “The moment the American Empire dies, the Empire of Israel is born.” Pax Judaica involves Israel leveraging chaos for dominance, inheriting military assets/infrastructure, and establishing a new order often tied to secret society goals. * https://jiangpredictions.com/pax-judaica * From the Secret History finale (Pax Judaica lecture): * Jiang explains “how and why Pax Judaica will come to rule the world,” linking it to historical patterns, secret societies (Jesuits, Freemasons, Sabbateans), and end-times visions. He notes that once established, it may become “arrogant, obvious, narrow-minded, insular” and ultimately vulnerable. Clips reference control via chaos: “Pax Judea... will start to control the world because through chaos...” * Broader strategic view: * “Pax Judaica is not about Israel or the Greater Israel project. What it is ultimately is an alliance of transnational capital...” (Positioning it as a shift in global power structures beyond mere territory.) * In game theory terms, he argues Israel benefits most from U.S.-Iran conflict, using determination and alliances to fill the vacuum * His posts are mostly promotional, linking to the lectures rather than long original text. Examples: * Sharing the Pax Judaica finale: “The Grand Finale! My talk on Pax Judaica...” (Dec 2025). * Debating outcomes: “Will Pax Judaica or GCC control the Middle East?” (Jan 2026). * Ritual sacrifice and the Gaza war * Yang Meng and others say Jiang has suggested that actions during the Gaza war amount to “ritual child sacrifice,” linking real‑world conflict to occult or sacrificial practices attributed to Israel or Jewish‑adjacent elites. * The FP argues this crosses from controversial political commentary into demonizing conspiracy narratives about Jews and Israel. * Key Quotes in His Own Words * Core statement on Gaza as ritual sacrifice (from Secret History #4 and wid

    1h 42m
  2. Christianity Was Never a Religion of "Peace" — Forgetting That Is Killing Us

    2d ago

    Christianity Was Never a Religion of "Peace" — Forgetting That Is Killing Us

    In this explosive Based Camp episode, Malcolm & Simone Collins dive deep into one of the most uncomfortable topics in Christianity: the Biblical commands to kill infants and civilians during conquest — and why they might actually reflect a coherent (if brutal) longtermist moral framework. From 1 Samuel 15 and the total destruction of the Amalekites, to Deuteronomy’s rules for Canaanite cities, to Jesus’ teachings on mercy — Malcolm argues that modern “peace at all costs” Christianity has cherry-picked the Bible and is actively destroying Western civilization. They explore how true Biblical mercy often looks like decisive action, not endless tolerance of predators and parasites. This is a raw, unfiltered discussion about civilizational morality, the dangers of naive pacifism, and what “love your enemies” actually meant in context. Tract 12: Sociatal Morality & A Genocidal God [00:00:00] Malcolm Collins: Hello Simone, I’m excited to be talking to you today. Today we are going to be digging into morality as the Bible and Christian faith relate to it. Because I am getting really sick of all of these Christians out there that we see within like the wider Christian media influencer ecosystem talking about how Christianity is like the religion of peace and we need to always be peaceful. And if you’re going to, for example make a blanket rule against dropping bombs on schools in a warfare scenario, then all of a sudden terrorists are going to put their headquarters under schools and make society net negative for children. Simone Collins: Oh, you’re not, you, this is purely hypothetical of course. Malcolm Collins: Yeah. If, if at a, a societal level, right, we did something like just always gave out food whenever somebody was hungry you would have groups begin to evolve or [00:01:00] move in close to you that evolve entirely predatory off of this, right? And somebody could be like, “Well, maybe the Bible didn’t predict all of these things, or didn’t really think through difficult moral decisions.” And the reality is is that’s not true at all. The Bible all over the place has God telling people to kill infants. And so we are going to go, because I think that this is one of the clearest, I mean, I could go into the instances where God’s like laying out the rules for selling your daughters into slavery or rules on how to treat slaves. But in this episode, that we’re gonna go more on in the next one, ‘cause this is gonna be a bit of a two-parter. But on this one we’re going to go deeper into specifically where, why, and when does God say it’s okay to kill infants? Because I think it’s through these scenarios we can get a broader understanding of how Christianity should [00:02:00] understand morality. Speaker 6: You know, maybe I was wrong about this pacifism thing. Speaker 8: Are you insane? Pacifism works like a charm as long as you button it. Malcolm Collins: Right? Simone Collins: Isn’t it broadly understood, though, that one of the reasons Christianity got so much early adoption in the in the Roman Empire was because the Christians didn’t kill the babies, and people kinda liked that. Like especially women. Malcolm Collins: Did, yeah. And so what I’ll also point out is I do not, I think that there was a period of history where Christianity was meant to be understood as this ultra-peacenic religion because that helped it grow. We’ve done an episode where we look at the morality of early Christians and show that them being willing to help each other during times of plague, them not killing their infants th- this helped their population grow at a significantly larger rate than pagan populations and lowered the persecution that they might have otherwise gotten during their period of growth. But once they were the dominant religion within regions- At first, they kept their [00:03:00] warlike nature. You know, they would still go and do crusades. They would still punish the infidel you know, still seek out witches in their community, stuff like this. But parts of the Bible began to be emphasized more than other parts over time until the religion became unrecognizable and a net negative in the way it was being practiced. So to go back to this we’ve got... And this one is the clearest, so I’m gonna go the longest on it. Samuel 15:2-3. It says, “ Thus says the Lord of hosts: ‘I have noted what Amalek did to Israel in opposing them on the way when they came out of Egypt.’” Now, note this would have happened hundreds of years before God is talking about this. So this is something that a people did hundreds of years ago. None of the people who actually did this negative thing to Israel would have still been among the Amaleks, okay? “Now go and strike Amalek and devote to destruction all that they have. Do not spare them, but kill them, both man and woman, [00:04:00] child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.” And there’s some different translations for infant here. We have suckling basically mean a child while it’s still surviving on breast milk. So you can’t be like, “Well, maybe they’re talking about older children here or something.” This is the- the word that’s used here means that. And you could say, okay, maybe something was lost in translation here, and God didn’t really mean, “No, you gotta kill everyone when you take this territory.” Speaker: And note here, people who want to say the Bible says thou shall not kill, it doesn’t say that. It doesn’t say that anywhere. It says that you’re not supposed to murder. Murder in Jewish law is very different from a generic killing. I didn’t mention this in the episode because I assumed it was obvious for people with like baseline biblical knowledge, but probably worth mentioning Malcolm Collins: Okay? So what then happens in Samuel 15:7-9, all right? “And Samuel defeated the Amaleks, and from Havilah as far as Shur, [00:05:00] which is to the east of Egypt. And he took Agag and the king of the Amaleks alive, and devoted destruction all the people with the edge of the sword. But Saul and the people spared Agag and the best sheep and the best oxen and fattened calves and lambs, and all that was good, and would not utterly destroy them. All that was despised and worthless they devoted to destruction.” Okay? So, what did God do about this, right? And the word of the Lord came to Samuel, this is Samuel 15:10 through 23, “I regret that I have made Saul king, for he has turned his back from following me and has not performed my commandments.” And Samuel was angry, and he cried to the Lord all night, dot, dot, dot. “And the Lord sent you on a mission,” he said, “Go and devote to destruction all the sinners, the Amaleks, and fight against them until they are consumed. Why then did you not obey the voice of your Lord? Why did you pronounce on the [00:06:00] spoil and do what was evil even in the sight of the Lord?” And then dot, dot, dot here. , And then response, “Because you have rejected the word of the Lord, he has also rejected you being king.” So if it was unclear what happened there, so I’ll just lay it out for you. Did you catch what he did wrong? Simone Collins: He didn’t kill them all? Malcolm Collins: He didn’t kill one person, the king- Yeah ... and some of the sheep and oxen. Simone Collins: Yeah, he was supposed to kill them all. Malcolm Collins: Now, the, a, he killed all of the infants. He killed Simone Collins: all the- No, but that’s not all of them ... Malcolm Collins: but that’s not all of them. Simone Collins: All of them. Malcolm Collins: All of them. And, Simone Collins: God, what is up, dude? Malcolm Collins: Here, the demons- This Simone Collins: is the whole demon, “I killed, I killed goblins.” Malcolm Collins: Yeah, okay, very, very similar to that, which Simone Collins: is why- Was that just, were they just, were they just trying to reenact the Bible there with the whole, like, goblin baby killing scene? Were they trying to be like... Speaker 4: [00:07:00] Then to show them mercy faces to the light of day Malcolm Collins: I will say that this is the morality the Bible teaches us. The morality of that scene in Goblin Slayer is essentially the morality the Bible teaches us, and we’re gonna point out, [00:08:00] ‘cause people can be like, “Oh, well, when Jesus came, all of these older stories are revoked,” right? Like, they don’t matter anymore. This is not the God we’re dealing with anymore. I’m gonna point out, no, Jesus makes it very clear all of this stuff holds. Well, we’re gonna point out that God’s mercy, when we understand mercy through the eyes of what God means by mercy- Mercy right, because we’re constantly told God is merciful- Simone Collins: Mm-hmm ... Malcolm Collins: and then you’re kicked out for being king because you didn’t kill them all, right? You know, like, clearly if we’re defining mercy through whatever trait God has, it’s not this standard human definition of mercy, right? So when we’re commanded to be merciful that does not undermine the... And handle it when you’re conquering a territory, right? So we’re gonna go into that. And I’ll note here, people will be like, “Well, like, God matured or something between the Old and the New Testament.” Mm-hmm. And I’m gonna say, no, no, no, no, no. The reason the rules that we are given and what’s asked of God is changed in between these two contexts- Simone Collins: Uh-huh Malcolm Collins: is that, [00:09:00] humanity changed. Civilization changed. So the rules that God gave us to help civilization advance- Oh ... are different in the different contexts. But it’s not that the older rules are no longer relevant or something we should be listening to or taking into understanding in warfare, in civilizational conflicts. Hmm. So I wanna continue here to point out for people who are like, “Well, maybe this, this Amalek peo

    58 min
  3. Terrorists & Crime Lords Discover Gig Work (Immediately Build Child Army)

    3d ago

    Terrorists & Crime Lords Discover Gig Work (Immediately Build Child Army)

    In this eye-opening episode of Based Camp, Simone and Malcolm Collins dive deep into the disturbing new reality of modern organized crime. From Iraqi crime syndicates in Australia using Signal and WhatsApp to recruit teenagers for firebombings and extortion, to Mexican cartels (Sinaloa, CJNG) recruiting kids via Fortnite, GTA V, and Call of Duty, this episode exposes how gig-economy crime, encrypted apps, and gaming platforms are transforming criminal operations. They discuss how minors (as young as 11) are being lured with small payments, status, and “missions,” why this model is so effective, real-world cases, terrorist virtual plotting by ISIS, darknet crime-as-a-service, and law enforcement stings like Operation Trojan Shield. A fascinating (and sometimes darkly humorous) look at how technology has supercharged crime in the 2020s. Show Notes We think of consumers and mainstream corporations as embracing remote work and the gig economy, but did you know there are also, for example, Signal groups, labeled “jobs” that Australian kids are using to get quick cash while doing chores and errands (+ the occasional firebombings) for an Iraqi crime syndicate, largely based over 8,000 miles away in Iraq? This is not just an Australian problem. Mexican Cartels like CJNG (Jalisco New Generation) and Sinaloa are recruiting Fortnite. The Iraqi Crime Syndicate Terrorizing Melbourne The Broad Scene An Iraq-based organized crime syndicate (often linked to figures like Kazem “Kaz” Hamad and referred to as “the Cartel”) is directing or strongly suspected in a wave of extortion, firebombings, shootings, and related violence targeting businesses in Melbourne. This has escalated notably in recent years, especially since around 2023 with the “tobacco wars,” and has expanded into hospitality/nightlife venues in 2026. * As reported by the Sydney Morning Herald: Kazem Hamad (an Iraqi-born Australian deported in 2023) and associates in Baghdad are alleged to orchestrate operations remotely. Hamad was arrested in Iraq in early 2026 at Australia’s request. Threats and directions come via encrypted apps from overseas. A 23-year-old Australian in Baghdad (linked to Hamad’s network) is also implicated. * The Guardian reports on how street-level crews (often teenagers or young offenders) are recruited via encrypted messaging apps to carry out attacks. Organized crime figures assign contracts to local “heads of street crews,” who then use youths as foot soldiers for arson, burglaries, or intimidation. Police have arrested numerous teens (some as young as 13-17) in connection with these incidents. This is described as a broader trend of organized crime exploiting youth gangs. * The violence has grown from tobacco-related turf wars (firebombings, shootings) to broader “alcohol wars” or hospitality attacks in 2026, with dozens of venues targeted. It’s linked to illicit tobacco/drug trades funding larger networks. Police operations (e.g., Operation Eclipse, Carmen) are ongoing, with infighting reported after key arrests. (See The Daily News Now! Podcast from Melbourne News Today). * Attacks often aim to force businesses (tobacco shops, bars, nightclubs, restaurants) to pay “protection” or taxes (e.g., the “Kaz tax”), stock illicit products, or comply with demands. Venues have received threats of monthly payments (e.g., around $10,000 reported in some cases) to avoid firebombing. Non-compliance leads to arson or violence. This has caused a surge in arson crimes (e.g., 68% increase linked to tobacco wars). * Note: The tobacco wars are an ongoing series of violent turf wars between organized crime groups fighting for control of the lucrative illicit (black market) tobacco trade in Victoria, Australia, particularly Melbourne * According to the Guardian, the conflict intensified around March 2023 after a meeting of key underworld figures failed to agree on controlling prices and distribution of illicit products. This led to a wave of retaliatory violence * The main fighting parties are several outlaw motorcycle gangs, the Haddara crime family, and Victoria Police (notably Taskforce Lunar) responding to the conflict * Kazem Hamad has also been linked * Per the wikipedia entry on this: “The illegal tobacco trade in Australia is highly lucrative due to high taxation on legal tobacco.” (they have some of the world’s highest cigarette taxes) How the Crime is Organized * Leadership uses Signal to recruit and assign tasks to local youths in crime networks, including those linked to Kazem Hamad-associated syndicates (the Cartel) * Teens are ideal recruits because they face lighter juvenile justice consequences * Tasks are assigned in group chats * Per the Sydney Morning Herald, one documented example of the group chats was titled “jobs” * Offers for jobs range from a few hundred dollars to $1,000 to over $20,000 for significant attacks * E.g. a venue firebombing would get you something more in the $20K range * The police and media are referring to this as a “CrimeTasker” model (akin to Airtasker, which I guess is Australia’s TaskRabbit) * They often use whatsapp for the actual extortion demands to business owners after attacks * So signal = for admin and operational recruitment * Whatsapp = for PR and comms * Payment * Extorted people pay the local gig workers in cash * Larger syndicate profits (e.g. extortion tax profits, illicit tobacco sales) undergo more sophisticated money laundering Other Modern Organized Crime Mexican Drug Cartels (Recruitment and Tasking) Cartels like CJNG (Jalisco New Generation) and Sinaloa excel at tech-enabled remote operations: * They post fake job ads (e.g., security guards) on Facebook/Instagram, then shift recruits to WhatsApp/Signal for training and assignments. They also recruit teens via video games (Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA V) for hitman/sicario roles or smuggling, offering cash incentives. * HOW IT WORKS * Per InSight Crime, recruiters (or cartel-linked players) join public multiplayer sessions or lobbies, especially late at night when parental supervision is lower. * They send direct messages, friend requests, or group invites via in-game chat. Profiles often feature glamorous or intimidating imagery (e.g., bulletproof vests, weapons, cartel symbols). * Common hooks: Complimenting the player’s skills (”You’re good at this—want to do it for real?”), promising adventure, money, guns, cars, or status. They may frame it as a “job” (e.g., security, lookout) or an “event” like a virtual recruitment drive. * They play together to build trust * Then they transition to private chats * Discord, Twitch, WhatsApp, or Signal) * Then they exploit vulnerabilities: As ABC4 reports, they target isolated or bored youths, those fascinated by violence/weapons (common in shooter games), or from low-income backgrounds. Promises often include weekly pay (e.g., $200+ for low-level roles like lookouts) and escalation to higher-paying criminal tasks. * Finally, they escalate * Once hooked, recruits may receive travel instructions, small initial tasks (e.g., local surveillance), or smuggling runs. * As InSite Crime reports, Cartels like CJNG, Sinaloa, or Cartel del Noreste (CDN) have been linked to these efforts. Roles start small (messengers, lookouts) and can progress to violence or drug transport. * EXAMPLES * The Free Fire Cases (Most Documented, 2021): In Oaxaca, Mexico, three boys aged 11–14 were recruited via Garena Free Fire (a battle royale game similar to Fortnite). A recruiter posed as a peer, offered jobs as lookouts with weekly pay, and bought bus tickets to northern Mexico. Authorities intercepted them. Similar cases involved girls and other minors lured for trafficking or cartel work. Mexican officials highlighted this as a pattern across games. * GTA Online Drug Mule Recruitment (US-Mexico, ~2021–2022): A woman in Arizona was recruited while playing GTA Online. She met a man in the game who offered her a “job” transporting what she thought were electronics (actually methamphetamine). She was arrested with ~60kg of meth. US Customs and Border Protection linked it to Mexican cartels using the game for real-world runners. * GTA V Recruitment Event (2021): A teen received an in-game invite at 3 a.m. to a virtual “RECLUTAMIENTO ABIERTO” (open recruitment) event tied to Cartel del Noreste (CDN) and Old School Zetas. The recruiter’s profile showed militarized gear. * Remote leaders coordinate border smuggling, hits, and extortion using apps. * US teens/citizens are increasingly targeted for low-level tasks like drug transport. * This is highlighted in the latest season of Euphoria Dark Web and Crime-as-a-Service (CaaS) * As ICE.gov reports (a think tank about organized crime), Darknet marketplaces (e.g., successors to Silk Road, AlphaBay) function like eBay for illicit goods/services—drugs, weapons, stolen data, hacking tools, fake IDs, and even hitman services. * Groups offer “crime-as-a-service” with hierarchies, reviews, and escrow payments (often crypto). * Eastern European and international networks dominate. * Forums divide labor * Coders sell malware, others handle distribution or enforcement. Gig Economy Terrorism Core Model: “Virtual Plotters” and Remote Direction ISIS pioneered a system of “virtual entrepreneurs” or “virtual plotters” — handlers operating from overseas (e.g., Syria/Iraq) who identify, groom, and guide attackers remotely. This lowers risk for the group while scaling impact through crowdsourced or gig-style terrorism HOW IT WORKS * Recruitment flow (per a GWU Program on Extremism report) * Starts on open platforms (Twitter/X, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram) with propaganda * Then shifts to encrypted messaging (primarily Telegram, also WhatsApp, Signal, or apps like Surespot/Wickr) for secure, one-on-one or small-group coordination * Tasking * Handlers assign specific “jobs” — e.g., “conduct a

    45 min
  4. How Evolution Proves the Bible

    4d ago

    How Evolution Proves the Bible

    In this episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins dive deep into the Book of Genesis, revealing surprising alignments between the ancient text and modern evolutionary science. Malcolm challenges common Sunday-school interpretations, showing how Genesis describes a timeline that closely matches scientific understanding: from the early Earth and origin of life, through aquatic creatures and large reptiles, to birds, land animals, and finally humanity. They explore alternate translations of key Hebrew words (like “yom” for “day/era”, “yatsar” for “formed/planned”, and “taninim” for great reptilian creatures), discuss the Big Bang, prebiotic Earth, the evolution of sexuality, and why Genesis stands out among global creation myths. A fascinating conversation blending biblical scholarship, evolutionary biology, and philosophical insight that will challenge both skeptics and literalists. Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. I’m excited to talk with you today. In a recent episode, I pointed out, I was like, “It is weird to within a modern context in Christianity and stuff like this, when people are saying that evolution is not coherent with Genesis.” And I would say that at least my readings of Genesis, evolution makes me believe Genesis more because Genesis says a bunch of stuff that aligns with what we know of the, about the evolutionary timeline without saying anything that disconfirms the evolutionary timeline. So we are gonna get into this. And it’s, it’s, it’s such a fun topic for me to get into because when I was a kid, and I believe that Genesis said what, as I call it, Sunday school Christianity, you know? Well Genesis says X, Y, and Z, and and I- if you look at it, and then don’t look up alternate translations of the words in it whenever something looks a little fishy or looks like it may be [00:01:00] factually incorrect or don’t look up how that word is used in other places in the Old Testament you immediately are like, “Okay, that’s believable,” right? And so that’s stupid because that’s an old story for savages. Speaker 2: We will call them cave Jews Speaker 3: Attacker! Malcolm Collins: And then you come at it with a more modern mindset. I mean, just if you look at the mere timeline given in it, right? It says first you have non-animal life. Then you have the vast array... No, it doesn’t even say, like, fishes. It’s, it’s the vast array of creatures that live in the sea. Simone Collins: Mm-hmm. Malcolm Collins: Along with some form of large reptilian creature. Hmm ... which, which, no- What could that Simone Collins: be? Malcolm Collins: Yeah, what, what could that be? Now, no, there’s, there’s a lot of really cool... First, it’s not as simple as saying, like, fi- they easily could have wr- fishes, right? But if you’re describing- Yeah ... the [00:02:00] evolutionary timeline- Yeah ... the vast array of things that live in the sea is a very good description for early animal life. 100%, Simone Collins: yeah. Malcolm Collins: And I’m also gonna go into stuff in the translations here, where a lot of people argue that the, the giant thing that’s written here, the 吨, or whatever is like a leviathan, that it is a giant sea creature-like serpent or something like that. And I’m gonna point out that actually if you read the, the correct, the Hebrew, which we’ll go into- Mm-hmm Isn’t necessarily talking about a sea animal. It’s only talking about a large reptilian creature. It just talks about it in the same context as it’s talking about sea animals, so people often assumed it was talking about sea animals. And then it says- there were also some very large Simone Collins: sea animals Malcolm Collins: though There were some large reptiles, but I’m just saying, like, if I was trying to give an evolutionary timeline of history. Then it says you’ve got the birds. Then you’ve got the creatures on Earth today. So like before we go into this, this is, even broadly most people are aware it gives this timeline.[00:03:00] Do you know how many other religions, and I’m talking even if I go Native American traditions, even if I go African traditions, ‘cause I have gone through AI after AI trying to find a single other religion that gets the evolutionary timeline as close to right as this. There isn’t one. Simone Collins: Yeah. I, I can’t think of one, for sure. One. There, there isn’t- Based on all the folk traditions I’ve heard, everything, yeah Malcolm Collins: There isn’t even one that gets the first two simple steps right. Mm. Non-animal life and aquatic life. Or fishes, or anything. Like, I tried to give it so many outs. Wow. Nothing. Nothing comes close to getting those two stages right. So again, this isn’t just like they randomly threw stuff together and happened to get it right. This is, like, easily very, very right related stuff. So we’re gonna get into that. Very, very fun. Speaker 3: So note, a lot of people will be like, “Well, there’s some really obvious mistakes that you find. For [00:04:00] example, that non-animal based life came about before the sun and the moon.” To which I would be like, “Well, actually, hold on a second here. , Do you know what the oldest evidence of life we have on Earth is? It’s Australia’s Jack Hills zircons, which date about 4.4 billion years old, , into the Hadean era. All right? So do you know when the moon was formed? Formed, by the way, from a collision of a body about the size of Mars into Earth, which led to the surface being largely covered in magma for a period that would likely have wiped out any evidence we had of life from before that period. It was formed f- 4.5 billion years ago. So the moon is from 4.5 billion years ago in an event that would have wiped any evidence of life existing before it off [00:05:00] the surface of the Earth. Then 4.4 billion years ago, we see evidence of life. What’s the chance you think that there could have been life on Earth before this collision, and that it in some way influenced or seeded the life that came after the collision? I’m gonna at least say, like, from my perspective, at least 20 to 30%, and I wouldn’t have known that without going into this. Otherwise, you have to assume that coincidentally life just happened to first evolve almost immediately after this collision during one of the most violent times of Earth’s history, which seems unlikely And then you can say, “Well, okay, but the sun definitely existed before that.” And we can say, “All right, but if you read the Bible, it says that it separated the night from the day.” That is the point of the creation of the sun in this particular story. , And if [00:06:00] we go 4.4 billion years ago to those Jackson Hill zircons, right, , the atmosphere was still transitioning, , More specifically, it had really high levels of CO2, potentially tens of hundreds of times higher than modern, and a very high level of water vapor that sustained a really strong greenhouse effect and permanent very thick cloud layers , And the image I have in the background here is an image from, as you can see, it’s from a scientific catalog, right, of what scientists think Earth looked like during this period of Earth’s history. So it would have been, , extremely, extremely diffuse and hazy. , Most days during that period from what we know , of Earth would have just looked like an orangish, reddish overcast. Things you would not have been able to see, or would have been able to see very rarely, maybe once every few hundred years or something like that, are the stars and a [00:07:00] clear day and night. So actually, the Bible isn’t even that wrong on some of the weirder claims it makes Malcolm Collins: A note here we’re gonna go into, like a lot of people will be like, “Uh-uh. It says that God formed the animals with the dirt, that it formed man with the dirt.” And we’re gonna point out the word that is translated in your Sunday school Bible into formed throughout the rest of the Old Testament, do you know what it means? No, actually. Planned. Really? It y- Oh. Yes. And we’ll go through instances. It, it, it can be used to mean formed, but it could equally be used to say, “God planned the dirt to become human. God planned-” Oh my word ... “the dirt to become animals.” Ooh. But we’re gonna go over all sorts of fun stuff like this which is fun. And we’re gonna mostly be focused on the first story of Genesis, ‘cause Genesis sort of has two beginning of Earth stories that aren’t really that contradictory. We have [00:08:00] another episode, the Adam and Eve story, that goes over that one. I think it’s one of the best episodes we’ve ever produced, if you’re interested. It’s, doesn’t even contradict normal Christianity that much and it’s very elucidating for, I think, a lot of people, around what’s actually in the Adam and Eve story, because it’s not often what you’re taught. And note here when people are like, “Well, if it’s saying that God like planned man to come out of dirt or whatever,” right? Like that, that still doesn’t mean evolution, right? You know? Because evolution is a natural process, so that wouldn’t be God doing it. And here I’m gonna be like, okay, let’s just talk about the nature of miracles. Imagine God was like, “I’m gonna shoot that guy with lightning.” Right? Like calling the shots. And then all of a sudden you see lightning come down from the sky and shock a guy, and he falls over dead. And then you turn and you go, “Yeah, but that was static in the clouds that caused that lightning, and so I don’t really think that that was a miracle,” right? You know, because it was done through natural processes. I’m like, actually, that’s, that’s a little bit more impressive than just [00:09:00] magicking it, okay? Right. Let’s go into this, “now the Lord God formed ou

    1 hr
  5. Why Do Wokes Support Islam Despite Apparent Ideological Conflicts? (A Serious Investigation)

    5d ago

    Why Do Wokes Support Islam Despite Apparent Ideological Conflicts? (A Serious Investigation)

    Malcolm and Simone Collins dive deep into one of the most paradoxical political alliances of our time: the surprising partnership between modern progressivism and Islamism.Why do groups that claim to champion LGBTQ+ rights, feminism, and secularism repeatedly align with a ideology that often rejects those very values? From the Iranian Revolution to "Queers for Palestine," this episode explores the ideological overlaps, cognitive dissonance, and shared strategic goals that make this alliance stronger than many realize.Topics include:• The "oppressor vs oppressed" framework• Treatment of homosexuality vs. gender transition in Muslim societies• Shared hostility toward Western civilization• Why suffering of "their side" is often irrelevant to both movements• Historical betrayals and future implicationsA sobering and unfiltered analysis of modern political bedfellows. Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to be discussing Islam and the left, which have been bedfellows throughout recent history. Obviously they were very strong bedfellows during the Iranian revolution, which we will discuss how that ended up happening. And they all were then killed afterwards. It was very much like the sheep siding with the wolves, only for the wolves to feast on the sheep as soon as they got what they wanted. B- pretty witless, and I think could be a sign of... Like, obviously there’s the famous picture of the two young progressive girls in a car cheering the rise of the new ayatollah, and both of... One of them was killed by his regime, and the other one lived their life as a refugee. And so, you know, not good for them historically when they’ve done this. But I wanted to better understand why and how these two things are compatible. And people can just say, “Well, they aren’t compatible, Malcolm,” and I’m like, surely [00:01:00] progressives don’t think that, right? Like, surely progressives have looked into this and have some sort of thesis I just haven’t taken the time to understand. So what I did, and what, what I, what I wanted this piece to be, which unfortunately it can’t be, and I’ll explain why in just a second- Simone Collins: Oh ... Malcolm Collins: is I wanted to go through on some sort of, like, well-reasoned progressive piece on why Islamism and progressive values make such good bedfellows. Simone Collins: Okay. Malcolm Collins: And that we would go through this piece and I would explain, “Well, this doesn’t really work here,” or, “They actually have some points here.” And very, very interestingly I could not find any such piece. Simone Collins: What? How... That seems Malcolm Collins: implausible. Right? I assumed they must be out there everywhere, right? Like, I was like, they must have, like, taken the time to, like, grok, digest, and explain this. Simone Collins: Yes. Malcolm Collins: Right? Because it seems like a contradiction, and there were a [00:02:00] lot of progressive pieces- Well, Simone Collins: The Free Press tried to m- to make an explanation of this. Malcolm Collins: No, they didn’t. No, they didn’t. What The Free Press did, ‘cause I read that article, that was one of the ones I read in preparation for this- Simone Collins: Okay Malcolm Collins: Is they tried to, they basically just said, “This happened before with the Islamic revolution,” and then they went over a few things from that. But that wasn’t, that didn’t really explain why the progressives thought this was okay. Simone Collins: Okay, so you’re just talk- Yeah, I guess your, your argument is that isn’t an explanation, it’s only a history of the alliance. It doesn’t explain the underlying reason for the alliance. The, oh my God, when you move around your room, it sounds like your room is the Star Wars trash compactor. Like So Malcolm Collins: so, I ended up running ahead and being like, “Okay, let’s see if I can find any of these,” right? And what I did find, so I’ll go over what I did find a number of. I found, like, six or seven of these. And there appear to be near infinity more, is progressives muldering over the fact [00:03:00] that people thought that they were unaware that Muslims... Like, like making fun of them when, like, Netanyahu said that gays for Gaza is like KFC K- fried chicken, or chicken for KFC, right? Like, and they, they really hate conservatives making fun of them for this. Huh. Okay ... being unaware that in these groups that they say they wanna help, they do want to kill gay people. Like, that’s in the Quran. You know, you stone somebody for being gay. That’s Sharia law, right? Like, this is part of their tradition. Hmm. It happens regularly across these countries. Speaker 2: What would happen to a gay couple in Gaza? Speaker 3: Executed according to Islamic law. Islam doesn’t endorse gays. Islam doesn’t endorse homosexuality. Just like Canada doesn’t endorse a lot of things. So would you like to see Sharia law in Canada replace Canadian law? At some point, it will. . One day we can have a Muslim majority nation here in Canada. Right In your face! Malcolm Collins: And what those articles did, which was very frustrating to me because it didn’t provide a [00:04:00] logical explanation, they basically just said, “Netanyahu’s government has said homophobic things as well.” And that was obviously very unsatisfying for me because I was just like, well, I mean, yes, it’s a right-wing government, but, well, like, when you say said homophobic things, like he said he’s comfortable being called a homophobe, he doesn’t support pride marches, he doesn’t support you know, gay stuff being taught to kids. He, That is not the same thing as having a government policy of murdering gay people, okay? But they’re sort of trying to equivocate the two. Or they will note that there have been some gay people who have been killed in Israel by members of the general public for bigoted reasons, right? And they seem to not be able to tell or assume that their audience won’t care that that’s different from something being carried out as a government policy. Mm-hmm. E.g. just [00:05:00] random homophobes versus the government will kill you. I mean, they’re, they’re obviously very different, but the core thing that I basically realized is they see being mildly... And I guess this makes sense if you look at their wider actions. They see being mildly uncomfortable with gay people or uncomfortable with trans people or disagreeing with their ideology as equivalent to a government policy of institutionalized killing of gay and trans people. But- But think about their actions and this makes sense. When they say that like, “Oh, Trump’s government’s going to get rid of me.” Like remember when Trump was elected and a bunch of gay people were like basically saying, “Oh, Trump, we’re gonna be eradicated now that Trump has come into power.” Trans people being like, “Trans people in the United States are gonna be mass genocided after this.” They talked about this, like that this was something that was going to happen to them. And I think that we as conservatives were not listening to that. We heard it and we thought it was funny, [00:06:00] but we didn’t understand that actually in their minds these two things are functional equivalents. Slightly disagreeing with them and or saying, “I personally would not live this lifestyle,” and saying, “We’re gonna build a government policy of killing you.” And that’s why they have reacted so harshly. That’s why they keep doing these assassination attempts and stuff like that, as I’ve explained in other videos, because they think that this mild disagreement is the same as murder. Hmm. Hmm. And then that justifies everything that comes out of this. But I wanna get into where these two things are surprisingly okay. Like, why do Muslims keep siding with the left, right? Like, why, why do they appear to make good bedfellows? And at first I thought, well, maybe there’s some policies in Muslim texts, because I, I found a few articles arguing this. These were from Muslims trying to explain to progressives why they should be friendly with Muslims. Oh. [00:07:00] And they went over Muslim teachings trying to argue that Muslim teachings are inherently socialist. Simone Collins: Oh. Malcolm Collins: This comes down to things like the zakat which is one of the five pillars, which means that you’re typically donate around 2.5% of wealth assets above a threshold to the poor, needy, debtors, or travelers. This is... I mean, it is socialist-like, but Christians have just as many parts of the Bible that they could point to and say “This is socialist-like.” You also, Have sorry. So but then you can say, “Okay, well, if this was the case, can we look at the Gini coefficient of Muslim majority countries to see if it’s higher or lower than equivalent other countries?” And Gini coefficients of Muslim countries are enormously higher than other countries. They are some of the- Simone Collins: Famously so, yes ... Malcolm Collins: yeah, some of the most unequal societies on earth. So then the question can be, okay, why do they... Because I don’t wanna ask, like, from a right-wing perspective how are these things the same. Like, as right-wingers we can say [00:08:00] they’re both totalitarian in the way they attempt to approach things. They’re both very fascist in the way they attempt to approach things. They both hate Western civilization. They both, you know, like, we can, we can throw all of this out here, right? But to the left, those explanations aren’t really gonna hold as much, right? So where do the left, like, really actually agree with them and find this co-solidarity? One is the issue of them killing gay people actually isn’t a big an issue to modern leftists as you would think. Simone Collins: Explain

    47 min
  6. Africans Rise Up Against Illegal Immigration (Fatigue Maxing)

    May 22

    Africans Rise Up Against Illegal Immigration (Fatigue Maxing)

    In this Based Camp episode, Simone and Malcolm Collins dive into the rising anti-immigration protests in South Africa — led by Black South Africans against illegal immigrants from other African nations. From “March and March” and Operation Dudula marches to demands for mass deportations, shop closures, and prioritizing citizens for jobs, this movement echoes familiar themes of economic frustration, crime concerns, and strained resources. Is this “Black MAGA”? Why is the global media quick to label it xenophobia while downplaying similar grievances elsewhere? The Collins discuss unemployment realities (32-33%), government responses, comparisons to US/UK/Canada immigration levels, ethnic economic niches, and why South Africans feel under attack from within Africa. Expect unfiltered analysis, humor, genetic tangents, and real talk on immigration policy that transcends race. What happens when citizens fight back against illegal immigration in their own country? Show Notes When I think of “anti-immigration protests” the image that pops into my head is of white people being angry about non-white people entering their neighborhoods and taking their jobs This happens so much that subconsciously even I sometimes find myself assuming this is a “white people clutching their pearls about their land being taken” thing, when it’s not And recent anti-immigrant protests in South Africa are proof of this. South Africa has seen a wave of anti-immigration (often described as anti-illegal immigration or xenophobic) protests and related violence in April–May 2026, concentrated in major cities like Pretoria, Johannesburg, Durban, and spreading to others. Key Details * According to the BBC at least, the main driver is the citizen-led group March and March, which advocates for stricter immigration enforcement, border control, mass deportations of undocumented migrants, and prioritizing South Africans for jobs, housing, and services. * Protests have drawn hundreds to thousands of participants, with marches to government buildings (e.g., Union Buildings in Pretoria), shop closures by foreign-owned businesses out of fear, and some “clean-up” campaigns. * Involvement or alignment from Operation Dudula (a vigilante-style anti-immigrant movement meaning “push out” in Zulu), ActionSA, Patriotic Alliance, and other local forums (e.g., Thokoza Abahambe Forum). * Some political figures, like Floyd Shivambu of the Africa Mayibuye Movement, have endorsed the concerns as legitimate ahead of local elections. * As CNN reports (here’s an Instagram link), protesters accuse undocumented migrants (primarily from other African countries, and some Asians) of taking jobs, engaging in crime/drug dealing, overloading public services (health, housing, schools), and straining the economy. * Some issued a June 30, 2026, ultimatum for undocumented foreigners to leave, with warnings of consequences. * Chants and actions target “illegal foreigners.” * THIS IS EXACTLY THE SAME RHETORIC YOU HEAR IN THE USA So this is NOT about white people at all, right? * Yeah, the protesters are primarily South African citizens, often from poorer communities, unemployed youth, township residents, and those feeling economic pressure. * See some footage from Sky News posted on reddit here * Note: South Africa’s official unemployment rate is very high (~32-33%), with widespread frustration over service delivery failures after decades of ANC governance, corruption allegations, and inequality. * They’re largely mad about immigrants from other African countries * Nigerians, Zimbabweans, Congolese, Ethiopians, Ghanaians Is immigration uniquely high in South Africa vis a vis other countries? Or other African countries? Is it higher than normal? South Africa’s immigration levels are not uniquely high by global standards, but they stand out significantly within Africa and have risen notably in recent decades. Key Metrics (UN DESA 2024 Data) * South Africa: ~2.63 million international migrants, representing ~4.1% of its total population (up from ~3.2% in 1990 and ~4.3% in 2010). (UN) * Global average: ~3.7% of world population (~304 million migrants). (Migration Policy Intitute) * Africa overall: ~1.9% (29.2 million migrants across the continent). (UN) A few other African countries have higher proportions due to specific factors (e.g., economic pull or refugee hosting): * Côte d’Ivoire: ~9.0% (around 2.88 million migrants) — historically one of the highest in sub-Saharan Africa due to cocoa plantations and labor migration from neighbors like Burkina Faso. * Others like Djibouti (~10.8%), Gabon, or some refugee-hosting nations (e.g., Uganda, Sudan) can show elevated shares in certain years. * Most African countries are well below 2–3%. Many high-income countries have 10–30%+ migrant shares (e.g., Gulf states 30–50%+, Australia ~30%, Europe/North America 12–16% averages). South Africa’s level is comparable to some other emerging economies but amplified by regional disparities How does South Africa’s rates of immigration and illegal immigration compare to those in the USA, Canada, Australia, and the UK? Basically, South Africa’s total migrant share is not high compared to these countries, but its challenges with undocumented migration (relative to enforcement capacity and economic conditions) appear more acute proportionally and socially. High-unemployment townships amplify perceptions of strain from irregular inflows, unlike the more managed systems in the Anglosphere nations. Statements from Protesters From March and March Leaders and Protesters Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma (Founder and National Leader of March and March): “They are not victims... If you walk down the roads, you will find that they take buildings. There are drugs. There is prostitution. There are cartels. There are mafias. So, everything in this country is a fertile ground for criminals to thrive.”“We are under attack from across Africa… The only thing that they do is to label us as xenophobic. There is nothing xenophobic about wanting law and order in your country.”On government inaction: “We’re frustrated, tired, and feel ignored by our own government... Our demand is that our government is moving at a snail’s pace in addressing the issue of illegal immigrants.” Sanele Nkambule (Treasurer, March and March): “Many spaza shops and informal businesses in the townships are owned or run by foreign nationals without proper trading rights... [placing] an unfair burden on citizens who pay taxes.” He called for all such shops to be run by South Africans, audits of immigrants, review of study visas, and army deployment in high-immigrant areas. Anonymous demonstrator (to BBC during Pretoria march): “We are grateful that we now have groups like this that have come up to aid the voice of what we have always been preaching about — illegal immigration is a big problem to our society.” (Referring to the “influx of illegal immigrants” that politicians ignore.) From Associated Groups Thami Madondo (National Executive Committee member, linked to Operation Dudula/March and March-aligned actions): “The immigration laws of the country have never been enforced by the law enforcement agencies... And that’s why we’re sitting with all of these crises. … We are stressing the fact that illegal foreigners in the country must leave.” He criticized “Ubuntu” narratives in this context: “That narrative of Ubuntu, unfortunately, is the nonsense that has put us where we are today. Ubuntu doesn’t mean that you must come into the country illegally.” Tshepo Totwe (Secretary, Abahambe Movement, collaborating with March and March): “We are here to partake and collaborate with March on March on a progressive march that is involving different organisations and also national forums to collaborate and fight against the foreign nationals that are taking advantage of our economic freedom in our country... That is the key purpose for us to indicate and send a message that we are being labelled as xenophobic, and that is not the point.” What are these protests like? * Human Rights Watch (citing “xenophobic attacks”) reports that some protests have escalated into vigilante actions, assaults on migrants (including beatings, shop attacks, and reported deaths—e.g., Nigerians, Ethiopians), and intimidation. * Human Rights Watch and others have noted insufficient police response in places. Foreign governments (Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya, etc.) have issued warnings to their citizens and, in Ghana’s case, offered evacuation flights (with low uptake in one reported instance). What is the South African government doing in response? * As they communicate on the official website of the presidency of the republic of south africa: President Cyril Ramaphosa’s administration and officials (e.g., Deputy President Paul Mashatile) condemn violence and vigilante “lawlessness” while acknowledging legitimate grievances over illegal immigration. * They’ve highlighted deportations (over 100k in recent years) and pledged legal enforcement. * They deny widespread xenophobia, calling incidents isolated or criminal What is the larger media narrative about these protests? * When you distill all the coverage together with AI summaries, you’ll see these protests being framed as a recurring pattern of xenophobic tensions in South Africa during economic hardship, seen in prior years (e.g., 2008, 2019, Operation Dudula activities). * High inflows of migrants/refugees amid regional instability, porous borders, and competition for scarce opportunities fuel it. Episode Transcript Simone Collins: [00:00:00] We are here to fight against the foreign nationals that are taking advantage of our economic freedom in our country. We are being labeled as xenophobic, and that is not the point.” So what are the protests like? And Malcolm Collins: again, you’re sure, you’re sure this guy w

    43 min
  7. 50 Years Ago Commies Had A Plan For Us ... It Worked?!

    May 21

    50 Years Ago Commies Had A Plan For Us ... It Worked?!

    Did the Communists win the Cold War in America? In this eye-opening Based Camp episode, Malcolm and Simone Collins dive deep into the 1963 list of Communist Goals for the United States (compiled by FBI agent Cleon Skousen and entered into the Congressional Record). From infiltrating schools and media, discrediting the family, promoting degeneracy, and weaponizing psychiatry and art — they check off how many of these goals have been achieved and what it means for modern culture, politics, and the future. This conversation covers the long march through the institutions, Yuri Bezmenov’s demoralization playbook, Cuba’s ongoing role, why the “Red Scare” was more accurate than we were taught, and how a new tech-right counter-movement can fight back using AI, culture, and high-agency communities. If you’ve ever wondered why everything feels broken — ugly art, broken families, captured institutions, endless culture war — this episode connects the dots. Episode Transcript Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to be asking the question, did the communists win with their goals in the United States? So this rabbit hole was prompted for me by a Chris Williamson clip where he had on a guest, Isabel Brown, who was going over a list that she reported to be the communist goals for the United States circa 1960. She sort of misstated this list implying that it was read into the Congressional Record by the Communist Party. It was not. It was read into the record by a Republican anti-communist, and was a review of the notes on the Communist Party and their goals, circa 1963- Hmm ... by an FBI agent, Cleon Skousen. So not a crackpot or anything like this. This was an FBI agent whose goal was in the FBI, was to track and to understand the Communist Party’s goals circa 1963. Simone Collins: All right? Okay. Yeah, [00:01:00] and it’s not like they were incredibly secret about their goals. So this can’t be that inaccurate. Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, you’re gonna be shocked by this list. You’re gonna be shocked. Really? She read a few of them. And I was like, “I need to go into the full thing.” Yes. “I need to look up the history of this list.” Like, I’m not gonna go over every single one of the points that he had read into it, because some of them would just get boring. But we’re going to have enough material to shock you. Oh, gosh. So let’s... And I’m not gonna be reading them in order either. Okay. So let’s start here, okay? “Transfer some of the power of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychologists can understand or treat.” What? This was the 1960s, early 1960s. Psychiatrists weren’t even a thing at that point. L- not, like, commonly. Simone Collins: Oh, wow. Yeah. [00:02:00] Did we lose the Cold War? We lost the Cold War. We lost the Cold War. We lost the Malcolm Collins: Cold... W- g- when I read through this, you’re gonna be like, “We lost the Cold War.” We were just- What? ... psy-oped into believing we won. I, I almost at the end of this, like, believe that there’s like a communist utopia in y- Russia right now, and that’s where we’ve been sending all our defrauded Somali dollars. Apparently. Like, the... Yeah. And, and that outside the US, everything’s still going and we’ve just been psy-oped into believing that the Cold War is over and that we won to make us happy. For Simone Collins: real? Malcolm Collins: What is happening? I don’t know if I’m ready for this. Speaker 7: Oh my God. Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon. Privet svitya, Dad. My son is a communist. Malcolm Collins: Okay, next. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive [00:03:00] control over those who oppose communist goals. Consider the way that they’ve used things like trans mental health laws to achieve other goals they have later down on this list. Octavian Collins: Huh. Malcolm Collins: First, given that this does seem to have been the plan, it’s a pretty clever plan, right? Simone Collins: No, yeah. If you, if you go, we, we rewind to the 1950s, 1960s, like, all right, how do we take out these... It is, yeah, I mean, it’s, it’s incredibly clever. I, I never would’ve thought of it. But in terms of destroying a country from the inside I... You know, there’s this one episode in earlier Doctor Who where the Doctor has this, like, plan where he’s like, “Oh, I know how to, like, single-handedly take down this prime minister.” And he, standing next to her, like, turns to a journalist who’s always there, or who, who is also there, and says, “She looks tired.” And that’s supposed to be like, that’s the end of her career. He just ended it by [00:04:00] saying that and, like, sowed this doubt. But this is so much more, like, this is the real version of that where, like, Russia was like, “Oh, that’s that’s not just you being a, a, a dick. It, it’s a mental health thing that is to be systematically- Well, so I should note here- ... defended” ... he is Malcolm Collins: not, he is not talking about Russia’s goals for the United States. These were the goals of the American Communist Party at the time, how they were going to dismantle the United States. Simone Collins: That is so... It’s, ‘cause, but then why? Why would you... I mean, ‘cause presumably the goal- So as was- ... of destabilizing the US means that we, then they can take over. But what is left to take over once you’ve done that to a country? Malcolm Collins: Well, they wanted to sell us out to the communists in Russia. We’ll go over this. It didn’t work out their way. But they have achieved all of their other goals other than that one. It really seems to be about destroying the United States above all else and destroying the institutions- That were most resistant to them- Mm ... specifically religious institutions. And we’ll- So it’s not about Simone Collins: brokering in some new age or transition, it’s just out of hatred for the United [00:05:00] States. Malcolm Collins: Mm. I mean, there does appear to be a new age or transition. It’s the communist order, right? Like, they’ve got to break down the existing social structure before they can create a new one or offer a new one. Hmm. Hmm. We’ll even go into how they plan to run their revolution and everything like that. Well, what Simone Collins: good is a communist citizen if they’re, like, crippled by anxiety and, and statutorily unable to not work? Because then they can’t fight Malcolm Collins: back against the government. Simone Collins: Yeah, but isn’t it... I guess in a, a post AGI world, a post singularity world, you don’t need workers. Like, the perfect communist state that has never been tried needs a lot of- Communists Malcolm Collins: didn’t need their workers to work hard, Simone. Like, I, I think you’re confused about this. Socialism involves- Communists treat their workers like slaves. Like, that’s the way communist states have always operated. Oh. They don’t actually need the- So I guess it was Simone Collins: just, there was a plan to rug pull, like systematically, mentally drive people insane. Well, how about we Malcolm Collins: go through all of the plans and then you can judge? Okay. Yeah, I, well, I would... Yes. Simone Collins: Yeah. Okay, let’s try to understand this better. Okay. Okay. Next Malcolm Collins: here, okay? Discredit the family as an [00:06:00] institution, encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. Octavian Collins: Oh, boy. Malcolm Collins: By the way, if you’re unfamiliar with the legal change of the United States in post 1960s not only has promiscuity obviously become very popular, The New York Times regularly writing about polyamory and stuff like this, and but the idea of easy divorce has become way, way, way easier. And there has been explicit attacks, like BLM saw the insti- the family unit as one of their core things that they wanted to target and discredit. Okay. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks, and the retarding of children to the suppressive influence of parents. The, Simone Collins: the retarding of children to the suppressive influence- Yeah, basically Malcolm Collins: they’re like- ... of parents ... we need a way to retard children and then we’ll- They must retard the children ... blame it on the parents. I love, I love that wording We need a way to Simone Collins: break the school system, and then Malcolm Collins: we’ll blame parents on the results of [00:07:00] that. That is so good. And every time somebody’s like, “Well, what about the parents?” Right? You know they’re running a communist op. They’re running a communist op. Come on, guys. I always hate that, that whiny, “Ooh, what about the parents?” Mm. It’s like, look, obviously par... It, it’s really about the family culture. Like, the parents cannot draconianly police everything a kid does. They need to create a culture where the negatives of society don’t get their hooks in the kid to the same extent. But by creating this learned helplessness, communists were able to degrade portions of our society. Okay, next. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures. A- again, note here, I am not editorializing these. I am not... This is what was written, read into the Congressional Record, okay? Simone Collins: Well, I guess that explains the witch hunt that took place in that sense, right? Wasn’t there a big blacklist because there was this, this i- i- intense fear of people taking over the media? So it sounds like this was- And they did internalized and taken seriously. Malcolm Collins: They did take over [00:08:00] the media. I mean, we’ve seen this today, right? You know? Yeah. Thi

    56 min
  8. One Conspiracy Explains All Modern Culture (This Explains EVERYTHING)

    May 20

    One Conspiracy Explains All Modern Culture (This Explains EVERYTHING)

    The internet has fundamentally changed — and almost no one has noticed. In this episode of Based Camp, Malcolm and Simone Collins break down how the explosion of global internet users (especially from India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Brazil, Bangladesh, Nigeria, and other developing nations) has dramatically reshaped online discourse on both the left and the right. They explore: * Why environmentalism, anti-Black racism, and anti-Hispanic racism faded from leftist priorities while Gaza, Pakistan, Jews, and “Hindu Indians” suddenly dominate * Audience capture, botting, and engagement farming * Why certain right-wing creators (Tucker Carlson, Nick Fuentes, Andrew Tate) shifted toward international/Islamic audiences * The hidden influence of third-world users on Western political conversation * Christian-majority vs. non-Western audience patterns * And why the “online right” often feels disconnected from actual American conservatives A paradigm-shifting look at how the internet is no longer majority American — and what that means for culture, politics, and influence. Show Notes * In terms of sheer internet users (using broadband and mobile internet subscriptions as a proxy), there is only one Western nation—the USA—represented in the top ten countries represented * (top representation = China, India, theU SA, Indonesia, Brasil, Russia, Japan, the Philippines, Bangladesh, and Pakistan). * Contrast this to 2008, when the top users of the internet were: * China (but doesn’t count, due to the great firewall of China) * And then the USA, Japan, Germany, the UK, France, and Brazil * In terms of broadband: Leading countries by total subscribers or penetration included the US, China, Japan, South Korea, Germany, France, UK, and Canada. * So functionally: Mostly Western nations were represented online Could this be why the left shifted from discourse about LGBT and climate change to discourse about Palestine? Internet + Broadband Subscriptions: Then and Now Internet/Broadband Subscriptions in 2008 Leading countries by total subscribers or penetration included the US, China, Japan, South Korea, Germany, France, UK, and Canada. Mobile + Broadband: * China: ~253 million (June/July 2008; some estimates ~180–220 million by end-2008). China surpassed the US mid-year. * United States: ~220–230 million (active/home users ~150 million in early 2008 per Nielsen). * Japan: ~80–90+ million (active home users ~47–48 million in early 2008). * Germany: ~40–50+ million (active home ~35 million). * UK, France, Brazil, etc.: Lower but still in the top tier (e.g., UK/France ~25 million active home users; Brazil growing rapidly). Internet/Broadband Subscriptions Today Dominated by: * China * India * USA * Indonesia * Brazil * Russia * Japan * The Philippines * Bangladesh * Pakistan The USA is the only “western” country represented on the top ten list. Pulling from Wikipedia’s list of sovereign states by number of broadband Internet subscriptions, I combined mobile + broadband internet subscriptions to create a ranked list: * China - 1852637000 * India - 1200170910 * United States - 505719000 * Indonesia - 464967914 * Brazil - 265158564 * Russian Federation - 258214661 * Japan - 210519139 * Philippines - 176599291 * Bangladesh - 152409669 * Pakistan - 146355310 * Nigeria - 144994174 * Germany - 139217000 * Mexico - 131458662 * Vietnam - 131286117 * Thailand - 129738000 * Egypt - 108181505 * United Kingdom - 105189476 * Italy - 100457919 * France - 97446000 * Iran - 97164277 * South Africa - 93576635 * Turkey - 89725075 * South Korea - 84854606 * Argentina - 69767601 * Colombia - 68540947 * Spain - 66958543 * Ethiopia - 63197120 * Ukraine - 60954476 * Poland - 56881929 * Algeria - 53040296 * Myanmar - 48356160 * Canada - 45381104 * Morocco - 45294933 * Malaysia - 45026300 * Kenya - 43103412 * Saudi Arabia - 42709657 * Tanzania - 41802027 * Peru - 41225603 * Ghana - 36808571 * Nepal - 36096396 * Australia - 35476000 * Democratic Republic of the Congo - 35271156 * Taiwan - 34490976 * Iraq - 33335316 * Côte d’Ivoire - 31890058 * Sri Lanka - 29419587 * Kazakhstan - 29046500 * Sudan - 28675221 * Netherlands - 27742800 * Uzbekistan - 27585670 * Romania - 27330000 * Venezuela - 27103805 * Chile - 26072126 * Uganda - 25094643 * Afghanistan - 23946523 * Hong Kong - 20986099 * Guatemala - 19986482 * United Arab Emirates - 19826224 * Cameroon - 19748144 * Cambodia - 18702623 * Burkina Faso - 17960442 * Austria - 17435540 * Syrian Arab Republic - 16804909 * Greece - 16715369 * Belgium - 16340062 * Sweden - 16171593 * Senegal - 15870161 * Czech Republic - 15695534 * Ecuador - 15565345 * Portugal - 15338153 * Switzerland - 15142000 * Tunisia - 15135865 * Hungary - 14987525 * Belarus - 14578427 * Zimbabwe - 14279414 * Zambia - 13474451 * Angola - 13420871 * Israel - 12882000 * Azerbaijan - 11932214 * Mozambique - 11917159 * Bolivia - 11321904 * El Salvador - 10424913 * Bulgaria - 10297690 * Serbia - 10101873 * Singapore - 9933200 * Costa Rica - 9584401 * Dominican Republic - 9555585 * Denmark - 9453730 * Finland - 9017200 * Rwanda - 8840997 * Benin - 8801877 * Niger - 8787534 * Madagascar - 8755561 * Slovakia - 8522504 * Honduras - 8466489 * Nicaragua - 8390000 * New Zealand - 7982000 * Norway - 7855360 * Malawi - 7781723 Follower Composition of Major Influencers Nick Fuentes - America First? * The Network Contagion Research Institute reported (in December 2025) that ~50% of retweets on Nick Fuentes most viral posts originated from foreign accounts before Kirk’s death. * These were heavily concentrated in countries like India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Malaysia, and Indonesia (with additional shares from the UK and Canada among foreign sources). Non-Western countries made up the majority of the foreign retweets. * The NY Post reported that the pattern matched known engagement farm/bot activity (rapid, coordinated retweets shortly after posting, often from anonymous/single-purpose accounts), with no clear organic tie to Fuentes’ “America First” content in those regions. Tucker Carlson - Pakistani Icon? Tucker Carlson’s popularity among a Pakistani audience surged due to his outspoken criticism of liberal Western culture, his advocacy for Palestinian rights, and a viral 2025 interview where he stated he had more in common with a “sincerely religious Pakistani cab driver” than with secular, liberal Western elites That said, Tucker Carlson Network (TCN) website traffic (as of early 2025 data) indicates: * ~82% from the United States * ~2.6% from Australia * ~2.05% UK * ~1.98 Canada * ~1.67 Russia * No notable Pakistan or South Asian spike in the available breakdown. On YouTube and X, independent estimates show moderate U.S.-heavy performance, with some international growth noted in the Middle East/Gulf due to his anti-war/anti-interventionist takes (e.g., on Iran), but nothing indicating dominance by Pakistan or similar countries. Some X posts and memes joke about his audience shifting to “Pakistan, Iran, Russia” amid his criticism of U.S. foreign policy (especially on Iran). These are often mocking, not serious analysis (e.g., claims of “closeted gay Muslims in Pakistan” as his base or similar). Pakistani users sometimes push back, noting low actual awareness of him domestically Andrew Tate: Indian Hustler? * Google search interest and anecdotal reporting (+ reporting form the Guardian) indicate higher per-capita interest in Muslim-majority countries (e.g., parts of the Middle East, Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia) than in the UK/US. * Popularity also noted in India, Brazil, and other Global South areas * Tate’s 2022 conversion to Islam boosted this * Much of Tate’s international reach comes from short-form content amplified by algorithms and affiliate promoters in places like India/Pakistan/Bangladesh * Audience composition often highlights young men from ethnic minority backgrounds in the West or aspiring youth in developing countries drawn to his “self-made” wealth, discipline, and anti-”matrix” messaging. Hustler University * Articles note it helps young Indians navigate industry/job challenges; Indian students comment on applicability (e.g., freelancing); LinkedIn profiles and reviews show Indian participants. Affiliate promotion and clip-sharing by creators in India contribute to virality Are Shifting Internet Audiences Changing the Discourse? From a Based Camp listener: “A lot of their viewerbase are muslims, they don’t care about climate change. That is also why Tucker changed his content. American politics is now no longer only consumed by Americans. People from other countries also have strong opinions on US politics.” To be fair, I checked Google Trends and Palestine has always (as long as they’ve been measuring search volume) been searched more than LGBTQ community stuff and climate change as a topic. Why islamists and modern progressives are so compatible The apparent alignment between Islamists (those advocating political Islam, often with Sharia-oriented goals) and progressives (or segments of the radical left) is a tactical “Red-Green alliance” driven primarily by shared enemies rather than shared values. This is not a new alliance. * This phenomenon, sometimes called “Islamo-leftism,” has historical roots (e.g., Western leftists supporting Iran’s 1979 Revolution before many were purged) and has intensified in recent years, especially post-9/11, during anti-Iraq War protests, and after October 7, 2023 (The Free Press writes about it) Core Reasons for the Alignment * Common adversaries: Both groups frequently oppose Western liberalism, capitalism, U.S. foreign policy, and Israel (viewed as a symbol of “imperialism” or colonialism). Progressives frame this through lenses of anti-racism, decolonization, and social justice; Islamists see it as a civilizational/religious struggle. This creates convergence on issues like Palestine, anti-Zionism (often overlapping with a

    1h 2m
4.4
out of 5
155 Ratings

About

Based Camp is a podcast focused on how humans process the world around them and the future of our species. That means we go into everything from human sexuality, to weird sub-cultures, dating markets, philosophy, and politics. Malcolm and Simone are a husband wife team of a neuroscientist and marketer turned entrepreneurs and authors. With graduate degrees from Stanford and Cambridge under their belts as well as five bestselling books, one of which topped out the WSJs nonfiction list, they are widely known (if infamous) intellectuals / provocateurs. If you want to dig into their ideas further or check citations on points they bring up check out their book series. Note: They all sell for a dollar or so and the money made from them goes to charity. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08FMWMFTG basedcamppodcast.substack.com

You Might Also Like