Sanity Check with Dan Schnur

Dan Schnur

Sanity Check with Dan Schnur cuts through the noise of American politics with honest, non-partisan analysis, no screaming, no spin. Each week, a campaign strategist turned independent analyst explains what's actually happening in politics at the local, national, and international levels, and what it actually means. danschnur.substack.com

  1. 5d ago

    The Real Fight Starts Wednesday

    Whoever wins on Tuesday, the next fight in American politics won’t be between the parties. It will be inside them. Every solid indicator, from the polls to grassroots fundraising to early voting in key swing states, shows Democrats more motivated than Republicans by a large margin. It seems likely Democrats will win a House majority, but the Senate outcome is less clear. I still won’t predict winners, but I am ready to talk about what happens Wednesday morning. Democrats will have to settle what they stand for. The party is still deeply divided — transgender policy, how fast to move on climate and energy, whether the base gets the impeachment it wants — and party leaders would much rather talk about affordability. But voters have other priorities. For Democrats, Wednesday marks the end of the beginning. Republicans will have to decide who they are after Trump. This week Marco Rubio hit the trail with the president while J.D. Vance has been working the campaign circuit for weeks. The one to watch is Ted Cruz, who appears determined to thwart Vance. The first real crack in the Trump coalition is Russia and Ukraine, where even loyal Republicans on the Hill are speaking out. For Republicans, Wednesday marks the beginning of the fight over what comes after Trump. But watch out: when the president feels cornered, he does not go quietly. Before the results come in, I want to hear from you. Pick a race, a candidate or a party leader and ask what their campaign should do next, or what I’d tell them. Leave your question in the replies, and I’ll do my best to answer. Get full access to Dan Schnur's Sanity Check at danschnur.substack.com/subscribe

    The Real Fight Starts Wednesday
  2. 6d ago ·  Bonus

    What Should Collins and Jackson Do in the Final Days?

    One of the most interesting questions we got this week was from one of our loyal subscribers, Sam, who asked: What should Susan Collins and Troy Jackson do in the final days of their respective Senate campaigns in the great state of Maine? I’ll admit I don’t know if referring to it as the great state of Maine means that Sam himself is from Maine or, like me, just really enjoys visiting there. But either way, it’s a great question, because as I told Sam in my response directly to him, it’s not just an important race, but a fascinating race. Susan Collins, who has held that seat since the late 20th century, is the last remaining Republican senator from the entire region of New England. For many years now, Maine Democrats have been determined to turn that region into a clean and overriding blue slate. What I told Sam, in terms of strategy, is for both candidates to largely keep doing what they’re doing. But I was certainly much more specific than that. Troy Jackson: reach the swing voters Jackson has to reach the swing voters in his state. Maine’s Democratic progressive base, like in most states around the country, is plenty fired up. They were excited about Graham Platner until that whole scandal took place. And even though Jackson isn’t nearly as talented a communicator, they’re pretty fired up about him too, not so much because they love Troy Jackson, but because of how much they despise Donald Trump. So for Jackson, the target is older voters, married voters, rural voters. In other words, Mainers who’ve always looked at Susan Collins as the great exception to their otherwise increasingly heavy Democratic leanings. Jackson has to continue reminding them that, for all practical purposes, he argues, Susan Collins is Donald Trump, and Collins does Trump’s bidding. If he can sell that message to the remaining undecided swing voters, his chance of victory increases geometrically. Susan Collins: win back women Collins’ task is much more specific. The demographic groups she needs in order to win are older female voters and younger women: Gen Z and millennials. Younger women don’t have much of a memory, for understandable reasons, of Collins’ very long Senate career. When they hear the name Susan Collins, they think of Brett Kavanaugh and the Supreme Court confirmation hearings a few years ago. Winning those voters back has been a pretty tough road for Collins, and it’s really not one she’s even engaging on all that seriously anymore. But if those young women think about Collins in the context of Kavanaugh and Trump, their mothers and grandmothers remember her much longer record of service. They look back at her entire career. Collins can’t make them forget about the Kavanaugh confirmation. But what she can do for those women of older generations is remind them of all the other things she’s done over the decades that make her significantly different than most other mainstream Republicans. Trump looms over both So, two very different target audiences and two very different strategies. But on both sides, no question, as is the case in most statewide campaigns around the country this year, Donald Trump looms over the entire proceedings and the entire discussion. If Collins can escape the Trump shadow, she wins. If Jackson can tag Trump to Collins, he pulls this one off. There are probably about a dozen Senate races around the country that right now could go in either direction. And even in increasingly and incredibly deep red states like Mississippi, South Carolina and Kansas, and even if Democrats are more likely or more certain to take over the House, there are a few dozen, as many as 40 or so House races that could go in either direction. So there’s plenty going on for the next week or so. If any of you have any questions, feel free to send them in. Get full access to Dan Schnur's Sanity Check at danschnur.substack.com/subscribe

    What Should Collins and Jackson Do in the Final Days?
  3. Oct 8

    The One Sentence That Could Transform the AI Debate

    Sam Altman, the head of OpenAI, told Politico that the world should “accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology.” He was trying to make the case for a lighter regulatory touch, but I think his words will have the opposite effect. When Congress takes up AI, probably sometime in January, I think this stark statement will scare a lot of people and help define the debate. Meanwhile, the anger driving American politics isn’t uniquely American. Germany’s ultra-conservative Alternative for Deutschland is threatening Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Spain’s prime minister called a snap election over housing costs. France saw massive protests, and the war in Iran is straining economies from Brazil to India. Frightened people get angry, and that anger is driving a populist backlash worldwide. Back home, there are less than four weeks until the midterms, and money may be the GOP’s last line of protection against a substantial Democratic blue wave. But Democrats are now campaigning in places like Mississippi, and I wonder whether they’re spreading themselves too thin. If their strategy works, they’ll look like risk-taking geniuses. If they come up short in places like Michigan, Maine, New Hampshire or Minnesota, they may wish they had concentrated their resources rather than venture into deep red states. I’ll be back Sunday with the written newsletter. Get full access to Dan Schnur's Sanity Check at danschnur.substack.com/subscribe

    The One Sentence That Could Transform the AI Debate
  4. Oct 7 ·  Bonus

    October 7 and the Israel Split in American Politics

    I know I normally come to you on Thursdays on the podcast and on Sundays with a written newsletter, but today is October 7th, and it is the three-year anniversary of the Hamas attacks on Israel and the beginning of the Gaza War. And while we can certainly talk in future podcasts and newsletters about the war itself, I wanted to talk for just a couple of minutes today about the extraordinary impact that the Gaza War has had on American politics. For many years, for most of the twenty-first century and the latter part of the twentieth century, American support for Israel was bipartisan and very wide and very deep. In the years leading up to October 7th, we began to see that support begin to dissipate to some degree. But there’s no question that the war has much more dramatically and overwhelmingly reshaped American public opinion toward Israel, and therefore just as dramatically reshaped American politics. This is a bipartisan phenomenon. There are certainly splits in the Republican Party relating to Israel, and I suspect that if we do see a 2028 presidential primary, we’ll see the two sides of the Israel debate among Republicans personified almost perfectly between Vice President J.D. Vance, who has been articulating a much more skeptical line toward Israel, and who seems to have identified an anti-Israel sentiment on the far right of the Republican Party, and Vance facing off against possibly Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who maintains a much more traditional and much more supportive approach to Israel, the way Bush, Romney, Reagan Republicans have for many, many years. But the greatest impact of the Gaza War on American politics is undoubtedly in the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is deeply, deeply divided over Israel in a way that we have never seen in the history of the state of Israel. Now, again, this is a bipartisan phenomenon. At this point, according to a recent NBC poll, barely 30% of Americans hold a favorable opinion toward Israel. Among Democrats, the poll results showed 13%. Thirteen percent of Democrats maintain positive feelings about the state of Israel. And not surprisingly, just as the most conservative voices in the Republican Party have begun speaking out in opposition, we’re hearing this even more loudly and more consistently from the most aggressively progressive voices in the Democratic Party. It’s an issue that’s divided the party at every level of government. There are many leading Democrats who believe that the Biden administration’s support of Israel kept Democratic loyalists from coming out to vote for Kamala Harris in 2024 and may have played a major contributing role in her defeat. And in primaries around the country now, we’re seeing pro- and anti-Israel Democrats facing off in a very confrontational and combative manner. I don’t know where this debate goes from here. I don’t know how it reshapes American politics. It’s a longer conversation for another day. But on October 7, 2026, on the three-year anniversary of the Hamas terrorist attacks that triggered the Gaza War, it is worth at least noting what an extraordinary impact that Middle East fighting has had on American domestic politics. Get full access to Dan Schnur's Sanity Check at danschnur.substack.com/subscribe

    October 7 and the Israel Split in American Politics
  5. Oct 3 ·  Bonus

    Trump's Tone Problem

    Every candidate, every officeholder, every leader talks in a certain way when they are just being themselves — when they’re not thinking about how they sound, but when they’re just comfortable. They give off a certain aspect and a certain demeanor. In Trump’s demeanor, under almost all circumstances, if you like him, is confidence. If you dislike him, is arrogance. And what drives Trump’s confidence slash arrogance is an innate belief that he understands politics and government better than people who’ve been in politics and government for a long time. Now, in the late 20th century, American voters decided to embrace outsiders. They decided that people with political experience were less desirable than people who were coming into the system to change the system. And since then, over the last half century, with the exception of George Bush Sr. and Joe Biden, we have elected outsiders as presidents, starting with governors and becoming progressively more outsiderish. Trump got elected, as Bernie Sanders might have, in 2016, by running as strongly against the system as any candidate we’d seen in quite some time. And now, 10 years later, as the country is facing challenges like affordability and inflation, like wars in Ukraine and Iran, and most ominously, or most promising, the challenge and opportunities that come with artificial intelligence, the idea of running against the experts might not seem quite as appealing as it once did. And while we certainly don’t trust those experts — we certainly don’t trust the leaders of Anthropic and OpenAI and Meta — what we’re seeing right now is the American people deciding who they’re willing to trust on these really big decisions. And Trump, who is attractive to almost exactly half of that electorate for over 10 years now, is no longer coming across in quite as credible a way as he did in 2016 and 2024. And you can see how much that’s frustrating to him, because he is reaching into his longtime reliable bag of tricks. He’s trying all of the tactics that have worked for him so effectively in the past. And they’re not working. And he’s got five weeks to figure out either something new, or how to make something old work better than it has for the better course of this midterm year. Get full access to Dan Schnur's Sanity Check at danschnur.substack.com/subscribe

    Trump's Tone Problem

Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
2 Ratings

About

Sanity Check with Dan Schnur cuts through the noise of American politics with honest, non-partisan analysis, no screaming, no spin. Each week, a campaign strategist turned independent analyst explains what's actually happening in politics at the local, national, and international levels, and what it actually means. danschnur.substack.com

You Might Also Like