Political Junkie Podcast

Claire Potter and Neil J. Young

Where contemporary history and politics meet the challenge of today. clairepotter.substack.com

  1. 1d ago

    How To Lose An Election

    We began this segment with MAHA influencer Jillian Michaels reacting to Donald Trump’s February 18, 2026, executive order ramping up the production and distribution of the glyphosate, often sold as the household weed killer Roundup. Our theme music this week is “Thanks A Lot,” written by Johnny Cash, performed by Johnny Cash and the Tennessee Two, and licensed from LickD. Donald Trump opened the new White House helipad on Monday, absent a press pool boycott. Note the absence of boom mics: video of the event was circulated, but here was no sound. Photo credit: The White House. In the News: * Last Friday, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles had already left for the weekend when President Donald Trump canceled press pool credentials for MS NOW, CNN, and Politico. Was the president simply left unattended for too long (Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had just stepped down.) Is he in a rage about repeated failures? The rest of the pool, including Fox News, joined a Trump boycott, depriving the President of his favorite thing: attention. In response, the administration launched a YouTube channel called TRUMP TV. On Monday, all three banned outlets sued in federal court, citing their First and Fifth Amendment rights. Here is the response filed by White House lawyers, characterizing press access to the President as a privilege. That ain’t what the Constitution says, and it ain’t what the judge who blocked the order says; as of Thursday morning, the White House continued to enforce the ban, lifting it that afternoon. * What else happens when the grownups leave Washington? 760,000 Americans lose their health coverage! Vice President JD Vance explained at a Tuesday press conference that these people were “fraudulently enrolled” in the ACA; the administration is now looking at over 400,000 more Americans who require “additional verification.” An HHS report from earlier this year estimated that half of the 12 million people who bought their policies through ACA exchanges were ineligible. One million Americans had already been dropped from their health care after Donald Trump took office; Vance projects that additional cuts will save $2.2 billion. Democrats released a plan that makes restoring healthcare a priority. * In a follow up to last week’s story about Donald Trump Jr.’s Big Fat Russian wedding, which at least one observer has called a “counterintelligence nightmare,” the Trump administration claims that all funds have been repaid. Senator Bill Cassidy wants evidence, and Senator John Curtis of Utah has called for a Judiciary Committee investigation. They are both Republicans. Your hosts: * Claire Potter is a historian of politics and media, a writer, a podcaster, and the sole author and editor of the Political Junkie Substack. Her most recent book is Political Junkies: From Talk Radio to Twitter, How Alternative Media Hooked Us on Politics and Broke Our Democracy (Basic Books, 2020), and she is currently writing a biography of feminist journalist Susan Brownmiller. * Neil J. Young is a historian of religion and politics, a journalist, and a former co-host of the Past Present podcast. His most recent book is Coming Out Republican: A History of the Gay Right (University of Chicago Press, 2024). Texas Senator John Cornyn greets fellow Republican Brooke Rollins at the hearing for her nomination for Secretary of Agriculture, January 23, 2025. Cornyn has since been dumped by the GOP, and Rollins has championed pesticides that the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement seeks to ban. Photo credit: Tom Witham, USDA/Wikimedia Commons. News focus: Earlier this summer Elaine Kamarck and E.J. Dionne noted that the GOP was splintering over Trump’s agenda, with non-MAGA Republicans sitting out the midterms. With a little more than 6 weeks before Election Day, independents, regular Republicans and MAGA influencers are abandoning the Party of Trump. * Energizing MAGA turnout appears to be Donald Trump’s midterm strategy. However, vulnerable candidates continue to distance themselves. This week, Florida Republican Representative Byron Donalds, in a tight race against Democrat (and former Republican!) David Jolly, reduced and obscured references to the President on his campaign website. * Earlier this month, former George W. Bush political advisor Karl Rove criticized Trump’s strategy of making the midterms about him; now, in a surprise move (given his history) Rove has denounced racism in the Republican Party, announcing he will vote against Bo French, a GOP candidate for Texas railroad commissioner and legendary bigot. * Outgoing Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) raises money for GOP Senate candidates—but not Trump-endorsed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, beat him in the primary. Cornyn says it is because Paxton is lazy and a poor fundraiser. A Cornyn event this week, which looked like an alumni reunion for the George W. Bush White House and includes the former president, will also exclude Republicans Mike Collins (Georgia) and Michael Whately (North Carolina.) * In June, mega-MAGA Tucker Carlson expressed regret about supporting Donald Trump. He left the Republican Party, stating that Trump put Israeli interests over American ones. Carlson has also defended Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic candidate opposing former Representative Mike Rogers in Michigan, and criticized Rogers as “a toady to Israel and an enemy of civil liberties.” * More recently, two members of Utah’s all-Republican delegation spoke out against Trump’s media ban; so has Representative Mike Simpson (R, ID-02). * Influencers Candace Owens, Joe Rogan, and Alex Jones have all broken with Trump over Iran as well. Influencer Milo Yiannopoulos, deported to Great Britain at the end of August, says he is “ashamed” to have supported Trump.Megyn Kelly has called the war and the Trump family’s profits while in the White House, “grifty.” The increasingly factional quality of the MAGA coalition also seems linked to plummeting influencer numbers. * Last week, Steve Bannon and Bernie Sanders shared a stage at the Pro-Human Assembly in Washington, D.C. Both criticized the Trump administration’s unwillingness to regulate AI. Earlier in the summer, Bannon also gave a lengthy interview to Politico in which he depicted the GOP as out of touch, without ideas, and vulnerable to a populist -infused Democrat party. * MAHA influencer Kelly Ryerson, a.k.a. “The Glyphosate Girl” called the Trump administration siding with Bayer in Johnson v. Monsanto, “devastating.” Ryerson and her allies also oppose Trump’s nomination of Heidi Overton as commissioner of the FDA: she supports glyphosate and food additive deregulation. Last week, the Agriculture Committee voted to send a farm bill to the full Senate that cuts funds for pesticide-free farming, delays pesticide review, and kills a provision proposed by Democrats permitting Americans harmed by pesticides to sue. * Support for Republicans has gone very soft among Latino voters, with 78% saying they would prefer Democratic control of Congress. Representative María Salazar (R, FL-27), in a hot race with former TV news anchor Elliott Rodriguez, has pushed back publicly on the administration’s immigration policies, and as a result, is being battered online by the MAGA faithful. What we want to go viral: * Once you finish listening to our show, Neil wants you to head on over to Drafting the Past, an online magazine of history books and ideas. Begun as an independent podcast by Princeton’s Kate Carpenter in 2022, award-winning historian Megan Kate Nelson joined up a year ago to create a terrific new website. * Claire wants you to read Micki McElya’s Liberation Summer: The Moment That Changed the Women’s Movement and the Future of American Politics (Avid Reader Press/Simon & Schuster, 2026), about the many revolutions that intersected at the September 7, 1968 No More Miss America demo on the Atlantic City Boardwalk. Don’t miss new drops from Claire and Neil. You can subscribe for free or support us for only $5 a month. You can also become an annual supporter for $50/year and choose Neil’s Coming Out Republican or Claire’s Political Junkies: as a welcome bonus. You can also get all audio content for free by subscribing on Apple iTunes, YouTube, or Spotify. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clairepotter.substack.com/subscribe

  2. Sep 18

    Casino Politics

    We begin this episode with President Donald Trump’s pledge, issued in Dallas last week at the GOP midterm convention, to give adult citizen of the United States $5,000, should the Republicans keep control of the House and the Senate in November. Our theme music this week is “Pennies from Heaven,” written by Arthur Johnston and Johnny Burke, performed by The Skyliners, and licensed from LickD. Rendering of the interior of the new White House ballroom, distributed on X by Donald Trump In the News: * Mitch McConnell is back! On Monday, the Kentucky Republican and former Majority Leader showed up on the Senate Floor. Last seen on June 11, he was in a wheel chair to be sure, but he was alive. A written statement issued by the 84-year-old said that he is “not yet 100%,” is in physical therapy, and will show up for important votes. The New York Times team said that McConnell “could be heard speaking in characteristically low tones with both Democrats and Republicans who came to wish him well.” Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear has been asking for updates on the Senator’s health for three months, and as of Monday, had not received one. But McConnell’s absence is not unprecedented: 91-year-old West Virginia Democrat Robert Byrd was away for two months in 2008 because of illness; then-Senator Joe Biden did not return to the Senate for 7 months after aneurysm surgery; South Dakota Republican Karl Mundt waited almost three years to resign after a 1969 stroke; and Virginia Democrat Carter Glass simply stopped coming to work in the spring of 1943—the seat became vacant in 1946 when Glass died. * On Tuesday, a New York Times/Siena poll shows Democrats making gains against Republicans in a generic midterm ballot. The spread is now eight points, and in nine out of ten categories, voters trust a Democratic Congress to do a better job. Support for Trump among independents has dipped to 27%, 11 points lower than those registered with a party. Voters overwhelmingly see Republicans as more extreme, more elitist, and more corrupt than Democrats. A massive 71% of Americans disapprove of how Trump is handling the affordability crisis. * In a surprise move, Republican Thomas Massie, the outgoing representative in Kentucky-04, has filed two articles of impeachment against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Primarily focused on the Iran war, the articles contend that the conflict is illegal, and that Hegseth defied Congress by not withdrawing troops and murdering civilians in the March bombing of a school. The resolution also accuses Hegseth of mishandling classified information, murdering people accused of being drug traffickers, violating the Geneva Convention, and imperiling the reputation of the United States and its military. Rather than permit a vote on the resolution, Speaker Mike Johnson sent everyone home a day early, canceling all business scheduled for Thursday. After having worked for 7 days since its summer break, Congress will not convene again until November 9. Your hosts: Claire Potter is a historian of politics and media, a writer, a podcaster, and the sole author and editor of the Political Junkie Substack. Her most recent book is Political Junkies: From Talk Radio to Twitter, How Alternative Media Hooked Us on Politics and Broke Our Democracy (Basic Books, 2020), and she is currently writing a biography of feminist journalist Susan Brownmiller. Neil J. Young is a historian of religion and politics, a journalist, and a former co-host of the Past Present podcast. His most recent book is Coming Out Republican: A History of the Gay Right (University of Chicago Press, 2024). You have too many subscriptions. You liked this episode. What to do? Donald Trump spent nearly $1 billion on the Trump Taj Mahal Casino and Resort; a year later, it was bankrupt. Photo credit: Kevin Wong/Wikimedia Commons News focus: Claire and Neil focus on how, under Trump, the Presidency is sloshing in gifts, taxpayer dollars, unrealized promises to the little guy, and donations from cronies. * Last week, President Donald J. Trump promised to send every adult citizen in the United States a $5,000 check, which he is calling a “dividend,” if the Republicans win the November midterms. * Trump has offered to give Americans free money five other times: tariff checks, DOGE dividend checks, direct health care payments, the “warrior dividend,” and Trump accounts seeded with $1,000 federal grants. Only the final two are remotely real. The payment to service members was a repurposed one-time housing allowance already budgeted by Congress, while the only babies eligible for Trump accounts are those born during Donald Trump’s second term. * MAGA figures have a history of paying people to support them. In 2018-2019, the Trump campaign ran at least 15 promotions promising small donors that they would be entered in a contest for an all-expense included evening with the President. The Trump campaign insisted that there had been a winner for every contest, even though they could not produce one. Then, in October 2024, Elon Musk ran a legally dubious contest in which he paid small sums (between $47 and $100) to registered voters in swing states who signed a petition pledging to support the First and Second Amendments—which then entered them in a raffle for a prize of $1 million. Seventeen people won the prize and became spokespeople for Musk’s AmericaPAC. The tech oligarch tried the same thing in the Wisconsin State Supreme Court election in the spring of 2025. In both cases, officials tried to bring charges, but it was unclear what laws had been broken. * Trump and his family have profited enormously from the Presidency. In the first term, the Trump family business took in a reported $2.4 billion over four years; in 2025 alone, Trump’s personal earnings and net worth jumped to between $2.2 and $2.4 billion. His current personal net worth is $7 billion, largely powered by crypto, but also by legal settlements, licensing fees, and global real estate ventures. * On Monday, a team from ProPublica broke the story that Russian oligarch Umar Kremlev paid for Bettina Anderson and Donald Trump, Jr.’s May 24 destination wedding in the Bahamas. It was a three-day event, and the hundreds of thousands of dollars that Kremlev, head of the International Boxing Association and a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin with a criminal past, were wired through Dubai. No one can explain why a person Trump Jr. describes as a friend he met only a few years ago would have a reason to pay for his wedding. It casts a new light on why Junior’s father did not attend. In response to a query from the New York Times, the President said he has no idea who Mr. Kremlev is. * During Trump’s first term the national debt, which now clocks in at over $40 trillion (or around $116,000 per United States citizen), grew by $7.2 trillion; Trump has now added about half that in a single year, even as he has gutted the government and solicited hundreds of millions of dollars from corporations and crony billionaires for his pet projects. Many donors are then rewarded with appointments, no-bid contracts, and pardons. * One basic problem is that the Trump administration spends money that he doesn’t have and collects money he isn’t legally entitled to collect, and then announces to taxpayers that he has generated “savings” and “profits” that are impossible because the national debt is growing rapidly. This week, we learned that the employees who were put on administrative leave by DOGE in 2025 were paid $9.5 billion to not work—a 435 percent increase over 2024. The promise was that the layoffs would save taxpayers $1 trillion, a number rounded this down (and without documentation) to $200 billion. As Senator Patty Murray pointed out, pushing out experts and paying them to stay home was “the most expensive way to make government worse.” * Listeners may be interested in a 2019 essay by James Banner that looks at the long history of Presidential misconduct, much of which seems to be Republican. But what’s interesting is that Republicans and Democrats define corruption differently. Republican voters see government itself as the primary location for corruption, whereas Democrats are more highly focused on self-dealing, cronyism, and lying. * To think about why Republicans understand government itself as corrupt, Claire recommends Nancy MacLean’s Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America (Viking, 2017). What we want to go viral: * Neil has been bingeing “The Bombing of Pan Am 103” (Netflix, 2026), a limited series about the terrorist attack on a US aircraft over Lockerbie, Scotland—and its consequences for victims in the air and on the ground. Neil came to understand the event as a tragedy that marked a turn towards 9/11 for the United States, but was less well understood as a national trauma for the people of Scotland. * Claire wants you to read Helen Lewis’s “Mothers for Sale” (The Atlantic, September 9, 2026) an essay about the politics and ethics of surrogacy, why the United States is an outlier because of its almost complete lack of regulation, and what the consequences of unregulated surrogacy are for the women involved. But regulating surrogacy out of existence also has consequences—usually for the health and welfare of poor women in other countries. Don’t miss new drops from Claire and Neil. You can subscribe for free or support us for only $5 a month. You can also become an annual supporter for $50/year and choose Neil’s Coming Out Republican or Claire’s Political Junkies: as a welcome bonus. You can also get all audio content for free by subscribing on Apple iTunes, YouTube, or Spotify. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clairepotter.substack.com/subscribe

  3. Sep 11

    Remember the Women

    We began this episode with a clip from a 1972 press conference in which Gloria Steinem protested an abortion reform bill passed by the New York State Legislature designed to circumvent the feminist demand that women have the right to choose. Our theme music this week is “I Am Woman,” written by Helen Reddy and Ray Burton, performed by Tanya Stephens, copyrighted music licensed from LickD. If you wish to read my memory of 9/11 on the 25th anniversary of this tragic event, go here. Gloria Steinem at a Fire Drill Friday with Jane Fonda and Dolores Huerta, an event organized by Fonda to protest government inaction against climate change, in Washington D.C. on December 20, 2019. Image courtesy of Fire Drill Fridays/Wikimedia Commons In the News: * On the 25th anniversary of the terror attacks on the Pentagon and Manhattan’s World Trade Center, a New York Department of Health study reveals what we know about long-term health damage from toxins released as soon as the first plane hit. Documents released by the Mamdani administration show that although New Yorkers were told the air was safe to breathe almost immediately, 10 months later, officials were still finding asbestos up to half a mile away. Of the 54,000 people in the Ground Zero study, half are being, or have been, treated for cancer. Some of them, and others, are also under care for respiratory and mental health, as well as dementia. Former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, who as on the scene that day for hours, appears to be a possible dementia: in addition to his passionate defense of the January 6 terrorist and support for election denialism, Giuliani has announced that Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who is Muslim and constantly defamed as a terrorist in right-wing media, should not attend the ceremony. * As the midterms approach, Donald Trump decided to double down on making the election about him, even as his popularity declines and candidates in tossup districts actively avoid him. A two-day midterm convention in Dallas this week cuts the sheep—candidates already receiving funds and endorsements from a man with 38% favorability rating—from the goats, Republicans with an unexpected family emergency that kept them as far from Dallas as possible. But both choices are bad: embracing Trump drives away independents, while separating him risks losing MAGA fanatics. The Brookings institution released a report this week that has Democrats on track to outperform previous forecasts as they take the House by 25-30 seats, while CBS news has expanded the number of Senate seats in playfrom 6 to 12. Here’s an account of Day 1, which featured a two-hour stemwinder from Trump; and Day 2, which featured JD Vance talking about his wife and Charlie Kirk. * Then, there was the unexpected, WTF convention video appearance from Democratic Senator John Fetterman. This week, we learned that a new X account allegedly controlled by former Fetterman staffers—@FettermanStaff—plans “to share our stories (and screenshots) to show Pennsylvanians exactly who their Senator is.” The first document dump is scheduled for next week, when the Senate is back in session. But the announcement comes on the heels of a Wall Street Journal exposé by Will Hobson and Siobhan Hughes. It alleges that Fetterman is indifferent to the work of the Senate, spends much of his time doing conservative media spots, fails to meet with constituents, and is isolated in the Democratic party. This is not news: an earlier report by Ben Terris at New York Magazine portrayed Fetterman as depressed, exhausted, erratic, and of uneven mental health since the stroke that disabled him in the 2022 campaign. Last week, Fetterman lost his third chief of staff in less than three years. Your hosts: Claire Potter is a historian of politics and media, a writer, a podcaster, and the sole author and editor of the Political Junkie Substack. Her most recent book is Political Junkies: From Talk Radio to Twitter, How Alternative Media Hooked Us on Politics and Broke Our Democracy (Basic Books, 2020), and she is currently writing a biography of feminist journalist Susan Brownmiller. Neil J. Young is a historian of religion and politics, a journalist, and a former co-host of the Past Present podcast. His most recent book is Coming Out Republican: A History of the Gay Right (University of Chicago Press, 2024). News focus: The feminists we lost in August * We were all shaken on August 25 when Dolly Parton, who had cancelled a number of events in the months following husband Carl Dean’s death from Alzheimers, passed at 80 after a short bout with cancer. On September 3, 92-year-old radical feminist Gloria Steinem passed; then, on September 5, Robin Morgan, an essayist, poet and colleague of Steinem’s at Ms. Magazine, died at the age of 85. * All three women were hard-working and prolific. Morgan wrote 20 books, and compiled the first anthology of radical feminist writing, Sisterhood is Powerful, in 1970. Steinem founded Ms. Magazine, wrote 11 books, traveled hundreds of thousands of miles for the movement, and created nonprofits to funnel money into feminist causes. Parton, who would not have used the word “feminist” to describe herself, nevertheless displayed all the best traits that feminism upholds. She was independent, kind, a performer, a self-made multi-millionaire, a tireless philanthropist, and endlessly creative; she wrote as many as 5,000 songs, 1000 of which she recorded herself on 49 studio albums. * Both Parton and Steinem made feminism approachable and friendly. This is something Robin Morgan was never accused of, although all three women believed that women could not create an egalitarian society without including men in that vision. Feminist Katha Pollitt also notes that, despite the occasional blunder (such as her remark that young women supported Bernie Sanders in 2016 because “that’s where the boys are,”) Steinem was witty, charming, kind, generous, and believed in a big tent movement for women. But she is also currently being targeted by socialist feminists and other leftists as an agent of the state who sabotaged feminism’s most radical impulses. * Claire and Neil also discussed the history of feminist struggles over the meaning of beauty. In contrast to Dolly’s deliberate artifice, Gail Collins noted that Steinem’s simple good looks as she became older were a guide to rethinking the relationship between the female aging process and the preservation of a youthful appearance. * Another thing these three women had in common was a belief that men were part of a feminist project. Although she emphasized women’s independence, Steinem—who married once, late in life—welcomed men into the movement, and believed that true liberation would include all genders. Morgan was married to poet Kenneth Pitchford for 20 years: he was a founding member of the Effeminists, a subset of Gay Liberation Front founded to fight misogyny; they had a son, Blake, who Morgan loved dearly. Parton, on the other hand, was married to one man her entire life, businessman Carl Dean, and skillfully navigated a music industry dominated by men with her wit, intelligence, and canny business sense. Although she had no children, she cared deeply about the welfare of children. She also used her cultural power to defend LGBTQ+ people and, among other things, paid for her chauffeur’s gender transition. * Dolly’s passing produced a gusher of love across political differences, perhaps because her feminism went unstated. In contrast, although many commenters have expressed fond memories of both women, the deaths of Gloria Steinem and Robin Morgan have resulted in something more familiar: accusations on the right and the left that they undermined the well-being of women, families, and society. One notable contribution to this is the revival of charges, initially launched by Redstockings in the early 1970s, that Steinem began her career with a CIA front, and that her central goal was not to elevate feminism but to suppress its most radical impulses. Similarly, within hours after her death, numerous feminist critics have denounced her as having spearheaded the anti-trans, anti-sex worker, and anti-pornography activism in the movement. What we want to go viral: * Neil wants you to read Haley Cohen Gilliland’s A Flower Traveled in My Blood: The Incredible True Story of the Grandmothers Who Fought to Find a Stolen Generation of Children (Avid Reader Press / Simon & Schuster, 2025), a New York Times Notable Book and Pulitzer Prize Finalist about a group of courageous women in Argentina who fought to find and reclaim grandchildren stolen by the junta between 1976 and 1983. * Claire wants you to read Gregory Barber’s “The 92-Year-Old Mathematician and the Teenage Apprentice” (New York Times, September 6, 2026.) It’s a longread about an elderly female professor who teamed up with a 15-year-old who loves math: together, they solved a problem no one had ever solved and launched a girl on her own career as a scholar. Don’t miss new drops from Claire and Neil. You can subscribe for free or support us for only $5 a month. You can also become an annual supporter for $50/year and choose Neil’s Coming Out Republican or Claire’s Political Junkies: as a welcome bonus. You can also get all audio content for free by subscribing on Apple iTunes, YouTube, or Spotify. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clairepotter.substack.com/subscribe

  4. Sep 2 ·  Bonus

    Who Owns History?

    Our opening segment is from “Drawing on the Archive: Tillie Walden’s Charity & Sylvia,” a short video featuring cartoonist Tillie Walden explaining the experience of creating a graphic novel from the Sylvia Drake and Charity Bryant archive at the Henry Sheldon Museum of Vermont History in Middlebury, VT. This week’s theme song is “Steal My Heart Away, written by Van Morrison, sung by Morrison and Willie Nelson, and licensed from LickD. These silhouettes are the only existing images of Charity Bryant and Sylvia Drake; the border is created from the two women’s hair, braided into one thread. Image courtesy of the Henry Sheldon Museum/Wikimedia Commons At the beginning of July, I stumbled across an open letter that Rachel Hope Cleves, a professor of history at the University of Victoria in British Columbia, Canada, had posted to Facebook. Cleves is the author of four books, three of which fall in what some call the history of sexuality, but many of us call queer history because such work is not strictly about sex, or how people understood sex itself, but about how intimate relations are refracted in, and shape, the larger realms of culture and politics. In this letter, Cleves recounted what she believes are the troubling similarities between her path-breaking book, Charity and Sylvia: A Same-Sex Marriage in Early America (Oxford University Press, 2014) and a new graphic history by cartoonist Tillie Walden. It’s also called Charity and Sylvia (Drawn and Quarterly, 2026) but without the subtitle. Both books tell the story of Charity Bryant and Sylvia Drake, a Vermont couple who lived openly, and were acknowledged in their community, as married at a time when that was not legally possible. Cleves, along with other scholars like Jen Manion and Elizabeth Reis, refute the notion that categories like gay, lesbian and trans are modern inventions; or that early Anglo-American society was uniformly repressive, either of non-heteronormative identities or queer people fashioning new identities that allowed them to be respectable. Histories like these have long been a source of pride and comfort to LGBTQ+ people: after all, being grounded in a proud past was a companion task to the forms of civil rights activism that liberated queers, women and people of color. It’s no wonder that, at a time when these hard-won rights are under threat, Walden would create an accessible version of Charity and Sylvia’s story. So, she dug back into archives and artifacts that Cleves had studied a decade earlier, and wrote her own version. But Cleves believes that the similarities between the two books—the use of silhouettes in Walden’s cover, the title itself, the structure of the book—too closely resemble her own work. While I cannot link to Cleves’s social media post, here is the text of the letter, in which she contests Walden’s work as an act of uncovering. She protests insufficient acknowledgment of her own extensive research, work that went well beyond the original archive that Walden did not duplicate but seems to rely on. Finally, Cleves expresses her distress that Walden’s book seems designed to divert readers from her own work and direct any future telling of the story in other media to the graphic novel. The ensuing controversy, largely fought out on social media, demonstrated a revealing split between professional historians and general audience readers. Numerous scholars chimed in to say that similar things had happened to them, and to their friends, and expressed solidarity with Cleves. Walden, however, has defended her own research, pointed to differences in the substance and purpose of two texts and to a website where she listed her sources and bibliography. Walden’s press, and her supporters saw the controversy as a David and Goliath struggle, in which an economically secure and prestigious historian was trying to “own” the story at the cost of an independent artist’s reputation. They have also argued that Cleves has misrepresented Walden’s claims about the originality of the story itself, minimized the work Walden had to do to produce the book. They maintain that, by virtue of it being a graphic account with conversations and other elements that Walden acknowledges she invented, the two are necessarily quite different books. Some of Cleves’s antagonists have inferred that historians concerned about Walden’s possible infringement on the original book have disparaged the art that graphic writers produce. I cannot speak for the rest of the guild, but I could not disagree more. I myself learned some of my first history from non-scholarly texts that included comic books from the 1930s and 1940s. Graphic histories are not only a great way to get young people interested in stories about our past, but I have used them in college classes to convey the larger narratives that the subject I am teaching relies on. There are no easy answers here, and I don’t intend to propose them. As the high-profile plagiarism cases of the past few years have demonstrated, historians aren’t perfect either, and work written for a general audience does not always reflect the respect for intellectual property that scholars expect. As one person who commented on this quarrel pointed out, this controversy might never have arisen had Walden simply chosen a different title. But, as Cleves herself states in the interview, an author cannot copyright a title; and it is not uncommon in publishing to make those choices so that a new book will appear in an internet search alongside another, well-established one. So, I wanted to see what Rachel had to say. An acrostic poem written by Charity Bryant to Sylvia Drake, expressing her love. Image courtesy of the Henry Sheldon Museum/Wikimedia Commons Show notes: * At The Daily Cartoonist, D.D. Degg writes that the controversy relies on the misapprehension of graphic books as a narrative form (June 30, 2026) * Christian Holub covered the controversy for Publisher’s Weekly (July 2, 2026). * Samantha Puc of Comics Culture interviewed all parties, including the Henry Sheldon Museum, where Drake and Bryant’s papers are held (July 3, 2026) * Cecilia Luce, of Seven Days, an independent Vermont newspaper, quotes Vermont cartoonist Alison Bechdel as saying that Cleves is correct to be concerned that her book will be superseded, which is “as much a commentary on our postliterate era as anything else.” (July 20, 2026) * For a meticulous (and, I think, largely fair) comparison between the two books, listeners may want to read an anonymous post in the literary newsletter, Witchcraft for Cyborgs, “Charity and Sylvia: the extraordinary claims of Rachel Hope Cleves.” (August 13, 2026) What I’m reading: Caro Claire Burke’s Yesteryear (Knopf, 2026), a novel about a tradwife influencer who wakes up one morning to find herself in the mid-19th century world that she sells as a fantasy. With Labor Day a scant 6 days off, I think it is fair to say that Yesteryear is the book of the summer. Confusingly, or perhaps fittingly, Burke is herself an influencer. A podcaster and TikToker, Burke has both profited from new media and produced a wry commentary on the individuation through mass consumption that new media promotes. As an added bonus, the heroine, Natalie Heller Mills, is possibly one of the most unlikeable protagonists on modern literature. A hundred pages in, she seems unredeemable. And yet: I cannot put Yesteryear down. So go figure. Short takes: * How to win the internet: “MapQuest has seen a surge in app downloads after the company said it will not rename Lake Ontario to Lake America, following an executive order President Donald Trump issued last week amid an ongoing trade war with Canada,” Aiofe Walsh reports at The Washington Post. “As of Tuesday, it was the top free app in both Apple’s U.S. and Canadian App Stores—its highest ranking in its 30-year history.” The company says it prefers names that are familiar and historic, but MAGAs can use a tool provided by the company to change it on their own devices. (September 1, 2026) * What grift will former Congressman George Santos pursue next? Now banned for life by prediction market Kalshi “for engaging in insider trading related to his attendance at President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address,” Erum Salam reports at MS Now. Santos also agreed last month “to pay more than $35,000 after the federal regulator concluded he improperly profited from trades tied to his possible attendance at the State of the Union.” Having agreed to go, “Santos placed a bet on Kalshi that he would not attend the event. Hours before Trump was set to deliver his speech, Santos announced his absence.” George, just get a job! (August 31, 2026) * Why has a very successful youth movement focused on climate change has pivoted almost completely to climate activism? “Wokeness is not concern about a particular issue or issues, or even an ideology,” Jonathan Chait writes at The Atlantic. “It is, instead, a political style, a form of apocalyptic obsession that is serially fixated on different issues, waxing and waning in intensity. It offers the comfort of Manichaean morality—telling adherents that they alone can see the world in its true horror. But what it doesn’t offer, by design, is any practical resolution.” (August 31, 2026) Political Junkie is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clairepotter.substack.com/subscribe

  5. Aug 26

    In Dolly We Trust

    I posted this as a podcast so that I could re-up an interview I did last year with Martha Ackman, Dolly Parton’s biographer. You can read the show notes here, and purchase Ain’t Nobody’s Fool: The Life and Times of Dolly Parton (St. Martin’s Press, 2025) here. Left to right: Zubin Mehta, Dolly Parton, and Smokey Robinson in the East Room of the White House after accepting honors from the Kennedy Center, December 3, 2006. Image credit: The Eric Draper/Wikimedia Commons Years from now, people will ask each other: Where were you when you found out that Dolly Parton died? And we will all remember. I was on the beach: I was shocked, but not shocked; everyone knew that she hadn’t been well, but people who are 80 also have chronic medical issues that recede for long periods of time. It wasn’t inconceivable, as recently as last week, when Dolly canceled an appearance at Dollywood, that she would be back, as she said, to do all the work she had yet to do. On Instagram, she looked beautiful as always, with her warm reassuring smile and perfect makeup. It seems that Dolly just didn’t want us to fret about things we couldn’t do anything about. The family has confirmed that Dolly died of cancer after a recent diagnosis. But in the 18 months since her husband, Carl Dean, passed after a years-long struggle with Alzheimer’s, it was clear that Dolly was not herself. It was unsurprising that, after a lifetime of carefully shielding her personal privacy, that Dolly did not exactly say what was wrong: most recently, she had gestured to dehydration and digestive issues. But in December 2025, she postponed a month-long residency at Caesar’s Palace in Las Vegas, rescheduling it for September 2026. Dolly was last seen on June 24, at the grand opening of Dolly Parton’s Tennessean Travel Stop truck stop but did not perform. Now she is gone. I wasn’t ready for this. I didn’t start crying until I came home and told my wife; then, I teared up off and on all evening as I read the tributes and played the YouTube videos and reels proliferating across social media. Let me say that as an older person, this kind of grief plays differently: in the last third of one’s life, there is no replacing the icons that were the wallpaper of one’s youth. When Dionne Warwick dies, as inevitably she will, I won’t be able to muster a similar commitment to Cardi B; nor will there ever be a song like “Walk On By” that returns me to a moment when it seemed like romance could be just around the corner. Like only a few other figures—Elvis and Aretha come to mind—Dolly earned universal appeal. Unlike those two other figures, she appeared to live her life without a whiff of scandal. Elvis, for example, was a generally weird person. It’s not just that he began courting his first wife when he was 24 and she was 14, it’s that he had a range of personal tics and fetishes, from pharmaceutical abuse to guns to having girls and women delivered to him wearing little girl panties, that coexisted alongside the conservative, law-and-order persona that endeared him to Richard Nixon. Differently, Aretha Franklin was not weird, but her musical brilliance competed with constant acts of overcoming that are typical of celebrity: sexual abuse and teenage motherhood, domestic violence, and the occasional run-in with the law. The closest Dolly ever came to controversy were the rumors that she was a lesbian. They were fed in part by her childlessness, but also by her husband Carl Dean’s refusal to be a public person. What few seemed to grasp was that Dolly and Carl’s long marriage, much like the decades-long partnership between Loretta Lynn and her husband Oliver (known as Doolittle, Doo or Mooney), may have exactly depended on allowing the non-performing, male, partner to have his own life. In turn, marriage became a private space where these women could rest, retreat, take off the wigs and the sequins, and just be themselves. Carl’s apparent absence, and the fact that Dolly took on a childhood friend (who served two stints in the military and never married) as her traveling companion and body woman fed rumors about her sexuality. Yet, instead of running from them, Dolly staked a part of her reputation on defending the LGBT community—not as a political cause, but as if to do this were only a common-sense act of kindness and decency. In a day and age when sexual and gender identity have become ugly fodder for conservative activism, Dolly created a cultural space where LGBTQ people could feel welcomed and at home. The fact that she did this took courage: it also speaks to her economic power and influence in a genre heavily dominated by bro culture. Country music has always been a somewhat conservative industry, one inflected with a form of Protestant Christianity that is, at best, generally capable of tolerance and studied ignorance about non-heteronormative sexualities. In that context, it was a big deal that Dolly made a point of being not just accepting, but loving, and—without identifying them—made a point of saying that she had LGBT people in her family (like everyone else does!) But Dolly also got away with taking this stand because she was very careful about sharing her opinions as if everyone wanted to know them. In addition, as Russell Moore pointed out in Christianity Today, Dolly responded to insults and objectification with pointed humor that always made her attacker look mean and small. “That was more than just good media training,” Moore writes. “Parton showed she was more cunning than those who looked down on her: She didn’t seem the least bit offended by the questions, nor did she seem to be the least bit shaken in who she was.” This became a valuable skill as social media became an unregulated technology for spreading bad takes and ugly information. Dolly is also one of the few celebrities who managed to simultaneously rise above politics and be on the right side of things: she was, for example, a staunch union woman, not just someone who played an exploited worker in the movie 9 to 5 (1980). But Dolly avoided partisanship, something that in retrospect, perhaps we should all have done. The closest she ever came to endorsing a candidate was in 2016, when Dolly told the New York Times that if the Democrats nominated Hillary Clinton it “would be wonderful. Hillary might make as good a president as anybody ever has.” Then, she delivered a prediction that was shockingly accurate. “I think no matter if it’s Hillary or Donald Trump, we’re gonna be plagued with PMS either way—presidential mood swings!” she said. “But I personally think a woman would do a great job. I think Hillary’s very qualified. So, if she gets it, I’ll certainly be behind her.” And yes, of course Dolly was a feminist. She was not beyond reproach, I am sure. But if you were going to reproach her, you better watch out. Two years ago, I was in Nashville when conservative blogger Ericka Anderson accused Dolly of supporting sin with her pro-LGBTQ views. “To be sure,” Anderson wrote, “the culture is on a constant witch hunt for those who would call homosexuality sinful. I understand wanting to avoid the avalanche of criticism, but calling sin out by name isn’t judgment. It’s adhering to Scripture. Parton had no problem identifying another kind of sin, saying, “Judging [others] is just as bad as any other sin.” I guess she’s a “good enough” Christian to call that one out. Furthermore, it’s illogical to avoid taking a stand on something simply because of imperfection or human nature. If this were the case, we couldn’t call anything wrong. Anderson did not avoid an avalanche of criticism. As I walked around Country Music Fest, Nashville’s annual tribute to itself, chalking, tee shirts, and rainbow bracelets all sent the same message: WWDD, or “what would Dolly do?” (For those unacquainted with popular Christianity, this is a play on the phrase: What would Jesus do?”) More pointedly was a fan comment, since expunged from the site, but memorialized on a gay journalism site, “You do not come after Dolly Parton. You absolutely do not.” Anderson had to apologize for the piece, becoming perhaps the only conservative in recent years who has done this. The fact that even Donald Trump, who has something nasty to say about everyone, has ordered flags to half-mast without a whimper, or a single reference to the fact that she twice found reasons to decline the Medal of Freedom from him, speaks volumes. As Spencer Kornhaber noted at The Atlantic, Dolly Parton was the ultimate franchise, “an idea that everyone could benefit from.” That’s true. But her superpower, and what she exemplified, was fairness, something we could use more of in a world awash with inequities, both real and imagined. She didn’t love indiscriminately, as many celebrities appear to do; she treated others with love, and that is a huge difference. She modeled what it meant to be both wildly successful, and to use her influence and fortune to be of service to others. It’s what we want from our leaders, and almost never get. But Dolly would tell us not to give up hoping. What I’m watching: Image courtesy of Apple TV “Shrinking” (Apple TV, 3 seasons) is a dramadey (yes, I used that word) about a therapist (Jason Segal) who is finding his way back to friendship and connection after his wife’s sudden death. Unlike most therapists, however, he has an actual workplace: Harrison Ford and comedian Jessica Williams are his co-workers, and the cast is sprinkled with terrific secondary characters. Christa Miller, who you may remember from “Scrubs”(2001-2008) plays a neighbor with no boundaries—but in fact, no one in this show has boundaries, which is why it is hilarious that the main characters are therapists. The scripts are snappy, the characters are believable—and yeah, three seasons! Short takes: * Was General Randy

  6. Jul 31

    True Grit and Public Service

    We opened with a clip from former Vermont Governor Howard Dean announcing his bid for the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination in Burlington, Vermont on June 23, 2003. Today’s theme music is “Go, Go, Go,” by Roy Orbison and the Teen Kings, copyrighted music licensed through Likd. Neil and I are off until after Labor Day—but there will be plenty of bonus content in August! Back in the spring of 2007, I was teaching at Wesleyan University when a student in one of my lecture classes dropped in to ask if I would advise his senior honors thesis in American Studies. When I asked what he planned to write about, Ryan McLaren answered: “Something about the history of Vermont. I love Vermont!” Who could resist such a request? This was also an ambitious guy. Most members of the football team didn’t write an honors thesis. The time they devoted to the sport, even at a Division III school, made it hard to fit a rigorous independent study—one that required intense research focus in the fall—into their schedules. Ryan graduated with honors in American Studies in the spring of 2008, and I learned a lot about the history of Vermont, and that state’s distinctive place in our democracy. Get acquainted with Vermont’s commitment to civic excellence and it won’t surprise you that it is one of four states to have produced two presidents, Chester Arthur and Calvin Coolidge; that it has supported a Senator, Bernie Sanders, who has reshaped the Democratic Party; or a presidential candidate, Howard Dean, whose investment in a digital strategy, revolutionized how campaigns are run, something I discuss in my book Political Junkie. After he graduated from Wesleyan, Ryan devoted himself to contributing to his state. I’ll let him tell you his story, but that path included AmeriCorps, coaching, working on schools and Democratic Party politics—working for Governor Peter Shumlin, and as a staffer for Senator Peter Welch. That upward trajectory was interrupted by a 2017 catastrophic spinal injury which left Ryan disabled in body but not in spirit. He’s still that same sunny guy I met back in 2007, still an athlete, and still devoted to public service—so much so that on Tuesday, August 11, he will be on the ballot for Lieutenant Governor of Vermont. Photo courtesy of Ryan McLaren for Vermont You can read more about where that campaign stands here, and an in-depth interview with Ryan here. Short takes: * “We’ve been living under the penumbra of Trump for so long that it can feel as if we will never escape it,” Lydia Polgreen writes at The New York Times. “But the battle over who will succeed Trump as the Republican nominee in 2028 is well underway.” One of those aspirants is billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy, currently running for Governor of Ohio. What could give him a chance? That he left the second Trump administration almost before it began. In fact, Ramaswamy seems to want to pretend that MAGA is already over—and maybe never happened. In a recent appearance, “he steered clear of culture war topics altogether. Indeed, far from leaning into Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda, he emphasized his immigrant roots as emblematic of the American ideal. And though he praised the success of other Republican states, Ramaswamy had little to say about the Trump administration’s record. He hardly mentioned Trump, and only in passing.” (July 31, 2026) * If you know someone in New York City who owns a condo or co-op worth more than $1 million (and believe me, that isn’t hard) or a townhouse worth more than $5 million (a heavier lift), you know someone who is pissed at Mayor Mamdani. “The ownership of every property in New York City is public and searchable through a funky website that takes a minute to master,” Adriane Quinlan of Curbed wrote about the preliminary, and flawed, rollout of the city’s pied à terre tax. Problem? Of the thousands of properties on the list, many are primary residences. “The residential properties on the list that could be hit by the tax included a bunch of media catnip, too: Anna Wintour’s Manhattan house was included, for example, and she certainly seems to live there. Councilmember Gale Brewer found her own home on it, the one she’s lived in since 1994.” (July 31, 2026) * At The Forward, Alyssa Katz reminds us that charges of antisemitism in the New York City Mayor’s office aren’t new. During the 1968 Ocean Hill-Brownsville conflict between a largely Jewish teachers’ union and a Black community demanding Black teachers, “Mayor John Lindsay’s attempt at making peace was an utter disaster: He had to flee East Midwood Jewish Center into his limo, with a jeering mob behind him.” Hiring Black teachers in significant meant firing Jewish union members from jobs they had held for years, however. “Jewish alarm in the face of such provocation — not to mention dismissals without cause, something out of a Soviet Union purge — was certainly warranted. Conflicts between the community-control school board and teachers escalated inside school buildings, prompting Jewish teachers to file complaints that prompted grand jury indictments and to seek police protection.” (July 30, 2026) Political Junkie is a reader-supported publication. Have you considered converting to paid? Only $5 a month! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clairepotter.substack.com/subscribe

  7. Jul 24

    Donald Trump’s Incredible Shrinking Majority

    We began this episode with a February 2016 clip of South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham speaking to the Washington Press Club Foundation. In a darkly funny speech, Graham warned journalists about what a danger Donald Trump posed to the GOP and the United States—and offers to jinx Trump by endorsing him. Our theme music this week is Knocking on Heaven’s Door, written by Bob Dylan and sung by Bryan Ferry, copyrighted music licensed from Lickd. The late Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) in the Oval Office with Donald Trump on February 3, 2026. Photo courtesy of The White House/Wikimedia Commons In the News: * Perhaps responding to President Donald Trump’s claim that 250,000 non-citizens were registered to vote in New Jersey, California, Nevada and Pennsylvania, Governor Mikie Sherrill of New Jersey has publicized the fact that the state has removed 6,600 noncitizens from the voting rolls. Added by computer error under the previous governor Phil Murphy, the Wall Street Journal reported this week that these individuals “were erroneously registered to vote when they applied for driver’s licenses and identification cards from June 2023 to June 2024. Fewer than 400 of those people, registered across the state, actually voted. * On Wednesday morning, Trump celebrated a MAGA sweep in the Arizona Republican Party primary, as if the November results were now predetermined. “THE DUMOCRATS ARE DUMBFOUNDED,” he crowed. Election-denying Congressman Andy Biggs (R, AZ-22) will challenge incumbent Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs. Alexander Kolodin, sanctioned by the Arizona State Bar for his role in the lawsuits filed by MAGA activists in 2020 will oppose Democratic incumbent Adrian Fontes for Secretary of State. In AZ-01, a tossup district that includes a chunks of liberal Scottsdale and Phoenix, Trump-endorsed former NFL kicker Jay Feely IV won his primary in AZ-01; he will face ER doc Amish Shah, not the DCCC pick, in what is projected to be a potential pickup for Democrats. Finally, in AZ-04, Democratic incumbent Greg Stanton handily dispatched Democratic Socialist Kai Newkirk, ensuring that Democrats will hang onto that seat. * In Michigan, where voters will select candidates on August 4, we have a brawl in the Democratic Party for the Senate seat being vacated by Gary Peters: progressive physician and public health official Abdul El-Sayed and Congresswoman Haley Stevens (MI-11) are leading the pack. Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is the most recent endorser to sign on to El-Sayed’s campaign, while Leader Chuck Schumer has endorsed the more moderate Stevens. This is an important Senate seat to hang on to; Trump won the state in 2024 by a point and a half, and the winner faces a strong opponent in former Representative Mike Rogers. Your hosts: Claire Potter is a historian of politics and media, a writer, a podcaster, and the sole author and editor of the Political Junkie Substack. Her most recent book is Political Junkies: From Talk Radio to Twitter, How Alternative Media Hooked Us on Politics and Broke Our Democracy (Basic Books, 2020), and she is currently writing a biography of feminist journalist Susan Brownmiller. Neil J. Young is a historian of religion and politics, a journalist, and a former co-host of the Past Present podcast. His most recent book is Coming Out Republican: A History of the Gay Right (University of Chicago Press, 2024). A proof of life photo issued by Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell’s office earlier this month that has failed to stem rumors and conspiracy theories about his health. News focus: * As of last week, the Senate is missing two notable figures: Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, died suddenly on July 11 at the age of 71 of an aortic dissection,. Meanwhile, former Leader Mitch McConnell was last seen in the Senate on June 11; supposedly he remains in care at a rehabilitation center from a fall and pneumonia. Although aides released a statement under his signature on July 12, and a photo of McConnell holding a newspaper was released on July 13 (along with a statement that he is doing Senate business and intends to return), rumors have circulated that McConnell is fatally compromised. * Graham’s death also exposes how much he had lost control of his own story. He was regularly derided by some on social media for being an allegedly closeted homosexual, something he denied his entire life. In the immediate aftermath of Graham’s death, memes of this genre proliferated: was that homophobia really just a political smear? Hunter Biden says no, alleging on a recent podcast that there’s a closeted gay Republican “mafia” waging culture wars to protect themselves. * The sudden absence of two very senior Senators has once again cast a spotlight on how old this body is. Let’s start with a little arithmetic: the average age of the Senate is 64. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is 92; Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Mitch McConnell (R-KY) are both 84; Jim Risch (R-ID) and Angus King (I-ME) are 82; and Dick Durbin (D-IL), who is retiring is 81. A third of the Senate is over 70. One aspect of this longevity may be that the last party to have a Senate supermajority was the Democrats in 2009, and both parties are using incumbency to hold seats. Senators are not required to reveal health status, and the seniority system has long made it advantageous to keep Senators in place, regardless of age: remember that Lindsey Graham replaced 100-year-old Strom Thurmond in 2003. * The current alignment in the Senate is 45 Democrats, two independents who caucus with Democrats, and 53 Republicans. With Graham’s passing and McConnell’s incapacity, the GOP was temporarily down 2 votes; with the appointment of Graham’s sister, Darline Nardone, to fill out his term, that is now one vote. However, there are also five other Republicans in play on any given day for the next 18 weeks: Maine’s Susan Collins, Texas’s John Cornyn, North Carolina’s Thom Tillis, Kentucky’s Rand Paul, and Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski. * To complicate matters, Graham was up for re-election this year. There will be a special primary in August to choose a replacement. Former representative Trey Gowdy has been mentioned as a strong candidate, although he has said he doesn’t want to run, as has Lt. Governor Pamela Evette. And while Darline Nardone, an optician who has worked on behalf of disabled people in state government, was initially seen as a placeholder, she has announced her candidacy: Trump has endorsed her. * Does Graham’s death create an opening for pediatrician Annie Andrews, the Democratic candidate, in the South Carolina Senate race? Unlikely. At the time of his death, Lindsey Graham was only up 3 points, but South Carolina has not elected a Democrat to the Senate since Fritz Hollings in 1998, and Trump won the state by 14 points in 2024. * It has not been uncommon for wives to replace their husbands in the House and Senate; some were then even elected in their own right. But Graham didn’t have a wife; his sister, however, was a prominent supporter and element of his political biography. * Numbers don’t tell the whole story of what it means for senior Senators to suddenly drop out of that body’s business. Although McConnell has been failing visibly for over a year, until this illness he chaired the Committee on Rules and administration, was on the Appropriations Committee (chaired by Susan Collins), and the agriculture committee. McConnell cannot be easily replaced, and not without testing the constitutionality of the recently passed law that bars Democratic governor Andy Beshear from doing so. Until McConnell returns, his seat on all these committees also remains vacant, since replacing him requires a vote of the full Senate. * Similarly, Graham, a Trump critic turned loyalist, chaired the Budget Committee, and was also on the Judiciary, Appropriations, and Environment and Public Works Committees. While Nardone can cast votes, she cannot fill the role her brother played in the Senate, particularly in foreign policy, national security, and jamming through key Trump nominees like Todd Blanche, currently in hearings to be confirmed as Attorney General. * Naturally, at a moment when trust in government could not be lower, there are conspiracy theories about both Graham and McConnell! Laura Loomer and George Santos used their platforms to assert that Lindsey Graham was murdered; and Kash Patel assured everyone he was on the case. Mitch McConnell is rumored to be variously dead or in a coma: Loomer claims that he is “brain dead.” These rumors were fueled last week when Governor Beshear said he had received two phone calls from agencies saying that McConnell had “passed.” What we want to go viral: * Neil wants you to watch “The Predator of Seville” (Netflix, 2026), about a man who ran excursions for American students abroad—and used that position to prey on women at their most vulnerable. * Claire wants you to read Rebecca Egan McCarthy’s account of horse racing’s slow collapse in the United States, after one of New York City’s two storied venues closed at the end of June: “The End of Aqueduct Race Track,” July 21, 2026. Don’t miss new drops from Claire and Neil. You can subscribe for free or support us for only $5 a month. You can also become an annual supporter for $50/year and choose Neil’s Coming Out Republican or Claire’s Political Junkies: as a welcome bonus. You can also get all audio content for free by subscribing on Apple iTunes, YouTube, or Spotify. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit clairepotter.substack.com/subscribe

  8. Jul 19 ·  Bonus

    Can Maine Democrats Beat Susan Collins?

    Dear subscribers: This post was supposed to go out last week, but due to a family emergency I had to suspend writing and publishing temporarily. All paid subscribers will receive an extra week in their billing cycle to compensate for the inconvenience. And now back to our regularly scheduled programming! Maine Senator Susan Collins has long been positioned as a persuadable moderate Republican who nevertheless has a strong record of voting for extremist policies and Trump nominees. Here, Collins meets with Ketanji Brown Jackson on March 8, 2022, who was successfully confirmed as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court with three Republican votes: Collins, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Mitt Romney of Utah. Photo credit: Renee Bouchard/Wikimedia Commons Our opening clip is from a 2020 interview in which Susan Collins, Republican Senator from Maine up for re-election this November, expresses “concern” about then-President Donald Trump’s remarks that he would not accept the election results if he lost. Democrats targeted Collins’s seat as part of their plan to win the Senate majority. So, when Democrat Graham Platner, dogged by scandal and credible allegations of sexual violence, I knew Amy Fried could help us think more insightfully about what had happened in Maine, that state’s political culture, and whether a new candidate has the time and savvy to win. Fried is Professor Emerita of Political Science, and the former John Mitchell Nickerson Professor of Political Science, at the University of Maine, and a former President of the New England Political Science Association. She has served as the Policy Advocate for the Rising Tide Center, funded by a five-year National Science Foundation ADVANCE-Institutional Transformation grant Frored co-wrote and for which she served as Co-Principal Investigator. She is also an alternate delegate to the Maine convention that will pick a new candidate to replace Collins. Neil and I began the political obituary for Platner here in case you missed it. Our theme music this week is “Susie Q,” written by Dan Hawkins and Robert Chaisson, performed by Johnny Savage & the Riders, and licensed through LickD. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. Claire Potter: I am here with one of my favorite political scientists, and definitely my favorite political scientist from Maine, Amy Fried of Political Sightlines. Amy, can you tell our listeners a little bit about your Substack? Amy Fried: I decided to start it about a year ago: I always knew I would be writing some about Maine politics because I’ve lived in Maine since 1997; I thought I’d write about other things as well. But somehow, with everything that’s been going on in Maine, particularly the Senate race. But there’s also this interesting race in Maine’s second congressional district, one of the few competitive house races really out there; it’s a Trump district with a now a very conservative Democrat who’s not running again. It seems like Maine has taken over. It certainly has. Last week, Neil Young and I talked about the implosion of the Graham Platner campaign. Before that, when the sexting scandal occurred in May, I wrote a post called “Who’s Afraid of Graham Platner,” in which I talked about whether sexting was a political issue or not. It turned out there was a lot more bad stuff out there, which a number of political journalists told me on X, and it makes me think that some of these stories were more well and widely known than Democrats who endorsed and supported Platner had imagined. Well, that’s certainly possible. I heard various rumors over time as well. I think that when the earliest controversies about the tattoo and the Reddit posts came out, Platner had a whole narrative about how he had changed, how he had worked through a lot of things in his life—including a lot of anger. The tattoo he just attributed to being drunk in Croatia with a bunch of his buddies, even though the social media posts were afterwards. Platner created this whole redemption arc, and Americans like that sort of thing a lot, I think. It always seemed to me to have certain kinds of Christian overtones that I didn’t necessarily relate to, and Maine’s a very secular state. But it’s in the cultural water currently, right? So, a lot of people were willing to say: That’s fine. That was in the past. They could believe Platner’s story because they liked other things about him. They liked his message. And he certainly was exciting. Lots of people were going to the town halls, and he got tons of volunteers. It fit a political moment in which people are somewhat anti-establishment. In addition, Platner’s major opponent initially was Governor Janet Mills, who’s 78 years old, and people don’t want older politicians. So, voters were willing to let a lot go when the campaign began. I think when that started to change was the sexting story in May, these texts between him and his various partners after he got married. After that came the first story, from Lindsey Fifield, about abuse. But with the sexting story, I started to see some people pulling away from him. Finally, there was Jenny Racicot’s allegation that Platner raped her. And I think the big difference, even before that, was that we had gone from things that happened a while ago, in words primarily--messages on Reddit and such--to behaviors, and they were more recent. All of those incidents—the sexting, the alleged violence towards women—were within the last five years. I agree with you: I think it escalated, as you’re saying, and on a certain level, the early scandals allowed us to become inoculated to later scandals, and then that too crumbled. With the Nazi tattoo, I thought, I’ve known a lot of troubled young men who’ve gone into the Marines. I’ve known a lot of troubled young men who’ve gotten weird tattoos when they were drunk. Platner doesn’t have a whole lot of formal education, so it also seemed plausible to me that he really had thought it was just a tough guy tattoo. And then that level of believing and making excuses takes you to the next level: sexting. Is this really something a voter should be concerned about? Isn’t this something his wife should be concerned about? Two other red flags that I think many people like me missed. Apparently in 2024 there was a Facebook post by Jenny Racicot on a Facebook forum where women identify men that might be cheating on them or might be married while trying to date them. Racicot saw his picture, wrote the woman and said: This is a problem, PM me. But the other red flag, and this allows us to turn to your post this week about misogyny on the left, was that very early on, a woman who was very high up in the campaign resigned. Genevieve McDonnell resigned in October 2025 after the Reddit posts and the tattoo came out. That should have been a signal for the rest of us to step back and look a little more coldly at this, right? I think so. And you know, people sometimes say Maine is just a big, small town. I don’t live far from Genevieve McDonald; probably an hour and a half away. I know people who know her and they said to me, I really trust her. Very oddly, it turns out that someone I know also knows Jenny Racicot: Jenny was her massage therapist. So, there are all of these like connections. But one of the things Genevieve was upset about was that the vetting was so poor. She said, I would have never joined this campaign if I knew they hadn’t really checked him out. She was also upset because of the way she was being treated by the consultants. Because even though they tried to create this flavor of it being very homegrown main campaign, Platner was recruited by people from out of state and that’s who was really running the campaign. Right. And there’s a lot of money in political consulting. I mean, some political consultants routinely recruit candidates who they actually know aren’t going to win because of the fundraising. If you raise ten million dollars, the political consultant gets about twenty-five percent off the top, the media people get another twenty-five percent, and so on. So, there’s a lot of money passing through political campaigns. But the political consultant, and maybe you can remind us of his name, had also been part of the Sanders movement since 2015, where had misogynist elements, and this guy apparently had been kicked off Summer Lee’s campaign for sexually harassing people. So, as we were all focused on “should we or shouldn’t we” with Graham Platner, there was other evidence we should have been looking at. Absolutely. The one who had this sexual harassment thing from the other campaign is Daniel Maroff, and he was one of the two main recruiters. He had been involved with Sanders, involved with Fetterman and a number of other people. and interestingly, Platner wasn’t even his first choice. They were first trying to get this guy who is a labor leader in Bath, where naval ships are built. It’s one of these things which is very important, a local part of the military industrial complex. And Susan Collins is always bragging about getting the contracts for Bath Ironworks. But it’s also a place with very strong organized labor. And so initially, they had tried to recruit this labor leader, and they found something in his background they thought could be a problem. So, they decided to go find someone else and they ended up with Platner and didn’t have much time. Now, why didn’t they have much time? Because they had a schedule they wanted to follow. They wanted him to launch by Labor Day. To launch by Labor Day, you then have to make the launch video, you have to get some training, you have to get some of the legal stuff set up so they can start taking contributions. So, it meant that they were kind of pushed up against their own self-imposed deadline and they went ahead with him. Maroff, after his first conversation with

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
7 Ratings

About

Where contemporary history and politics meet the challenge of today. clairepotter.substack.com